Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Insights into Riverscape Dynamics with the Hydrological, Ecological and Social Dimensions for Water Sustenance


Affiliations
1 Energy and Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Science, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
2 RCG School of Infrastructure Design and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Kharagpur 721 302, India
 

Spatio-temporal patterns of four neighbouring river-scapes in the central Western Ghats, India through land-use analyses using temporal remote sensing data (1973, 2018), reveal a decline in evergreen forests (41%) and fragmentation of intact or contiguous forests (60%). Hydro-ecological footprint illustrates that catchment integrity plays a decisive role in sustaining water for societal and ecological needs. This is evident from the occurrence of perennial streams in the catchment dominated by native flora with forest cover greater than 60%, highlighting the riverscape dynamics with hydrological, ecological, social and environmental dimension linkages and water sustainability. This helps in evolving strategies to adopt integrated watershed management to sustain anthropogenic and environmental water demand.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Eco-hydrological Footprint, Land Use, Lotic Ecosystems, Water Quality.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bruijnzeel, L. A., Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2004, 104, 185–228.

  • Lana-Renault, N., Latron, J., Karssenberg, D., Serrano-Muela, P., Regüés, D. and Bierkens, M. F. P., Differences in stream flow in relation to changes in land cover: a comparative study in two sub-Mediterranean mountain catchments. J. Hydrol., 2011, 411, 366– 378.

  • Bargués Tobella, A. et al., The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Bur-kina Faso. Water Resour. Res., 2014, 50, 3342–3354.

  • Mackey, B., Watson, J. and Worboys, G. L. G., Connectivity Conservation and the Great Eastern Ranges Corridor, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2010.

  • Vertessy, R. A., Watson, F. G. R. and O’Sullivan, S. K., Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 2001, 143, 13–26.

  • Pugh, D., How forests regulate streamflows, 2014, pp. 1–8; https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/ncec/pages/50/attachments/orignal/1422089907/How_Forests_Regulate_Streamflows.pdf?1422089907

  • Kuczera, G., Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest. J. Hydrol., 1987, 94, 215–236.

  • Pearce, A. J., Rowe, L. K. and O’Loughlin, C. L., Hydrologic regime of undisturbed mixed evergreen forests, South Nelson, New Zealand. J. Hydrol. (New Zealand), 1982, 21, 98–116.

  • Mehta, R., Jain, S. K., Rathor, D. S. and Garvit, K., Hydrological impacts of dams: a review. Int. J. Water Resour. Environ. Manage., 2012, 3, 75–97.

  • Tiemann, J. S., Gillette, D. P., Wildhaber, M. L. and Edds, D. R., Effects of lowhead dams on riffle-dwelling fishes and macro-invertebrates in a Midwestern river. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 2004, 133, 705–717.

  • Tiemann, J. S., Dodd, H. R., Owens, N. and Wahl, D. H., Effects of lowhead dams on unionids in the Fox River, Illinois. North-east. Nat., 2007, 14, 125–138.

  • Jansson, R., Nilsson, C. and Renöfält, B., Fragmentation of riparian floras in rivers with multiple dams. Ecology, 2000, 81, 899– 903.

  • Nilsson, C. and Berggren, K., Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. Bioscience, 2000, 50, 783–792.

  • Jain, S. K., Assessment of environmental flow requirements.Hydrol. Process., 2012, 26, 3472–3476.

  • Salik, K. M., Hashmi, M. Z.-R., Ishfaq, S. and Zahdi, W.-Z., Environmental flow requirements and impacts of climate change-induced river flow changes on ecology of the Indus Delta, Pakistan. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 2016, 7, 185–195.

  • Bunn, S. E. and Arthington, A. H., Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.Environ. Manage., 2002, 30, 492–507.

  • Poff, N. L. et al., The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 1997, 47, 769–784.

  • Peñas, F. J. et al., Estimating minimum environmental flow requirements for well-mixed estuaries in Spain. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 2013, 134, 138–149.

  • Kimmerer, W. J., Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary. Estuaries, 2002, 25, 1275–1290.

  • Brown, C. and King, J., Environmental Flows: Concepts and Methods, Water Resour. Environ. Tech. Note C.1., The World Bank, 2003, 1st edn.

  • Hughes, D. A., Providing hydrological information and data analysis tools for the determination of ecological instream flow requirements for South African rivers. J. Hydrol., 2001, 241, 140–151.

  • Yang, F., Xia, Z., Yu, L. and Guo, L., Calculation and analysis of the instream ecological flow for the Irtysh River. Proc. Eng., 2012, 28, 438–441.

