Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of river sensitivity for sustainable management of sand quarrying activities in Damodar river, West Bengal, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Geography, Burdwan Raj College, Burdwan 713 104, India
2 Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, India
 

For sustainable management of a threatened river, a process-based understanding as well as in-depth study of the river is required. Unfortunately, during Anthro­pocene almost every river in the world is under threat. Damodar river, an important drainage system of the Bhagirathi–Hooghly river basin situated in the eastern part of India is not an exception to this. Besides construction of dams and embankment, man has changed the nature of this river by unscientific overexploitation of riverine sand not only from the river bed but also fertile river bars and adjacent river terrace which leads to environmental disruption through adverse dramatic impacts on the river morpho­logy, ecosystem, hydrology and environment. Though from an economic and flood management point of view, we have to mine this inexpensive resource from river, we should follow scientific methods in appropriate mining sites. For this purpose, study of river sensitivity based on active and total channel area can be a good strategy. In the case of Damodar river, using sensitivity we classified 12 reaches in very low, low, moderate and high sensitive sections and suggested section wise which method should be applied. We hope that this study will help to use rivers in a sustainable way.

Keywords

Damodar river, sand quarrying, river morphology, sensitivity, sustainable sand mining
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Martín-Vide, J. P., Ferrer-Boix, C. and Ollero, A., Incision due to gravel mining: modeling a case study from the Gállego River, Spain. Geomorphology, 2010, 117, 261–271.

  • Kondolf, G. M., Geomorphic and environmental effects of instream gravel mining. Landsc. Urban Plann., 1994, 28, 225–243.

  • Rinaldi, M., Wyzga, B. and Surian, N., Sediment mining in alluvial channels: physical effects and management perspectives. River Res. Appl., 2005, 21, 805–828.

  • Padmalal, D. and Maya, K., Sand Mining: Environmental Impacts and Selected Case Studies. Springer, The Netherlands, 2014; doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9144-1.

  • UNEP Global Environmental Alert Service (GEAS). Sand, Rarer than One Thinks, 2014; https://na.unep.net/geas/archive/pdfs/ GEAS_Mar2014_Sand_Mining.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2020).

  • Milliman, D. and Syvitski, M., Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers. J. Geol., 1992, 100(5), 525–544.

  • Salopek, P., Inside the deadly world of India’s sand mining mafia. 2019; https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/insideindia-sand-mining-mafia/ (accessed on 8 June 2020).

  • Galay, V. J., Causes of river bed degradation. Water Resour. Res., 1983, 19(5), 1057–1090.

  • Collins, B. D. and Dunne, T., Gravel transport, gravel harvesting, and channel-bed degradation in rivers draining the southern Olympic Mountains, Washington, USA. Environ. Geol. Water Sci., 1989, 13(3), 213–224.

  • Collins, B. and Dunne, T., Fluvial geomorphology and river gravel mining: a guide for planners, case studies included. Sacramento, CA: California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California, USA, Spec. Publ., 1990, vol. 98, p. 29.

  • Kondolf, G. M., Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ. Manage., 1997, 21(4), 533–551.

  • Petit, F., Poinsart, D. and Bravard, J.-P., Channel incision, gravel mining and bedload transport in the Rhône River upstream of Lyon, France (‘canal de Miribel’). Catena, 1996, 26, 209–226.

  • Rinaldi, M. and Simon, A., Bed-level adjustments in the Arno River, Central Italy. Geomorphology, 1998, 22(1), 57–71.

  • Surian, N. and Rinaldi, M., Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy. Geomorphology, 2003, 50, 307–326.

  • Marston, R. A., Bravard, J. P. and Green, T., Impacts of reforestation and gravel mining on the Malnant River, Haute-Savoie, French Alps. Geomorphology, 2003, 55, 65–74.

  • Rinaldi, M., Recent channel adjustments in alluvial rivers of Tuscany, Central Italy. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 2003, 28(6), 587–608.

  • Graf, W. L., Mining and channel response. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 1979, 69(2), 262–275.

