Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Fishers’ Livelihood Diversification in Bhagirathi–Hooghly Stretch of Ganga River in India


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
 

For the resource-poor fishers, livelihood diversification is a strategy to cope with the uncertainties and inadequateness of fisheries as a profession. The present study is an attempt to assess the socioeconomic conditions together with livelihood diversification of fishermen households of the Bhagirathi– Hooghly stretch of Ganga River. Data were collected by personally interviewing 500 fishermen from Sagar to Farakka (560 km stretch) in West Bengal using survey schedules in 2016. Analysis of data indicated that the socio-economic conditions of fishermen households were not encouraging. Fishing is the main occupation of around 88.60% of fishers and overall, fishing contributes about 70.30% to the total income of the family. Average number of income-generating activities per household ranged from 1.43 in the lower stretch to 1.79 in the upper stretch. Further, it was found that not only the average household income and number of income sources were limited, their level of diversification was also quite low. The monthly income of a household was found to be Rs 9391. The income is higher in the lower stretch because of higher catch and high value fish in the catch. Fishery as an only profession is unable to provide a decent life. The study also revealed that among other factors, the Simpson index contributes positively and significantly towards per capita income of the fisher households. However, in the absence of suitable alternative opportunities, the resource is under pressure. Government needs to develop appropriate strategies to facilitate successful livelihood diversification. Facilities may be created for non-fishing activities like fish marketing kiosks, cloth weaving facilities, agro-processing in fruit orchard areas, e-rickshaws and so on. Fishers may be trained in other income-generating activities like carpentry, embroidery, dress making, driving, etc. for better livelihood.

Keywords

Diversification, Ganga, India, Occupation, Riverine Fisher.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • SANDRP; https://sandrp.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/dams-fish-and-fishing-communities-of-the-ganga-glimpses-of-the-gangetic-fisheriesprimer/

  • Brugère, C., Holvoet, K. and Allison, E., Livelihood diversification in coastal and inland fishing communities: misconceptions, evidence and implications for fisheries management. Working paper, Sustainable Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (SFLP), Rome, FAO/DFID, 2008.

  • FAO and World Bank, Farming Systems and Poverty – Improving Farmer’s Livelihoods in a Changing World, Rome and Washington, DC, 2001.

  • Jan, H., Wangila, B. and Degen, A., Livelihoods and income diversification among artisanal fishers on the Kenyan coast. In African Studies, 2008, vol. 7, pp. 255–272, E-ISBN: 9789047442660.

  • Gordon, A. and Pulis, A., Livelihood diversification and fishing communities in Ghana’s Western Region, World Fish Center. USAID Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Governance Initiative for the Western Region, Ghana, 2010, p. 69.

  • Giesbrecht D., Small-scale Fisher Livelihood Strategies and the Role of Credit In Paraty, Brazil. A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of Master of Natural Resources Management (MNRM), 2011, p. 119.

  • Adeleke, M. L. and Fagbenro, O. A., Livelihood diversification and operational techniques of the artisanal fisherfolks in the coastal region of Ondo State, Nigeria. Int. J. Innov. Res. Develop., 2013, 2(1), 262–273.

  • Talabi, F. M. and Oyesola, O. B., Extent of livelihood diversification among artisanal fisher-folks in communities around Ikere Gorge dam, Oyo State, Nigeria African. J. Livestock Extension, 2014, 14, 7–12.

  • Martin, S. M., Lorenzen, K. and Bunnefeld, N., Fishing farmers: fishing, livelihood diversification and poverty in rural Laos. Human Ecol., 2013, 41(5), 737–747.

  • Chand, R., A critique on the methods of measuring economic diversification. Paper presented for the training course on Quantitative Technique for Policy Analysis in Agricultural Economics, conducted by the Division of agricultural Economics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 27 November to 9 December 1995.

  • Shiyani, R. L. and Pandya, H. R., Diversification of agriculture in Gujarat: a spatio-temporal analysis. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 1998, 53(4), 627–639.