  • Chen, H. and Zhao, Y. W., Evaluating the environmental flows of China’s Wolonghu wetland and land use changes using a hydrological model, a water balance model, and remote sensing. Ecol.Modell., 2011, 222, 253–260.

  • Sims, N. C. and Colloff, M. J., Remote sensing of vegetation responses to flooding of a semiarid floodplain: implications for monitoring ecological effects of environmental flows. Ecol.Indic., 2012, 18, 387–391.

  • Dyson, M., Bergkamp, G. and Scanlon, J. (eds), Flow – The Essentials of Environmental Flows Gland Switz. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Switzerland, 2013, 2nd edn.

  • Ramachandra, T. V. and Bharath, S., Geoinformatics based valuation of forest landscape dynamics in Central Western Ghats, India. J. Remote Sensing GIS, 2018, 7.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Vinay, S. and Subash Chandran, M. D., Quantification of annual sediment deposits for sustainable sand management in Aghanashini river estuary. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1263–1273.

  • Gunnel, Y. and Radhakrishna, B. P. (eds), Sahyadri: The Great Escarpment of the Indian Subcontinent, Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 2001.

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2019.

  • Conservation International, Hotspots, 2002; https://www.conservation.org/priorities/biodiversity-hotspots

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Soman, D., Naik, A. D. and Subash Chandran, M. D., Appraisal of forest ecosystems goods and services: challenges and opportunities for conservation. J. Biodivers., 2017, 8, 12–33.

  • Daniels, R. R. J. and Venkatesan, J., Western Ghats – Bio-diversity, People, Conservation, Rupa & Company, 2008.

  • Suryanath, U. K. (ed.), Uttara Kannada District Gazetteer, Government of Karnataka, 1985; http://gazetteer.kar.nic.in/

  • Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Census of India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, 2011.

  • Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. and Guevara, E., SRTM 90 m Digital Elevation Database v4.1. Cgiar-Csi, 2008.

  • Survey of India, Topographic maps. Department of Science and Technology, 2018; www.surveyofindia.gov.in

  • USGS, Earthexplorer. United States Geological Survey, 2000; https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

  • Survey of India, Nakshe. Department of Science and Technology, 2018; soinakshe.uk.gov.in

  • Pascal, J. P., Explanatory Booklet on the Forest Map of South India, French Institute of Pondicherry, Puducherry, 1986.

  • Google, Google Earth, 2018; https://www.google.com/earth/

  • National Remote Sensing Centre, Bhuvan, Indian Space Research Organisation, Government of India, 2016; bhuvan.nrec.gov.in

  • Department of Science and Technology, Karnataka State Natural Disater Monitoring Centre, Government of Karnataka, 2007; ksndmc.org/default.aspx

  • Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Government of Karnataka, 2017; des.kar.nic.in

  • India Meteorological Department, Hydrometerological Services, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, 2018.

  • FAO, Meteorological data, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2017; fao.org/home/en

  • District Statistical Office, District Statistics at a Glance, Bengaluru, 2016; http://districts.nic.in/

  • Karnataka State Department of Agriculture, Raitamitra, 2017; http://raitamitra.kar.nic.in/

  • Department of Economics and Statistics, Season and Crop Report Tamil Nadu 2009–2010, Chennai (India), 2011.

  • Ikisan Agri-Informatics and Services Division, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd, Hyderabad, 2017; https://krishijagran.com/list-of-irrigation-companies/ikisan/.

  • Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, TNAU Agritech Portal, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, http://www.tnau.ac.in/

  • Ramachandra, T., Vinay, S. and Bharath, H. A., Environmental flow assessment in a lotic ecosystem of central Western Ghats, India. Hydrol. Curr. Res., 2016, 7, 1–14.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Vinay, S., Bharath, S. and Shashishankar, A., Eco-hydrological footprint of a river basin in Western Ghats.Yale J. Biol. Med., 2018, 91, 431–444.

  • Putty, M. R. Y. and Prasad, R., Understanding runoff processes using a watershed model – a case study in the Western Ghats in South India. J. Hydrol., 2000, 228, 215–227.

  • Ramachandra, T. V, Hydrological responses at regional scale to landscape dynamics. J. Biodivers., 2014, 5, 11–32.

  • Vinay, S. et al., Hydrological regime in sacred groves and non-sacred groves of Central Western Ghats. In Lake 2016: Conference on Conservation and Sustainable Management of Ecologically Sensitive Regions in Western Ghats, Moodbidri, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, 2016.

