Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Spectral Characteristics of Common Iora Aegithina tiphia Vocalizations and their Context-Specific Preferences


Affiliations
1 Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (P.O.), Coimbatore 641 108, India
 

Spectral properties such as duration of signal and frequency range were studied in Common Iora Aegithina tiphia vocalizations. Bird calls were sampled from different locations of the study area at different times to capture variability of their vocal signals in space and time. Along with call recordings, behaviour parameters such as presence of male or female conspecific members and their activities were recorded. From 48 bird call data, a total of 240 min of recordings was analysed. The most commonly uttered 15 syllables were identified, of which 14 were produced by males and the remaining one by females. Basic statistics of the spectral characteristics along with the observed behavioural parameters explain the natural history of Common Iora. The duration of syllable and frequency parameters such as low and high frequencies varied significantly across the 15 syllables. Common Iora males were recorded as using high frequency syllables with shorter duration as ‘contact calls’ with the nearby conspecific members, while low frequency ‘long distance’ calls were used by solitary males. Though these context preferences are not conclusive in nature based on this brief study, it suggests existence of context specificity of spectral characteristics in bird vocalizations.

Keywords

Acoustic Parameters, Bird Acoustics, Call Syllable, Common Iora, Frequency Range.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Beeman, K., Digital signal analysis, editing, and synthesis. In Animal Acoustic Communication: Sound Analysis and Research Methods (eds Hopp, S. L., Owren, M. J. and Evans, C. S.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1998, pp. 59–103.

  • Catchpole, C. K. and Slater, P. J. B., Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008, 2nd edn, pp. 203–239.

  • Beeman, K., RTS V1.0 User’s Guide (IBM PC). Engineering Design, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA, 1991.

  • Beeman, K., RTS V2.0 User’s Guide (IBM PC). Engineering Design, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA, 1996.

  • Cardoso, G. C. and Atwell, J. W., On the relation between loudness and increased song frequency of urban birds. Anim. Behav., 2011, 82, 831–836; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.018.

  • Singh, P. and Price, T. D., Causes of the latitudinal gradient in bird song complexity assessed from geographical variation within two Himalayan warbler species. Ibis, 2015, 157(3), 511–527; https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12271.

  • Nowicki, S. and Nelson, D. A., Defining natural categories in acoustic signals: comparison of three methods applied to ‘chick-a-dee’ call notes. Ethology, 1990, 86(2), 89–101; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1990.tb00421.x.

  • Baker, M. C. and Boylan, J. T., A catalog of song syllables of Indigo and Lazuli Buntings. Condor, 1995, 97, 1028–1040.

  • Irwin, R. E., Directional sexual selection cannot explain variation in song repertoire size in the New World Blackbirds (Icterinae). Ethology, 1990, 85, 212–224; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1990.tb00401.x.

  • Wiley, R. H. and Richards, D. G., Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound propagation and signal detection. In Acoustic Communication in Birds Vol. 1 (eds Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H.), Academic Press, New York, USA, 1982, pp. 131– 181.

  • Wiley, R. H., Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat., 1991, 138, 973–993; https://doi.org/10.1086/285263.

  • Morton, E. S., Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat., 1975, 109(965), 17–34; https://doi.org/10.1086/282971.

  • Marten, K. and Marler, P., Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1977, 2, 271–290; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299740.

  • Aylor, D., Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J Acoust. Soc. Am., 1971; 51(1), 197–205; https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912830.

  • Marten, K., Quine, D. and Marler, P., Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II Tropical forest habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1977, 2, 291–302; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299741.

  • Ali, S. and Ripley, D., Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan Vol 6, Oxford University Press, 2001, 2nd edn.

  • Gokula, V. and Vijayan, L., Foraging pattern of birds during the breeding season in thorn forest of Mudumalai wildlife sanctuary, Tamil Nadu, southern India. Trop. Ecol., 2000, 41(2), 195–208.

  • Mukherjee, D. and Bhupathy, S., A new species of wolf snake (Serpentes: Colubridae: Lycodon) from Anaikatti hills, Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Russ. J. Herpetol., 2007, 14(1), 21–26.

