Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nanoparticles mitigate arsenic stress in plants by modulating defence mechanisms


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, Cotton University, Guwahati 781 001, India
2 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar 144 411, India
3 Department of Biochemistry, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer 305 817, India
 

Arsenic (As) stress greatly affects plant growth and production, threatening food security and also human health through the food chain. As alters various physiological processes that subsequently affect the normal metabolism in plants. The plants have evolved different mechanisms against stress, where nanoparticles (NPs) improve plant metabolism and the defence system, thereby alleviating As stress in it. This article discusses the effects of As in plants at different levels, and the role of NPs in modulating the plant defence system against As stress. This article may help encourage future research on plant protective mechanisms against stress and the significance of NPs in plant science and agriculture.

Keywords

Agriculture, arsenic stress, food security, nanoparticles, plant protective mechanisms.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abbas, G., Murtaza, B., Bibi, I., Shahid, M., Niazi, N. K., Khan, M. I. and Hussain, M., Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and spe-ciation in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(1), 59.
  • Thounaojam, T. C., Khan, Z. and Upadhyaya, H., Molecular physio-logy of arsenic uptake, transport, and metabolism in rice. In Arsenic in Drinking Water and Food, Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 391–410.
  • Pan, W., Wu, C., Xue, S. and Hartley, W., Arsenic dynamics in the rhizosphere and its sequestration on rice roots as affected by root oxidation. J. Environ. Sci., 2014, 26(4), 892–899.
  • Sohn, E., Contamination: the toxic side of rice. Nature, 2014, 514(7524), S62–S63.
  • Majumder, B., Das, S., Mukhopadhyay, S. and Biswas, A. K., Iden-tification of arsenic-tolerant and arsenic-sensitive rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars on the basis of arsenic accumulation assisted stress perception, morpho-biochemical responses, and alteration in geno-mic template stability. Protoplasma, 2019, 256(1), 193–211.
  • Siddiqui, F., Tandon, P. K. and Srivastava, S., Arsenite and arsenate impact the oxidative status and antioxidant responses in Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 2015, 21(3), 453–458.
  • Rahman, A., Mostofa, M. G., Alam, M., Nahar, K., Hasanuzzaman, M. and Fujita, M., Calcium mitigates arsenic toxicity in rice seedlings by reducing arsenic uptake and modulating the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems and stress markers. Biomed Res. Int., 2015, 340812, 1–12.
  • Souri, Z., Karimi, N. and de Oliveira, L. M., Antioxidant enzymes responses in shoots of arsenic hyperaccumulator, Isatis cappadocica Desv. under interaction of arsenate and phosphate. Environ. Tech-nol., 2018, 39(10), 1316–1327.
  • Li, J., Zhao, Q., Xue, B., Wu, H., Song, G. and Zhang, X., Arsenic and nutrient absorption characteristics and antioxidant response in different leaves of two ryegrass (Lolium perenne) species under arse-nic stress. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(11), e0225373.
  • Ahmad, P. et al., Zinc oxide nanoparticles application alleviates arse-nic (As) toxicity in soybean plants by restricting the uptake of As and modulating key biochemical attributes, antioxidant enzymes, ascorbate–glutathione cycle and glyoxalase system. Plants, 2020, 9, 825.
  • Bidi, H., Fallah, H., Niknejad, Y. and Tari, D. B., Iron oxide nano-particles alleviate arsenic phytotoxicity in rice by improving iron uptake, oxidative stress tolerance and diminishing arsenic accumu-lation. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2021, 163, 348–357.
  • Niazi, N. K. et al., Phosphate-assisted phytoremediation of arsenic by Brassica napus and Brassica juncea: morphological and physio-logical response. Int. J. Phytoremed., 2017, 19(7), 670–678.
  • Singh, H. P., Batish, D. R., Kohli, R. K. and Arora, K., Arsenic-induced root growth inhibition in mung bean (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) is due to oxidative stress resulting from enhanced lipid per-oxidation. Plant Growth Regul., 2007, 53(1), 65–73.