  • India Biodiversity Portal, The Western Ghats; https:// indiabiodiversity.org/

  • Avibase – the world bird database, 2003; https://avibase.bsceoc.org/avibase.jsp?lang=EN

  • ENVIS, CES, IISc, Sahyadri: Western Ghats Biodiversity Information System, 1995; http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/

  • Karnataka Forest Department e-portal, Government of Karnataka, 2018; https://aranya.gov.in/

  • Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Fish distribution dynamics in the Aghanashini estuary of Uttara Kannada, west coast of India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 1739–1744.

  • Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Impact of Hydroelectric dams on fisheries in the Sharavathi estuary of Uttara Kannada District. In Lake 2012: Conference on Conservation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems, Kottayam, Kerala, 2012.

  • Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Inventory of fishes of Gangavali estuary in Uttara Kannada, Karnataka state. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2016, 58, 69–74.

  • Ramachandra, T. V.et al., Integrated ecological carrying capacity of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, Sahyadri Conservation Series 47, ENVIS Technical Report 87, 2014.

  • Balachandran, C., Dinakaran, S., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Diversity and distribution of aquatic insects in Aghanashini River of Central Western Ghats, India. In Lake 2012: Conference on Conservation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems, Kottayam, 2012.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V. and Bhoominathan, M., Edible bivalves of Central West Coast, Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India, Sahyadri Conservation Series 17, ENVIS Technical Report 48, Bangalore, 2012.

  • Boominathan, M., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Economic valuation of bivalves in the Aghanashini Estuary, west coast, Karnataka, Sahyadri Conservation Series 9, ENVIS Technical Report: 301, Bangalore, 2008.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Rao, G. R., Vishnu, D. M. and Subash Chandran, M. D., Forest trees of Central Western Ghats, ENVIS Technical Report 121, Bangalore, 2017.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V., Karthik, B., Sameer, A. and Vishnu, D. M., Ecohydrology of lotic ecosystems of Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats, Sahyadri Conservation Series 14, ENVIS Technical Report 40, Bangalore, 2012.

  • Karthik, B. and Ramachandra, T. V., Water quality status of Sharavathi River Basin, Western Ghats, Sahyadri Conservation Series 6, ENVIS Technical Report 23, Bangalore, 2006.

  • Amit, S. Y. et al., Ecological status of Kali River flood plain, ENVIS Technical Report 29, Bangalore, 2008.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Vinay, S., Bharath, S. and Bharath, H. A., Profile of rivers in Karnataka, Sahyadri Conservation Series 71, ENVIS Technical Report129, Bangalore, 2017.

  • Kumar, U., Chiranjit, M. and Ramachandra, T. V., Multi resolution spatial data mining for assessing land use patterns. In Data mining and warehousing, Sudeep Ela. CENGAGE Learning, Delhi, 2015, pp. 97–138.

  • Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W. and Chipman, J. W., Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation Lloydia Cincinnati, Wiley, New York, USA, 2004, 7th edn.

  • Bharath, H. A., Vinay, S., Chandan, M. C., Gouri, B. A. and Ramachandra, T. V., Green to gray: Silicon Valley of India. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1287–1295.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., Rajan, K. S. and Subash Chan-dran, M. D., Stimulus of developmental projects to landscape dynamics in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. Egypt. J. Remote Sensing Space Sci., 2016, 19, 175–193.

  • Haddad, N. M. et al., Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv., 2015, 1, 27.

  • Jha, C. S., Goparaju, L., Tripathi, A., Gharai, B., Raghubanshi, A. S. and Singh, J. S., Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: an analysis using remote sensing and GIS. Biodivers. Conserv., 2005, 14, 1681–1698.

  • Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G. and Delamonica, P., Tropical forest fragmentation and greenhouse gas emissions. For. Ecol. Manage., 1998, 110, 173–180.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S. and Subash Chandran, M. D., Geospatial analysis of forest fragmentation in Uttara Kannada District, India. For. Ecosyst., 2016, 3, 15.

  • Sreekantha, Gururaja, K. V. and Ramachandra, T. V., Nestedness pattern in freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats: an indication of stream islands along riverscapes. Curr. Sci., 2008, 95, 1707–1714.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Vinay, S. and Aithal, B. H., Environmental flow assessment in a lotic ecosystem of Central Western Ghats, India. Hydrol. Curr. Res., 2016.

  • Ramachandra, T. V. et al., Sacred groves (Kan forests) of Sagara taluk, Shimoga district, Sahyadri Conservation Series: 54, ENVIS Technical Report 102, Bangalore, 2016.

