Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Transformation of Arsenic by Indigenous Soil Microbes as Affected by Phosphorus and Arsenic


Affiliations
1 Department of Agriculture, Government of West Bengal, Jalpaiguri 735 101, India
2 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok 737 102, India
 

Highly arsenic-polluted soil (16.5 mg kg–1) of West Bengal, India, was used for isolation, screening and identification of indigenous soil microbes. Citrobacter koseri significantly removed (7.6) and bioaccumulated (4.95) highest arsenic in P15As15 treatment, while loss (2.9) was higher in P10As15. Similarly, Pseudomonas putida significantly removed (7.4) and bioaccumulate (4.8) highest as in P15As15 and while loss (2.8) was higher in P10As15. Percentage removal of As was 47–59, bioaccumulation was 29–38 and loss 17–23 with Citrobacter sp., while it was 47–58% (removal), 29–39% (bioaccumulation) and 17–21% (loss) with Pseudomonas putida. Maximum removal and bioaccumulation of phosphorus was 37.8% and 32.1% respectively, for P10As15 in Citrobacter sp. In P. putida it was 33.1% and 27.2% respectively, for P10As15. At the same level of arsenic, increase in phosphorus significantly increased its removal and bioaccumulation, but the opposite was true during calculation in terms of percentage removal and percentage bioaccumulation.

Keywords

Arsenic, Bioaccumulation, Citrobacter, Phosphorus, Pseudomonas.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Metral, J. et al., Comparison of dissolved and particulate arsenic distributions in shallow aquifers of Chakdaha India, and Araihazar, Bangladesh. Geochem. Trans., 2008, 9, 1–18.

  • Attanayake, C. P., Hettiarachchi, G. M., Martin, S. and Pierzynski, G. M., Potential bioavailability of lead, arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in compost-amended urban soils. J. Environ. Qual., 2015, 44, 930–944.

  • Sheik, C. S. et al., Exposure of soil microbial communities to chromium and arsenic alters their diversity and structure. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(6), e40059.

  • Cheng, Z. et al., Trace metal contamination in New York City garden soils. Soil Sci., 2015, 180, 167–174.

  • Selvaraj, K., Sevugaperumal, R. and Ramasubramanian, V., Phytoremediation of arsenic chloride by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian J. Fundam. Appl. Life Sci., 2013, 3, 184–191.

  • Jackson, B. P., and Miller, W. P., Effectiveness of phosphate and hydroxide for desorption of arsenic and selenium species from iron oxides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2002, 64, 1616–1622.

  • Bradhamm, K. D. et al., In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B, 2018, 21, 83–114.

  • Mumford, A. C., Barringer, J. L., Benzel, W. M., Reily, P. A. and Young, L. Y., Microbial transformations of arsenic: mobilization from glauconitic sediments to water. Water Res., 2012, 46, 2859–2868.

  • Eton, E. C., Phosphorus and arsenic uptake by corn, wheat and soybean from broiler litter ash and egg layer manure ash. J. Plant. Nutr., 2013, 36, 1083–1101.

  • Nemanja, B., Sandra, S., Zoran, B., Milan, B., Dragan, M., Rada, P. and Aleksandar, C., Arsenic in agricultural soils of a historically mined and industrial region of southern Serbia and northern Kosovo: bioavailability and uptake by plants species Zea mays L. and Solanum tuberosum L. Soil Sediment Contam., 2015, 24, 656–674.

  • Jackson, M. L., Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, 1967.

  • Black, C. A. et al. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd edn, Agronomy Monograph 9. Agronomy Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA, 1965.

  • Subbiah, B. V. and Asija, G. L., A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr. Sci., 1956, 25, 259–260.

  • Brown, A. J. and Warncke, D., Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Carolina Region. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Station Bull., 1988, 499, 15–16.

  • Piper, C., Soil and Plant Analysis, International Public Inc., New York, USA, 1950.

  • Sparks, D. L. et al., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, USA, 2006, pp. 811–831.

  • Das, S. K., Ghosh, G. K. and Avasthe, R. K., Ecotoxicological responses of weed biochar on seed germination and seedling growth in acidic soil. Environ. Technol. Innov., 2020, 20(3), 101074.

  • Das, S. K., Ghosh, G. K. and Avasthe, R. K., Evaluating biomassderived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth of maize and black gram. Biomass Conver. Bioref., 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00887-8.