  • Nath, S., Panda, P., Mishra, S., Dey, M., Choudhury, S., Sahoo, L. and Panda, S. K., Arsenic stress in rice: redox consequences and regulation by iron. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2014, 80, 203–210.
  • Thounaojam, T. C., Meetei, T. T., Panda, S. K. and Upadhyaya, H., North East India rice genotypes: screening of arsenic tolerant and sensitive rice at germinating stage. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem., 2019, 15(4).
  • Sharma, P., Goyal, K., Kumar, T. and Chauhan, N. S., Inimical ef-fects of arsenic on the plant physiology and possible biotechnological solutions to mitigate arsenic-induced toxicity. In Contaminants in Agriculture, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 399–422.
  • Ronzan, M., Piacentini, D., Fattorini, L., Della Rovere, F., Eiche, E., Riemann, M. and Falasca, G., Cadmium and arsenic affect root development in Oryza sativa L. negatively interacting with auxin. Environ. Exp. Bot., 2018, 151, 64–75.
  • Atabaki, N., Shaharuddin, N. A., Ahmad, S. A., Nulit, R. and Abiri, R., Assessment of water mimosa (Neptunia oleracea Lour.) mor-phological, physiological, and removal efficiency for phytoremedi-ation of arsenic-polluted water. Plants, 2020, 9(11), 1500.
  • Hu, Y. et al., The role of reactive oxygen species in arsenic toxicity. Biomolecules, 2020, 10(2), 240.
  • Meharg, A. A. and Hartley-Whitaker, J., Arsenic uptake and meta-bolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phy-tol., 2002, 154(1), 29–43.
  • Sudhani, H. P., García-Murria, M. J. and Moreno, J., Reversible in-hibition of CO2 fixation by ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase through the synergic effect of arsenite and a monothiol. Plant Cell Environ., 2013, 36(6), 1160–1170.
  • Bergquist, E. R., Fischer, R. J., Sugden, K. D. and Martin, B. D., Inhibition by methylated organoarsenicals of the respiratory 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenases. J. Organomet. Chem., 2009, 694(6), 973–980.
  • Gusman, G. S., Oliveira, J. A., Farnese, F. S. and Cambraia, J., Ar-senate and arsenite: the toxic effects on photosynthesis and growth of lettuce plants. Acta Physiol. Plant., 2013, 35(4), 1201–1209.
  • Shahid, M. A. et al., Selenium impedes cadmium and arsenic toxi-city in potato by modulating carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2019, 180, 588–599.
  • Pavlíkova, D., Zemanova, V., Pavlik, M., Dobrev, P. I., Hnilicka, F. and Motyka, V., Response of cytokinins and nitrogen metabo-lism in the fronds of Pteris sp. under arsenic stress. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(5), e0233055.
  • Gresser, M. J., ADP-arsenate. Formation by submitochondrial par-ticles under phosphorylating conditions. J. Biol. Chem., 1981, 256(12), 5981–5983.
  • Nemeti, B., Regonesi, M. E., Tortora, P. and Gregus, Z., The mech-anism of the polynucleotide phosphorylase-catalyzed arsenolysis of ADP. Biochimie, 2011, 93(3), 624–627.
  • Byers, L. D., She, H. S. and Alayoff, A., Interaction of phosphate analogs with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Bioche-mistry, 1979, 18(12), 2471–2480.
  • Tariang, K. U., Ramanujam, S. N. and Das, B., Effect of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) on glycogen content and on the activities of se-lected enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism in freshwater catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis. Int. Aquat. Res., 2019, 11(3), 253–266.
  • Pandey, A. K., Gedda, M. R. and Verma, A. K., Effect of arsenic stress on expression pattern of a rice specific miR156j at various developmental stages and their allied co-expression target net-works. Front. Plant Sci., 2020, 11, 752.
  • Marotti, I., Betti, L., Bregola, V., Bosi, S., Trebbi, G., Borghini, G. and Dinelli, G., Transcriptome profiling of wheat seedlings follow-ing treatment with ultrahigh diluted arsenic trioxide. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med., 2014, 851263.
  • Pan, D., Yi, J., Li, F., Li, X., Liu, C., Wu, W. and Tao, T., Dynamics of gene expression associated with arsenic uptake and transport in rice during the whole growth period. BMC Plant Biol., 2020, 20, 1–10.
