Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Habitat suitability analysis for blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) in Nahar Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India


Affiliations
1 Haryana Space Applications Centre, Citizen Resources Information Department, Haryana, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar 125 004, India
2 Haryana Forest Department, Panchkula 134 116, India
 

Remote sensing and GIS play an important role in wildlife species conservation through their applicability to study spatial distribution, landscape pattern and also factors that affect the distribution, density and movement of wild fauna. The present study deals with the distribution of blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) in Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India, and to determine their habitat suitability which is shrinking due to the spread of settlements (urban and rural). For habitat suitability analysis of blackbuck, data from WorldClim, 19 bioclimatic variable layers such as temperature, humidity, precipitation, etc. were utilized to calculate the maximum entropy using MaxEnt version 3.2. Satellite data from Landsat 8 were used to generate land use and land cover for analysing habitat suitability. An area of 330.71 ha was found to be suitable for blackbuck habitat within the 10 km buffer area, against the present area of 28.32 ha. The growth of Prosopis juliflora which causes damage to the skin of blackbuck during movement was found to be another factor responsible for confining its niche within the Sanctuary. The present study will help in the effective safeguarding of blackbuck species by the Wildlife Wing of the Haryana Forest Department.

Keywords

Bioclimatic variables, blackbuck, habitat suitability, remote sensing, spatial distribution.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Feoli, E., Vuerich, L. G. and Zerihun, W., Evaluation of environmental degradation in northern Ethiopia using GIS to integrate vegetation, geomorphological, erosion and socioeconomic factors. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2002, 91, 313–325; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00236-5.

  • Araujo, M. B., Thuiller, W. and Pearson, R. G., Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J. Biogeogr., 2006, 33(10), 1712–1728; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x.

  • Boucher, L. V., Kerr, J. T. and Currie, D. J., Does climate limit species richness by limiting individual species’ ranges? Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2014, 281(1776), 2013–2695; https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2695.

  • Hargreaves, A., Samis, K. and Eckert, C., Are species’ range limits simply niche limits writ large? A review of transplant experiments beyond the range. Am. Nat., 2014, 183(2), 157–173; https://doi.org/10.1086/674525.

  • Lee, Y. J. A. et al., A synthesis of transplant experiments and ecological niche models suggests that range limits are often niche limits. Ecol. Lett., 2016, 19(6), 710–722; https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12604.

  • Marsico, T. D. and Hellmann, J. J., Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges. Oikos, 2009, 118(12), 1783–1792; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17698.x.

  • Davis, A. J., Jenkinson, L. S., Lawton, J. H., Shorrocks, B. and Wood, S., Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature, 1998, 391(6669), 783–786; https://doi.org/10.1038/35842.

  • Svenning, J. C. et al., The influence of inter-specific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography, 2014, 37(12), 1198– 1209; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00574.x.

  • Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P. and Etienne, R. S., The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2011, 26(7), 340–348; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.024.

  • Roy, K., Hunt, G., Jablonski, D., Krug, A. Z. and Valentine, J. W., A macro-evolutionary perspective on species range limits. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2009, 276(1661), 1485–1493; https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1232.

  • Ritchie, J. C. and Rango, A., Remote sensing applications to hydrology: introduction. Hydrol. Sci. J., 1996, 41(4), 429–431; https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669609491518.

  • Schultz, G. A. and Engman, E. T., Present Use and Future Perspectives of Remote Sensing in Hydrology and Water Management, IAHS-AISH Publishers, Wallingford, UK, 2000, vol. 267, pp. 545–551.

  • Clark, R. D., Mathieu, R. and Seddon, P. J., Geographic Information Systems in Wildlife Management, Department of Conservation, New Zealand, 2008.

  • Singh, P. B. et al., Projected distribution and climate refugia of endangered Kashmir musk deer Moschus cupreus in Greater Himalaya, South Asia. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10, 7909; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-020-63413-w.

  • Koparde, P., Mhaskar, M., Mhaske, P. and Patwardhan, A., Spatial distribution and habitat correlates of Nilgiri wood-pigeon (Columba elphinstonii) in north Western Ghats, India. TAPROBANICA: J. Asian Biodivers., 2015, 7(1), 20–28; http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tapro.v7i1.7497.