  • Karnataka Biodiversity Board, Government of Karnataka, 2018.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V., Mahima, B., Prakash, N. M. and Srikanth, N., Estuarine fish diversity and livelihood in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka state, Sahyadri Conservation Series 34, ENVIS Technical Report 64, Bangalore, 2013.

  • IUCN, The IUCN red list ofthreatened species, 2019; https://www.iucnredlist.org/

  • Wang, F., Qin, Z., Song, C., Tu, L., Karnieli, A. and Zhao, S., An improved mono-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 thermal infrared sensor data. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7, 4268–4289.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S. and Nimish, G., Modelling land-scape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1253–1262.

  • Ramachandra, T. V. et al., Water bodies of Uttara Kannada, Sahyadri Conservation Series 44, ENVIS Technical Report 81, Bengaluru, 2014.

  • Vinay, S., Bharath, S., Bharath, H. A. and Ramachandra, T. V., Hydrologic model with landscape dynamics for drought monitoring. In Joint International Workshop of ISPRS VIII/1 and WG IV/4 on Geospatial Data for Disaster and Risk Reduction, Hyderabad, 2013.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Nagar, N., Vinay, S. and Bharath, H. A., Modelling hydrologic regime of Lakshmanatirtha watershed, Cauvery river. In 2014 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference – South Asia Satellite, GHTC-SAS 2014, 2014, pp.64–71.

  • Vinay, S. et al., Landscapes and hydrological regime linkages: case study of Chandiholé, Aghanashini,. In National Seminar for Research Scholars 2017, Bangalore, 2017.

  • Johansson, E. L., Fader, M., Seaquist, J. W. and Nicholas, K. A., Green and blue water demand fromlarge-scale land acquisitions in Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2016, 113, 11471–11476.

  • Mutreja, K. N., Applied Hydrology, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1995, 4th edn.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Setturu, B., Rajan, K. S. and Subash Chandran, M. D., Modelling the forest transition in Central Western Ghats, India. Spat. Inf. Res., 2017, 25, 117–130.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V. and Bharath, S., Fragmentation of Uttara Kannada Forests, Sahyadri Conservation Series 29, ENVIS Technical Report 57, Bangalore, 2013.

  • Ramachnadra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Rao, G. R., Vishnu, D. M. and Joshi, N. V., Floristic diversity in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka. In Biodiversity in India (eds Pullaiah, T. and Sandhya Rani, S.), Regency Publications, New Delhi, 2015, 1st edn, pp. 1–87.

  • Rao, G. R., Krishnakumar, G., Dudani, S. N., Chandran, M. D. S. and Ramachandra, T. V., Vegetation changes along altitudinal gradients in human disturbed forests of Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. J. Biodivers., 2017.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Bharath, S., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Joshi, N. V., Salient ecological sensitive regions of Central Western Ghats, India. Earth Syst. Environ., 2018, 2, 15–34.

  • Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D. and Ramachandra, T. V., Impact of hydroelectric projects on finfish diversity in the Sharavathi River estuary of Uttara Kannada District, central west coast of India. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 2014, 5.

  • Ramachandra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, Rakhi, R. K., Prakash, N. M. and Sumesh, N. D., Valuation of estuarine ecosystem, Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka, Sahyadri Conservation Series 27, ENVIS Technical Report 45, Bangalore, 2013.


Abstract Views: 423

PDF Views: 169




  • Insights into Riverscape Dynamics with the Hydrological, Ecological and Social Dimensions for Water Sustenance

Abstract Views: 423  |  PDF Views: 169

Authors

T. V. Ramachandra
Energy and Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Science, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
S. Vinay
Energy and Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Science, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
S. Bharath
Energy and Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Science, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
M. D. Subash Chandran
Energy and Wetland Research Group, Centre for Ecological Science, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Bharath H. Aithal
RCG School of Infrastructure Design and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Kharagpur 721 302, India

Abstract


Spatio-temporal patterns of four neighbouring river-scapes in the central Western Ghats, India through land-use analyses using temporal remote sensing data (1973, 2018), reveal a decline in evergreen forests (41%) and fragmentation of intact or contiguous forests (60%). Hydro-ecological footprint illustrates that catchment integrity plays a decisive role in sustaining water for societal and ecological needs. This is evident from the occurrence of perennial streams in the catchment dominated by native flora with forest cover greater than 60%, highlighting the riverscape dynamics with hydrological, ecological, social and environmental dimension linkages and water sustainability. This helps in evolving strategies to adopt integrated watershed management to sustain anthropogenic and environmental water demand.

Keywords


Biodiversity, Eco-hydrological Footprint, Land Use, Lotic Ecosystems, Water Quality.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi9%2F1379-1393