Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

How Capuchin Monkeys Use Their Semi-Prehensile Tails


Affiliations
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States
2 Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
3 Department of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-020, Brazil
4 Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 44-00185 Rome, Italy
5 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States
 

Among primates, prehensile/semi-prehensile tails have evolved independently in the families Atelidae and Cebidae of the infraorder Platyrrhini (Neotropical monkeys). They facilitate maintaining stability during locomotion on thin, flexible branches and while reaching for food on challenging substrates. How a prehensile/semi-prehensile tail is coordinated with the hind limbs to facilitate controlled, flexible adoption of postures remains unknown. In an experimental set-up in the wild, we induced capuchin monkeys to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down tripodal posture to reach for food, documenting from slow-motion video recordings (120 fps) both qualitative changes in the monkeys’ positional behaviour – the relative orientation of their limbs and semi-prehensile tail – and quantitative changes in the left knee angle. The monkeys coordinated their tail and hind limbs in an online manner by preparing to anchor the tail over a substrate when beginning to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down, tripodal posture, but anchoring it only at the moment when they extended their hand to grasp the food. Coordination of their semi-prehensile tail with their limbs enables these capuchin monkeys to adjust their posture more flexibly compared to anchoring their tail over a substrate in anticipation and subsequently changing posture.

Keywords

Left Knee Angle, Locomotion, Prehensility, Sapajus libidinosus, Tail Cantilever Length, Tropodal Posture.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Rosenberger, A. L., Tale of tails: parallelism and prehensility. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1983, 60, 103–107.

  • Emmons, L. H. and Gentry, A. H., Tropical forest structure and the distribution of gliding and prehensile-tailed vertebrates. Am. Nat., 1983, 121, 513–524.

  • Nowak, R. M. and Walker, E. P., Walker’s Mammals of the World, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1999.

  • Larson, S. G. and Stern Jr, J. T., Maintenance of above-branch balance during primate arboreal quadrupedalism: coordinated use of forearm rotators and tail motion. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2006, 129, 71–81.

  • Meldrum, D. J., Tail-assisted hind limb suspension as a transitional behaviour in the evolution of the platyrrhine prehensile tail. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances (eds Strasser, E. et al.), Springer US, Boston, MA, USA, 1998, pp. 145–156.

  • Youlatos, D. and Meldrum, J., Locomotor diversification in New World monkeys: running, climbing, or clawing along evolutionary branches. Anat. Rec., 2011, 294, 1991–2012.

  • Lemelin, P., Comparative and functional myology of the prehensile tail in New World monkeys. J. Morphol., 1995, 224, 351–368.

  • German, R. Z., The functional morphology of caudal vertebrae in New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1982, 58, 453–459.

  • Organ, J. M., Structure and function of platyrrhine caudal vertebrae. Anat. Rec., 2010, 293, 730–745.

  • Organ, J. M., Teaford, M. F. and Taylor, A. B., Functional correlates of fiber architecture of the lateral caudal musculature in prehensile and nonprehensile tails of the Platyrrhini (primates) and Procyonidae (carnivora). Anat. Rec., 2009, 292, 827–841.

  • Grand, T. I., Body weight: its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution, and motor function. I. Interspecific comparisons. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1977, 47, 211–239.

  • Organ, J. M., Muchlinski, M. N. and Deane, A. S., Mechanoreceptivity of prehensile tail skin varies between ateline and cebine primates. Anat. Rec., 2011, 294, 2064–2072.

  • Bergeson, D. J., Patterns of suspensory feeding in Alouatta palliata, Ateles geoffroyi, and Cebus capucinus. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances (eds Strasser, E. et al.), Springer US, Boston, MA, 1998, pp. 45–60.

  • Lawler, R. R. and Stamps, C., The relationship between tail use and positional behaviour in Alouatta palliata. Primates, 2002, 43, 147–152.

  • Schmitt, D., Rose, M. D., Turnquist, J. E. and Lemelin, P., Role of the prehensile tail during ateline locomotion: experimental and osteological evidence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2005, 126, 435–446.

  • Turnquist, J. E., Schmitt, D., Rose, M. D. and Cant, J. G. H., Pendular motion in the brachiation of captive Lagothrix and Ateles. Am. J. Primatol., 1999, 48, 263–281.

  • Youlatos, D., Positional behavior of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus) in French Guiana. Int. J. Primatol., 2002, 23, 1071– 1093.

  • Bezanson, M., The ontogeny of prehensile-tail use in Cebus capucinus and Alouatta palliata. Am. J. Primatol., 2012, 74, 770–782.

  • Garber, P. A., Primate locomotor positional behaviour and ecology.

  • In Primates in Perspective (eds Campbell, C. J. et al.), Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2011, pp. 548–563.

  • Garber, P. A. and Rehg, J. A., The ecological role of the prehensile tail in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1999, 110, 325–339.

  • Russo, G. A. and Young, J. W., Tail growth tracks the ontogeny of prehensile tail use in capuchin monkeys (Cebus albifrons and C. apella). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2011, 146, 465–473.

  • Youlatos, D., Tail use in capuchin monkeys. Neotrop. Primates, 1999, 7, 16–20.

  • Mangalam, M. and Fragaszy, D. M., Wild bearded capuchin monkeys crack nuts dexterously. Curr. Biol., 2015, 25, 1334–1339.

  • Mangalam, M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E. and Fragaszy, D. M., Taskspecific temporal organization of percussive movements in wild bearded capuchin monkeys. Anim. Behav., 2016, 114, 129–137.

  • Mangalam, M., Pacheco, M. M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E. and Fragaszy, D. M., Unique perceptuomotor control of stone hammers in wild monkeys. Biol. Lett., 2018, 14, 20170587.

  • Mangalam, M., Rein, R. and Fragaszy, D. M., Bearded capuchin monkeys use joint synergies to stabilize the hammer trajectory while cracking nuts in bipedal stance. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2018, 285, 20181797.

  • Johnson, K. O., The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2001, 11, 455–461.


Abstract Views: 378

PDF Views: 163




  • How Capuchin Monkeys Use Their Semi-Prehensile Tails

Abstract Views: 378  |  PDF Views: 163

Authors

Madhur Mangalam
Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States
Callum F. Ross
Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
Patrícia Izar
Department of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-020, Brazil
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 44-00185 Rome, Italy
Dorothy M. Fragaszy
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States

Abstract


Among primates, prehensile/semi-prehensile tails have evolved independently in the families Atelidae and Cebidae of the infraorder Platyrrhini (Neotropical monkeys). They facilitate maintaining stability during locomotion on thin, flexible branches and while reaching for food on challenging substrates. How a prehensile/semi-prehensile tail is coordinated with the hind limbs to facilitate controlled, flexible adoption of postures remains unknown. In an experimental set-up in the wild, we induced capuchin monkeys to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down tripodal posture to reach for food, documenting from slow-motion video recordings (120 fps) both qualitative changes in the monkeys’ positional behaviour – the relative orientation of their limbs and semi-prehensile tail – and quantitative changes in the left knee angle. The monkeys coordinated their tail and hind limbs in an online manner by preparing to anchor the tail over a substrate when beginning to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down, tripodal posture, but anchoring it only at the moment when they extended their hand to grasp the food. Coordination of their semi-prehensile tail with their limbs enables these capuchin monkeys to adjust their posture more flexibly compared to anchoring their tail over a substrate in anticipation and subsequently changing posture.

Keywords


Left Knee Angle, Locomotion, Prehensility, Sapajus libidinosus, Tail Cantilever Length, Tropodal Posture.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi2%2F195-200