Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative foraging behaviour and pollination efficiency of Apis laboriosa S. and Apis cerana F. on black mustard (Brassica nigra L.) in Western Himalaya, India


Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
2 College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yunnan Agricultural University, 650201, China
 

Crop productivity profoundly depends upon efficient pollination. Pollinator diversity and foraging behaviour patterns of pollinators ensure efficient pollination. Therefore, we conducted an observational study on the diversity of insect pollinators of black mustard (Brassica nigra). We also compared the pollination efficiency of its two primary pollinators, i.e. Apis dorsata laboriosa and Apis cerana indica. The study was conducted in Uttarakhand, India, during the peak flowering season (February and March). The flower visitation rate of A. cerana (9.87 ± 2.45 flowers/min) was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than that of A. laboriosa (7.52 ± 2.08 flowers/min). Time spent per flower and time spent per flight were higher for A. laboriosa than A. cerana. Also, A. cerana started its diurnal activity earlier (08:00 h) and ceased later (17:30 h) compared to A. laboriosa (09:00 h and 17:00 h respectively). A brief decline was observed in the activity of A. cerana during the peak activity of A. laboriosa. This is possibly due to asymmetric interspecific competition, which might lead A. cerana to shift its peak activity earlier (11:30 to 12:00 h) than A. laboriosa (13:00–13:30 h). The pollen load and area of corbiculae of A. laboriosa were more than that of A. cerana. Our results suggest that A. cerana is a more efficient pollinator of black mustard than A. laboriosa.

Keywords

Black mustard, foraging behaviour, honey bee, pollination efficiency, sympatric species.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O., The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies WW, Norton and Company, 2009.

  • Abrol, D. P., The role of pollination in improving food security and livelihoods. In Pollination Biology, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, pp. 737–770.

  • Partap, U. and Partap, T., Managed crop pollination: the missing dimension of mountain productivity, Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1997.

  • Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. and Olesen, J. M., Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science, 80, 2006.

  • Kluser, S., Peduzzi, P. and Programme, U. N. E., Global pollinator decline: a literature review. UNEP/GRID Europe, 2007, 4.

  • Free, J. B., Insect Pollination of Crops, Academic Press, London, UK, 1993, para 1, p. 480.

  • Basu, P., Bhattacharya, R. and Iannetta, P. P. M., A decline in pollinator dependent vegetable crop productivity in India indicates pollination limitation and consequent agro-economic crises. Nature Preced., 2011, 1–9.

  • Ahmad, F., Joshi, S. R. and Gurung, M. B., The Himalayan cliff bee Apis laboriosa and the honey hunters of the Himalayas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2003, para 1, p. 22.

  • Kitnya, N. et al., Geographical distribution of the giant honey bee Apis laboriosa Smith, 1871 (Hymenoptera, apidae). Zookeys, 2020, 2020, 67–81.

  • Batra, S. W. T., Biology of Apis laboriosa Smith, a pollinator of apples at high altitude in the great Himalaya range of Garhwal, India, (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 1996, 2, 177–181.

  • Tiwari, P., Tiwari, J. K., Singh, D. and Singh, D., Traditional beekeeping with the Indian honey bee (Apis cerana F.) in District Chamoli, Uttarakhand, India. IJRS, 2013, 20, 1–7.

  • Sharma, S., Energy budget studies of some multiple cropping patterns of the central himalaya. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 1991, 36, 199–206.

  • Stewart, A., A review of Brassica species, cross-pollination and implications for pure seed production in New Zealand. Agron. NZ, 2002, 32, 63–82.

  • Abrol, D. P., Honeybees and rapeseed: a pollinator–plant interaction. Adv. Bot. Res., 2007, 45, 337–367.

  • Atmowidi, T., Buchori, D., Manuwoto, S., Suryobroto, B. and Hidayat, P., Diversity of pollinator insects in relation to seed set of mustard (Brassica rapa L.: Cruciferae). Hayati J. Biosci., 2007, 14, 155–161.

  • Free, J. B. and Spencer-Booth, Y., The pollination of mustard by honeybees. J. Apic. Res., 1963, 2, 69–70.

  • Mishra, R. C., Kumar, J. and Gupta, J. K., The effect of mode of pollination on yield and oil potential of Brassica campestris L. var. sarson with observations on insect pollinators. J. Apic. Res., 1988, 27, 186–189.

  • Shakeel, M. et al., Insect pollinators diversity and abundance in Eruca sativa Mill. (Arugula) and Brassica rapa L. (Field mustard) crops. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 2019, 26, 1704–1709.

  • Joshi, N. C. and Joshi, P. C., Foraging behaviour of Apis spp. on apple flowers in a subtropical environment. NY Sci. J., 2010, 3, 71–76.

  • Verma, L. R. and Dulta, P. C., Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana indica and Apis mellifera in pollinating apple flowers. J. Apic. Res., 1986, 25, 197–201.