  • Erskine, W. D., The real environmental costs of sand and soil mining on the Nepean River, NSW. In Science and Technology in the Environmental Management of the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment (eds Riley, J., Erskine, W. D. and Shreshta, S.), Geographical Society of New South Wales Conference Papers, Australia, 1997, vol. 14, pp. 29–35.

  • Mossa, J. and McLean, M., Channel planform and land cover changes on a mined river floodplain. Amite River, Louisiana, USA. Appl. Geogr., 1997, 17, 43–54; ISBN-13: 978-1-40512704-2.

  • Meador, M. and Layher, A., Instream sand and gravel mining: environmental issues and regulatory process in the United States. Fisheries, 1998, 23(11), 6–13.

  • Surian, N., Channel changes due to river regulation: the case of the Piave River, Italy. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 1999, 24, 1135– 1151.

  • Surian, N., Effects of human impact on braided river morphology: examples from northern Italy. In Braided Rivers: Process, Deposits, Ecology and Management (eds Gregory, H. et al.), International Association of Sedimentologists, Spl. Publ. No. 36, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Victoria Australia, 2006, pp. 327–338; ISBN: 978-1-405-15121-4.

  • Gob, F. et al., River dredging, channel dynamics and bedload transport in an incised meandering river (The River Semois, Belgium). River Res. Appl., 2005, 21(7), 791–804.

  • Padmalal, D. et al., Environmental effects of river sand mining: a case from the river catchments of Vembanad lake, Southwest coast of India. Environ. Geol., 2008, 54, 879–889.

  • Melton, B., In-stream gravel mining impacts and environmental degradation feedback associated with gravel mining on the Rio Tigre of the OSA Peninsula, Costa Rica, and the proposed ADI Jimenez Gravel Mining Concession. Final Draft 072109. Rio Tigre Report, Melton Engineering Services Austin, Kirkham, TX, Austin, USA, 2009.

  • Wallick, J. R. et al., Channel change and bed-material transport in the Umpqua River basin. Oregon: US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011, pp. 2011–5041.

  • Lajczak, A., Anthropogenic changes in the suspended load transportation by and sedimentation rates of the River Vistula, Poland. Geogr. Pol., 1997, 68, 7–30.

  • Billi, P. and Rinaldi, M., Human impact on sediment yield and channel dynamics in the Arno River basin (central Italy). In Human Impact on Erosion and Sedimentation (eds Walling, D. E. and Probst, J. L.), Publication No. 245, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, UK, Wallingford, 1997, pp. 301–311.

  • Gaillot, S. and Piegay, H., Impact of gravel mining on stream channel and coastal sediment supply: example of the Calvi Bay in Corsica (France). J. Coastal Res., 1999, 15(3), 774–788.

  • Sreebha, S., Environmental impact of sand mining: a case study in the River Catchments of Vembanad Lake, Southwest India. Unpublished Ph D thesis submitted to Cochin University of Science and Technology, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, India, 2008.

  • Tamang, L., Effects of boulder lifting on the fluvial characteristics of lower Balason basin in Darjeeling district, West Bengal. Unpublished Ph D thesis submitted to the Department of Geography and Applied Geography, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling, India, 2013.

  • Isik, S. et al., Effects of anthropogenic activities on the Lower Sakarya River. Catena, 2008, 75, 172–181.

  • Ghosh, P. K., Bandyopadhyay S., Jana, N. C. and Mukhopadhyay, R., Sand quarrying activities in an alluvial reach of Damodar River, Eastern India: towards a geomorphic assessment. Int. J. River Basin Manage., 2016, 14(22), 1–18; doi:10.1080/15715124.2016.1209509.

  • Bhattacharya, R., Das Chatterjee, N. and Das, K., Geomorphic response to riverine land cover dynamics in a quarried alluvial river Kangsabati, South Bengal, India. Environ. Earth Sci., 2019,78, 633; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8652-y

  • Ramkumar, M., Kumaraswamy, K., James, R. A., Suresh, M., Sugantha, T., Jayaraj, L. and Shyamala, J., Sand mining, channel bar dynamics and sediment textural properties of the Kaveri River, South India: implications on fooding hazard and sustainability of the natural fuvial system. In Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems (eds Kumaraswamy, K., Ramkumar, Mu. and Mohanraj, R.), Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 283– 318; ISBN: 9783319134246.

