Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mineralogical characterization of raw materials from Dholavira, Gujarat, India and its geological and archaeological significance


Affiliations
1 Archaeological Sciences Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382 355, India, India
 

Dholavira was one among the five largest settlements (probably six) of the Harappan civilization during the third millennium bce. The location of this site in a desolate corner of Khadir Island in Kachchh, Gujarat, India, speaks well of the planning and ingenuity showed by the Harappans for making it an urban and administrative centre. Excavations at this site between 1989 and 2005 brought to light a long and continuous occupation of nearly 1500 years (c. 3000–1500 bce), which records the rise, culmination and fall of the Harappan Civilization. Evidences for various craft activities are found from the earliest levels onwards and the Harappans exploited various lithic raw materials for both utilitarian purposes and making ornaments. Kachhch and the Gujarat mainland are rich in raw material resources in general and agate–carnelian, limestone, various types of clay, copper–lead–silver and steatite, in particular. Dholavira contains both raw materials and finished artefacts, thus presents an ideal scenario to study. In the present study, we interpret the mineralogical characterization and probable provenance of the raw materials from different spatio-temporal contexts at the Dholavira site using techniques like XRD and SEM-EDS analysis. Samples of clay, stone raw materials and a few artefacts were selected from among the innumerable resources available at the site

Keywords

Archaeological site, artefacts, geological framework, mineralogical characterization, raw materials.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bisht, R. S., A new model of the Harappan town planning as revealed at Dholavira in Kutch: a surface study of its plan and architecture. In History and Archaeology, Prof. H. D. Sankalia Felicitation Vol-ume (ed. Chatterjee, B.), Ramanand Vidhya Bhawan, Delhi, 1989, pp. 397–408.

  • Bisht, R. S., Dholavira: new horizons of the Indus civilization. Pura-tattva, 1991, 20, 71–82.

  • Kenoyer, J. M., Urban process in the Indus tradition: a preliminary model from Harappa. In Harappa Excavations 1986–1990 (ed. Meadow, R. H.), Prehistory Press, Madison, USA, 1991, pp. 29–60.

  • Kenoyer, J. M. and Miller, H.-L., Metal technologies of the Indus Valley tradition in Pakistan and western India. In The Archaeomet-allurgy of Asian Old World (ed. Piggott, V. C.), University of Pen-nyslvania Press, USA, 1999, pp. 101–151.

  • Law, R. W., Appendix 5: Recent Investigations and analyses of rocks and minerals from Harappa. In Harappa Archaeological Res-earch Project: Harappa Excavations 2000 and 2001 (eds Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M. and Wright, R. P.), Report submitted to the Director-General of Archaeology and Museum, Government of Pa-kistan, Karachi, 2001.

  • Law, R. W., Inter-regional interaction and urbanism in the ancient Indus Valley: a geologic provenience study of Harappa’s rock and mineral assemblage. In Occasional Paper 11. Linguistics, Archaeology and the Human Past, Indus Project, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan, 2011; ISBN 978-4-902325-57-7.

  • Bhan, K. K., Sonawane, V. H., Ajithprasad, P. and Pratapchandran, S., Excavations of an important Harappan trading and craft produc-tion center at Ghola Dhoro (Bagasra), on the Gulf of Kutch, Gujarat, India. J. Interdiscip. Stud. Hist. Archaeol., 2004, 1, 153–158.

  • Jarrige, C. J. F., Jarrige, R. H. and Meadow, Mehrgarh Field Reports 1974–1985: from Neolithic times to the Indus Civilization, Govern-ment of Pakistan, Karachi.

  • Mackay, E., Bead making in ancient Sind. J. Am. Orient. Soc., 1937, 57, 1–15.

  • Blackman, M. J. and Vidale, M., The production and distribution of stone ware bangles at Mohenjo-daro and Harappa as monitored by chemical characterization studies. In South Asian Archaeology 1989. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 14 (ed. Jarrige, C.), Prehistory Press, Madison, USA, 1992, pp. 37–44.

  • Kenoyer, J. M. and Vidale, M., A new look at the stone drills of Indus Valley Tradition. In Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Volume 267 (eds Vandiver, P. B. et al.), Materials Research Society, Pittsburg, USA, 1992, pp. 495–518.

