Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comprehensive Analysis of Health Risk due to Natural Outdoor Gamma Radiationin Southeast Haryana, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Environmental Sciences, M.D. University, Rohtak 124 001, India
 

A systematic study of background radiation in southeast Haryana, India, i.e. the Jhajjar, Sonipat and Rohtak districts, was initiated to establish reliable baseline data on the background radiation level of the region. Worldwide many areas have been found with high background gamma radiation, leading to several types of disorders in human beings. So the present study was carried out as a precautionary step. There are two natural sources of ionizing radiation – cosmic and ter-restrial. Isotopes of heavy elements and their decay products present in the Earth’s crust are the major sources of terrestrial radiation. A radiation survey meter was used for the analysis of gamma radiation. In total, 50 locations were chosen for the survey. Gamma radiation showed variation from 82 to 184 nSv/h, with the mean value of 131.64 ± 5.56 nSv/h. An independ-ent t-test at a significance level of 5% was applied for comparison. Annual effective dose and excess lifetime cancer risk were computed to determine the number of cancer cases due to outdoor radiation.

Keywords

Annual Effective Dose, Cancer Risk, Cosmic Rays, Gamma Radiation, Heavy Metals
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Sonkawade, R. G., Kant, K., Muralithar, S., Kumar, R. and Ra-mola, R. C., Natural radioactivity in common building construc-tion and radiation shielding materials. Atmosp. Environ., 2008, 42(9), 2254–2259.

  • Zakaly, H. M., Uosif, M. A., Madkour, H., Tammam, M., Issa, S., Elsaman, R. and El-Taher, A., Assessment of natural radionuclides and heavy metal concentrations in marine sediments in view of tourism activities in Hurghada City, Northern Red Sea, Egypt. J. Phys. Sci., 2019, 30(3), 21–47.

  • Mahur, A. K., Kumar, R., Sonkawade, R. G., Sengupta, D. and Rajendra, P., Measurement of natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate from rock samples of Jaduguda Uranium Mines and its radiological implications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 2008, 266, 1591–1597.

  • Pashazadeh, A. M., Aghajani, M., Nabipour, I. and Assadi, M., Annual effective dose from environmental gamma radiation in Bushehr city. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2014, 12(1), 1–4.

  • Bahreyni, T. S., Bayani, S. H., Yarahmadi, M., Aghamir, A., Jomehzadeh, A., Haghparast, M. and Tamjidi, A., Gonad, bone marrow and effective dose to the population of more than 90 towns and cities of Iran, arising from environmental gamma radia-tion. Int. J. Radiat. Res., 2009, 7(1), 41–47.

  • Gholami, M., Mirzaei, S. and Jomehzadeh, A., Gamma back-ground radiation measurement in Lorestan province, Iran. Int. J. Radiat. Res., 2011, 9(2), 89–93.

  • Hazrati, S., Baghi, A. N., Sadeghi, H., Barak, M., Zivari, S. and Rahimzadeh, S., Investigation of natural effective gamma dose rates case study: Ardebil Province in Iran. Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2012, 9(1), 1–6.

  • Saghatchi, F., Salouti, M. and Eslami, A., Assessment of annual effective dose due to natural gamma radiation in Zanjan (Iran). Radiat. Protect. Dosim., 2008, 132(3), 346–349.

  • Shahbazi, G. D., Annual background radiation in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Int. J. Radiat. Res., 2003, 1(2), 87–91.

  • Abusini, M., Al-Ayasreh, K. and Al-Jundi, J., Determination of uranium, thorium and potassium activity concentrations in soil cores in Araba valley, Jordan. Radiat. Protect. Dosim., 2008, 128(2), 213–216.

  • Matiullah, A. A., Rehman, S. Ur. and Faheem, M., Measurement of radioactivity in the soil of Bahawalpur division, Pakistan. Radi-at. Prot. Dosim., 2004, 112, 443–447.

