Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Carbonates from the Palaeoproterozoic Sleemanabad Formation, Mahakoshal Basin, Central India


Affiliations
1 Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
 

Facies and facies succession analysis from four sections in a ~12 m thick carbonate succession, hitherto undescribed, exposed over an east–west transect over 600 km from the topmost part of the Palaeoproterozoic Sleemanabad Formation, Mahakoshal Group, Central India reveals facies development in a proximal–distal relation. The facies types include microbialite and stromatolite, interbedded limestone–mudstone, intra-clastic conglomerate, pyrite bearing dark-coloured li-mestone and massive/normal-graded conglomerate and fine-grained sandstone. While microbialites and isolated stromatolites (rarely conjoined) with seafloor precipitate are interpreted as a product of proximal peritidal deposition, the dark-coloured pyrite bearing limestone represents the distal platform deposition below storm wave base.

Keywords

Carbonate Succession, Facies Types, Mass Flow, Proximal-Distal Relation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gradstein, F. M. et al. (eds), The Geologic Time Scale, Elsevier, 2012, p. 1145.
  • Dalziel, I. W., Overview: Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic geography and tectonics: review, hypothesis, environmental speculation. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1997, 109(1), 16–42.
  • Hoffman, P. F., Kaufman, A. J., Halverson, G. P. and Schrag, D. P., A Neoproterozoic snowball Earth. Science, 1998, 281(5381), 1342–1346.
  • Knoll, A. H., Proterozoic and Early Cambrian protists: evidence for accelerating evolutionary tempo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994, 91(15), 6743–6750.
  • Chakraborty, P. P., Tandon, S. K., Roy, S. B., Saha, S. and Paul, P. P., Proterozoic sedimentary basins of India. In Geodynamics of the Indian Plate (Gupta, N. and Tandon, S. K.), Springer, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 145–178.
  • Grotzinger, J. P., Facies and evolution of Precambrian carbonate depositional systems: emergence of the modern platform archetype. In Controls on Carbonate Platform and Basin Development, Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, Arizona, USA, 1989, vol. 44, pp. 79–106.
  • Grey, K. and Thorne, A. M., Biostratigraphic significance of stromatolites in upward shallowing sequences of the early Proterozoic Duck Creek Dolomite, Western Australia. Precambrian Res., 1985, 29(1–3), 183–206.
  • Grotzinger, J. P., Evolution of Early Proterozoic passive-margin carbonate platform, rocknest formation, Wopmay orogen, Northwest Territories, Canada. J. Sediment. Res., 1986, 56(6), 831–847.
  • Grotzinger, J. P., Cyclicity and paleoenvironmental dynamics, Rocknest platform, northwest Canada. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1986, 97(10), 1208–1231.
  • Grotzinger, J. P. and Read, J. F., Evidence for primary aragonite precipitation, lower Proterozoic (1.9 Ga) Rocknest dolomite, Wopmay orogen, Northwest Canada. Geology, 1983, 11(12), 710–713.
  • Hofmann, H. J. and Jackson, G. D., Proterozoic ministromatolites with radial‐fibrous fabric. Sedimentology, 1987, 34(6), 963–971.
  • Sami, T. T. and James, N. P., Synsedimentary cements as Paleoproterozoic platform building blocks, Pethei Group, northwestern Canada. J. Sediment Res., 1996, 66(1), 209–222.
  • Roy, A. and Bandyopadhyay, B. K., Cleavage development in Mahakoshal group of rocks of Sleemanabad–Sihora area, Jabalpur district, Madhya Pradesh. Indian Miner., 1990, 44(2–3), 111–128.
  • Roy, A. and Bandyopadhyay, B., Tectonic and structural pattern of the Mahakoshal belt of central India: a discussion. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ., 1990, 28, 226–240.
  • Thakur, K. S. and Shukla, R. S., Geochemistry of early proterozoic metabasites and associated copper mineralisation in Karaudiya area in Mahakoshal rift Basin, Shahdol district, Madhya Pradesh. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ., 1990, 28, 512–526.
  • Roy, A. and Devarajan, M. K., A reappraisal of the stratigraphy and tectonics of the Palaeoproterozoic Mahakoshal supracrustal belt, Central India. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ., 2000, 57, 79–97.
  • Chakraborty, P. P., Slides, soft-sediment deformations, and mass flows from Proterozoic Lakheri Limestone Formation, Vindhyan Supergroup, central India, and their implications towards basin tectonics. Facies, 2010, 57(2), 331–349.
  • Hamon, Y. and Merzeraud, G., Facies architecture and cyclicity in a mosaic carbonate platform: effects of fault-block tectonics (Lower Lias, Causses platform, south-east France). Sedimentology, 2008, 55(1), 155–178.
  • Bera, M. K., Sarkar, A., Chakraborty, P. P., Loyal, R. S. and Sanyal, P., Marine to continental transition in Himalayan foreland. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 2008, 120(9–10), 1214–1232.
  • Mutti, E. and Normark, W. R., Comparing examples of modern and ancient turbidite systems: problems and concepts. In Marine Clastic Sedimentology, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987, pp. 1–38.
  • Mutti, E., Tinterri, R., Benevelli, G., di Biase, D. and Cavanna, G., Deltaic, mixed and turbidite sedimentation of ancient foreland basins. Mar. Pet. Geol., 2003, 20(6–8), 733–755.