  • Lamsal, P., Kumar, L. Aryal, A. and Atreya, K., Future climate and habitat distribution of Himalayan musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster). Ecol. Inform., 2018, 44, 101–108; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.02.004.

  • Schaller, G. B., The Deer and the Tiger: Study of Wild Life in India, University of Chicago Press, 2009.

  • Lydekker, R. and Dollman, J. G., The Game Animals of Indian Sub-continents. International Books & Periodicals Supply Service, 1985.

  • Gaekwad, F. P. and Oza, G. M., An Indian conservational success: saving habitat for the endangered blackbuck. Environ. Conserv., 1988, 15(2), 167–169; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900028988.

  • Rathore, D., Blackbuck occupancy in Moyar valley, Tamil Nadu. M Sc thesis, Department of Natural Resource, TERI University, Delhi, 2017.

  • Gogol, P. M., Predicting habitat suitability for rare plants at local spatial scales using a species distribution model. Ecol. Appl., 2011, 21(1), 33–47; https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1190.1.

  • Kunwar, A., Suraj, B. and Maniram, B., Habitat assessment, conflict evaluation and conservation awareness of blackbuck Antelope cervicapra in blackbuck conservation area, Bardia, Nepal. The Ruffor Foundation, United Kingdom, 2015.

  • Prakash, V., Saran, S. and Talukdar, G., Delineating eco-sensitive zones using geospatial methods – a case of Jhilmil Jheel conservation reserve. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm., Remote Sensing Spat. Infor. Sci., 2018, 4, 459–466; https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annalsIV-5-459-2018.

  • Rew, J., Cho, Y., Moon, J. and Hwang, E., Habitat suitability estimation using a two-stage ensemble approach. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(9), 14–75; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091475.

  • Fakharzadeh, F. and Hosseinzadeh, M., Overview of taxonomy and prediction potential distribution of Bufotes sitibundus (Anura: Bufonidae) using environmental factors. J. Wildl. Biodivers., 2021, 5(1), 21–34; https://doi.org/10.22120/jwb.2021.138255.1191.


Abstract Views: 209

PDF Views: 85




  • Habitat suitability analysis for blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) in Nahar Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India

Abstract Views: 209  |  PDF Views: 85

Authors

Poonam Chandel
Haryana Space Applications Centre, Citizen Resources Information Department, Haryana, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar 125 004, India
Ritesh Kumar
Haryana Space Applications Centre, Citizen Resources Information Department, Haryana, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar 125 004, India
Promila Bishnoi
Haryana Space Applications Centre, Citizen Resources Information Department, Haryana, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar 125 004, India
Vinod Kumar
Haryana Forest Department, Panchkula 134 116, India
K. E. Mothi Kumar
Haryana Space Applications Centre, Citizen Resources Information Department, Haryana, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Campus, Hisar 125 004, India

Abstract


Remote sensing and GIS play an important role in wildlife species conservation through their applicability to study spatial distribution, landscape pattern and also factors that affect the distribution, density and movement of wild fauna. The present study deals with the distribution of blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) in Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India, and to determine their habitat suitability which is shrinking due to the spread of settlements (urban and rural). For habitat suitability analysis of blackbuck, data from WorldClim, 19 bioclimatic variable layers such as temperature, humidity, precipitation, etc. were utilized to calculate the maximum entropy using MaxEnt version 3.2. Satellite data from Landsat 8 were used to generate land use and land cover for analysing habitat suitability. An area of 330.71 ha was found to be suitable for blackbuck habitat within the 10 km buffer area, against the present area of 28.32 ha. The growth of Prosopis juliflora which causes damage to the skin of blackbuck during movement was found to be another factor responsible for confining its niche within the Sanctuary. The present study will help in the effective safeguarding of blackbuck species by the Wildlife Wing of the Haryana Forest Department.

Keywords


Bioclimatic variables, blackbuck, habitat suitability, remote sensing, spatial distribution.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi5%2F609-617