  • Chen, Y., Xu, W., Shen, H., Yan, H., Xu, W., He, Z. and Ma, M., Engineering arsenic tolerance and hyperaccumulation in plants for phytoremediation by a PvACR3 transgenic approach. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(16), 9355–9362.
  • Zvobgo, G., LwalabaWaLwalaba, J., Sagonda, T., Mapodzeke, J. M., Muhammad, N., Shamsi, I. H. and Zhang, G., Phosphate alleviates arsenate toxicity by altering expression of phosphate transporters in the tolerant barley genotypes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2018, 147, 832–839.
  • Castrillo, G. et al., WRKY6 transcription factor restricts arsenate uptake and transposon activation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2013, 25(8), 2944–2957.
  • Pathare, V., Srivastava, S., Sonawane, B. V. and Suprasanna, P., Arsenic stress affects the expression profile of genes of 14-3-3 pro-teins in the shoot of mycorrhiza colonized rice. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 2016, 22(4), 515–522.
  • Khan, E. and Gupta, M., Arsenic–silicon priming of rice (Oryza sa-tiva L.) seeds influence mineral nutrient uptake and biochemical re-sponses through modulation of Lsi-1, Lsi-2, Lsi-6 and nutrient transporter genes. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1), 1–16.
  • Zhou, P. et al., Application of nanoparticles alleviates heavy metals stress and promotes plant growth: An overview. Nanomaterials, 2021, 11(1), 26.
  • Ma, X., Sharifan, H., Dou, F. and Sun, W., Simultaneous reduction of arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 384, 123802.
  • Wu, F., Fang, Q., Yan, S., Pan, L., Tang, X. and Ye, W., Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on arsenic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.): germination, early growth, and arsenic uptake. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2020, 27, 26974–26981.
  • Mushtaq, T., Shah, A. A., Akram, W. and Yasin, N. A., Synergistic ameliorative effect of iron oxide nanoparticles and Bacillus subtilis S4 against arsenic toxicity in Cucurbita moschata: polyamines, anti-oxidants, and physiochemical studies. Int. J. Phytoremediat., 2020, 22, 1408–1419.
  • Praveen, A., Khan, E., Perwez, M., Sardar, M. and Gupta, M., Iron oxide nanoparticles as nano-adsorbents: a possible way to reduce arsenic phytotoxicity in Indian mustard plant (Brassica juncea L.). J. Plant Growth Regul., 2018, 37, 612–624.
  • Khan, S., Akhtar, N., Rehman, S. U., Shujah, S., Rha, E. S. and Jamil, M., Biosynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) mitigate arsenic toxicity in rice seedlings. Toxics, 2021, 9, 2.
  • Katiyar, P., Yadu, B., Korram, J., Satnami, M. L., Kumar, M. and Keshavkant, S., Titanium nanoparticles attenuates arsenic toxicity by up-regulating expressions of defensive genes in Vigna radiata L. J. Environ. Sci., 2020, 92, 18–27.
  • Salar, E., Khavari-Nejad, R. A., Mandoulakani, B. A. and Najafi, F., Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on activity of antioxidant enzymes, the expression of genes involved in rosmarinic acid biosynthesis and rosmarinic acid content in Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2021, 68(1), 118–125.
  • Wu, X. et al., Application of TiO2 nanoparticles to reduce bioac-cumulation of arsenic in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.): a mecha-nistic study. J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 124047.
  • Cui, J., Li, Y., Jin, Q. and Li, F., Silica nanoparticles inhibit arsenic uptake into rice suspension cells via improving pectin synthesis and the mechanical force of the cell wall. Environ Sci.: Nano, 2020, 7, 162–171.
  • Gohari, G., Mohammadi, A., Akbari, A., Panahirad, S., Dadpour, M. R., Fotopoulos, V. and Kimura, S., Titanium dioxide nanoparti-cles (TiO2 NPs) promote growth and ameliorate salinity stress effects on essential oil profile and biochemical attributes of Draco-cephalum moldavica. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1), 1–14.
  • Adrees, M. et al., Simultaneous mitigation of cadmium and drought stress in wheat by soil application of iron nanoparticles. Chemo-sphere, 2020, 238, 124681.
  • Hussain, A. et al., Combined use of different nanoparticles effecti-vely decreased cadmium (Cd) concentration in grains of wheat grown in a field contaminated with Cd. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2020, 215, 112139.