  • Noss, R. F., Platt, W. J., Sorrie, B. A., Weakley, A. S., Means, D. B., Costanza, J. and Peet, R. K., How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers. Distrib., 2015, 21(2), 236–244.

  • Nirmala, T., Diversity of Avifauna in Anaikatty hills, Coimbatore. J. Biol. Food Sci. Res., 2013, 2(8), 97–108.

  • Bioacoustics Research Program, Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.4), The Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Ithaca, NY, USA, 2011; http://www.birds.cornell.edu/raven.

  • Audacity Team, Audacity (version 2.0.6; 2014) (computer program); http://audacityteam.org (retrieved on 24 December 2014).

  • Fisher, R. A., Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK, 1925.

  • Gosset, W. S., The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 1908, 6(1), 1–25.

  • SPSS for Windows, Rel.16.0.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA, 2007.

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. and Ryan, P. D., PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron., 2001, 4(1), 1–9; http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.

  • Hartshorne, C., Born to Sing: An Interpretation and World Survey of Bird Song, Indiana University Press, 1973.

  • Ballentine, B., Hyman, J. and Nowicki, S., Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol., 2004, 15(1), 163–168; doi:10.1093/beheco/arg090.

  • Cramer, E. R. A., Physically challenging song traits, male quality, and reproductive success in house wrens. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(3), e59208; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059208.

  • Suthers, R. A., Peripheral vocal mechanisms in birds: are songbirds special? Neth. J. Zool., 2001, 51(2), 217–242; https:// doi.org/10.1163/156854201X00288.

  • Hartley, R. S. and Suthers, R. A., Airflow and pressure during canary song: direct evidence for mini-breaths. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1989, 165(1), 15–26; http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613795.

  • Suthers, R. A. and Goller, F., Respiratory and syringeal dynamics of song production in northern cardinals. In Nervous Systems and Behaviour (ed. Burrows, M. et al.), Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Neuroethology, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 1996, p. 333.

  • Endler, J. A., Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat., 1992, 139, S125–S153; https://doi.org/10.1086/285308.

  • Wiley, R. H. and Richards, D. G., Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1978, 3(1), 69– 94; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300047.

  • Brenowitz, E. A., Environmental influences on acoustic and electric animal communication. Brain Behav. Evol., 1986, 28, 32–42; https://doi.org/10.1159/000118690.

  • Ryan, M. J. and Brenowitz, E. A., The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat., 1985, 126, 87–100; https://doi.org/10.1086/284398.


Abstract Views: 446

PDF Views: 133




  • Spectral Characteristics of Common Iora Aegithina tiphia Vocalizations and their Context-Specific Preferences

Abstract Views: 446  |  PDF Views: 133

Authors

C. Divyapriya
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (P.O.), Coimbatore 641 108, India
P. Pramod
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (P.O.), Coimbatore 641 108, India

Abstract


Spectral properties such as duration of signal and frequency range were studied in Common Iora Aegithina tiphia vocalizations. Bird calls were sampled from different locations of the study area at different times to capture variability of their vocal signals in space and time. Along with call recordings, behaviour parameters such as presence of male or female conspecific members and their activities were recorded. From 48 bird call data, a total of 240 min of recordings was analysed. The most commonly uttered 15 syllables were identified, of which 14 were produced by males and the remaining one by females. Basic statistics of the spectral characteristics along with the observed behavioural parameters explain the natural history of Common Iora. The duration of syllable and frequency parameters such as low and high frequencies varied significantly across the 15 syllables. Common Iora males were recorded as using high frequency syllables with shorter duration as ‘contact calls’ with the nearby conspecific members, while low frequency ‘long distance’ calls were used by solitary males. Though these context preferences are not conclusive in nature based on this brief study, it suggests existence of context specificity of spectral characteristics in bird vocalizations.

Keywords


Acoustic Parameters, Bird Acoustics, Call Syllable, Common Iora, Frequency Range.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi11%2F1863-1871