Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Empirical Study on the Influence of on-Road Static Obstacles on Driver Behaviour


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, India
2 University of Alaska, Anchorage, 2900 Spirit Drive, AK 99508, United States
 

Understanding the influence of static obstacles on driver behaviour is important because drivers’ instinctual reactions may pose serious hazards to safety and mobility. The effects of road geometry, roadside infrastructure and static objects near the road on driver behaviour have been studied extensively. However, no studies discuss the influence of two variables that are to likely to affect driver behaviour: obstacle size (width and length) and the side on which the static obstacle is present (driver’s side or passenger’s side). Controlled experiments were conducted using an instrumented vehicle to collect instantaneous driver behaviour data in the presence of on-road static obstacles. The results show that the side on which the obstacle is present influences the lateral gap. The results also show that obstacle size, both in terms of width and length, affects driving speed and the lateral gap. The results of this study can aid in the analysis of safety and mobility issues related to partial lane closures, stopped vehicles and similar obstacles.

Keywords

Driver Behaviour, Obstacle Size, On-road Static Obstacles, Lateral Gap, Vehicle Speed.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • DeLucia, P. R. and Warren, R., Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform., 1994, 20(4), 783–798.
  • DeLucia, P. R., Effects of size on collision perception and implications for perceptual theory and transportation safety. Psychol. Sci., 2013, 22(3), 199–204.
  • Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory: A State-of-the-Art, 2001.
  • Chakroborty, P., Agrawal, S. and Vasishtha, K., Microscopic modeling of driver behaviour in uninterrupted traffic flow. J. Transport. Eng., 2004, 130(4), 438–451.
  • Rosey, F., Auberlet, J. M., Moisan, O. and Dupré, G., Impact of narrower lane width comparison between fixed-base simulator and real data. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, 2009, 2138, 112–119.
  • Yousif, S., Nassrullah, Z. and Norgate, S. H., Narrow lanes and their effect on drivers’ behaviour at motorway roadworks. Transport. Res. Part F, 2017, 47, 86–100.
  • Green, P., Lin, B. and Bagian, T., Driver workload as a function of road geometry: a pilot experiment. Report No. GLCTTR 22-91/01, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1994.
  • Bassat, T. B. and Shinar, D., Effect of shoulder width, guardrail and roadway geometry on driver perception and behaviour. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, 2142–2152.
  • De Waard D., Jessurun, M., Steyvers, F. J., Raggatt, P. T. and Brookhuis, K. A., Effect of road layout and road environment on driving performance, drivers’ physiology and road appreciation. Ergonomics, 1955, 38(7), 1395–1407.
  • Marten, M., Comte, S. and Kaptein, N., The effects of road design on speed behaviour: a literature review, Deliverable D1 (Report 2.3.1), MASTER, 1997.
  • Godley, S. T., Triggs, T. J. and Fildes, B. N., Perceptual lanewidth, wide perceptual road centre marking and driving speeds. Ergonomics, 2004, 47(3), 237–256.
  • Shinar, D., In Traffic Safety and Human Behaviour, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2000.
  • Stamatiadis, N., Bailey, K., Grossardt, T. and Ripy, J., Evaluation of highway design parameters on influencing operator speeds through case wise visual evaluation. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, 2010, 219, 143–149.
  • Michaels, R. M. and Cozan, L. W., Perceptual and field factors causing lateral displacement. Highway Res. Rec., 1963, 25, 1–13.
  • Taragin, A., Driver behaviour as affected by static objects on highway shoulders. Highway Transport. Res. Boards, Bureau of Public Roads, 1955, 1445, 34–46.
  • Van Der Horst, R. and De Ridder, S., Influence of roadside infrastructure on driving behaviour: driving simulator study. J. Exp. Phychol. Learn: Hum. Percept. Perform., 2007, 2018(1), 36–44.
  • Martin, P. L., Audet, T., Corriveau, H., Hamel, M., D’Amours, M. and Smeesters, C., Comparison between younger and older drivers of the effect of obstacle direction on the minimum obstacle distance to brake and avoid a motor vehicle accident. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2010, 42, 1144–1150.
  • DeLucia, P. R., Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. J. Exp. Phychol. Learn: Hum. Percept. Perform., 1991, 17, 738–748.
  • DeLucia, P. R., Does binocular disparity or familiar size override effects of relative size on judgments of time to contact. J. Exp. Psychol., 2005, 58A, 865–886.
  • Caird, J. K. and Hancock, P. A., The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecol. Psychol., 1994, 6, 83–109.
  • Levulis, S. J., DeLucia, P. R. and Jupe, J., Effects of oncoming vehicle size on overtaking judgments. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2015, 82, 163–170.

Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 88




  • An Empirical Study on the Influence of on-Road Static Obstacles on Driver Behaviour

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 88

Authors

Bhupali Dutta
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, India
Vinod Vasudevan
University of Alaska, Anchorage, 2900 Spirit Drive, AK 99508, United States

Abstract


Understanding the influence of static obstacles on driver behaviour is important because drivers’ instinctual reactions may pose serious hazards to safety and mobility. The effects of road geometry, roadside infrastructure and static objects near the road on driver behaviour have been studied extensively. However, no studies discuss the influence of two variables that are to likely to affect driver behaviour: obstacle size (width and length) and the side on which the static obstacle is present (driver’s side or passenger’s side). Controlled experiments were conducted using an instrumented vehicle to collect instantaneous driver behaviour data in the presence of on-road static obstacles. The results show that the side on which the obstacle is present influences the lateral gap. The results also show that obstacle size, both in terms of width and length, affects driving speed and the lateral gap. The results of this study can aid in the analysis of safety and mobility issues related to partial lane closures, stopped vehicles and similar obstacles.

Keywords


Driver Behaviour, Obstacle Size, On-road Static Obstacles, Lateral Gap, Vehicle Speed.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi4%2F699-706