Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Challenges in Geospatial Documentation of Unprotected Built Heritage Sites in India


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc Campus, Bengaluru, 560012, India
 

India is generally acceptedas a treasure trove of many thousands ofbuilt heritage sites. If one looks for a list of such sites with its geographical location and some basic identificatory description, unfortunately there is none, exceptfor the ones protected by the Government authorities. Today with most geospatial databasesbeing on digital platform, it is extremely important to recognize and also include the unprotected built heritage sites. Doing this is the need for the hour, in light of dramatic changes to the landscape caused by developmental activities that are insensitive to cultural heritage. This article looks in detail at the extent of digital information available on the location of Indianmonuments (both protected and unprotected), the challenges in extracting and bringing it into a geospatial platform with the case study of Arasibidi in north Karnataka, India.

Keywords

Arasibidi, Digital Heritage, Geospatial Documentation, Listing Unprotected Monuments.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules 1959, Ministry of Scientific Research and Cultural Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, 1959.

  • www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/34229-temples-to-get-grant-of-Rs.-36000-every-year/article13978082.ece(accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • DeLozier, G., Baldridge, J. and London, L., Gazetteer-Independent toponym resolution using geographic word profiles. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015, pp. 2382–2388.

  • Beyan, O., An Overview of Geotagging, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, 2016.

  • Campbell, J. M., Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency Volume XXIII Bijapur, Government Central Press, Bombay, 1884.

  • Jeelani, S., Gazetteer of India, Karnataka State Gazetteer, Bijapur District (Bagalkot District included), Government of Karnataka, Bangalore, 2006.

  • Goodchild, M. F. and Hill, L. L., Introduction to digital gazetteer research. Int. J. Geogr. Inf., 2008, 22(10), 1039–1044.

  • Mitra, S., Grover, A. & Singh, R., Handbook of Conservation of Heritage Buildings – A Guide, Central Public Works Department, New Delhi, 2013.

  • Thakurta, T. G., Monuments, Objects, Histories, Columbia University Press, New York, 2004.

  • Cunningham, A., Four Reports Made during the Year 1862–63, 64, 65, Archaeological Survey of India, Simla, 1871.

  • Roy, S., Indian archaeology from Jones to Marshall (1784–1902). Ancient India Bull. Archaeol. Surv. India, 1953, 9, 4–28.

  • Burgess, J., List of the Antiquarian Remains in the Bombay Presidency, Archaeological Survey of Western India, Bombay, 1885.

  • GoI, The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act No. VII of 1904– (as modified up to 1 September 1949), Gazette of India, New Delhi, 1949;https://asihyderabadcircle.com//storage/files/C6Z7AV46pJ-L9n4mLBaLj8eOQ6ZVF69uzyxJiSnDo.pdf(accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • GoI, The Ancient and Historical Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (Act no LXXI), Government of India, New Delhi, 1951; www.asichennai.gov.in/downloads/ahmasr_act_1951.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • Mathrani, R. and Sharma, S. K., Report on Performance Audit of Preservation and Conservation of Monuments and Antiquities, Union Government (Civil) Ministry of Culture, New Delhi, 2012.

  • Archaeological Survey of India;www.asi.nic.in/alphabetical-list-of-monuments-karnataka-dharwad/ (accessed on 28 July 2019).

  • Department of Kannada and Culture; www.kannadasiri.kar.nic.in/ archaeology/eng/e_contents.htm (retrieved on 26 August 2019).

  • https://bhuvan-app1.nrsc.gov.in/culture_monuments/ (accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • INTACH, Charter for Conservation of Unprotected Architectural Heritage and Sites in India, Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage, New Delhi, 2004.

  • Gupta, E. et al., The need for an Archaeological database. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(10), 1961–1973.

  • Gregory, I., A Place in History: A Guide to Using GIS in Historical Research (AHDS Guides to Good Practice), The Arts and Humanities Data Service and Oxbow Books, Oxford, 2005.

  • Fleet, J. F. and Burgess, J., Revised list of remains in the Ahmad Nagar, Nasik, Puna, Thana,and Kaladgi Zillas. In Antiquities of the Talukas of Parner, Sangamner, Ankola, and Kopargaum(ed. Sinclair, W. F.), Archaeological Survey of Western India, Calcutta, 1877, pp. 12–27.

