Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Snow avalanche risk management in Shemshak region: a modelling, mapping and evaluation of factors affecting the occurrence of snow avalanches


Affiliations
1 Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
3 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of
 

In the last two decades, 40 persons have been killed by avalanches in the Shemshak region, Tehran, Iran. The area has also suffered a lot of damage. Here, we have studied 18 variables affecting the occurrence of avalanches in Shemshak region. They are related to the geomorphological, topographic, climatic and snow conditions as well as human activities. The modelling and mapping were performed using various environmental factors and statistics as well as data-driven methods (e.g. hierarchical analysis method, maximum entropy) followed by field visits. Finally the conceptual model of avalanche risk assessment was prepared using spatial mapping and HEV approaches. The results showed that avalanche hazard maps differ from the risk maps. Many areas that were considered as low- or medium-hazard areas in avalanche hazard maps are considered as the high-risk and most important areas in the avalanche risk map. Also, some high-risk areas in the avalanche hazard maps are considered as low-risk areas in the avalanche risk map. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that due to the complexity of the risk mapping process, it is difficult to use a worldwide benchmark and indicators system to assess hazards and prepare risk maps. Therefore, more research is needed to elucidate the applied risk maps for avalanche hazard management.

Keywords

Hazard and risk maps, mapping and modelling, risk management, snow avalanche.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Keylock, C., Snow avalanches. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ., 1997, 21(4), 481–500.

  • Baggi, S. and Schweizer, J., Characteristics of wet-snow avalanche activity: 20 years of observations from a high alpine valley (Dischma, Switzerland). Nat. Hazard., 2009, 50, 97–108.

  • Gusain. H. S., Mishra, V. and Singh, D. K., Study of a snow avalanche accident along Chowkibal–Tangdhar road, Kupware district, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115, 969–972.

  • Ganju, A., Thakur, N. K. and Rana, V., Characteristics of avalanche accidents in western Himalayan region, India. In Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Penticton, B.C., Canada, 29 September–4 October 2002, pp. 200–207.

  • Gusain, H. S., Negi, H. S. and Mishra, V. D., Development of avalche information system using remote sensing and GIS technology in the Indian Karakoram Himalaya. Curr. Sci., 2019, 117, 104–109.

  • Eckerstorfer, M., Bühler, Y., Frauenfelder, R. and Malnes, E., Remote sensing of snow avalanches: recent advances, potential and limitations. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2016, 121, 126–140.

  • Delparte, D., Jamieson, B. and Waters, N., Statistical runout modeling of snow avalanches using GIS in Glacier National Park, Canada. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2008, 54, 183–192.

  • Kumar, S., Srivastava, P. K. and Snehmani, GIS-based MCDAAHP modelling for avalanche susceptibility mapping of Nubra Valley region, Indian Himalaya. Geocarto Int., 2017, 32(11), 1254–1267.

  • Singh, D. K., Mishra, D. V., Gusain, S. H., Gupta, N. and Singh, K. A., Geo-spatial modeling for automated demarcation of snow avalanche hazard areas using Landsat-8 satellite images and in situ data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2019, 47, 513–526.

  • Singh, A. et al., Avalanche hazard mitigation in east Karakoram mountains. Nat. Hazards, 2020, 105, 643–665.

  • Negi, H. S., Jassar, H. S., Saravana, G., Thakur, N. K., Snehmani and Ganju, A., Snow-cover characteristics using Hyperion data for the Himalayan region. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2012, 34, 2140– 2160.

  • Hawker, L., Bates, P., Neal, J. and Rougier, J., Perspectives on digital elevation model (DEM) simulation for flood modeling in the absence of a high-accuracy open access global DEM. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 6, 233.

  • Maleki, A., Marabi, H. and Rahimi, H., An analysis of topographic position index (TPI) in Sanandaj–Sirjan, zone and Broken Zagros Zone. Quant. Geomorphol. Res., 2016, 5(1), 129–141.

  • Sahrai, A. and Ebrahimzadeh, I., Land use planning and optimal location in urban areas using geographic information system (GIS) (case study: 47 neighborhood of Zahedan). Sci. Res. Quart. Geogr. Data, 2015, 29(94), 77–93.

  • Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J. M., Tucker, C. J. and Stenseth, N. C., Using the satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to assess ecological effects of environmental change. Trends Ecol., 2005, 20, 503–510.

  • Jackson, R. D. and Huete, A. R., Interpreting vegetation indexes. Prev. Vet. Med., 1991, 11, 185–200.

  • Myneni, R. B., Hall, F. G., Sellers, P. J. and Marshak, A. L., The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 1995, 33, 481–486.

  • Borowik, T., Pettorelli, N., Sönnichsen, L. and Jędrzejewska, B., Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2013, 59, 675–682.

  • Ahmadi, H. and Taheri, S., Strategic power for preparing role of high-risk avalanche actors in watershed package (definable Chalus Road), Compact of the 5th National Conference on Watershed, Iran, 2009.

  • bfu–Swiss Council for Accident Prevention, Avalanche danger: how to better assess the risks, 2010.

  • Schweizer, J., Jamieson, B. J. and Schneebeli, M., Snow avalanche formation. Rev. Geophys., 2003, 41(4).

  • Gleason, J. A., Terrain parameters of avalanche starting zones and their effects on avalanche frequency. International Snow Science Workshop, Snowbird, Utah, USA, 1994, pp. 393–404.

  • Jamieson, B. and Geldsetzer, T., Avalanche accidents in Canada 1984–96, Canadian Avalanche Association, Revelstoke, BC, Canada, 1996, p. 203.

  • Jenness, J., Manual: DEM surface tools for ArcGIS (last modified 13 May 2013).

