Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Topology-based protein–protein interaction analysis of oral cancer proteins


Affiliations
1 Department of Bioinformatics, Center for Biological Sciences (Bioinformatics), Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur Road, Fathehpur, Tekari-Gaya 824 236, India, India
 

Oral cancer is a common type of head and neck cancer that affects majority of the population worldwide. The present study focuses on the network-based protein–protein interaction (PPI) approach for the identification of oral cancer targets and systems biology approach-based analysis. Totally 47 oral cancer gene targets were extracted from the BioXpress database, Oral Cancer Gene Database and HNC database. The related protein networks were explored and visualized using Cytoscape v3.7.2. Topology predictions were performed by Mole­cular Complex Detection tool and Biological Networks Gene Ontology tool (BiNGO) plug-in from Cytoscape v3.7.2. The comprehensive study using MCODE are three clusters of 15 common oral cancer genes. The pre­dicted proteins were GSK-3b, PKM, Catenin-b1, Tp53, SMAD-3, MYC, LDHA, HIF1-a, PDPK-1, AKT3, PIK3CA, ILK, UBC, E2F1 and SKP. The 15 oral cancer genes with their significant P-value < 0.05 are responsible for the development of oral cancer. These 15 proteins obtained from network-based interaction analysis can be a potential solution of anti-cancer drug molecules against multiple targets of oral cancer

Keywords

Cluster analysis, gene ontology, oral cancer, protein–protein networks, topology analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ang, K. K. et al., Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 363, 24–35.
  • Johnson, D. E. et al., Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nature Rev. Dis. Primers, 2020, 6, 92.
  • Kumar, R. et al., Identification of oral cancer related candidate genes by integrating protein–protein interactions, gene ontology, pathway analysis and immunohistochemistry. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1), 1–18.
  • Geng, F. et al., Identification of potential candidate genes of oral cancer in response to chronic infection with porphyromonas gingi-valis using bioinformatical analyses. Front. Oncol., 2019, 9, 1–12.
  • Wahab Khattak, F., Salamah Alhwaiti, Y., Ali, A., Faisal, M. and Siddiqi, M. H., Protein–protein interaction analysis through network topology (oral cancer). J. Healthc. Eng., 2021, 2021, 1–9.
  • Reyimu, A. et al., Identification of latent biomarkers in connection with progression and prognosis in oral cancer by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol., 2021, 19, 1–13.
  • Mathavan, S., Kue, C. S. and Kumar, S., Identification of potential candidate genes for lip and oral cavity cancer using network analysis. Genomics Inform., 2021, 19, 1–9.
  • Dash Atan, N. A., Koushki, M., Tavirani, M. R. and Ahmadi, N. A., Protein–protein interaction network analysis of salivary proteomic data in oral cancer cases. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2018, 19, 1639– 1645.
  • Hubner, N. et al., Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease. Nature Genet., 2005, 37, 243–253.
  • Gröger, C. J., Grubinger, M., Waldhör, T., Vierlinger, K. and Mikulits, W., Meta-analysis of gene expression signatures defining the epithelial to mesenchymal transition during cancer progression. PLoS One, 2012, 7, 1–10.
  • Laurie, C. C. et al., Quality control and quality assurance in geno-typic data for genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol., 2010, 34, 591–602.
  • McKay, J. D. et al., A genome-wide association study of upper aerodigestive tract cancers conducted within the INHANCE con-sortium. PLOS Genet., 2011, 7, 1–13.
  • Schubert, K. et al., A comprehensive candidate gene study on bronchial asthma and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Disease Markers, 2006, 22, 127–132; http://ihg.gsf.de/linkage/download/finetti.zip
  • Tiffin, N. et al., Computational disease gene identification: a concert of methods prioritizes type 2 diabetes and obesity candidate genes. Nucl. Acids Res., 2006, 34(10), 3067–3081.
  • Zamanian-Azodi, M. et al., Introducing biomarker panel in esopha-geal, gastric, and colon cancers: a proteomic approach. Gastroente-rol. Hepatol. Bed Bench, 2015, 8, 6.
  • Gonzalez, M. W. and Kann, M. G., Protein interactions and disease. PLOS Comput. Biol., 2012, 8, 1–11.
  • Wan, Q. et al., BioXpress: an integrated RNA-seq-derived gene expression database for pan–cancer analysis. Database (Oxford), 2015, 2015, 1–13.
  • Gadewal, N. S. and Zingde, S. M., Database and interaction network of genes involved in oral cancer: Version II. Bioinformation, 2011, 6, 169–170.
  • Zhang, Q. et al., HNCDB: an integrated gene and drug database for head and neck cancer. Front. Oncol., 2019, 9, 1–10.
  • Zhou, G. et al., NetworkAnalyst 3.0: a visual analytics platform for comprehensive gene expression profiling and meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 47, 2019, W234–W241.
  • Szklarczyk, D. et al., STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019, 47, D607–D613.
  • Shannon, P. et al., Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res., 2003, 13(11), 2498–2504.
  • Bader, G. D. and Hogue, C. W. V., An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformat., 2003, 4, 1–27.
  • Maere, S., Heymans, K. and Kuiper, M., BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, 3448–3449.
  • Doble, B. W. and Woodgett, J. R., GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase. J. Cell Sci., 2003, 116, 1175–1186.
  • Qian, J., Wenguang, X., Zhiyong, W., Yuntao, Z. and Wei, H., Hypoxia inducible factor: a potential prognostic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol., 2016, 37, 10815–10820.
  • Wang, Y. et al., Overexpression of pyruvate kinase M2 associates with aggressive clinicopathological features and unfavorable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther., 2015, 16, 839– 845.
  • Pelicano, H., Martin, D. S., Xu, R. H. and Huang, P., Glycolysis inhibition for anticancer treatment. Oncogene, 2006, 25, 4633–4646.
  • Du, L., Shen, J., Weems, A. and Lu, S.-L., Role of phosphatidylino-sitol-3-kinase pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oncol., 2012, 2012, 12.
  • Walter, V., Yin, X., Wilkerson, M. D., Cabanski, C. R. and Zhao, N., Molecular subtypes in head and neck cancer exhibit distinct patterns of chromosomal gain and loss of canonical cancer genes. PLoS One, 2013, 8, 56823.
  • Cohen, Y. et al., Mutational analysis of PTEN/PIK3CA/AKT path-way in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol., 2011, 47, 946– 950.
  • Tsukamoto, Y. et al., Molecular and cellular pathobiology Micro-RNA-375 is downregulated in gastric carcinomas and regulates cell survival by targeting PDK1 and 14-3-3ζ. Cancer Res., 2010, 70, 2339–2349; doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2777.
  • Masumoto, K. and Kitagawa, M., E3 ubiquitin ligases as molecular targets in human oral cancers. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2016, 16, 130–135.
  • Ertosun, M. G., Hapil, F. Z. and Osman Nidai, O. Z. E. S., E2F1 transcription factor and its impact on growth factor and cytokine signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 2016, 31, 17–25.
  • Harada, K. et al., Down-regulation of S-phase kinase associated protein 2 (Skp2) induces apoptosis in oral cancer cells. Oral Oncol., 2005, 41, 623–630.