  • Das, A. and Das, B., Nanotechnology a potential tool to mitigate abiotic stress in crop plants. In Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants, IntechOpen, London, UK, 2019.
  • Duo, L. A., Liu, C. X. and Zhao, S. L., Alleviation of drought stress in turfgrass by the combined application of nano-compost and micro-bes from compost. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2018, 65(3), 419–426.
  • Mohammadi, R., Maali-Amiri, R. and Mantri, N. L., Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense systems in chickpea seedlings during cold stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2014, 61(6), 768–775.
  • Khan, M. I. R. et al., Crosstalk of plant growth regulators protects photosynthetic performance from arsenic damage by modulating defense systems in rice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2021, 222, 112535.
  • Praveen, A., Pandey, C., Ehasanullah, K., Panthri, M. and Gupta, M., Silicon-mediated genotoxic alterations in Brassica juncea un-der arsenic stress: a comparative study of biochemical and molecu-lar markers. Pedosphere, 2020, 30, 517–527.
  • Ahmed, T. et al., Nanoparticle-based amelioration of drought stress and cadmium toxicity in rice via triggering the stress responsive genetic mechanisms and nutrient acquisition. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2021, 209, 111829.
  • Rizwan, M., Noureen, S., Ali, S., Anwar, S., Rehman, M. Z. U., Qayyum, M. F. and Hussain, A., Influence of biochar amendment and foliar application of iron oxide nanoparticles on growth, photo-synthesis, and cadmium accumulation in rice biomass. J. Soil. Sedi-ment., 2019, 19, 3749–3759.
  • Hussain, A. et al., Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physio-logical response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. Envi-ron. Pollut., 2018, 242, 1518–1526.
  • Wang, Y. et al., Effects of cerium oxide on rice seedlings as affect-ed by co-exposure of cadmium and salt. Environ. Pollut., 2019, 252, 1087–1096.
  • Rizwan, M. et al., Alleviation of cadmium accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) by foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles and bio-char to contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut., 2019, 248, 358–367.
  • Khan, Z. S. et al., Effects of silicon nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat in cadmium contaminated soil under different soil moisture levels. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2020, 27, 4958–4968.
  • de Sousa, A. et al., Silicon dioxide nanoparticles ameliorate the phytotoxic hazards of aluminum in maize grown on acidic soil. Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 693, 133636.

Abstract Views: 335

PDF Views: 131




  • Nanoparticles mitigate arsenic stress in plants by modulating defence mechanisms

Abstract Views: 335  |  PDF Views: 131

Authors

Thorny Chanu Thounaojam
Department of Botany, Cotton University, Guwahati 781 001, India
Zesmin Khan
Department of Botany, Cotton University, Guwahati 781 001, India
Thounaojam Thomas Meetei
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar 144 411, India
Sanjib Kumar Panda
Department of Biochemistry, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer 305 817, India
Hrishikesh Upadhyaya
Department of Botany, Cotton University, Guwahati 781 001, India

Abstract


Arsenic (As) stress greatly affects plant growth and production, threatening food security and also human health through the food chain. As alters various physiological processes that subsequently affect the normal metabolism in plants. The plants have evolved different mechanisms against stress, where nanoparticles (NPs) improve plant metabolism and the defence system, thereby alleviating As stress in it. This article discusses the effects of As in plants at different levels, and the role of NPs in modulating the plant defence system against As stress. This article may help encourage future research on plant protective mechanisms against stress and the significance of NPs in plant science and agriculture.

Keywords


Agriculture, arsenic stress, food security, nanoparticles, plant protective mechanisms.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi5%2F642-649