Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Neotectonic evidences of some major rivers of North East India


Affiliations
1 Geoscience Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat 785 006, India
2 Department of Applied Geology, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh 786 004, India
 

The neotectonic activity of some parts of the Assam–Arakan Basin in North East India has been studied through drainage patterns, anomalies and morphotectonics to determine the recent deformation in the area that serves as the input for any seismic hazard assessment. Various drainage anomalies like annular drainage pattern, compressed meanders, paleochannels, and knick points in the river courses reveal the presence of neotectonic activity in the area, which is also confirmed by topographic profiles and seismic sections. The present study reveals that active subsurface structures like the Rudrasagar High, Geleki Low, Geleki High and Jorhat Fault have direct influence on the development and modification of the river systems courses. The morphometric and morphotectonic studies of drainage basins flowing through the Belt of Schuppen and Dauki Fault show strong influence of tectonics. The tectonic activities of the Bomdila and Kopili Faults are studied through neotectonics and seismotectonics, supplemented by gravity data. Seismicity is fairly intense in both the areas and both faults have influences in modifying the drainage alignments of the region. Occurrence of bils/swamps and develop­ment of knicks, presence of tectonic scarps, disturbed and folding in beds on the river banks and intense seismic activity in the region reveal neotectonic activity.

Keywords

Drainage anomalies, morphotectonics, neotectonic activity, seismotectonics, seismic hazard assessment.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • BIS, IS 1893–2002 (Part 1): Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002.

  • Richter, C. F., Elementary Seismology, W.H. Freeman and Company Inc, San Francisco, USA, 1958, p. 768.

  • Ouchi, S., Response of alluvial rivers to slow active tectonic movement. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1985, 96, 504–515.

  • Bull, W. B. and McFadden, L. D., Tectonic geomorphology of north and south Garlock fault, California. In Geomorphology in Arid Regions. In Proceedings of the Eight Annual Geomorphology Symposium (ed. Doehring, D. O.), State University of New York, Binghamton, USA, 1977, pp. 115–138.

  • Holbrook, J. and Schumm, S. A., Geomorphic and sedimentary response of rivers to tectonic deformation: a brief review and critique of a tool for recognizing subtle epeirogenic deformation in modern and ancient settings. Tectonophysics, 1999, 305, 287–306.

  • Roy, T. K., Drainage analysis in upper Assam valley. Indian J. Earth Sci., 1975, 2, 39–50.

  • Kunte, S. V., Geomorphic analysis of Upper Assam Plains and adjoining areas for hydrocarbon exploration. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 1988, 16(1), 15–28.

  • Sharma, S. and Sarma, J. N., Drainage analysis in a part of the Brahmaputra valley in Sivasagar district, Assam, India, to detect the role of neotectonic activity. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2013, 41(4), 895–904.

  • Das, J. D., Tectonic geomorphology of Shillong region. Indian J. Earth Sci., 1994, 21(1), 47–53.

  • Das, J. D. and Saraf, A. K., Remote sensing in the mapping of the Brahmaputra/Jamuna river channel patterns and its relation to various landforms and tectonic environment. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2007, 28(16), 3619–3631.

  • Valdiya, K. S., Why does River Brahmaputra remain untamed? Curr. Sci., 1999, 76(10), 1301–1305.

  • Valdiya, K. S., Reactivation of Himalayan frontal fault: implications. Curr. Sci., 2003, 85(7), 1031–1040.

  • Valdiya, K. S. and Narayana, A. C., River response to neotectonic activity: example from Kerala, India. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2007, 70, 427–433.

  • Mazumdar, K. and Sarma, P. K., Report on neotectonics, seismotectonics and seismic hazard studies in Kopili Valley area, Assam. (Field Season – 1995–1997). GSI Report, 2001, pp. 1–16.

  • Sarma, J. N., Acharjee, S. and Gogoi, C., Application of DEM, remote sensing and geomorphic studies in identifying a recent [or perhaps Neogene?] upwarp in the Dibru River Basin, Assam, India. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2011, 39(4), 507–517.

  • Luirei, K. and Bhakuni, S. S., Ground tilting in Likhabali area along the frontal part of Arunachal Himalaya: evidence of Neotectonics. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2008, 71, 780–786.

