Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Allopatric and Sympatric Modes of Speciation: Examples from Drosophila


Affiliations
1 Genetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
 

Basically, there are two different ways by which new species are created: anagenesis and cladogenesis (true speciation). During anagenesis, one species is transformed into new one so there is a phyletic change in the course of time and there is no involvement of reproductive isolation. Cladogenesis is considered as true speciation during which new species originate through splitting of pre-existing ones. Different models have been proposed from time to time to explain the modes of speciation. There are two important modes of speciation which are primarily based on geographic factors: allopatric (dichopatric and peripatric) and sympatric. In this article, both allopatric and sympatric modes of speciation are briefly described with the help of suitable examples from Drosophila.

Keywords

Allopatric, Drosophila, Speciation, Sympatric.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Mallet, J., Species, concepts of. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (ed. Levin, S. A.), Elsevier, Oxford, 2007, pp. 1–15.

  • Singh, B. N., Concepts of species and modes of speciation. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 784–790.

  • Mayr, E. and Ashlock, P. D., Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw Hill Int. Edn, Singapore, 1991.

  • Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A., Speciation, Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 2004.

  • Castillo, D. M. and Barbash, D. A., Moving speciation genetics forward: modern techniques built on fundamental studies on Drosophila. Genetics, 2017, 207, 825–842.

  • Mayr, E., Speciation phenomena in birds. Am. Nat., 1940, 74, 249–278.

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Mendelian populations and their evolution. Am. Nat., 1950, 84, 401–418.

  • Simpson, G. G., Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York, 1961.

  • Mayr, E., The Growth of Biological Thoughts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA, 1982.

  • Mayden, R. L., A hierarchy of species concepts, the development in the saga of species problem. In Species: The Unit of Biodiversity (eds Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A. and Wilson, M. R.), Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1997, pp. 381–424.

  • Darwin, C., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, John Muray, London, 1859.

  • Mallet, J., A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1995, 9, 175–180.

  • Mayr, E., Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York, 1942.

  • Singh, B. N., The genus Drosophila is characterized by a large number of sibling species showing evolutionary significance. J. Genet., 2016, 95, 1053–1064.

  • Cook, D. F., Evolution without isolation. Am. Nat., 1906, 42, 727– 731.

  • White, M. J. D., Modes of Speciation, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1978.

  • Huxley, J., Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, Allen and Unwin, London, 1942.

  • Mayr, E., Animal Species and Evolution, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1966.

  • Wright, S., Population structure in evolution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 1949, 93, 471–473.

  • Bush, G. L., Modes of animal speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1975, 6, 339–364.

  • Hartl, D. L. and Clark, A. G., Principles of Population Genetics, Sinauer and Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2007, 4th edn.

  • Singh, B. N., Reproductive isolating mechanisms: prerequisite for speciation. J. Exp. Zool. India, 2014, 17, 23–31.

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y., Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the Drosophila planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution,

  • , 30, 740–745.

  • Watanabe, T. K. and Kawanishi, M., Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science, 1979, 205, 906– 907.

  • Nanda, P. and Singh, B. N., Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila. J. Biosci., 2012, 37, 359–374.

  • Carson, H. L., Chromosome tracers of the origin of species. Science, 1970, 168, 1414–1418.

  • Carson, H. L., Speciation and the founder principle. Stadler Genetics Symposium, 1971, vol. 3, pp. 51–70.

  • Carson, H. L., Ancient chromosomal polymorphism in Hawaiian Drosophila. Nature, 1973, 241, 200–202.

  • Carson, H. L., Pattern of speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila inferred from ancient chromosomal polymorphism. In Genetic Mechanisms of Speciation in Insects (ed. White, M. J. D.), Australia and New Zealand Book Co., Sydney, Australia, 1987, pp. 81–93.

  • Carson, H. L., Hardy, D. E., Spieth, H. T. and Stone, W. S., Evolutionary biology of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. In Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honour of Theodosius Dobzhansky (eds Hetch, M. K. and Steere, W. C.), Appleton Century Crafts, New York, 1970, pp. 437–443.

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y., Carson, H. L., Clayton, F. E. and Heed, W. B., Nitch separation in a pair of homosequential Drosophila species from Islands of Hawaii. Am. Nat., 1973, 107, 766–774.

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y., Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution, 1980, 34, 437–444.

  • Nanda, P. and Singh, B. N., Origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila ananassae due to founder effect. Genetica, 2011, 139, 779– 787.

  • Arita, L. H. and Kaneshiro, K. Y., Ethological isolation between two stocks of Drosophila adiastola. Proc. Hawaii Entomol. Soc., 1979, 23, 31–34.

  • Ahearn, J. N., Evolution of behavioural reproductive isolation in a laboratory stock of Drosophila silvestris. Experientia, 1980, 36, 63–64.

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y. and Kurihara, J. S., Sequential differentiation of sexual isolation in populations of Drosophila silvestris. Pac. Sci., 1981, 35, 177–183.

  • Dwivedi, Y. N., Singh, B. N. and Gupta, J. P., One-sided sexual isolation between Drosophila takahashii and D. pseudotakahashii. Experientia, 1982, 38, 318.

  • Ramachandra, N. B. and Ranganath, H. A., Mating preference between Drosophila nasuta nasuta and Drosophila nasuta albomicans. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 1987, 25, 55–57.

  • Thoday, J. M. and Gibson, J. B., Isolation by disruptive selection. Nature, 1962, 193, 1164–1166.

  • Nanda, P. and Singh, B. N., Disruptive selection for sternopleural bristle phenotypes in Drosophila ananassae. Genome, 2011, 54, 845–851.

  • Singh, B. N., Mode of mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 1997, 35, 111–119.

  • Singh, B. N., Dwivedi, Y. N. and Gupta, J. P., Sexual isolation among three species of the Drosophila bipectinata species complex. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 1981, 19, 898–900.

  • Banerjee, P. and Singh, B. N., Interspecific sexual isolation and phylogeny among different members of the Drosophila bipectinata species complex. Genetica, 2012, 14, 75–81.

  • Singh, B. N. and Chaatterjee, S., Symmetrical and asymmetrical sexual isolation among laboratory strains of Drosophila ananassae. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 1985, 27, 405–409.

  • Futch, D. G., A study of speciation in South Pacific populations of Drosophila ananassae. Univ. Texas Publ., 1966, 6615, 79–120.

  • Futch, D. G., On the ethological differentiation of Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Evolution, 1973, 52, 456–467.

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York, 1970.

  • Savage, J. M., Evolution, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1963.


Abstract Views: 290

PDF Views: 87




  • Allopatric and Sympatric Modes of Speciation: Examples from Drosophila

Abstract Views: 290  |  PDF Views: 87

Authors

B. N. Singh
Genetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

Abstract


Basically, there are two different ways by which new species are created: anagenesis and cladogenesis (true speciation). During anagenesis, one species is transformed into new one so there is a phyletic change in the course of time and there is no involvement of reproductive isolation. Cladogenesis is considered as true speciation during which new species originate through splitting of pre-existing ones. Different models have been proposed from time to time to explain the modes of speciation. There are two important modes of speciation which are primarily based on geographic factors: allopatric (dichopatric and peripatric) and sympatric. In this article, both allopatric and sympatric modes of speciation are briefly described with the help of suitable examples from Drosophila.

Keywords


Allopatric, Drosophila, Speciation, Sympatric.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi1%2F56-60