Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Method for the Identification and Evaluation of Stay-Green Wheat Variety


Affiliations
1 College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
 

Leaf senescence is synchronized with grain-filling in wheat. Delayed leaf senescence, or stay-green, can im-prove wheat yield. In this study, a method has been proposed to identify and evaluate the stay-green wheat. First, chlorophyll content of flag leaf was measured by SPAD-502 meter at three-day intervals from seven days after anthesis to physiological matur-ity. Meanwhile, green leaf area duration was visually recorded using 0–9 scale. Secondly, a mathematical model was simulated according to the above pheno-typic dates. Thirdly, the senescence characteristic parameters were calculated, including the time from anthesis to (i) senescence start (Ts ), (ii) complete senescence (To), and (iii) maximum rate of senescence (TMRS), as well as the maximum rate of senescence. Finally, wheat varieties were divided into three stay-green types by hierarchical cluster analysis, including stay-green, early senescence and intermediate type. Based on this approach, a functional stay-green variety, Tainong 18 was screened. Tainong 18 with a delayed Ts and normal rate of senescence (RS) was similar to dSnR of type A under normal irrigation. However, it had earlier Ts and very small RS, and was similar to type B under drought stress. It can be used as a par-ent of crossing combinations in future wheat breeding, due to a longer photosynthetic activity and high yield potential.

Keywords

Cluster Analysis, Leaf Senescence, Staygreen Variety, Wheat.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adu, M. O., Sparkes, D. L., Parmar, A. and Yawson, D. O., Stay green in wheat: comparative study of modern bread wheat and ancient wheat cultivars. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2011, 6, 16–24.

  • Chaves, M. M. and Oliveira, M. M., Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture.J. Exp. Bot., 2004, 55, 2365–2384.

  • Cooper, M., Woodruff, D. R., Phillips, I. G., Basford, K. E. and Gilmour, A. R., Genotype-by-management interactions for grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Field Crops Res., 2001, 69, 47–67.

  • Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G. and van Herwaarden, A. F., Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci., 2002, 42, 111–121.

  • Christopher, J. T., Manschadi, A. M., Hammer, G. L. and Borrell, A. K., Developmental and physiological traits associated with high yield and stay-green phenotype in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 2008, 59, 354–364.

  • Gregersen, P. L., Culetic, A., Boschian, L. and Krupinska, K., Plant senescence and crop productivity. Plant Mol. Biol., 2013, 82, 603–622.

  • Lopes, M. S. and Reynolds, M. P., Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology. J.Exp. Bot., 2012, 63, 3789–3798.

  • Fu, J. D., Yan, Y. F. and Lee, B. W., Physiological characteristics of a functional stay-green rice ‘SNU-SG1’ during grain-filling period. J. Crop. Sci. Biotechnol., 2009, 12, 47–52.

  • Hoang, T. B. and Kobata, T., Stay-green in rice (Oryza sativaL.) of drought-prone areas in desiccated soils. Plant Prod. Sci., 2009, 12, 397–408.

  • Wada, Y. and Wada, G., Varietal differences in leaf senescence during ripening period of advanced indica rice. Jpn. J. Crop. Sci., 1991, 60, 529–536.

  • Woonho, Y., Shingu, K., Jeong-Hwa, P., Sukjin, K., Jong-Seo, C. and Sunggi, H., Association of grain filling duration and leaf activity with the grain yield in field-grown temperate japonica rice. Korean J. Crop. Sci., 2018, 63, 120–130.

  • Evangelista, C. C. and Tangonan, N. G., Reaction of 31 non-senescent sorghum genotypes to stalk rot complex in southern philippines. Int. J. Pest Manage., 1990, 36, 214–215.

  • Victor, D. M., Cralle, H. T. and Miller, F. R., Partitioning of 14 C-photosynthate and biomass in relation to senescene characteristics of sorghum. Crop. Sci., 1989, 29, 1049–1053.

  • Rosenow, D. T., Quisenberry, J. E., Wendt, C. W. and Clark, L. E., Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agric. Water Manage., 1983, 7, 207–222.

  • Ceppi, D., Sala, M., Gentinetta, E., Verderio, A. and Motto, M., Genotype-dependentleaf senescence in maize: inheritance and effects of pollination-prevention. Plant Physiol., 1987, 85, 720–725.

  • Russell, W. A., Contribution of breeding to maize improvement in the United States, 1920s–1980s. Iowa State J. Res., 1986, 61, 5–34.

  • Duvick, D. N., Genetic contributions to yield gains of US hybrid maize, 1930 to 1980. In Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants (ed. Fehr, W. R.), Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, 1984, pp. 15–47.

  • Thomas, H. and Howarth, C. J., Five ways to stay green. J. Exp. Bot., 2000, 51, 329–337.

  • Borrell, A. K., Hammer, G. L. and Henzell, R. G., Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop. Sci., 2000, 40, 1037–1048.

  • Zeng, J., The genetic dissection of stay green and grain filling in rice. Huazhong Agricultural University, China, 2006.

