Open Access
Subscription Access
An empirical method for estimation of groundwater unit draft of energized agricultural tube wells
Field methods for the estimation of groundwater unit draft are not fully reliable due to non-uniformity of draft in the time domain. In India, use of norm values recommended by the Groundwater Estimation Committee is in common practice. However, large-scale electrification in agricultural sector has drastically changed the agricultural pumping scenario. Conversion of diesel-powered pump sets to unmetered electrified pump sets and then to metered electrical pump sets has possibly invalidated the unit draft norms in many parts of the country. In this study, a computational method for groundwater unit draft estimation for energized agricultural tube wells is proposed. Availability of detailed minor irrigation census data is the key towards implementation of the method. The method involves utilization of several well-known empirical formulae for arriving at the desired numerical solution.
Keywords
Agricultural tube wells, groundwater draft, norm values, numerical computational method, unit draft estimation.
User
Font Size
Information
- Jain, S. K., Agarwal, P. K. and Singh, V. P., Hydrology and Water Resources of India, Springer, The Netherlands, 2007, p. 349.
- Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Detailed guidelines for implementing the ground water estimation methodology (GEC1997). Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), Government of India (GoI), 2009, p. 223.
- CGWB, Report of the Ground Water Resource Estimation Committee (GEC-2015). Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, GoI, 2017, p. 142.
- CGWB, Ground water resource estimation methodology. Report of the Ground Water Resource Estimation Committee, MoWR, GoI, 2009, p. 113.
- Balec, J., Groundwater resources assessment. Dev. Water Sci., 1989, 38, 249.
- Jamil, R. and Abdul Mujeebu, M., Empirical relation between Hazen–Williams and Darcy–Weisbach equations for cold and hot water flow in plastic pipes. Water, 2019, 10, 104–114.
- Spellman, F. R., Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008, 2nd edn, p. 826.
- Payne, F. C., Quinnan, J. A. and Potter, S. T., Remediation Hydraulics, CRC Press, New York, USA, 2008, p. 405.
- Liou, C. P., Limitations and proper use of the Hazen–Williams equation. J. Hydraul. Eng., 1998, 124(9); doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:9(951).
- Allen, R. G., Relating the Hazen–Williams and Darcy–Weisbach friction loss equations for pressurized irrigation. Appl. Eng. Agric, 1996, 12(6), 685–690.
- Travis, Q. B. and Mays, L. W., Relationship between Hazen– William and Colebrook–White roughness values. J. Hydraul. Eng., 2007, 133(11); doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133: 11(1270).
- Wei, Q. and Sun, X., Performance influence in submersible pump with different diffuser inlet widths. Adv. Mech. Eng., 2017, 9(1), 1–8; doi:10.1177/1687814016683354.
- Haque, M. E., Islam, M. S., Islam, M. R., Haniu, H. and Akhter, M. S., Energy efficiency improvement of submersible pumps using in Barind area of Bangladesh. Energy Procedia, 2019, 160, 123–130; ICEP2018.10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.127
- MoWR, Report on Third Census of Minor Irrigation Schemes. Minor Irrigation Division, Ministry of Water Resources, GoI, 2005, p. 345.
- CGWB Eastern Region, Report on the dynamic ground water resources of West Bengal as on 31 March 2011, MoWR, GoI, 2014, p. 242.
Abstract Views: 396
PDF Views: 143