Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Tale of Two Views:Why are Scientists Polarized?


Affiliations
1 Department of Crop Physiology and School of Ecology and Conservation, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, India
 

In his book, The Two Cultures, C. P. Snow, the chemist and writer, laments the fact that the world comprises of ‘Two polar groups: at one pole we have the literary intellectuals, at the other scientists, and as the most representative, the physical scientists. Between the two, a gulf of mutual incomprehension’ exists (The Two Cultures, Cambridge University Press, London, 2012). People of the two dispensation, seem to inhabit entirely different universes. The gulf could be even deeper and catastrophic, if we throw in laymen and clergy with scientists, as was witnessed during the Renaissance period. The most tragic fallout of such divide was of course the unfortunate fate met out to Bruno in 16th century Rome. In hindsight, the fault lines and the different universes, and the polarized views, could be attributed to the belief systems and grammar of life in which one was brought up. Simplistically therefore, had all been schooled similarly, one would not be witness to mutual incomprehension and polarized groups in society. But that is, as said, only simplistically.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 461

PDF Views: 131




  • A Tale of Two Views:Why are Scientists Polarized?

Abstract Views: 461  |  PDF Views: 131

Authors

R. Uma Shaanker
Department of Crop Physiology and School of Ecology and Conservation, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, India

Abstract


In his book, The Two Cultures, C. P. Snow, the chemist and writer, laments the fact that the world comprises of ‘Two polar groups: at one pole we have the literary intellectuals, at the other scientists, and as the most representative, the physical scientists. Between the two, a gulf of mutual incomprehension’ exists (The Two Cultures, Cambridge University Press, London, 2012). People of the two dispensation, seem to inhabit entirely different universes. The gulf could be even deeper and catastrophic, if we throw in laymen and clergy with scientists, as was witnessed during the Renaissance period. The most tragic fallout of such divide was of course the unfortunate fate met out to Bruno in 16th century Rome. In hindsight, the fault lines and the different universes, and the polarized views, could be attributed to the belief systems and grammar of life in which one was brought up. Simplistically therefore, had all been schooled similarly, one would not be witness to mutual incomprehension and polarized groups in society. But that is, as said, only simplistically.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi10%2F1483-1484