Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Fine Root Biomass Differs Significantly across Different Forest Types and Soil Depth in Central Himalaya, India


Affiliations
1 Forest Research Institute (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248 001, India
2 Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Kumaun University, Nainital 263 001, India
3 Institute of Forestry, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
4 Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun 248 001, India
5 Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
 

Fine roots (diameter less than 2 mm) comprise a significant portion of the plant biomass. They are important for water absorption, cycling of nutrients and the carbon budget on a global scale. The aim of the present study was to quantify fine root biomass in the Nainital district, Central Himalaya, India, which has several dominant forest types. A total of 81 samples were collected from nine sample plots for each forest type in three distinct directions. The results showed that sal forest (1.11  0.04 t ha–1) had the largest fine root biomass, followed by oak forest (0.72  0.06 t ha–1) and pine forest (0.61  0.06 t ha–1). We observed that the trend in fine root biomass across different forest types was as follows: sal forest > oak forest > pine forest, significant at 0.05 level. Fine root biomass was also observed to decrease similarly with increasing soil depth in each forest type, following the trend: 0–20 cm > 20– 40 cm > 40–60 cm, which was significant at 0.05 level. Researchers will benefit from this study since it will help them comprehend fine root biomass variation and offer baseline data for future research on nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget.

Keywords

Forest Types, Global Carbon Budget, Nutrient Cycling, Plant Biomass, Soil Depth
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Sayer, E. J., Tanner, E. V. J. and Cheesman, A. W., Increased litterfall changes fine root distribution in a moist tropical forest. Plant Soil, 2006, 281, 5–13.
  • Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., Palmiotto, P. A., Boon, P., Ohara, J. and Asbjornsen, H., Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil, 1996, 187, 159–219.
  • Gill, A. R. and Jackson, B. R., Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol., 2000, 147, 13–31.
  • Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C. and Vogt, D. J., Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res., 1986, 15, 303–378.
  • Persson, H., The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests. Plant Soil, 1982, 71, 87–101.
  • Noordwijik, M., Lawson, G., Soumare, A., Groot, J. J. R. and Hairiah, K., Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarit. In Tree-Crop Interactions: A Physiological Approach (eds On, C. K. and Huxley, P.), CAB International, Washington, Oxon, UK, 1996, pp. 319–364.
  • Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. and Schulze, E. D., A global budget for fine roots biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94, 7362–7366.
  • Jones, R. H., Mitchell, R. J., Stevens, G. N. and Pecot, S. D., Controls of fine root dynamics across a gradient of gap sizes in a pine woodland. Oecologia, 2003, 134, 132–143.
  • Hendrick, R. L. and Pregitzer, K. S., Patterns of fine root mortality in 2 sugar maple forests. Nature, 1993, 361, 59–61.
  • Wang, Z. Q. and Guo, D. L., Root ecology. J. Plant Ecol., 2008, 32, 1213–1216.
  • Barbhuiya, A. R., Arunachalam, A., Pandey, H. N., Khan, M. L. and Arunachalam, K., Fine root dynamics in undisturbed and disturbed stands of a tropical wet evergreen forest in northeast India. Trop. Ecol., 2012, 53(1), 69–79.
  • Pant, H. and Tewari, A., Fine root biomass, productivity and turnover in two contrasting aspects in natural chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Central Himalaya. Russ. J. Ecol., 2015, 46(6), 511– 517.
  • Welke, S. E., Hope, G. D. and Hunt, G. A., Effects of harvesting on fine root biomass and decomposition in an Engelmann spruce subalpine fir forest. Can. J. For. Res., 2003, 33(5), 847–853.
  • Polomski, O. and Kuhn, N., Wurzelsysteme Forschungsanstalt für Wald. In Schnee und Landschaft (WSL/FNP) Birmensdorf (ed. Haupt, P.), Bern, Switzerland, 1998.
  • Steen, E., Root and rhizome dynamics in a perennial grass crop during an annual growth cycle. Swed. J. Agric. Res., 1985, 156, 25–30.
  • Eissenstat, D. M. and Yanai, R. D., The ecology of root life span. Adv. Ecol. Res., 1997, 27, 1–62.
  • Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J. and Bloomfield, J., Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating roots biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil, 1998, 200, 71–89.
  • Sabin, T. P., Krishnan, R., Vellore, R., Priya, P., Borgaonkar, H. P., Singh, B. B. and Sagar, A., Climate change over the Himalayas. In Assessment of Climate Change over the Indian Region (eds Krishnan, R. et al.), Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 207–222.
  • Yuan, Z. Y. and Chen, H. Y. H., Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta-analyses. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2010, 29, 204–221.
  • Persson, H., Root dynamics in a young Scots pine stand in Central Sweden. Oikos, 1978, 30, 508–519.
  • Usman, S., Rawat, Y. S., Singh, S. P. and Gargoti, S. C., Fine root biomass production and turnover in evergreen forests of Central Himalaya, India. Oecologia, 1997, 6, 4–8.
  • Ostonen, I., Lohmus, K. and Pajuste, K., Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest: comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods. For. Ecol. Manage., 2005, 212, 264–277.
  • Bhattarai, P. K. and Mandal, N. T., Soil microbial biomass in relation to fine root in Kiteni hill Sal forest of Ilam, Eastern Nepal. Nepal J. Biosci., 2012, 2, 80–87.
  • Gautam, P. G. and Mandal, N., Effects of disturbance on fine root biomass in tropical moist forest of eastern Nepal. Nepal J. Biosci., 2012, 21, 10–16.
  • Leuschner, C. and Hertel, D., Fine root biomass of temperate forests in relation to soil acidity and fertility, climate, age and species. Prog. Bot., 2003, 64, 405–438.
  • Noguchi, H. et al., Fine root biomass in a tropical moist forest in the upper Negro River basin, Brazilian Amazon. Tropics, 2014, 22(4), 179–183.
  • Helmisaari, H. S., John, D., Pekka, N. and Mikko, K., Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol., 2007, 27, 1493–1504.
  • Garkoti, S. C., Fine root dynamics in three central Himalayan high elevation forests ranging from closed canopied to open canopied tree line vegetation. J. For. Res., 2011, 16(2), 136–143.
  • Verma, A. K., Garkoti, S. C., Singh, S., Kumar, S. and Kumar, M., Fine root production and nutrient dynamics in relation to stand characteristics of chir pine mixed banj oak forests in Central Himalaya. Flora, 2021, 279, 151808.
  • Cordeiro, A. L. et al., Fine-root dynamics vary with soil depth and precipitation in a low-nutrient tropical forest in the Central Amazonia. Plant–Environ. Interact., 2020, 1(1), 3–16.
  • Melgar, R. J., Smyth, T. J., Sanchez, P. A. and Cravo, M. S., Fertilizer nitrogen movement in a Central Amazon Oxisol and Entisol cropped to corn. Fert. Res., 1992, 31, 241–252.
  • Pathak, G. C., Joshi, H., Singh, R. D., Tewari, A., Pandey, R. and Singh, S. P., Vertical root distribution in Himalayan trees: about half of roots occur below 30 cm, the generally sampled depth. Trop. Ecol., 2021, 62, 479–491.
  • Usman, S., Singh, S. P. and Rawat, Y. S., Fine root productivity and turnover in two evergreen Central Himalayan forests. Ann. Bot., 1999, 84, 87–94.
  • Rawat, S. V., Fine root biomass and soil nutrient in Van Panchayat forest of Almora district. Indian J. Plant Sci., 2012, 1(1), 101–108.
  • Nadelhoffer, K. J. and Raich, J. W., Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology, 1992, 73, 1139–1147.

Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 99




  • Fine Root Biomass Differs Significantly across Different Forest Types and Soil Depth in Central Himalaya, India

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 99

Authors

Harish Bahadur Chand
Forest Research Institute (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248 001, India
Ganesh Joshi
Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Kumaun University, Nainital 263 001, India
Roshan Prasad Bhatta
Institute of Forestry, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
Sanjay Singh
Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun 248 001, India
Abhishek Kumar
Forest Research Institute (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248 001, India
Nabin Raj Joshi
Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
Ramesh Bohara
Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Kumaun University, Nainital 263 001, India

Abstract


Fine roots (diameter less than 2 mm) comprise a significant portion of the plant biomass. They are important for water absorption, cycling of nutrients and the carbon budget on a global scale. The aim of the present study was to quantify fine root biomass in the Nainital district, Central Himalaya, India, which has several dominant forest types. A total of 81 samples were collected from nine sample plots for each forest type in three distinct directions. The results showed that sal forest (1.11  0.04 t ha–1) had the largest fine root biomass, followed by oak forest (0.72  0.06 t ha–1) and pine forest (0.61  0.06 t ha–1). We observed that the trend in fine root biomass across different forest types was as follows: sal forest > oak forest > pine forest, significant at 0.05 level. Fine root biomass was also observed to decrease similarly with increasing soil depth in each forest type, following the trend: 0–20 cm > 20– 40 cm > 40–60 cm, which was significant at 0.05 level. Researchers will benefit from this study since it will help them comprehend fine root biomass variation and offer baseline data for future research on nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget.

Keywords


Forest Types, Global Carbon Budget, Nutrient Cycling, Plant Biomass, Soil Depth

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi2%2F194-201