Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Metal Detection:An Essential Aid in Maritime Archaeology


Affiliations
1 Department of Maritime Archaeology, WA Shipwreck Museum, Cliff St. Fremantle, 6160,, Australia
 

Metal detection has proven itself to be an essential adjunct to the human eye in the non-disturbance location and assessment of archaeological deposits where metals exist. It can also assist greatly during excavation and in post excavation management strategies. Relating experiences in Australia over the course of several decades helps explain why the method has been slow in being more broadly accepted as an archaeological tool and in some instances misunderstood by many archaeologists. These experiences illustrate why it is essential for historical and maritime archaeologists to avail themselves of the tool.

Keywords

Magnetometer, Metal Detection, Remote Sensing, Vergulde Draeck, Zuytdorp.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gibbs, M., The enigma of William Jackman ‘The Australian captive’: a fictional account or the true story of a 19th century castaway in Western Australia. J. Aust. Assoc. Mari. Hist., 2002, 24, 3–21.

  • McCarthy, M., Koombanah Bay Wrecks. Western Aust. Mari. Museum, 1983, 19, 1–97.

  • McCarthy, M., Australian maritime archaeology: changes, their antecedents and the path ahead. Aust. Archaeol., 1998, 47, 33–38.

  • Ford, A., Report on the 2006 Western Australian Museum, In Cape Inscription National Heritage Listing Archaeological Surve (ed. Green, J.), Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Maritime Museum, Fremantle, Report No. 223, 2007, p. 50.

  • Playford, P., Carpet of Silver: The wreck of the Zuytdorp, UWA Press, Nedlands, Western Australia, 1996.

  • McCarthy, M., In Dutch Connections – 400 years of AustralianDutch Maritime Links 1606–2006 (eds Shaw, L. and Wilkins, W.), Australian National Maritime Museum, Sydney, 2006, pp. 94–109.

  • Souter, C., Archaeology on Dirk Hartog Island, Western Australia: maritime meets historical. Bull. Australasian Inst. Mar. Archaeol., 2006, 24, 37–40.

  • Ford, A., Glenrowan Siege Archaeological Project, Dig International, Cultural Heritage Management, Rural City of Wangarrata, City of Wangarrata, Victoria, 2010.

  • Lewis, M., A Detectorist’s Utopia? Archaeology and metal– detecting in England and Wales. Open Archaeol., 2016, 2, 127– 139.

  • Connor, M. and Scott, D. D., Metal detector use in archaeology: an introduction. Hist. Archaeol., 1998, 32(4), 76–85.

  • Scott, D., Uncovering History: Archaeological Investigations at the Little Bighorn, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman USA, 2013.

  • Scott, D., Fox, R., Connor, M. and Harmon, D., Archaeological Perspectives on the Battle of the Little Bighorn, University of Oklahoma Press, Oklahoma, 1989.


Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 97




  • Metal Detection:An Essential Aid in Maritime Archaeology

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 97

Authors

M. McCarthy
Department of Maritime Archaeology, WA Shipwreck Museum, Cliff St. Fremantle, 6160,, Australia

Abstract


Metal detection has proven itself to be an essential adjunct to the human eye in the non-disturbance location and assessment of archaeological deposits where metals exist. It can also assist greatly during excavation and in post excavation management strategies. Relating experiences in Australia over the course of several decades helps explain why the method has been slow in being more broadly accepted as an archaeological tool and in some instances misunderstood by many archaeologists. These experiences illustrate why it is essential for historical and maritime archaeologists to avail themselves of the tool.

Keywords


Magnetometer, Metal Detection, Remote Sensing, Vergulde Draeck, Zuytdorp.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi10%2F1629-1634