Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Multi-Hazard Analysis and Design Guidelines: Recommendations for Structure And Infrastructure Systems in The Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Multi-Hazard Protective Structures (MHPS) Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India
 

The interdependencies between various risks imposed by natural as well as accidental/man-made hazards demand a holistic design approach to ensure structural safety through multi-hazard engi-neering. In this regard, the present article provides guidelines and recommendations for design of structure and infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios of natural and accidental/man-made hazards, specifically in the Indian context. The need and relevance of multi-hazard analysis and design of structures are elaborated, and key design strategies during design (service) life for normal civil engineering structures as well as critical infrastructure and facilities are recommended for major regions of India experiencing multiple hazards.

Keywords

Design Guidelines, Multi-Hazard Analysis, Natural and Man-Made Hazards, Structure and Infrastructure Systems.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • National Institute of Disaster Management, East Asia Summit (NIDM-EAS), New Delhi 2014; https://nidm.gov.in/easindia2014/err/pdf/country_profile/India.pdf.

  • NDMA, National Disaster Management Plan, A publication of the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, 2019; https://ndma.gov.in/sites/default/files/PDF/ndmp-2019.pdf

  • India Risk Survey, 2017; http://ficci.in/Sedocument/20416/IndiaRisk-Survey-2017-Report.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2021).

  • BIS, National building code of India. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2016; http://www.bis.org.in/sf/nbc.htm

  • Kale, V. S., Landscapes and Landforms of India. In World Geomorphological Landscapes, Springer, 2014, pp. 1–271.

  • BIS, IS 1893 – Part 1, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures – Part 1: general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 1–29.

  • Roy, T. and Matsagar, V., Effectiveness of passive response control devices in buildings under earthquake and wind during design life. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2019, 15(2), 252–268; https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1547768.

  • Roy, T. and Matsagar, V., Probabilistic assessment of steel buildings installed with passive control devices under multi-hazard scenario of earthquake and wind. Struct. Saf., 2020, 85, article number 101955; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101955.

  • Malhotra, A., Roy, T. and Matsagar, V., Effectiveness of friction dampers in seismic and wind response control of connected adjacent steel buildings. Shock Vibr. (Spec. Issue), 2020, Article ID 8304359; https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8304359.

  • BIS, IS 1893 – Part 3, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures – Part 3: bridges and retaining walls, Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS), New Delhi, 2014, pp. 1–29.

  • IRS Concrete Bridge Code, Code of practice for plain, reinforced and prestressed concrete for general bridge construction. Indian Railway Standard, Research Designs and Standards Organization, Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Government of India, 1997.

  • IRC: 24, Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section-V: steel road bridges (Limit State Method). Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2010.

  • IRC: 112, Code of practice for concrete road bridges, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2011.

  • IRC: 6, Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section-II: loads and load combinations. Indian Roads Congress, IRC Bhawan, India, 2017.

  • IRS Steel Bridge Code (SBC), Code of practice for the design of steel or wrought iron bridges carrying rail, road or pedestrian traffic, Indian Railway Standard, Research Designs and StandardsOrganization, 2019, Ministry of Railways, Government of India, 2019.

  • Kim, I., Fard, M. Y. and Chattopadhyay, A., Investigation of a bridge pier scour prediction model for safe design and inspection, J. Bridge Eng., 2015, 20(6), article number 04014088.

  • Song, S.-T., Wang, C.-Y. and Huang, W.-H., Earthquake damage potential and critical scour depth of bridges exposed to flood and seismic hazards under lateral seismic loads. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr., 2015, 14(4), 579–594.

  • Sun, Y. et al., Damage effect of steel circular tube subjected to fire and blast. J. Construct. Steel Res., 2021, 176, article number 106389.

  • Fabry, N., Guesdon, M., D’Aló, G. and Cros, E., Stay cable hardening: new developments on blast, fire and ice protection. In FIB 2018 – Proceedings for the 2018 FIB Congress: Better, Smarter, Stronger, Melbourne, Australia, 2019, pp. 2879–2890.

  • BIS, IS 6922, Criteria for safety and design of structures subjected to underground blasts. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2003, pp. 1–13.

  • BIS, IS 4991, Criteria for blast resistant design of structures for explosions above ground. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India, 2003, pp. 1–38.

  • Roy, T. and Matsagar, V., Fire fragility of reinforced concrete panels under compressive in-plane and transverse out-of-plane loads. Fire Saf. J., 2020, 113, article number 102976; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102976.

  • Behnam, B. and Ronagh, H., An engineering solution to improve post-earthquake fire resistance in important reinforced concrete structures, Adv. Struct. Eng., 2014, 17(7), 993–1009.

  • BIS, IS 456, Plain and reinforced concrete – code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2000.

  • HAZUS MH MR1, Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.

  • Duthinh, D. and Simiu, E., Safety of structures in strong winds and earthquakes: multi-hazard considerations. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE), 2010, 136(3), 330–333.

  • Huang, C., Shen, J. J., Zhou, M. and Lee, G. C., Force-based and displacement-based reliability assessment approaches for highway bridges under multiple hazard actions. J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 2015, 2(4), 223–232.

  • Roy, T., Saito, T. and Matsagar, V., Multi-hazard framework for investigating high-rise base-isolated buildings under earthquakes and long duration winds. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2021, 50(5), 1334–1357; https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3401.

  • Zelleke, D. H., Saha, S. K. and Matsagar, V., Multi-hazard response control of base-isolated buildings under bidirectional dynamic excitation. Shock Vibr. (Spec. Issue), 2020, article ID 8830460; https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8830460.

  • Bach, C., Gupta, A. K., Nair, S. S. and Birkmann, J., Critical infrastructure and disaster risk reduction. National Institute of Disaster Management, 2014, pp. 1–62.


Abstract Views: 378

PDF Views: 134




  • Multi-Hazard Analysis and Design Guidelines: Recommendations for Structure And Infrastructure Systems in The Indian Context

Abstract Views: 378  |  PDF Views: 134

Authors

Tathagata Roy
Multi-Hazard Protective Structures (MHPS) Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India
Vasant Matsagar
Multi-Hazard Protective Structures (MHPS) Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India

Abstract


The interdependencies between various risks imposed by natural as well as accidental/man-made hazards demand a holistic design approach to ensure structural safety through multi-hazard engi-neering. In this regard, the present article provides guidelines and recommendations for design of structure and infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios of natural and accidental/man-made hazards, specifically in the Indian context. The need and relevance of multi-hazard analysis and design of structures are elaborated, and key design strategies during design (service) life for normal civil engineering structures as well as critical infrastructure and facilities are recommended for major regions of India experiencing multiple hazards.

Keywords


Design Guidelines, Multi-Hazard Analysis, Natural and Man-Made Hazards, Structure and Infrastructure Systems.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi1%2F44-55