  • Mokarram, M., Dervish, A. and Negahban, S., Correlation of morphometric characteristics of watersheds and erodibility at different elevation levels using topographic position index (TPI). Sepehr Geogr. Infor. J., 2017, 26(101), 131–142.

  • Weiss, A., Topographic Position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation at ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 2006.

  • Weiss, A., Topographic position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation at ESRI user Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 2001.

  • Ganju, A., Thakur, N. K. and Rana, V., Characteristics of avalanche accidents in western Himalayan region. In Proceedings of International Snow Science Workshop, Penticton, BC, 2002.

  • Ciolli, M., Tabarelli, S. and Zatelli, P., 3D spatial data integration for avalanche risk management. In ISPRS Commission IV Symposium on GIS – between Visions and Applications (eds Fritsch, D., Englich, M. and Sester, M.), 2002, pp. 121–127.

  • Nosrati, K., Kiashemshaki, S. and Hosienzade, M. M., Predictability of avalanche occurrence on the Maigon–Shemshak axis using logistic regression of rare events. Geogr. Environ. Hazards, 2016, 5(1), 55–68.

  • Zare Bidaki, R. and Fathzadeh, A., Estimating the distribution of snow melt equivalent at the peak of snow accumulation, through degree–day model. Iran. J. Soil Water Res., 2012, 43, 171–177.

  • Saldivar-Sali, A. and Einstein, H., A landslide risk rating system for Baguio, Philippines. Eng. Geol., 2007, 91, 85–99.

  • Rudolf-Miklau, F., Sauermoser, S. and Mears, A. L., The Technical Avalanche Protection Hand Book, Willey, 2014, p. 430.

  • Lamrani Alaoui, Y., Introduction to MCDM techniques: AHP as example. Seminar at Islamic Financial Engineering Laboratory (IFELAB), Mohammadia School of Engineering, Rabat, Morocco, 2019.

  • Sinickas, A., Jamieson, B. and Maes, M. A., Snow avalanches in western Canada: investigating change in occurrence rates and implications for risk assessment and mitigation. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2016, 12(4), 490–498.

  • Cappabianca, F., Barbolini, M. and Natale, L., Snow avalanche risk assessment and mapping: a new method based on a combination of statistical analysis, avalanche dynamics simulation and empiricallybased vulnerability relations integrated in a GIS platform. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2008, 54(3), 193–205.

  • Giovanelli, J. G. R., de Siqueira, M. F., Haddad, C. F. B. and Alexandrino, J., Modeling a spatially restricted distribution in the Neotropics: how the size of calibration area affects the performance of five presence-only methods. Ecol. Model., 2010, 221(2), 215–224.

  • Larsen, H. T. et al., Developing nationwide avalanche terrain maps for Norway. Nat. Hazards, 2020, 103, 2829–2847.

  • Gruber, U. and Haefner, H., Avalanche hazard mapping with satellite data and a digital elevation model. Appl. Geogr., 1995, 15(2), 99–113.

  • Barbolini, M., Pagliardi, M., Ferro, F. and Corradeghini, P., Avalanche hazard mapping over a large undocumented areas. Nat. Hazards, 2011, 56, 451–464.

  • Bühler, Y., Kumar, S., Veitinger, J., Christen, M., Stoffel, A. and Snehmani, S., Automated identification of potential snow avalanche release areas based on digital elevation models. Natural Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2013, 13(5), 1321–1335.

  • Bühler, Y., Rickenbach, D. V., Stoffel, A., Margreth, S., Stoffel, L. and Christen, M., Automated snow avalanche release area delineation–validation of existing algorithms and proposition of a new object-based approach for large-scale hazard indication mapping. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2018, 18(12), 3235–3325.

  • Statham, G. et al., A conceptual model of avalanche hazard. Nat. Hazards, 2018, 90, 663–691.

  • Favier, P., Eckert, N., Bertrand, D. and Naaim, M., Sensitivity of avalanche risk to vulnerability relations. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2014, 108, 163–177.

  • Stethem, C., Jamieson, B., Schaerer, P., Liverman, D., Germain, D. and Walker, S., Snow avalanche hazard in Canada – a review. Nat. Hazards, 2003, 28, 487–515.


Abstract Views: 189

PDF Views: 99




  • Snow avalanche risk management in Shemshak region: a modelling, mapping and evaluation of factors affecting the occurrence of snow avalanches

Abstract Views: 189  |  PDF Views: 99

Authors

Ali Rajaee Baghsorkhi
Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Baharak Motamedvaziri
Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Aliakbar Nazari Samani
Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Hasan Ahmadi
Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Abolfazl Moeini
Department of Forest, Range and Watershed Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


In the last two decades, 40 persons have been killed by avalanches in the Shemshak region, Tehran, Iran. The area has also suffered a lot of damage. Here, we have studied 18 variables affecting the occurrence of avalanches in Shemshak region. They are related to the geomorphological, topographic, climatic and snow conditions as well as human activities. The modelling and mapping were performed using various environmental factors and statistics as well as data-driven methods (e.g. hierarchical analysis method, maximum entropy) followed by field visits. Finally the conceptual model of avalanche risk assessment was prepared using spatial mapping and HEV approaches. The results showed that avalanche hazard maps differ from the risk maps. Many areas that were considered as low- or medium-hazard areas in avalanche hazard maps are considered as the high-risk and most important areas in the avalanche risk map. Also, some high-risk areas in the avalanche hazard maps are considered as low-risk areas in the avalanche risk map. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that due to the complexity of the risk mapping process, it is difficult to use a worldwide benchmark and indicators system to assess hazards and prepare risk maps. Therefore, more research is needed to elucidate the applied risk maps for avalanche hazard management.

Keywords


Hazard and risk maps, mapping and modelling, risk management, snow avalanche.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi6%2F717-734