Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of Windspeed Retrieval Model using RISAT-1 SAR Cross-Polarized Observations


Affiliations
1 Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area, Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
 

In this study, a method for retrieving ocean surface wind speed using C-band cross-polarization SAR observations has been outlined. A linear least square technique has been used to develop a Geophysical Model Function (GMF), C2P. The GMF was derived using NRCS observations from RISAT-1 and wind-speed observations from ASCAT. The correlation between observed and simulated NRCS values obtained from C2P was 0.66, with a negative bias of 0.01 dB and the corresponding ischolar_main mean square difference of 1.13 dB. Subsequently, the developed GMF was tested with 774 RISAT-1 MRS datasets to retrieve wind speed along the Indian coast and also of the tropical cyclone ‘Megh’. The measured intensity and radius of maximum wind speed were 30 m s–1 and 16.65 km respectively. Subsequently, the retrieved wind speed was validated with ASCAT wind-speed observations. The statistical comparison of RISAT-1 and ASCAT observed wind speed showed negative biases of 0.90 and 0.34 m s–1 with the corresponding RMSD of 2.11 and 1.77 m s–1 respectively, for CMOD5.N and C2P. The developed GMF C2P showed 16% more accuracy than that of CMOD5.N.

Keywords

Cross-polarization, Geophysical Model Function, Ocean Surface, Wind Speed Retrieval.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Zhang, B., Perrie, W. and He, Y., Wind speed retrieval from RADARSAT-2 quad-polarization images using a new polarization ratio model. J. Geophys. Res., 2011, 116, C08008, doi:10.1029/2010JC006522.

  • Zhang, B. and Perrie, W., Cross-polarized synthetic aperture radar: a new potential technique for hurricanes. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2012, 93, 531–541; doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00001.1.

  • Horstmann, J., Thompson, D. R., Monaldo, F., Iris, S. and Graber, H. C., Can synthetic aperture radars be used to estimate hurricane force winds? Geophys. Res. Lett., 2005, 32(2), L22801-1– L22801-5.

  • Shen, H., Perrie, W. and He, Y., A new hurricane wind retrieval algorithm for SAR images. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, 33(21), L21812-1–L21812-5.

  • Vachon, P. W. and Wolfe, J., C-band cross-polarization wind speed retrieval. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett., 2011, 8(3), 456–459.

  • Hwang, P. A., Zhang, B. and Perrie, W., Depolarized radar return for breaking wave measurement and hurricane wind retrieval. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2010, 37(1), L01604-1–L01604-4.

  • Monaldo, F. M., Jackson, C. and Li, X., On the use of Sentinel-1 cross-polarization imagery for wind speed retrieval. Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symp., 2017, 392–395.

  • Shao, W. et al., Development of wind speed retrieval from cross-polarization Chinese Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar in typhoons. Sensors, 2018, 18, 412.

  • Gao, Y. et al.,A wind speed retrieval model for Sentinel-1A EW mode cross-polarization images. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11, 153; doi:10.3390/rs11020153.

  • Mouche, A. et al., Copolarized and cross-polarized SAR measurements for high-resolution description of major hurricane wind structures: application to Irma category 5 hurricane. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 2019, 124, 3905–3922; https://doi.org/10.1029/2019 JC015056.

  • Jagdish et al., An interesting case of persistent rain cells observed by RISAT-1 SAR over the Indian Ocean during a pair of depres-sion–cyclone interactions (August, 2012). Remote Sensing Lett., 2019, 10(6), 545–552; doi:10.1080/2150704X.2019.1579377.

  • Jagdish et al., Atmospheric fronts using RISAT-1 SAR data: case studies for shear lines. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sensing, 2018, 11(12), 4711–4717; doi:10.1109/ JSTARS.2018.2878753.

  • Zhang, B. et al., Tropical cyclone vector winds from C-band dual-polarization synthetic aperture radar. Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symp., 2014, 3522–3525.

  • Jiang, Z. et al., A damped Newton variational inversion method for SAR wind retrieval. J. Geophys. Res., 2016, 122(2), 823–845.

  • Jagdish, Kumar, S. V. V. A., Chakraborty, A. and Kumar, R., Validation of wind speed retrieval from RISAT-1 SAR images of the North Indian Ocean. Remote Sensing Lett., 2018, 9(5), 421– 428; doi:10.1080/2150704X.2018.1430392.


Abstract Views: 322

PDF Views: 143




  • Development of Windspeed Retrieval Model using RISAT-1 SAR Cross-Polarized Observations

Abstract Views: 322  |  PDF Views: 143

Authors

Jagdish Prajapati
Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area, Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
Abhisek Chakraborty
Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area, Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
Bipasha Paul Shukla
Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area, Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
Raj Kumar
Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area, Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India

Abstract


In this study, a method for retrieving ocean surface wind speed using C-band cross-polarization SAR observations has been outlined. A linear least square technique has been used to develop a Geophysical Model Function (GMF), C2P. The GMF was derived using NRCS observations from RISAT-1 and wind-speed observations from ASCAT. The correlation between observed and simulated NRCS values obtained from C2P was 0.66, with a negative bias of 0.01 dB and the corresponding ischolar_main mean square difference of 1.13 dB. Subsequently, the developed GMF was tested with 774 RISAT-1 MRS datasets to retrieve wind speed along the Indian coast and also of the tropical cyclone ‘Megh’. The measured intensity and radius of maximum wind speed were 30 m s–1 and 16.65 km respectively. Subsequently, the retrieved wind speed was validated with ASCAT wind-speed observations. The statistical comparison of RISAT-1 and ASCAT observed wind speed showed negative biases of 0.90 and 0.34 m s–1 with the corresponding RMSD of 2.11 and 1.77 m s–1 respectively, for CMOD5.N and C2P. The developed GMF C2P showed 16% more accuracy than that of CMOD5.N.

Keywords


Cross-polarization, Geophysical Model Function, Ocean Surface, Wind Speed Retrieval.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi8%2F1282-1286