  • Borrell, A., Henzell and Douglas, A. C. L., Visual rating of green leaf retention is highly correlated with measured green leaf area in sorghum. Proceedings of the Third Australian Sorghum Conference, Tamworth, Australia, 1996.

  • Joshi, A. K., Kumari, M., Singh, V. P., Reddy, C. M., Kumar, S., Rane, J. and Chand, R., Stay green trait: variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). Euphytica, 2007, 153, 59–71.

  • Henzell, R. G., Brengman, R. L., Fletcher, D. S. and McCosker, A. N., Relationship between yield and non-senescence (stay green) in some grain sorghum hybrids grown under terminal drought stress. Proceedings of the Second Australian Sorghum Conference, Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, Gatton, Australia, 1992.

  • Wang, S., Liang, Z., Sun, D., Dong, F., Chen, W., Wang, H. and Jing, R., Quantitative trait loci mapping for traits related to the progression of wheat flag leaf senescence. J. Agric. Sci., 2014, 153, 1234–1245.

  • Shi, S., Azam, F. I., Li, H., Chang, X., Li, B. and Jing, R., Mapping QTL for stay-green and agronomic traits in wheat under diverse water regimes. Euphytica, 2017, 213, 246–264.

  • Dwyer, L. M., Tollenaar, M. and Houwing, L., A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1991, 71, 505–509.

  • Inada, N., Sakai, A., Kuroiwa, H. and Kuroiwa, T., Three-dimensional analysis of the senescence program in rice (Oryza sativaL.) coleoptiles. Planta, 1998, 205, 153–164.

  • Spano, G. et al., Physiological characterization of ‘stay green’ mutants in durum wheat. J. Exp. Bot., 2003, 54, 1415–1420.

  • Thomas, H. and Smart, C. M., Crops that stay green. Ann. Appl. Biol., 1993, 123, 193–219.

  • Park, J. and Lee, B., Photosynthetic characteristics of rice cultivars depending on leaf senescence during grain filling. Korean J. Crop. Sci., 2003, 48, 216–223.

  • Crafts-Brandner, S. J., Below, F. E., Harper, J. E. and Hageman, R. H., Differential senescence of maize hybrids following ear removal: I. Whole plant. Plant Physiol., 1984, 74, 360–367.

  • Crafts-Brandner, S. J., Below, F. E., Wittenbach, V. A., Harper, J. E. and Hageman, R. H., Differential senescence of maize hybrids following ear removal: Ii. Selected leaf. Plant Physiol., 1984, 74, 368–373.

  • Walulu, R. S., Rosenow, D. T., Wester, D. B. and Nguyen, H. T., Inheritance of the stay green trait in sorghum. Crop Sci., 1994, 34, 970–972.

  • Thomas, H. and Stoddart, J. L., Leaf senescence. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 1980, 31, 83–111.

  • Tollenaar, M. and Daynard, T. B., Leaf senescence in short-season maize hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1978, 58, 869–874.

  • Hunková, E., ŽIvčák, M. and Olšovská, K., Leaf area duration of oilseed rape (Brassica napus subsp.Napus) varieties and hybrids and its relationship to selected growth and productivity parameters. J. Central Eur. Agric., 2011, 12, 1–15.

  • Dohleman, F. G. and Long, S. P., More productive than maize in the midwest: how does Miscanthusdo it? Plant Physiol., 2009, 150, 2104–2115.


Abstract Views: 361

PDF Views: 124




  • A Method for the Identification and Evaluation of Stay-Green Wheat Variety

Abstract Views: 361  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Huiyan Wang
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
Shuguang Wang
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
Zenghao Liang
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
Xue Yan
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
Jianming Wang
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China
Daizhen Sun
College of Agronomy, Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity, Taigu, Shanxi, 030801, China

Abstract


Leaf senescence is synchronized with grain-filling in wheat. Delayed leaf senescence, or stay-green, can im-prove wheat yield. In this study, a method has been proposed to identify and evaluate the stay-green wheat. First, chlorophyll content of flag leaf was measured by SPAD-502 meter at three-day intervals from seven days after anthesis to physiological matur-ity. Meanwhile, green leaf area duration was visually recorded using 0–9 scale. Secondly, a mathematical model was simulated according to the above pheno-typic dates. Thirdly, the senescence characteristic parameters were calculated, including the time from anthesis to (i) senescence start (Ts ), (ii) complete senescence (To), and (iii) maximum rate of senescence (TMRS), as well as the maximum rate of senescence. Finally, wheat varieties were divided into three stay-green types by hierarchical cluster analysis, including stay-green, early senescence and intermediate type. Based on this approach, a functional stay-green variety, Tainong 18 was screened. Tainong 18 with a delayed Ts and normal rate of senescence (RS) was similar to dSnR of type A under normal irrigation. However, it had earlier Ts and very small RS, and was similar to type B under drought stress. It can be used as a par-ent of crossing combinations in future wheat breeding, due to a longer photosynthetic activity and high yield potential.

Keywords


Cluster Analysis, Leaf Senescence, Staygreen Variety, Wheat.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi9%2F1407-1414