Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Quantification and Economic Valuation of Carbon Sequestration from Smallholder Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from The Foothills of The Nilgiris, India


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Institute, Pali Marwar 306 401, India
2 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 301, India
 

Agroforestry is widely recognized for its role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, carbon sequestration and a marketable carbon value of smallholder agroforestry systems in India are poorly documented. Therefore, the present study was carried out to quantify carbon stock in a circular-shaped multifunctional agroforestry (MFA) divided into four equal quadrats. It comprises 24 different tree species and 8 intercrops, mainly established to provide daily income to small and marginal farmers. A nondestructive method was used to assess biomass carbon stock. Soil core samples collected from 0 to 60 cm depth were analysed to quantify soil organic carbon (SOC) stock. Results revealed significantly higher biomass and carbon stock in the following order: Neolamarckia cadamba > Melia dubia > Lagerstroemia parviflora > Dalbergia latifolia > Tectona grandis. Duncan’s multiple range test revealed significant differences in the multi-utility circles (P < 0.001). The total change in SOC stock was 11.55 Mg quadrat–1, but the difference was insignificant in different soil depths. The results indicated that the total carbon sequestration and CO2e from vegetation were 2.23 and 9.23 tonnes respectively. Similarly, CO2e from the soil were 42.37 Mg quadrat–1 respectively; the highest contributions were from quadrat II and quadrat IV of MFA. By taking into account profitability and incentives to smallholder farmers, the total marketable carbon revenue of MFA was calculated as US$ 206.40

Keywords

Biomass Carbon Stock, Multifunctional Agroforestry, Soil Organic Carbon, Total Carbon Sequestration.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Watson‐Lazowski, A. et al., Plant adaptation or acclimation to rising CO2? Insight from first multigenerational RNA‐Seq transcriptome. Global Change Biol., 2016, 22(11), 3760–3773.

  • IEA, Emissions-Global Energy and CO2 Status report analysis, International Energy Agency, p. 684; https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/emissions

  • Nath, A. J., Sileshi, G. W., Laskar, S. Y., Pathak, K., Reang, D., Nath, A. and Das, A. K., Quantifying carbon stocks and sequestration potential in agroforestry systems under divergent management scenarios relevant to India’s nationally determined contribution. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 24831.

  • IPCC, Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.), IPCC Press Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019, p. 36.

  • Van Noordwijk, M. and Brussaard, L., Minimizing the ecological footprint of food: closing yield and efficiency gaps simultaneously? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain, 2014, 8, 62–70.

  • Zomer, R., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., Place, F., Van Noordwijk, M. and Xu, J., Trees on Farms: An update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio-ecological characteristics. Working Paper (ed. WACISARPD WP14064.pdf), World Agroforestry Center, Bogor, Indonesia, 2014, pp. 1–33.

  • Ahmad, F., Uddin, M. D., Goparaju, L., Rizvi, J. and Biradar, C., Quantification of the land potential for scaling agroforestry in South Asia. KN-J. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf., 2020, 70(2), 71–89.

  • Rizvi, R. H., Newaj, R., Handa, A. K., Sridhar, K. B. and Anil Kumar, Agroforestry mapping in India through geospatial technology: present status and way forward. Technical Bulletin 01/2019, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, 2019.

  • Montagnini, F. and Nair, P. K. R., Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst., 2004, 61, 281–295.

  • Holmes, I., Kirby, K. R. and Potvin, C., Agroforestry within REDD+: experiences of an indigenous Emberá community i Panama. Agrofor. Syst., 2017, 91, 1181–1197.

  • Richards, M. et al., How countries plan to address agricultural adaptation and mitigation: an analysis of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CCAFS dataset version 1.2, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016.

  • Government of India, India’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution: working towards climate justice, Government of India, New Delhi, 2015.

  • Chavan, S. B., Keerthika, A., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., Newaj, R. and Rajarajan, K., National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1826–1834.

  • Parthiban, K., Srivastava, D. and Keerthika, A., Design and development of multifunctional agroforestry for family farming. Curr. Sci., 2021, 120(1), 27–28.

  • Woomer, P. L., Karanja, N. K. and Murage, E. W., Estimating total system carbon in smallholder farming systems of the East Africa Highlands. In Assessment of Methods for Soil Carbon (eds Lal, R. et al.), Lewis, London, 2001, pp. 58–78.

  • Thangata, P. H. and Hildebrand, P. E., Carbon stock and sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in smallholder agroecosystems of sub-Saharan Africa: mechanisms for ‘reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation’ (REDD+), Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2012, 158, 172–183; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.007.

  • Albrecht, A. and Kandji, S. T., Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2003, 99, 15–27; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00138-5.

  • Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al., A handbook of protocols standardisation and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot., 2003, 51, 335–380.