  • Sarma, J. N. and Acharjee, S., Bank erosion of the Brahmaputra river and neotectonic activity around Rohmoria, Assam, India. Comun. Geol., 2012, 99(1), 33–38; ISSN:0873-948X; e-ISSN: 1647-581X.

  • Sarma, J. N. and Acharjee, S., Morphotectonic study of the Disai River basin. Asian J. Spat. Sci., 2014, 1(1), 53–66.

  • Sarma, J. N. and Acharjee, S., Morphotectonic study of the Brahmaputra basin using geoinformatics. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2015, 68, 324–330.

  • Nandy, D. R., Tectonic pattern in NE India. Indian J. Earth Sci., 1980, 7, 103–107.

  • Nandy, D. R., Tectonic pattern in NE India – a discussion. Indian J. Earth Sci., 1981, 8(1), 82–86.

  • Dasgupta, S. and Nandy, D. R., In Proceedings of the VII Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee University, 1982, pp. 19–24.

  • Nandy, D. and Dasgupta, S., Application of remote sensing in regional geological studies – a case study in northeastern part of India. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing for Developing Countries, Survey of India, New Delhi, 1986, pp. T.4-P./6.1–T.4-P./6.4.

  • Lienert, B. R., Berg, B. E. and Frazer, L. N., Hypocenter: an earthquake location method using centered, scaled and adaptively damped least squares. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1986, 76, 771–783.

  • Louvari, E. K. and Kiratzi, A. A., Rake: a Windows program to plot earthquake focal mechanisms and the orientation of principal stresses. Comput. Geosci., 1997, 23, 851–857.

  • Sharma, S., Sarma, J. N. and Baruah, S., Dynamics of Mikir Hills Plateau and its vicinity: inferences on Kopili and Bomdila Faults in Northeastern India through seismotectonics, gravity and magnetic anomalies. Ann. Geophys., 2018, 61(3); doi:10.4402/ag-7516.

  • Kreemer, C., Holt, W. E. and Haines, A. J., An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation. Geophys. J. Int., 2003, 154, 8–34.

  • Dasgupta, A. B., Geology of Assam Arakan region. Min. Metall. Soc. India Q. J., 1977, 49, 1–54.

  • Narula, P. L., Acharyya, S. K. and Banerjee, J., Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, Geological Survey of India, SEISAT-16, Northeast India, 2000.

  • Akhtar, S. M., Chakrabarti, S., Singh, R. K., Moulik, S. R., Bhattacharya, J. and Singh, H., Structural style and deformation history of Assam & Assam Arakan Basin, India: from integrated seismic study. Adapted from Oral Presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, Denver, Colorado, USA, 7–10 June 2009.


Abstract Views: 216

PDF Views: 97




  • Neotectonic evidences of some major rivers of North East India

Abstract Views: 216  |  PDF Views: 97

Authors

Sangeeta Sharma
Geoscience Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat 785 006, India
Saurabh Baruah
Geoscience Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat 785 006, India
Jogendra Nath Sarma
Department of Applied Geology, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh 786 004, India

Abstract


The neotectonic activity of some parts of the Assam–Arakan Basin in North East India has been studied through drainage patterns, anomalies and morphotectonics to determine the recent deformation in the area that serves as the input for any seismic hazard assessment. Various drainage anomalies like annular drainage pattern, compressed meanders, paleochannels, and knick points in the river courses reveal the presence of neotectonic activity in the area, which is also confirmed by topographic profiles and seismic sections. The present study reveals that active subsurface structures like the Rudrasagar High, Geleki Low, Geleki High and Jorhat Fault have direct influence on the development and modification of the river systems courses. The morphometric and morphotectonic studies of drainage basins flowing through the Belt of Schuppen and Dauki Fault show strong influence of tectonics. The tectonic activities of the Bomdila and Kopili Faults are studied through neotectonics and seismotectonics, supplemented by gravity data. Seismicity is fairly intense in both the areas and both faults have influences in modifying the drainage alignments of the region. Occurrence of bils/swamps and develop­ment of knicks, presence of tectonic scarps, disturbed and folding in beds on the river banks and intense seismic activity in the region reveal neotectonic activity.

Keywords


Drainage anomalies, morphotectonics, neotectonic activity, seismotectonics, seismic hazard assessment.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi8%2F918-933