Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Variability of Ionospheric Total Electron Content at Low-latitude Station During Twin Solar Maxima and Solar Minima of The 24th Solar Cycle and its Comparison With Different Versions of IRI Models


Affiliations
1 Department of Physics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462 026, India, India
2 Department of Physics, Govt. P.G. College, Tikagarh 472 001, India, India
3 Barkatullah University Institute of Technology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462 026, India, India
4 National Institute of Technical Teachers’ Training and Research, Shamla Hills, Bhopal 462 002, India, India
 

latest International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) versions (viz. IRI-2007, IRI-2012 and IRI-2016) with TEC deri­ved by the International GNSS Service (IGS) receivers at a low-latitude station, namely Pathum Wan, Thailand (code-CUSV; lat. 13.74°N, long. 100.54°E) during the twin solar maxima 2012 and 2014, and the solar minima 2017 of the 24th solar cycle. We observed that the modelled TEC results were slightly underestimated than those derived by global positioning system (GPS), during the maxima and minima periods. It was also observed that the modelled TEC and GPS TEC follo­wed a similar sinusoidal pattern with crests in the equinox months and troughs in the solstice months. We calculated standard deviation of the modelled TEC from the corresponding GPS TEC during the period. The study shows that the IRI model is more suitable when applied during solar minima period. We also carried out correlation study between modelled TEC and GPS TEC, and obtained a moderate degree of positive correlation. Thus we can conclude that IRI-2007 is the most suitable version for the twin solar maxima and the minima periods. Also IRI-2016 is the most suitable model for TEC estimation during geomagnetic storms.

Keywords

Geomagnetic Storms, Ionosphere, Low-Latitude Station, Solar Cycle, Total Electron Content.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bilitza, D., Hernandez-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M. and Sanz, J., Comparison between IRI and GPS–IGS derived electron content during 1991–97. Phys. Chem. Earth, 1999, 24(4), 311–319.

  • Bilitza, D. and Rawer, K., International reference ionosphere – past, present and future: electron density. Adv. Space Res., 2013, 13(3), 3–13.

  • Bilitza, D., Lee-Anne, M., Bodo, R. and Tim, F. R., The international reference ionosphere today and in the future. Geod. J., 2011, 85, 909–920; doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0427.

  • Wang, X., Wan, Q., Maruyama, T., Guanyi, M. A., Jinghua, L. I. and Jiangtao, F., Comparison of global TEC between IRI TEC and GPS TEC in the spring of 2006. In 32nd Union Radio Scientifique International General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, Montreal, Canada, 19–26 August 2017.

  • Kelley, M. C., The Earth’s Ionosphere: Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, Elsevier, New York, USA, 2009, 2nd edn, p. 545.

  • Hunsucker, R. D. and Hargreaves, R. D., The High-Latitude Ionosphere and its Effects on Radio Propagation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Collins, J., Global Positioning System Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, USA, 1992, pp. 289–311.

  • Misra, P. and Enge, P., Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Ganga-Jamuna Press, Lincoln, USA, 2006, pp. 200–218.

  • Hansen, A., Blanch, J. T. and Walter, T., Ionospheric correction analysis for WAAS quiet and stormy. In Proceedings of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation Global Positioning System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2000, pp. 19–22.

  • Lanyi, G. E. and Roth, T., A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and Beacon satellite observations. Radio Sci., 1988, 23(4), 483– 492.

  • Bilitza, D., International reference ionosphere 2000. Radio Sci., 2001, 36(2), 261–275.

  • Kumar, S., Tan, E. and Murti, D., Impacts of solar activity on performance of the IRI-2012 model predictions from low to mid latitudes. Earth Planets Space, 2015, 67, 42; doi:10.1186/ s40623015-0205-3.

  • Ezquer, R. G. et al., Behaviour of ionospheric magnitudes of F2 region over Tucumán during a deep solar minimum and comparison with the IRI 2012 model predictions. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2014, 107, 89–98.

  • Asmare, Y., Tsgaye, K. and Melssew, N., Validation of IRI-2012 TEC model over Ethiopia during solar minimum (2009) and solar maximum (2013) phases. Adv. Space Res., 2014, 53, 1582–1594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.02.017.

  • Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S. and Souza, J. R., An overview of IRIobservational data comparison in American (Brazilian) sector low latitude ionosphere. Adv. Space Res., 1996, 18(6), 13–22.

  • Kumar, S., Performance of IRI-2012 model during a deep solar minimum and a maximum year over global equatorial regions. J. Geophys. Res., Space Phys., 2016, 121, 394; doi:10.1002/2015JA022269.