  • Enos, P., Flow regimes in debris flow. Sedimentology, 1977, 24(1), 133–142.
  • Sarkar, S., Chakraborty, P. P. and Bose, P. K., Multimode generation of carbonate tabular intraclast deposits: unnamed proterozoic formation, Maharashtra. J. Geol. Soc. India, 1994, 43(4), 415– 423.
  • Beukes, N. J. and Lowe, D. R., Environmental control on diverse stromatolite morphologies in the 3000 Myr Pongola Supergroup, South Africa. Sedimentology, 1989, 36(3), 383–397.
  • Sarkar, S., Chakraborty, P. P. and Bose, P. K., Proterozoic Lakheri limestone, central India: facies, paleogeography and physiography. In Recent Adv. Vindhyan Geol. (ed. Bhattacharya, A.), Journal of Geological Society India Memoir, Bangalore, 1996, no. 36, pp. 5–25.
  • Grotzinger, J. P. and James, N. P., Precambrian carbonates: evolution of understanding. In Carbonate Sedimentation and Diagenesis in the Evolving Precambrian World (eds Grotzinger, J. P. and James, N. P.), Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, 2000, vol. 67, pp. 3–20.
  • Pope, M. C. and Grotzinger, J. P., Controls on fabric development and morphology of tufas and stromatolites, uppermost Pethel Group (1.8 Ga), Great Slave Lake, northwest Canada. In Carbonate Sedimentation and Diagenesis in the Evolving Precambrian World (eds Grotzinger, J. P. and James, N. P.), Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, 2000.
  • Pratt, B. R., James, N. P. and Cowan, C. A., Peritidal carbonates. In Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Changes (Walker, R. G. and James, N. P.), Geological Association of Canada, St John’s, Newfoundland, 1992, pp. 303–322.
  • Sarkar, S. and Bose, P. K., Variations in Late Proterozoic stromatolites over a transition from basin plain to nearshore subtidal zone. Precambrian Res., 1992, 56(1–2), 139–157.
  • Sarkar, S., Banerjee, S., Samanta, P. and Jeevankumar, S., Microbial mat-induced sedimentary structures in siliciclastic sediments: examples from the 1.6 Ga Chorhat Sandstone, Vindhyan Supergroup, MP, India. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2006, 115(1), 49–60.
  • Grotzinger, J. P. and Knoll, A. H., Stromatolites in Precambrian carbonates: evolutionary mileposts or environmental dipsticks? Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 1999, 27(1), 313–358.
  • Bartley, J. K., Knoll, A. H., Grotzinger, J. P. and Sergeev, V. N., Lithification and fabric genesis in precipitated stromatolites and associated peritidal carbonates, Mesoproterozoic Billyakh Group, Siberia. In Carbonate Sedimentation and Diagenesis in the Evolving Precambrian World (eds Grotzinger, J. P. and James, N. P.), Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, 2000, vol. 67, pp. 59–73.
  • Sumner, D. Y. and Grotzinger, J. P., Herringbone calcite; petrography and environmental significance. J. Sediment Res., 1996, 66(3), 419–429.
  • Shinn, E. A., Birdseyes, fenestrae, shrinkage pores, and loferites; a reevaluation. J. Sediment. Res., 1983, 53(2), 619–628.
  • Mishra, S. R., Sharma, A., Chakraborty, P. P., Mohanty, S. P. and Tripathi, S. C., Mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sedimentation in the Upper Cretaceous Nilkanth Formation, Garhwal Himalaya, India. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2020, 129(1), 1–14.
  • Morad, S., Pyrite–chlorite and pyrite–biotite relations in sandstones. Sediment. Geol., 1986, 49(3–4), 177–192.
  • Chakraborty, P. P., Saha, S. and Das, K., Record of continental to marine transition from the Mesoproterozoic Ampani basin, Central India: an exercise of process-based sedimentology in a structurally deformed basin. J. Asian Earth Sci., 2017, 143, 122–140.
  • Wright, L. D., Sediment transport and deposition at river mouths: a synthesis. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1977, 88(6), 857–868.
  • Chakrabarti, G., Shome, D., Kumar, S., Stephens G. M. and Kah, L. C., Carbonate platform development in a Paleoproterozoic extensional basin, Vempalle Formation, Cuddapah Basin, India. J. Asian Earth Sci., 2014, 91, 263–279.

Abstract Views: 406

PDF Views: 145




  • Carbonates from the Palaeoproterozoic Sleemanabad Formation, Mahakoshal Basin, Central India

Abstract Views: 406  |  PDF Views: 145

Authors

Aditi Sharma
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Partha Pratim Chakraborty
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India

Abstract


Facies and facies succession analysis from four sections in a ~12 m thick carbonate succession, hitherto undescribed, exposed over an east–west transect over 600 km from the topmost part of the Palaeoproterozoic Sleemanabad Formation, Mahakoshal Group, Central India reveals facies development in a proximal–distal relation. The facies types include microbialite and stromatolite, interbedded limestone–mudstone, intra-clastic conglomerate, pyrite bearing dark-coloured li-mestone and massive/normal-graded conglomerate and fine-grained sandstone. While microbialites and isolated stromatolites (rarely conjoined) with seafloor precipitate are interpreted as a product of proximal peritidal deposition, the dark-coloured pyrite bearing limestone represents the distal platform deposition below storm wave base.

Keywords


Carbonate Succession, Facies Types, Mass Flow, Proximal-Distal Relation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi3%2F414-421