  • Lu, X. X., Zhang, S. R., Xie, S. P. and Ma, P. K., Rapid channel incision of the lower Pearl River (China) since the 1990s as a consequence of sediment depletion. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discus., 2007, 11(6), 1897–1906; ffhal-00305116f.

  • John, E., The impacts of sand mining in Kallada river (Pathanapuram Taluk), Kerala. J. Basic Appl. Biol., 2009, 3(1&2), 108–113.

  • Leeuw, J. D. et al., Strategic assessment of the magnitude and impacts of sand mining in Poyang Lake, China. Reg. Environ. Change, 2010, 10, 95–102.

  • Yao, J., Zhang, Q., Ye, X., Zhang, D. and Bai, P., Quantifying the impact of bathymetric changes on the hydrological regimes in a large floodplain lake: Poyang Lake. J. Hydrol., 2018, 561, 711– 723.

  • Sreebha, S. and Padmalal, D., Environmental impact assessment of sand mining from the small catchment rivers in the Southwestern Coast of India: a case study. Environ. Manage., 2011, 47, 130–140; doi:10.1007/s00267-0109571-6.

  • Saviour, N., Environmental impact of soil and sand mining: a review. Int. J. Sci., Environ. Technol., 2012, 1(3), 125–134.

  • Bayram, A. and Önsoy, H., Sand and gravel mining impact on the surface water quality: a case study from the city of Tirebolu (Giresun Province, NE Turkey). Environ. Earth Sci., 2015, 73, 1997– 2011.

  • Koehnken, L., Rintoul, M. S., Goichot, M., Tickner, D., Loftus, A.‐C. and Acreman, M. C., Impacts of riverine sand mining on freshwater ecosystems: a review of the scientific evidence and guidance for future research. River Res. Appl., 2020, 36(3), 362– 370; https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3586.

  • Koehnken, L. and Rintoul, M., Impacts of Sand Mining on Ecosystem Structure, Process and Biodiversity in Rivers. WWF, 2018, ISBN: 978-2-940529-88-9; https://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/sand mining impacts on world rivers final.pdf and https://wwfint.awsassets.pand.org/downloads/sandmining execsumfinal.pdf

  • Schumm, S. A., To Interpret the Earth: Ten Ways to be Wrong, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA, 1991.

  • Jain, V., Tandon, S. K. and Sinha, R., Application of modern geomorphic concepts for understanding the spatio-temporal complexity of the large Ganga river dispersal system. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103(11), 1300–1319.

  • Brunsden, D. and Thornes, J. B., Landscape sensitivity and change. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 1979, 4, 463–484.

  • Chorley, R. J., Schumm, S. A. and Sugden. D. E., Geomorphology. Methuen and Sons, London, UK, 1984.

  • Allison, R. J. and Thomas, D. S. G., The sensitivity of landscapes. In Landscape Sensitivity (eds Thomas, D. S. G. and Allison, R. J.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993, 1993, 1–5.

  • Evans, R., Sensitivity of the British landscape to erosion. In Landscape Sensitivity (eds Thomas, D. S. G. and Allison, R. J.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993, pp. 189–210.

  • Downs, P. W. and Gregory, K. J., The sensitivity of river channels in the landscape system. In Landscape Sensitivity (eds Thomas, D. S. G. and Allison, R. J.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993, pp. 15–30.

  • Downs, P. W. and Gregory, K. J., Approaches to river channel sensitivity. Prof. Geogr., 1995, 47(2), 168–175.

  • Fitzpatrick, F. A. and Knox, J. C., Spatial and temporal sensitivity of hydrogeomorphic response and recovery to deforestation, agriculture and floods. Phys. Geogr., 2000, 21, 89–108; https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2000.10642701.

  • Brunsden, D., A critical assessment of the sensitivity concept in geomorphology. Catena, 2001, 42, 99–123.