  • Daulta, R., Singh, B., Kataria, N. and Garg, V. K., Assessment of uranium concentration in the drinking water and associated health risks in Eastern Haryana, India. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J., 2018, 24(4), 1115–1126.

  • UNSCEAR, Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Sales Publication, New York, USA, 1993.

  • UNSCEAR, Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Sales Publication, New York, USA, 2000, vol. 1: sources.

  • Taskin, H., Karavus, M., Ay, P., Topuzoglu, A., Hidiroglu, S. and Karahan, G., Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J. Environ. Radioact., 2009, 100, 49–53.

  • Panghal, A. et al., Radiation dose-dependent risk on individuals due to ingestion of uranium and radon concentration in drinking water samples of four districts of Haryana, India. Radiat. Effects Defects Solids, 2017, 172(5–6), 441–455.

  • Sannappa, J., Chandrashekara, M. S., Sathish, L. A., Paramesh, L. and Venkataramaiah, P., Study of background radiation dose in Mysore city, Karnataka State, India. Radiat. Measur., 2003, 37(1), 55–65.

  • Ajayi, O. S., Measurement of activity concentrations of 40 K, 226 Ra and 232 Th for assessment of radiation hazards from soils of the southwestern region of Nigeria. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 2009, 48(3), 323–332.

  • Singh, B., Kataria, N., Garg, V. K., Yadav, P., Kishore, N. and Pulhani, V., Uranium quantification in groundwater and health risk from its ingestion in Haryana, India. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 2014, 96(10), 1571–1580.

  • ICRP, Recommendations of the ICRP: Annals of the ICRP (Interna-tional Commission on Radiological Protection), 2007, vol. 37, p. 2e4.

  • Moghazy, N. M., El-Tohamy, A. M., Fawzy, M. M., Awad, H. A., Zakaly, H. M., Issa, S. A. and Ene, A., Natural radioactivity, radi-ological hazard and petrographical studies on Aswan granites used as building materials in Egypt. Appl. Sci., 2021, 11(14), 6471.

  • Rangaswamy, D, Srinivasa, E., Srilatha, M. and Sannappa, J., Measurement of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and evaluation of annual effective dose in Shimoga district of Karnataka state, India. Radiat. Prot. Environ., 2015, 38, 154; https://doi.org/10. 4103/0972-0464.176152.

  • Monica, S., Visnu Prasad, A. and Soniya, S. and Jojo, P., Estima-tion of indoor and outdoor effective doses and lifetime cancer risk from gamma dose rates along the coastal regions of Kollam dis-trict, Kerala. Radiat. Prot. Environ., 2016, 39, 38; https://doi.org/ 10.4103/0972-0464.185180.

  • Sharma, P., Kumar Meher, P. and Prasad Mishra, K., Terrestrial gamma radiation dose measurement and health hazard along river Alaknanda and Ganges in India. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci., 2014, 7, 595–600; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.09.011.

  • Sankaran, A. V., Jayaswal, B., Nambi, K. S. V. and Sunata, C. M., U, Th and K distributions inferred from regional geology and the terrestrial radiation profiles in India (INIS-mf-11557), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 1986, vol. 20(24), p. 104.

  • Saud, S., Jamil, B., Upadhyay, Y. and Irshad, K., Performance im-provement of empirical models for estimation of global solar radi-ation in India: a k-fold cross-validation approach. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2020, 40, 100768.

  • Jamil, B. and Akhtar, N., Comparative analysis of diffuse solar radi-ation models based on sky-clearness index and sunshine period for humid–subtropical climatic region of India: a case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 78, 329–355.

  • Jamil, B. and Siddiqui, A. T., Estimation of monthly mean diffuse solar radiation over India: performance of two variable models under different climatic zones. Sustainable Energy Technol. Assessm., 2018, 25, 161–180.

  • Tanwer, N., Anand, P., Batra, N., Kant, K., Gautam, Y. P. and Sahoo, S. K., Quantification of outdoor gamma radiation level and consequent health hazards assessment in Panipat district of Harya-na, India. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 20021, 330(3), 1453–1459.