  • Hawai, Measuring economic diversification in Hawaii. Research and Economic Analysis Division, Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism, State of Hawaii, 2008; http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/economic/data_reports/EconDiversification/Economic_Diversification_Report_Final%203-7-08.pdf

  • Khatun, D. and Roy, B. C., Rural livelihood diversification in West Bengal: nature and extent. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2016, 29, 183–190.

  • Rodgers, A., Some aspects of industrial diversification in the United States. Econ. Geogr., 1957, 33, 16–30.

  • Hawaii Economic Issues, Measuring economic diversification in Hawaii, 2011; http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/economic/data_reports/reports-studies/2011-12-diversification.pdf

  • Grossberg, A. J., Metropolitan industrial mix and cyclical employment stability. Regional Sci. Persp., 1982, 2, 13–35.

  • Jackson, R. W., An evaluation of alternative measures of regional industrial diversification. Reg. Stud., 1984, 18, 103–112.

  • Bhaumik, U. and Sharma, A. P., Present status of Hilsa in Hooghly– Bhagirathi river, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Bulletin No. 179, 2012.

  • Vass, K. K., Samanta, S., Suresh, V. R., Katiha, P. K. and Mandal, S. K., Current Status of river Ganges, Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, India, Bull No. 152, 2008.

  • Ali, A. D., Naser, N. M., Bhaumik, U., Hazra, S. and Bhattacharya, S. B., Migration, Spawning patterns and conservation of hilsa Shad (Tenualosa ilisha) in Bangladesh and India. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Academic Foundation, New Delhi, 2014, p. 81.

  • Vass, K. K., Mondal, S. K., Samanta, S., Suresh, V. R. and Katiha, P. K., The environment and fishery status of the River Ganges. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage., 2010, 13(4), 385–394; doi:10.1080/14634988.2010.530139.


Abstract Views: 299

PDF Views: 126




  • Fishers’ Livelihood Diversification in Bhagirathi–Hooghly Stretch of Ganga River in India

Abstract Views: 299  |  PDF Views: 126

Authors

Arun Pandit
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
Anjana Ekka
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
B. K. Das
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
S. Samanta
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
Lokenath Chakraborty
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
Rohan K. Raman
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India

Abstract


For the resource-poor fishers, livelihood diversification is a strategy to cope with the uncertainties and inadequateness of fisheries as a profession. The present study is an attempt to assess the socioeconomic conditions together with livelihood diversification of fishermen households of the Bhagirathi– Hooghly stretch of Ganga River. Data were collected by personally interviewing 500 fishermen from Sagar to Farakka (560 km stretch) in West Bengal using survey schedules in 2016. Analysis of data indicated that the socio-economic conditions of fishermen households were not encouraging. Fishing is the main occupation of around 88.60% of fishers and overall, fishing contributes about 70.30% to the total income of the family. Average number of income-generating activities per household ranged from 1.43 in the lower stretch to 1.79 in the upper stretch. Further, it was found that not only the average household income and number of income sources were limited, their level of diversification was also quite low. The monthly income of a household was found to be Rs 9391. The income is higher in the lower stretch because of higher catch and high value fish in the catch. Fishery as an only profession is unable to provide a decent life. The study also revealed that among other factors, the Simpson index contributes positively and significantly towards per capita income of the fisher households. However, in the absence of suitable alternative opportunities, the resource is under pressure. Government needs to develop appropriate strategies to facilitate successful livelihood diversification. Facilities may be created for non-fishing activities like fish marketing kiosks, cloth weaving facilities, agro-processing in fruit orchard areas, e-rickshaws and so on. Fishers may be trained in other income-generating activities like carpentry, embroidery, dress making, driving, etc. for better livelihood.

Keywords


Diversification, Ganga, India, Occupation, Riverine Fisher.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi10%2F1748-1752