Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Stability of Pillar and Drive Advances in Hard Rock Mine Through Numerical Modelling and Instrumentation


Affiliations
1 Tummalapalle Mine, Uranium Corporation of India Ltd, Jharkhand 832 102, India
2 Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Dhanbad 826 004, India
3 National Institute of Rock Mechanics, Kolar Gold Fields 563 122, India
 

Rock support systems are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation. This study, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate number of blasts in a drive, from where the support system is required to stop mitigation of the stressdeformation conditions around it. Here, two models have been built and simulated using the RS2D programme, i.e. first to optimize the pillar and gallery size for maximum safety and extraction ratio and second is evaluation by numerical modelling and validation with rock mechanics instruments to study on mining-induced stresses, factor of safety, and displacement around the drive with no rock support system for every blast advance. The interpretation of instrumentation data collected shows that drive stability suffers significantly, with no rock support after third blast in the second model and necessity of proper rock support system is confirmed and validated.

Keywords

Factor of Safety, Instrumentation, Mine Development, Mining-Induced Stresses, Numerical Modelling.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abdellah, W. R., Geotechnical Risk Assessment of Mine Haulage Drifts during the Life of a Mine Plan, University of McGill, Montreal, 2013, p. 352.
  • Guntumadugu, D. R., Methodology for the Design of Dynamic Rock Supports in Burst Prone Ground, University of McGill, Montreal, 2013, p. 249.
  • Deere, D. U., Hendron, A. J., Patton, F. D. and Cording, E. J., Design of surface and near surface construction in rock. Failure and Breakage of Rock. In Proceedings of the 8th US Symposium Rock on Mechanics (ed. Fairhurst, C.), Society of Mining Engineering, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1967, pp. 237–302.
  • Barton, N., Lien, R. and Lunde, J., Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 1974, 6, 189–236.
  • Grimstad, E. and Barton, N., Updating of the Q-System for NMT. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete – Modern Use of Wet Mix Sprayed Concrete for Underground Support. (eds Kompen, C., Opsahl, S. L. and Berg, S. L.), Norwegian Concrete Association, 1993, pp. 46–66.
  • Dianmin, C., Design of Rock Bolting Systems for Underground Excavations, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, 1994, p. 275.
  • Murugamoorthy, C., Kho, C. M., Vaidya, B. G., Tang, S. K. and Subramanian, T., Behaviour of various support systems for deep excavations. In Station CAUM, RTS Conference, Changi Airport Underground MRT Station, Singapore, 2003.
  • Palmstrom, A. and Broch, E., Use and misuse of rock mass classification systems with particular reference to the Q-system. Tunnels Underground Space Technol., 2006, 21(6), 575–593.
  • Gharavi, M. and Shafiezadeh, N., A comparison of underground opening support design methods in jointed rock mass. Int. J. Eng. Trans. B: Applications, 2008, 21(3), 235–248.
  • Rafiee, R., Development rock behavior index around underground space using a rock engineering system. J. Geol. Min. Res., 2014, 6(4), 46–56; https://doi.org/10.5897/JGMR14.0205
  • Martin, C. D. and Maybee, W. G., The strength of hard-rock pillars. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 2000, 37, 1239–1246.
  • Hedley, D. G. F. and Grant, F., Stope and pillar design for Ellliot Lake Uranium Mines. Bull. Can. Inst. Mining Metal., 1977, 65, 37–44.
  • Carter, T. G., Diederichs, M. S. and Carvalho, J. L., Application of modified Hoek–Brown transition relationships for assessing strength and post yield behaviour at both ends of the rock competence scale. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction. (eds Stacey, T. R. and Malan, D. F.), SAIMM, Johannesburg, 2008, pp. 37–60.
  • Marinos, V., Geological behaviour of rock masses in underground excavations. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece, 2010, 43(3), 1238–1247; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.11300.
  • Singh, G. S. P. and Murthy, V. M. S. R., Applications of numerical modelling for strata control in mines. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 2010, 28(4), 513–524; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9324-6
  • Yu, Z. S., Kulatilake, W. and Jiang, F., Effect of tunnel shape and support system on stability of a tunnel in a deep coal mine in China. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 2012, 30(2), 383–394; https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10706-011-9475-0.
  • Rao, K. K., Choudhary, B. S. and Ghade, A., Critical analysis of process cycle by numerical modelling for faster development of drives in hard rock underground mines – a case study. Curr. Sci., 2020, 118, 1547–1556.
  • Kimmelmann, M. R., von Hyde, B. and Madgwick, R. J., The use of computer applications at BCL Limited in planning pillar extraction and design of mining layouts. In Proceedings of the ISRM Symposium Design and Performance of Underground Excavations (eds Brown, E. T. and Hudson, J. A.), British Geomechanics Society, London, 1984, pp. 53–63.
  • Krauland, N. and Soder, P. E., Determining pillar strength from pillar failure observations. Eng. Mining J., 1987, 8, 34–40.
  • Potvin, Y., Hudyama, M. R. and Miller, H. D. S., Design guidelines for open stope support. Can. Mining Metal. Bull., 1989, 82, 53–62.
  • Sjoberg, J., Failure modes and pillar behavior in the Zinkgruvan mine. In Proceedings of 33 US Rock Mechanics Symposium (eds Tillerson, J. A. and Wawersik, W. R.), Santa Fe, Rotterdam, AA Balkema, 1992, pp. 491–500.
  • Lunder, P. J. and Pakalnis, R. C., Determination of the smngth of hard-rock mine pillars. Bull. Can. Bst. Min. Metall., 1997, 90(1013), 51–55.

Abstract Views: 260

PDF Views: 122




  • Stability of Pillar and Drive Advances in Hard Rock Mine Through Numerical Modelling and Instrumentation

Abstract Views: 260  |  PDF Views: 122

Authors

K. K. Rao
Tummalapalle Mine, Uranium Corporation of India Ltd, Jharkhand 832 102, India
B. S. Choudhary
Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Dhanbad 826 004, India
G. D. Raju
National Institute of Rock Mechanics, Kolar Gold Fields 563 122, India

Abstract


Rock support systems are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation. This study, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate number of blasts in a drive, from where the support system is required to stop mitigation of the stressdeformation conditions around it. Here, two models have been built and simulated using the RS2D programme, i.e. first to optimize the pillar and gallery size for maximum safety and extraction ratio and second is evaluation by numerical modelling and validation with rock mechanics instruments to study on mining-induced stresses, factor of safety, and displacement around the drive with no rock support system for every blast advance. The interpretation of instrumentation data collected shows that drive stability suffers significantly, with no rock support after third blast in the second model and necessity of proper rock support system is confirmed and validated.

Keywords


Factor of Safety, Instrumentation, Mine Development, Mining-Induced Stresses, Numerical Modelling.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi11%2F1758-1767