  • Gupta, D. K., Bhatt, R. K., Keerthika, A., Shukla, A. K., Mohamed, M. N. and Jangid, B. L., Wood specific gravity of trees in hot semi-arid zone of India: diversity among species and relationship between stem and branches. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(8), 1597–1600.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Climate Change Synthesis Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007, pp. 1–53.

  • Wani, N. R. and Qaisar, K. N., Carbon percent in different components of tree species and soil organic carbon pool under these tree species in Kashmir valley. Curr. World Environ., 2014, 9(1), 174.

  • Walkley, A. J. and Black, C. A., Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chronic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–38.

  • Neya, T., Abunyewa, A. A., Neya, O., Zoungrana, B. J., Dimobe, K., Tiendrebeogo, H. and Magistro, J., Carbon sequestration potential and marketable carbon value of smallholder agroforestry Parklands across climatic zones of Burkina Faso: Current Status and Way Forward for REDD+ Implementation. Environ. Manage., 2020, 65(2), 203–211.

  • Ajit, et al., Estimating carbon sequestration potential of existing agroforestry systems in India. Agrofor. Syst., 2017, 91(6), 1101– 1118.

  • Singh, S., Carbon sequestration potential of red sander (Pterocarpus santalinus) plantations under different ages in Vellore and Thiruvallur districts of Tamil Nadu. Life Sci. Leaflets, 2020, 123, 1–10.

  • Tamilselvan, B., Sekar, T. and Anbarashan, M., Short-term girth increment and biomass changes in tree species of Javadhu hills, Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Trees, For. People, 2021, 4, 100081.

  • Rizvi, R. H., Handa, A. K., Dhillon, R. S. and Tewari, S., Development and validation of generalized biomass models for estimation of carbon stock in important agroforestry species. Indian J. Agrofor., 2018, 20, 68–72.

  • Kumar, P. et al., Biomass estimation and carbon sequestration in Populus deltoides plantation in India. J. Soil Salinity Water Qual., 2016, 1, 25–29.

  • Brown, S., Schroeder, P. and Birdsey, R., Above ground biomass distribution of US Eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development. For. Ecol. Manage., 1997, 94, 37–47.

  • Marak, T. and Khare, N., Carbon sequestration potential of selected tree species in the campus of SHIATS. Int. J. Sci. Res. Develop., 2017, 5(6), 63–66.

  • Nimbalkar, S. D., Patil, D. S., Sharma, J. P. and Daniel, J. N., Quantitative estimation of carbon stock and carbon sequestration in smallholder agroforestry farms of mango and Indian gooseberry in Rajasthan, India. Environ. Conserv. J., 2017, 18(1&2), 103– 107.

  • Chandana, P., Lata, A. M., Khan, M. A. and Krishna, A., Climate change smart option and doubling farmer’s income through Melia dubia-based agri-silviculture system. Curr. Sci., 2020, 118(3), 444.

  • Roshetko, J. M., Lasco, R. D. and Angeles, M. S. D., Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 2007, 12(2), 219–242.

  • Takimoto, A., Nair, P. K. R. and Nair, V. D., Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2008, 125, 159–166.


Abstract Views: 173

PDF Views: 81




  • Quantification and Economic Valuation of Carbon Sequestration from Smallholder Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from The Foothills of The Nilgiris, India

Abstract Views: 173  |  PDF Views: 81

Authors

A. Keerthika
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Institute, Pali Marwar 306 401, India
K. T. Parthiban
Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 301, India

Abstract


Agroforestry is widely recognized for its role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, carbon sequestration and a marketable carbon value of smallholder agroforestry systems in India are poorly documented. Therefore, the present study was carried out to quantify carbon stock in a circular-shaped multifunctional agroforestry (MFA) divided into four equal quadrats. It comprises 24 different tree species and 8 intercrops, mainly established to provide daily income to small and marginal farmers. A nondestructive method was used to assess biomass carbon stock. Soil core samples collected from 0 to 60 cm depth were analysed to quantify soil organic carbon (SOC) stock. Results revealed significantly higher biomass and carbon stock in the following order: Neolamarckia cadamba > Melia dubia > Lagerstroemia parviflora > Dalbergia latifolia > Tectona grandis. Duncan’s multiple range test revealed significant differences in the multi-utility circles (P < 0.001). The total change in SOC stock was 11.55 Mg quadrat–1, but the difference was insignificant in different soil depths. The results indicated that the total carbon sequestration and CO2e from vegetation were 2.23 and 9.23 tonnes respectively. Similarly, CO2e from the soil were 42.37 Mg quadrat–1 respectively; the highest contributions were from quadrat II and quadrat IV of MFA. By taking into account profitability and incentives to smallholder farmers, the total marketable carbon revenue of MFA was calculated as US$ 206.40

Keywords


Biomass Carbon Stock, Multifunctional Agroforestry, Soil Organic Carbon, Total Carbon Sequestration.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi1%2F61-69