Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Artificial Nests Conserve Important Native Bees, Braunsapis spp. Pollinating Cashew


Affiliations
1 Crop Protection Section, ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur 574 202, India
 

Native bees, Braunsapis picitarsis Cameron and Braunsapis mixta (Smith) are the common pollinators of cashew. Occupancy of both bee species was record-ed within 15 days of installation of artificial nests made in wooden blocks as well as sticks of different plant species. Increased occupancy of bees in all nest holes was seen over time. Nest hole size of 3 mm diameter was highly preferred followed by 2.5 and 3.5 mm diameter. Out of total nests occupied, 80% and 14.71% were of 3 and 2.5 mm diameter hole size respectively, in the first year. During the second and third years also, higher occupancy was recorded in 3 mm diameter holes. The nests also assisted in recording the nesting behaviour and natural enemies of these bees.

Keywords

Artificial Nest, Braunsapis spp., Cashews, Dried Sticks, Wooden Blocks.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Roubik, D. W. and Roubik, D. W., Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. Food Agricultural Organisation, UN, Rome, Italy, 1995.

  • Danforth, B. N., Sipes, S., Fang, J. and Brady, S. G., The history of early bee diversification based on five genes plus morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, 103, 15118–15123.

  • Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. and Thorp, R. W., Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99(26), 16812–16816; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.262413599.

  • Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Roberts, S., O’Toole, C., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G. and Willmer, P. A. T., Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol. Entomol., 2005, 30, 78–85; doi:10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00662.x.

  • Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G., O’Toole, C., Roberts, S. and Willmer, P. G., Response of plant–pollinator communities following fire: changes in diversity, abundance and reward structure. Oikos, 2003, 101, 103–112.

  • Bayo, S. F. and Wyckhuys, K. A., Worldwide decline of the Entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol. Conserv., 2019, 232, 8–27.

  • National Research Council, Status of Pollinators in North America, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2017; https://doi.org/10.17226/11761.

  • Rhodes, C. J., Pollinator decline – an ecological calamity in the making? Sci. Progr., 2018, 101(2), 121–160; doi:10.3184/003685018x15202512854527; ISSN 0036-8504.

  • Cane, J. H., A native ground-nesting bee (Nomia melanderi) sustainably managed to pollinate alfalfa across an intensively agricultural landscape. Apidologie, 2008, 39, 315–323.

  • Sardinas, H. S. and Kremen, C., Evaluating nesting microhabitat for ground-nesting bees using emergence traps. Basic Appl. Ecol., 2014, 15, 161–168; doi:10.1016/j.baae.2014.02.004.

  • Vanitha, K. and Raviprasad, T. N., Diversity, species richness and foraging behaviour of pollinators in cashew. Agric. Res., 2019, 8(2), 197–206; doi:10.1007/s40003-018-0370-2.

  • Prasantha, C., Taxonomic studies on carpenter bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae) of Karnataka. Ph D thesis, Department of Agricultural Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, 2017.

  • ICAR-DCR, Annual Report (eds Shamsudheen, M., Siddanna Savadi and Mohana, G. S.), ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur, 2018.

  • Richards, K., Comparisons of nesting materials used for the alfalfa leafcutter bee, Megachile pacifica (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Can. Entomol., 1978, 110, 841–846.

  • Thiele, R., Phenology and nest site preferences of wood-nesting bees in Neotropical lowland rain forest. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 2005, 40, 39–48.

  • Dicks, L. V., Showler, D. A. and Sutherland, W. J., Bee Conservation: Evidence for the Effects of Intervention, Pelagic Publishing, UK, 2010.

  • Fortel, L., Henry, M., Guilbaud, L., Mouret, H. and Vaissière, B. E., Use of human‐made nesting structures by wild bees in an urban environment. J. Insect Conserv., 2016, 20, 239–253.

  • Gazola, A. L. and Garófalo, C. A., Trap‐nesting bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in forest fragments of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Genet. Mol. Res., 2009, 8, 607–622.

  • Gaston, K. J., Smith, R. M., Thompson, K. and Warren, P. H., Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiver. Conserv., 2005, 14, 395–413.

  • Clements, D. K., The enemy within – conopid flies as parasitoids of bees and wasps in Britain. Br. Wildl., 1997, 8(5), 310–315.

  • Rasmussen, C. and Cameron, S. A. Conopid fly (Diptera: Conopidae) attacking large orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Eulaema). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 2004, 77(1), 61–62.

  • Lucia, M., Aquino, D. A., Hansson, C. and Abrahamovich, A. H., The first record of conopid flies (Diptera: Conopidae) and eulophid wasps (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as parasitoids and hyperparasitoids associated with carpenter bees (Apidae: Xylocopinae) in Argentina. J. Apicult. Res., 2009, 49(2), 208–211; doi:10.3896/IBRA.1.49.2.11.

  • Malfi, R. L., Walter, J. A., Roulston, T. H., Stuligross, C., McIntosh, S. and Bauer, L., The influence of conopid flies on bumble bee colony productivity under different food resource conditions. Ecol. Monogr., 2018, 88(4), 653–671; https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1327.

  • Wcislo, W. T., The roles of seasonality, host synchrony, and behaviour in the evolution and distribution of nest parasites in Hymenoptera (Insecta) with special reference to bees (Apoidea). Biol. Rev., 1987, 62(4), 515–543.

  • Wilkaniec, Z. and Giejdasz, K., Suitability of nesting substrates for the cavity-nesting bee Osmia rufa. J. Apicult. Res., 2003, 42, 29–31.


Abstract Views: 400

PDF Views: 153




  • Artificial Nests Conserve Important Native Bees, Braunsapis spp. Pollinating Cashew

Abstract Views: 400  |  PDF Views: 153

Authors

K. Vanitha
Crop Protection Section, ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur 574 202, India
T. N. Raviprasad
Crop Protection Section, ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur 574 202, India

Abstract


Native bees, Braunsapis picitarsis Cameron and Braunsapis mixta (Smith) are the common pollinators of cashew. Occupancy of both bee species was record-ed within 15 days of installation of artificial nests made in wooden blocks as well as sticks of different plant species. Increased occupancy of bees in all nest holes was seen over time. Nest hole size of 3 mm diameter was highly preferred followed by 2.5 and 3.5 mm diameter. Out of total nests occupied, 80% and 14.71% were of 3 and 2.5 mm diameter hole size respectively, in the first year. During the second and third years also, higher occupancy was recorded in 3 mm diameter holes. The nests also assisted in recording the nesting behaviour and natural enemies of these bees.

Keywords


Artificial Nest, Braunsapis spp., Cashews, Dried Sticks, Wooden Blocks.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi1%2F127-132