  • Notebaert, B. and Verstraeten, G., Sensitivity of West and Central European river systems to environmental changes during the Holocene: a review. Earth-Sci. Rev., 2010, 103, 163–182; doi:10.1016/

  • j.earscirev.2010.09.009.

  • Fryirs, K. A., River sensitivity: a lost foundation concept in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 2017, 42, 55–70; doi:10.1002/esp.3940.

  • Lisenby, P. E., Fryirs, K. A. and Thompson, C. J., River sensitivity and sediment connectivity as tools for assessing future geomorphic channel behavior. Int. J. River Basin Manage., 2020, 18(3), 279–293; https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2019.1672705.

  • Khan, S. and Fryirs, K. A., An approach for assessing geomorphic river sensitivity across a catchment based on analysis of historical capacity for adjustment. Geomorphology, 2020, 359, 107–135;

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107135.

  • Bhattacharyya, K., Applied geomorphological study in a controlled tropical river – the case of the Damodar between Panchet reservoir and Falta. Ph D dissertation, submitted to The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India, 1998.

  • Bhattacharyya, K., The Lower Damodar River, India: Understanding the Human Role in Changing Fluvial Environment, Springer, New York, 2011.

  • Das, S. and Biswas, A. B., Report on the Groundwater Investigation in Parts of The Burdwan and Birbhum District, West Bengal, Unpublished report, Geological Survey of India, 1968.

  • Chatterjee, S. P., The planning atlas of the Damodar Valley region. Joint committee for diagnostic survey of Damodar Valley Region, Technical Advisory Committee, Calcutta, 1969.

  • Bandyopadhyay, S. et al., Probability of flooding and vulnerability assessment in the Ajay River, Eastern India: implications for mitigation. Environ. Earth Sci., 2016, 75(7), 1–22.

  • Straffin, E. C. and Blum, M. D., Holocene fluvial response to climate change and human activities; Burgundy, France. Neth. J. Geosci., 2002, 81(3–4), 417–430.

  • Sen, A. K., Water Balance and Landuse Planning: A Case Study of the Upper Damodar Basin. Unpublished Ph D thesis submitted to The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India, 1987.

  • Rosgen, D. L., A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 1994, 22, 169–199.

  • Thieler, E. R., Himmelstoss, E. A., Zichichi, J. L. and Ergul, A., Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0 – An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1278, 2009.

  • Friend, P. F. and Sinha, R., Braiding and meandering parameters. In Braided Rivers (eds Best, J. L. and Bristow, C. S.), The Geological Society, London, UK, 1993, Special Publication No 75, pp.

  • –111.

  • Reid, H. E. and Brierley, G. J., Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment. Geomorphology, 2015, 251, 108–121; doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.009.


Abstract Views: 179

PDF Views: 94




  • Study of river sensitivity for sustainable management of sand quarrying activities in Damodar river, West Bengal, India

Abstract Views: 179  |  PDF Views: 94

Authors

Prasanta Kumar Ghosh
Department of Geography, Burdwan Raj College, Burdwan 713 104, India
Narayan Chandra Jana
Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, India

Abstract


For sustainable management of a threatened river, a process-based understanding as well as in-depth study of the river is required. Unfortunately, during Anthro­pocene almost every river in the world is under threat. Damodar river, an important drainage system of the Bhagirathi–Hooghly river basin situated in the eastern part of India is not an exception to this. Besides construction of dams and embankment, man has changed the nature of this river by unscientific overexploitation of riverine sand not only from the river bed but also fertile river bars and adjacent river terrace which leads to environmental disruption through adverse dramatic impacts on the river morpho­logy, ecosystem, hydrology and environment. Though from an economic and flood management point of view, we have to mine this inexpensive resource from river, we should follow scientific methods in appropriate mining sites. For this purpose, study of river sensitivity based on active and total channel area can be a good strategy. In the case of Damodar river, using sensitivity we classified 12 reaches in very low, low, moderate and high sensitive sections and suggested section wise which method should be applied. We hope that this study will help to use rivers in a sustainable way.

Keywords


Damodar river, sand quarrying, river morphology, sensitivity, sustainable sand mining

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi6%2F810-822