  • Das, S. K., Ghosh, G. K. and Avasthe, R. K., Valorizing biomass to engineered biochar and its impact on soil, plant, water, and microbial dynamics: a review. Biomass Conver. Bioref., 2020, 1–17.

  • Das, S. K. and Mondal, T., Mode of action of herbicides and recent trends in development: a reappraisal. Int. J. Agric. Soil Sci., 2014, 2(3), 27–32.

  • Das, S. K. and Mukherjee, I., Low cost biomass derived biochar amendment on persistence and sorption behaviour of flubendiamide in soil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2020, 105(2), 261–269.

  • Das, S. K., Mukherjee, I. and Das, S. K., Metsulfuron-methyl herbicide on dehydrogenase and acid phosphatase enzyme activity on three different soils. Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manage., 2017, 8(2), 236–241.

  • Das, S. K., Mukherjee, I. and Roy, A., Alachlor and metribuzin herbicide on N2-fixing bacteria in a sandy loam soil. Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manage., 2017, 7(2), 334–338.

  • McBride, M. B., Shayler, H. A., Russell-Anelli, J. M., Spliethoff, H. M. and Marquez-Bravo, L. G., Arsenic and lead uptake by vegetable crops grown on an old orchard site amended with compost. Water Air Soil Pollut., 2015, 1–10; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270015-2529-9.

  • Xiu, W., Guo, H., Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Zou, Y. and Zhang, B., Arsenic removal and transformation by Pseudomonas sp. strain GE-1induced ferrihydrite: co-precipitation versus adsorption. Water Air Soil Pollut., 2015, 226, 167.

  • Mellem, J., Bijnath, H. and Odhav, B., Bioaccumulation of Cr, Hg, As, Pb, Cu and Ni with the ability for hyper accumulation by Amaranthus dublis. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 2012, 7, 591–596.

  • Simeonova, D. D., Lievremont, D., Lagarde, F., Muller, D. A., Groudeva, V. I. and Lett, M. C., Microplate screening assay for the detection of arsenite-oxidizing and arsenate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 2004, 237, 249–253.

  • Tuffin, I. M., de Gischolar_main, P., Deane, S. M. and Rawlings, D. E., An unusual Tn21-like transposon containing an ars operon is present in highly arsenic-resistant strains of the biomining bacterium Acidithio bacilluscaldus. Microbiology, 2005, 151(9), 3027–3039.

  • Anna, P. Z., Cheng, Deeb M., Peter, M. G., Richard, K. S. and Mark, M., Accumulation of arsenic and lead in garden-grown vegetables: factors and mitigation strategies. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 640, 273–283.


Abstract Views: 386

PDF Views: 126




  • Transformation of Arsenic by Indigenous Soil Microbes as Affected by Phosphorus and Arsenic

Abstract Views: 386  |  PDF Views: 126

Authors

Suvo Kr. Das
Department of Agriculture, Government of West Bengal, Jalpaiguri 735 101, India
Shaon Kumar Das
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok 737 102, India

Abstract


Highly arsenic-polluted soil (16.5 mg kg–1) of West Bengal, India, was used for isolation, screening and identification of indigenous soil microbes. Citrobacter koseri significantly removed (7.6) and bioaccumulated (4.95) highest arsenic in P15As15 treatment, while loss (2.9) was higher in P10As15. Similarly, Pseudomonas putida significantly removed (7.4) and bioaccumulate (4.8) highest as in P15As15 and while loss (2.8) was higher in P10As15. Percentage removal of As was 47–59, bioaccumulation was 29–38 and loss 17–23 with Citrobacter sp., while it was 47–58% (removal), 29–39% (bioaccumulation) and 17–21% (loss) with Pseudomonas putida. Maximum removal and bioaccumulation of phosphorus was 37.8% and 32.1% respectively, for P10As15 in Citrobacter sp. In P. putida it was 33.1% and 27.2% respectively, for P10As15. At the same level of arsenic, increase in phosphorus significantly increased its removal and bioaccumulation, but the opposite was true during calculation in terms of percentage removal and percentage bioaccumulation.

Keywords


Arsenic, Bioaccumulation, Citrobacter, Phosphorus, Pseudomonas.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi3%2F428-434