  • Miller, H. M.-L., Reassessing the urban structure of Harappa: evi-dence from Craft Production Distribution. In South Asian Archaeo-logy 1997 (eds Taddei, M. and De Marco, G.), ISIAO, Rome, 2000, pp. 77–100.

  • Law, R. W., Regional interaction in the prehistoric Indus Valley: initial results of rock and mineral sourcing studies at Harappa. In South Asian Archaeology 2001 (eds Jarrige, C. and Lefèvre, V.), Recherche sur les Civilisations, Paris, 2005, pp. 179–190.

  • Law, R. W., Inter-regional interaction and urbanization in the ancient Indus Valley: a geologic provenance study of Harappa’s rock and mineral assemblage. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madi-son, USA, 2008.

  • Allchin, R. and Allchin, B., Origins of a Civilization: The Prehistory and Early Archaeology of South Asia, Viking, Penguin Books, India, New Delhi, 1997.

  • Prabhakar, V. N., Bisht, R. S., Law, R. W. and Kenoyer, J. M., Stone drill bits from Dholavira – a multi-faceted analysis. Man En-viron., 2012, XXXVII, 8–25.

  • Bisht, R. S., Jewels and Jewellery in Early Indian Archaeology and Literature, Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar and Aryan Books International, New Delhi, 2017, pp. 15–40.

  • Merh, S. S., The Great Rann of Kachchh: perceptions of a field geo-logist. J. Geol. Soc. India (on-line archive from vol. 1 to vol. 78).2005, 65(1), 9–25.

  • Biswas, S. K., Note on the geology of Kutch. Quart. J. Geol., Min-ing, Metall. Soc. India, 1971, 43, 223–226.

  • Agrawal, O. P., Dyes and Pigments in India: Historical, Social and Material Perspectives, Chemistry and Chemical Techniques in India(ed. Subbarayappa, B. V.), Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture, Centre for Studies in Civilizations, 1999,vol. IV, pp. 171–208.

  • Bisht, R. S., Law, R., Peterman, E. and Rensen, V., Isotope analy-sis of lead, silver and copper artefacts from Dholavira. Heritage J.Multidiscip. Stud. Archaeol., 2015, 3, 1–18.

  • Prabhakar, V. N., Analysis of the ernestite drill bits from Dholavira excavations. In South Asian Archaeology and Art 2012 Volume 1. Man and Environment in Prehistoric and Protohistoric South Asia: New Perspectives (eds Lefevre, V., Didier, A. and Mutin, B.), Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium, 2015.

  • Foote, R. B., Geology of Baroda State, Addison & Co, Madras, 1898.


Abstract Views: 321

PDF Views: 133




  • Mineralogical characterization of raw materials from Dholavira, Gujarat, India and its geological and archaeological significance

Abstract Views: 321  |  PDF Views: 133

Authors

Ravi Kant Prasad
Archaeological Sciences Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382 355, India, India
V. N. Prabhakar
Archaeological Sciences Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382 355, India, India

Abstract


Dholavira was one among the five largest settlements (probably six) of the Harappan civilization during the third millennium bce. The location of this site in a desolate corner of Khadir Island in Kachchh, Gujarat, India, speaks well of the planning and ingenuity showed by the Harappans for making it an urban and administrative centre. Excavations at this site between 1989 and 2005 brought to light a long and continuous occupation of nearly 1500 years (c. 3000–1500 bce), which records the rise, culmination and fall of the Harappan Civilization. Evidences for various craft activities are found from the earliest levels onwards and the Harappans exploited various lithic raw materials for both utilitarian purposes and making ornaments. Kachhch and the Gujarat mainland are rich in raw material resources in general and agate–carnelian, limestone, various types of clay, copper–lead–silver and steatite, in particular. Dholavira contains both raw materials and finished artefacts, thus presents an ideal scenario to study. In the present study, we interpret the mineralogical characterization and probable provenance of the raw materials from different spatio-temporal contexts at the Dholavira site using techniques like XRD and SEM-EDS analysis. Samples of clay, stone raw materials and a few artefacts were selected from among the innumerable resources available at the site

Keywords


Archaeological site, artefacts, geological framework, mineralogical characterization, raw materials.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi11%2F1341-1351