Abstract Views: 151

PDF Views: 82




  • Topology-based protein–protein interaction analysis of oral cancer proteins

Abstract Views: 151  |  PDF Views: 82

Authors

Keerti Kumar Yadav
Department of Bioinformatics, Center for Biological Sciences (Bioinformatics), Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur Road, Fathehpur, Tekari-Gaya 824 236, India, India
Ajay Kumar Singh
Department of Bioinformatics, Center for Biological Sciences (Bioinformatics), Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur Road, Fathehpur, Tekari-Gaya 824 236, India, India

Abstract


Oral cancer is a common type of head and neck cancer that affects majority of the population worldwide. The present study focuses on the network-based protein–protein interaction (PPI) approach for the identification of oral cancer targets and systems biology approach-based analysis. Totally 47 oral cancer gene targets were extracted from the BioXpress database, Oral Cancer Gene Database and HNC database. The related protein networks were explored and visualized using Cytoscape v3.7.2. Topology predictions were performed by Mole­cular Complex Detection tool and Biological Networks Gene Ontology tool (BiNGO) plug-in from Cytoscape v3.7.2. The comprehensive study using MCODE are three clusters of 15 common oral cancer genes. The pre­dicted proteins were GSK-3b, PKM, Catenin-b1, Tp53, SMAD-3, MYC, LDHA, HIF1-a, PDPK-1, AKT3, PIK3CA, ILK, UBC, E2F1 and SKP. The 15 oral cancer genes with their significant P-value < 0.05 are responsible for the development of oral cancer. These 15 proteins obtained from network-based interaction analysis can be a potential solution of anti-cancer drug molecules against multiple targets of oral cancer

Keywords


Cluster analysis, gene ontology, oral cancer, protein–protein networks, topology analysis.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi10%2F1216-1224