  • Tariku, Y. A., Patterns of GPS-TEC variation over low-latitude region (African sector) during the deep solar minimum (2008 to 2009) and solar maximum (2012 to 2013) phases. Earth Planets Space, 2015, 67, 35; doi:10.1186/s40623-015-0206-2.

  • Tariku, Y. A., Variability of TEC and improvement of performance of the IRI model over Ethiopia during the high solar activity phase. Ann. Geophys. Discuss., 2018, 48; https://doi.org/10.5194/ angeo-2018-48.

  • Mahesh, P., Roshni, A., Shweta, M. and Purohit, P. K., Latitudinal variation of ionospheric TEC at northern hemispheric region. Russ. J. Earth Sci., 2019, 19, 1; doi:10.2205/2018ES000644.

  • Olawepo, A. O., Oladipo, O. A., Adeniyi, J. O. and Doherty, P. H., TEC response at two equatorial stations in the African sector to geomagnetic storms. Adv. Space Res., 2015, 56(1), 19–27.

  • Hamzah, S. Z. M. and Homam, M. J., The correlation between total electron content variations and solar activity. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2015, 10(20).

  • Bilitza, D. et al., The International Reference Ionosphere 2012 – a model of international collaboration. J. Space Weather Space Climate, 2014, 4, A07.

  • Rush, C., Fox, M. and Bilitza, D., Ionospheric mapping – an update of foF2 coefficients. Telecommunications J., 1989, 56, 179–182.

  • Aggarwal, M., TEC variability near northern EIA crest and comparison with IRI model. Adv. Space Res., 2011, 48(7), 1221–1231.

  • Roshni, A., Azad, A. M., Parvaiz, A. K. and Rafi, A., Study of ionospheric TEC variability over low, mid and high latitudes during solar maximum and its comparison with IRI-2012 and IRI-2016 model. Astronom. Astrophys. Trans., 2017, 30(2), 223–232.

  • Tariq, M. A., Shah, M., Inyurt, S., Shah, M. A. and Liu, L., Comparison of TEC from IRI-2016 and GPS during the low solar activity over Turkey. Astrophys. Space Sci., 2020, 365, 179.

  • Jumpon, U., Supnithi, P., Phakphisut, W., Hozumi, K. and Tsugawa, T., Assessment of GPS-TEC with the IRI-2016 model, the IRIPlas model and GIM-TEC during low solar activity at KMITL,

  • Thailand. In 34th International Technical Conference on Circuits/ Systems, Computers and Communications. 23–26 June 2019. Date added to IEEE Xplore, 12 August 2019; doi:10.1109/ITC-CSCC.2019.8793371.

  • Ghimire, B. D., Chapagain, N. P., Basnet, V., Bhatta, K. and Khadka, B., Variation of GPS-TEC measurements of the year 2014: a comparative study with IRI-2016 model. JNPS, 2020, 6(1), 90–96; doi:http://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v6i1.30555.


Abstract Views: 307

PDF Views: 146




  • Variability of Ionospheric Total Electron Content at Low-latitude Station During Twin Solar Maxima and Solar Minima of The 24th Solar Cycle and its Comparison With Different Versions of IRI Models

Abstract Views: 307  |  PDF Views: 146

Authors

Mahesh Parwani
Department of Physics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462 026, India, India
Azad Ahmad Mansoori
Department of Physics, Govt. P.G. College, Tikagarh 472 001, India, India
P. K. Sharma
Barkatullah University Institute of Technology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal 462 026, India, India
P. K. Purohit
National Institute of Technical Teachers’ Training and Research, Shamla Hills, Bhopal 462 002, India, India

Abstract


latest International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) versions (viz. IRI-2007, IRI-2012 and IRI-2016) with TEC deri­ved by the International GNSS Service (IGS) receivers at a low-latitude station, namely Pathum Wan, Thailand (code-CUSV; lat. 13.74°N, long. 100.54°E) during the twin solar maxima 2012 and 2014, and the solar minima 2017 of the 24th solar cycle. We observed that the modelled TEC results were slightly underestimated than those derived by global positioning system (GPS), during the maxima and minima periods. It was also observed that the modelled TEC and GPS TEC follo­wed a similar sinusoidal pattern with crests in the equinox months and troughs in the solstice months. We calculated standard deviation of the modelled TEC from the corresponding GPS TEC during the period. The study shows that the IRI model is more suitable when applied during solar minima period. We also carried out correlation study between modelled TEC and GPS TEC, and obtained a moderate degree of positive correlation. Thus we can conclude that IRI-2007 is the most suitable version for the twin solar maxima and the minima periods. Also IRI-2016 is the most suitable model for TEC estimation during geomagnetic storms.

Keywords


Geomagnetic Storms, Ionosphere, Low-Latitude Station, Solar Cycle, Total Electron Content.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi11%2F1417-1424