  • Thorp, R. W., Structural, behavioral and physiological adaptations of bees (Apoidea) for collecting pollen. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 1979, 66, 788–812.

  • Grant, V., The flower constancy of bees. Bot. Rev., 1950, 16, 379–398.

  • Abrol, D. P., Foraging behaviour of Apis florea F., an important pollinator of Allium cepa L. J. Apic. Res., 2010, 49, 318–325.

  • Verma, L. R. and Partap, U., Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana on cauliflower and cabbage and its impact on seed production. J. Apic. Res., 1994, 33, 231–236.

  • Riessberger, U. and Crailsheim, K., Short-term effect of different weather conditions upon the behaviour of forager and nurse honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann). Apidologie, 1997, 28, 411–426.

  • Magurran, A. E., Measuring Biological Diversity, John Wiley, 2013, para 6, p. 101.

  • Milne, C. P. and Pries, K. J., Honeybees with larger corbiculae carry larger pollen pellets. J. Apic. Res., 1986, 25, 53–54.

  • Feng, C. et al., Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry, 2014, 26(2), 105.

  • Joshi, P. C., Kumar, K. and Arya, M., Assessment of insect diversity along an altitudinal gradient in Pinderi forests of Western Himalaya, India. J. Asia Pac. Entomol., 2008, 11, 5–11.

  • Waddington, K. D., Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar. Oecologia, 1980, 44, 199–204.

  • Cui, Q. and Corlett, R. T., Seasonal and diurnal patterns of activity in honeybees (Apis spp.) on the northern edge of the Asian tropics; their implications for the climate-change resilience of pollination. Trop. Conserv. Sci., 2016, 9, 1940082916667142.

  • Nagamitsu, T. and Inoue, T., Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia, 1997, 110, 432–439.

  • Nagamitsu, T. and Inoue, T., Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia, 1997, 110, 432–439.

  • Young, A. M., Kohl, P. L., Rutschmann, B., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Brockmann, A. and Dyer, F. C., Temporal and spatial foraging patterns of three Asian honey bee species in Bangalore, India. Apidologie, 2021, 52, 503–523.

  • Zhang, S., Schwarz, S., Pahl, M., Zhu, H. and Taut, J., Honeybee memory: a honeybee knows what to do and when. J. Exp. Biol., 2006, 209, 4420–4428.

  • Roubik, D. W. and Roubik, D. W., Foraging behavior of competing Africanized honeybees and stingless bees. Ecology, 1980, 61, 836–845.

  • Gross, C. L., Whitehead, J. D., Mackay, E. S. G., Mackay, K. D., Andrew, N. R. and Paini, D., Interactions between two species of recently-sympatric invasive honeybees: Apis cerana induces aggression in Apis mellifera during foraging. Biol. Invasions, 2019, 21, 3697–3706.

  • Smith, A. R., Kitchen, S. M., Toney, R. M. and Ziegler, C., Is nocturnal foraging in a tropical bee an escape from interference competition? J. Insect. Sci., 2017, 17, 62.

  • Scriven, J. J., Whitehorn, P. R., Goulson, D. and Tinsley, M. C., Niche partitioning in a sympatric cryptic species complex. Ecol. Evol., 2016, 6, 1328–1339.


Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 148




  • Comparative foraging behaviour and pollination efficiency of Apis laboriosa S. and Apis cerana F. on black mustard (Brassica nigra L.) in Western Himalaya, India

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 148

Authors

Ritesh Kumar Gautam
Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
Gao Shuyi
College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yunnan Agricultural University, 650201, China
V. P. Uniyal
Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India

Abstract


Crop productivity profoundly depends upon efficient pollination. Pollinator diversity and foraging behaviour patterns of pollinators ensure efficient pollination. Therefore, we conducted an observational study on the diversity of insect pollinators of black mustard (Brassica nigra). We also compared the pollination efficiency of its two primary pollinators, i.e. Apis dorsata laboriosa and Apis cerana indica. The study was conducted in Uttarakhand, India, during the peak flowering season (February and March). The flower visitation rate of A. cerana (9.87 ± 2.45 flowers/min) was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than that of A. laboriosa (7.52 ± 2.08 flowers/min). Time spent per flower and time spent per flight were higher for A. laboriosa than A. cerana. Also, A. cerana started its diurnal activity earlier (08:00 h) and ceased later (17:30 h) compared to A. laboriosa (09:00 h and 17:00 h respectively). A brief decline was observed in the activity of A. cerana during the peak activity of A. laboriosa. This is possibly due to asymmetric interspecific competition, which might lead A. cerana to shift its peak activity earlier (11:30 to 12:00 h) than A. laboriosa (13:00–13:30 h). The pollen load and area of corbiculae of A. laboriosa were more than that of A. cerana. Our results suggest that A. cerana is a more efficient pollinator of black mustard than A. laboriosa.

Keywords


Black mustard, foraging behaviour, honey bee, pollination efficiency, sympatric species.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi7%2F840-845