  • Cousens, H., Revised List of the Antiquarian Remains in the Bombay Presidency, Archaeological Survey of India, Bombay, 1897.

  • Enthoven, R. E. and Edwardes, S. M., Imperial Gazetteer of India Provincial Series, Volume II, Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909.

  • Sathyan, B. N., Mysore State Gazetteer Bijapur District, Government Press, Bangalore, 1966.

  • Survey of India;www.surveyofindia.gov.in/pages/display/246-publications (accessed on 17 December 2019).

  • Srivastava, B. K. and Ramalingam, K., Error Estimates for WGS-84 and Everest (India – 1956) Transformation. Geospatial World, 2009; www.geospatialworld.net/article/error-estimates-for-wgs-84-and-everest-india-1956-transformation/(accessed on 17 December 2019).

  • Census of India;www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/A-3_Vill/ Note_A-3_Villages_Population.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • Press Information Bureau;www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=76471(accessed on 28 July 2019).

  • Archaeological Survey of India Dharwad Circle;www.asidharwadcircle.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/List-of-Monuments.pdf(accessed on 26 August 2019).

  • Archaeological Survey of India Dharwad Circle;www.asidharwadcircle.in/monuments/?search_keywords=&search_region=97&search_categories%5B%5D= (accessed on 12 August 2019).

  • Archaeological Survey of India Dharwad Circle; www.asidharwadcircle.in/monument/stone-bearing-an-inscription/(accessed on 12 August 2019).

  • Department of Kannada and Culture;www.kannadasiri.kar.nic.in/archaeology/eng/E08_Bagalkote.htm (retrieved on 26 August 2019).

  • SoI, Karnataka Map of grid 48M13, Scale 1:50,000, Survey of India, Government of India, 1976, 1st edn.

  • SoI, Open Series Map D43D13, Scale 1:50,000, Survey of India, Government of India, Bangalore, 2010.

  • www.landrecords.karnataka.gov.in/service3/(retrieved on 17 December 2019).

  • Kokatanur, S. P., Arasibidi: a forgotten capital of Chalukyas. Zenith Int. J. Multidisci. Res., 2019, 9(1), 207–213.

  • Desai, P., Sircar, D. C. and Gai, G., South Indian Inscriptions Volume XV: Bombay Karnataka Inscriptions: Volume II, The Manager of Publications, Madras, Delhi, 1964.

  • Cousens, H., The Chalukyan Architecture of the Kanarese District, Government of India Cental Publication Branch, Calcutta, 1926.

  • www.karnatakatravel.blogspot.com/2013/04/arshibidu-temples.html (accessed on 9 June 2018).

  • www.deccanherald.com/spectrum/spectrum-statescan/mapping-lifelines-a-step-towards-their-revival-748186.html(accessed on 22 July 2019).

  • https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11 (accessed on 22 Au-gust 2019).

  • https://en.unesco.org/themes/protecting-our-heritage-and-fostering-creativity (accessed on 22 August 2019).

  • Feilden, B., Guidelines for Conservation A Technical Manual, The Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage, New Delhi, 1989.

  • INTACH,www.intach.org/about-charter-guidelines.php#b2 (accessed on 2 July 2019).

  • Department of Science and Technology;www.dst.gov.in/indian-heritage-digital-space-research (accessed on 19 April 2019).


Abstract Views: 437

PDF Views: 117




  • Challenges in Geospatial Documentation of Unprotected Built Heritage Sites in India

Abstract Views: 437  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

Kuili Suganya
National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc Campus, Bengaluru, 560012, India

Abstract


India is generally acceptedas a treasure trove of many thousands ofbuilt heritage sites. If one looks for a list of such sites with its geographical location and some basic identificatory description, unfortunately there is none, exceptfor the ones protected by the Government authorities. Today with most geospatial databasesbeing on digital platform, it is extremely important to recognize and also include the unprotected built heritage sites. Doing this is the need for the hour, in light of dramatic changes to the landscape caused by developmental activities that are insensitive to cultural heritage. This article looks in detail at the extent of digital information available on the location of Indianmonuments (both protected and unprotected), the challenges in extracting and bringing it into a geospatial platform with the case study of Arasibidi in north Karnataka, India.

Keywords


Arasibidi, Digital Heritage, Geospatial Documentation, Listing Unprotected Monuments.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi6%2F877-882