  • Mercier, J. F. et al., Increased environmental gamma-ray dose rate during precipitation: a strong correlation with contributing air mass. J. Environ. Radioact., 2009, 100(7), 527–533.

  • Fujinami, N., Observational study of the scavenging of radon daughters by precipitation from the atmosphere. Environ. Int., 1996, 22, 181–185.

  • Greenfeld, M. B., Domondon, A. T., Tsuchiya, S. and Tomiyama, M., Monitoring precipitation rates using γ rays from adsorbed radon progeny as tracers. J. Appl. Phys., 2003, 93, 5733–5741; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1563313.

  • Paatero J., Wet deposition of radon-222 progeny in northern Fin-land measured with an automatic precipitation gamma analyser. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 2000, 87, 273–280; https://doi.org/10. 1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033008.

  • Cuttler, J. M., Commentary on Fukushima and beneficial effects of low radiation. Dose–response, 2013, 11, 432–443; https://doi. org/10.2203/dose-response.13-008.

  • Feinendegen, L. E., Relative implications of protective response versus damage induction at low dose and low-dose-rate exposures, using the microdose approach. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 2003, 104, 337–346; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006197.

  • Ludwig, E. F, Myron, P. and Neumann, R. D., Hormesis by low dose radiation effects: low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection. In Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (ed. Baum, R. P.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 789–803.

  • Pandey, B. N., Sarma, H. D., Shukla, D. and Mishra, K. P., Low-dose radiation induced modification of ROS and apoptosis in thy-mocytes of whole body irradiated mice. Int. J. Low Radiat., 2006, 2, 111–118; https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLR.2006.007901.

  • Calabrese, E. J. and Calabrese, V., Low dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) is effective in the treatment of arthritis: animal model findings. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2013, 89(4), 287–294.

  • Rodel, F. et al., Modulation of inflammatory immune reactions by low-dose ionizing radiation: molecular mechanisms and clinical application. Curr. Med. Chem., 2012, 19, 1741–1750; https://doi. org/10.2174/092986712800099866.

  • Mishra, K. P., Ahmed, M. and Hill, R. P., Low-dose radiation ef-fects on human health with implications to radioprotection and cancer radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2008, 84, 441–444; https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000802061293.

  • Calabrese, E. J., Historical foundations of wound healing and its potential for acceleration: dose‐response considerations. Wound Repair Regen., 2013, 21(2), 180–193.


Abstract Views: 229

PDF Views: 109




  • A Comprehensive Analysis of Health Risk due to Natural Outdoor Gamma Radiationin Southeast Haryana, India

Abstract Views: 229  |  PDF Views: 109

Authors

Sandeep Singh Duhan
Department of Environmental Sciences, M.D. University, Rohtak 124 001, India
Pradeep Khyalia
Department of Environmental Sciences, M.D. University, Rohtak 124 001, India
Jitender Singh Laura
Department of Environmental Sciences, M.D. University, Rohtak 124 001, India

Abstract


A systematic study of background radiation in southeast Haryana, India, i.e. the Jhajjar, Sonipat and Rohtak districts, was initiated to establish reliable baseline data on the background radiation level of the region. Worldwide many areas have been found with high background gamma radiation, leading to several types of disorders in human beings. So the present study was carried out as a precautionary step. There are two natural sources of ionizing radiation – cosmic and ter-restrial. Isotopes of heavy elements and their decay products present in the Earth’s crust are the major sources of terrestrial radiation. A radiation survey meter was used for the analysis of gamma radiation. In total, 50 locations were chosen for the survey. Gamma radiation showed variation from 82 to 184 nSv/h, with the mean value of 131.64 ± 5.56 nSv/h. An independ-ent t-test at a significance level of 5% was applied for comparison. Annual effective dose and excess lifetime cancer risk were computed to determine the number of cancer cases due to outdoor radiation.

Keywords


Annual Effective Dose, Cancer Risk, Cosmic Rays, Gamma Radiation, Heavy Metals

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi2%2F169-176