Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Can the Restrictive Boundaries of Intellectual Property Create a Larger Social Impact?


Affiliations
1 Centre for Society and Policy, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
 

This note highlights broad societal concerns associated with the intellectual property (IP) system and presents illustrative case examples to show how firms can address such concerns to fulfil their corporate social responsibility while simultaneously enjoying exclusivity obtained through IP rights. IP-specific initiatives taken by mission-oriented private organizations suggest that if designed and exercised consciously and wisely, stronger and efficient IP policy systems can act as a powerful tool to realize better societal outcomes to achieve social sustainability.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Anr. vs Cipla Limited on 19 March 2008; https://indiankanoon.org/doc/64813/
  • Bayer Corporation versus Union of India on 15 July 2014; https://indiankanoon.org/doc/28519340/
  • Scaria, A. G., The Wire, 2021; https:// thewire.in/law/sci-hub-elsevier-delhi-highcourtaccess-medical-literature-scientificpublishing-access-inequity
  • Martin, M. and Owen, T., Routledge Handbook of Human Security, Routledge, UK, 2013.
  • Timmermann, C. and van den Belt, H., Liverpool Law Rev., 2013, 34, 47–73; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-013-9129-9
  • WIPO, Advice on Flexibilities under the TRIPS Agreement. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva; https:// www.wipo.int/ipdevelopment/en/policy_legislative_assistance/advice_ trips.html#:~:text=These%20flexibilities%20can%20operate%20either,referred%20to%20as%20TRIPS%20plus (accessed on 21 April 2021).
  • Sharma, A., Mondaq, 15 October 2015; https://www.mondaq.com/india/patent/ 435044/compulsory-license-the-mosthappeningsection-of-the-patents-act-1970
  • Jayaraman, K. S., Nature, 1997, 389, 6; https://www.nature.com/articles/37838 9. Mathews, P. G., Spicy IP, 28 December 2016; https://spicyip.com/2016/12/tataisa-well-known-mark-reaffirms-delhihcjudgment-in-tata-sons-limited-v-ramniwasors.html
  • Verma, S. and Thakuria, S., OkhaiCentre for Empowerment: refashioning the lives of rural women. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, 2017, pp. 1–15; https://doi.org/10.1108/CASE.IIMA.2020.000110.
  • Abrol, D. and Gupta, A., Afr. J. Sci. Technol., Innov. Dev., 2014, 6, 541–552; https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.976974.
  • Brant, J., Marathe, K., McDole, J. and Schultz, M., Policy approaches to close the intellectual property gender gap – practices to support access to the intellectual property system for female innovators, creators and entrepreneurs, World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), Geneva, 2019; https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ip-development/en/agenda/pdf/policy_approaches_close_the_ip_gender_gap.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
  • USPTO, Progress and potential: 2020 update on US women inventor-patentees; https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economicresearch/publications/reports/progresspotential
  • Gage, M. J., North Am. Rev., 1883, 136, 478–489; https://www.jstor.org/stable/25118273
  • Boomer, L., Life Story: Catharine Littlefield Greene Miller. Women a& the American Story, 2021; https://wams.nyhistory.org/settler-colonialism-andrevolution/ the-american-revolution/catharine-littlefield-greene-miller/ (accessed on 21 April 2021).
  • Mamuric, N., J. Brand Strat., 2019, 7, 318–325.
  • Coe, E., The female inventor problem and how lawyers are helping Sterne Kessler. Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, News and Insights, 6 August 2019; https://www.sternekessler.com/newsinsights/ news/female-inventor-problemand-how-lawyers-are-helping (accessed on 21 April 2021).
  • Bluestone, K., Heaton, A. and Lewis, C., Beyond philanthropy: the pharmaceutical industry, corporate social responsibility and the developing world, Oxfam, London, UK, 2002.

Abstract Views: 311

PDF Views: 124




  • Can the Restrictive Boundaries of Intellectual Property Create a Larger Social Impact?

Abstract Views: 311  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Akriti Jain
Centre for Society and Policy, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Anjula Gurtoo
Centre for Society and Policy, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


This note highlights broad societal concerns associated with the intellectual property (IP) system and presents illustrative case examples to show how firms can address such concerns to fulfil their corporate social responsibility while simultaneously enjoying exclusivity obtained through IP rights. IP-specific initiatives taken by mission-oriented private organizations suggest that if designed and exercised consciously and wisely, stronger and efficient IP policy systems can act as a powerful tool to realize better societal outcomes to achieve social sustainability.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi11%2F1667-1669