Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effects of temperature and slope on the infiltration rate for a landfill surface


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi 110 016, India, India
 

In this study, parameters of the Kostiakov, Horton, Modified Kostiakov, SCS, Philip and Smith models were estimated using the double-ring infiltrometer on two different slopes, viz. 4° and 23°; in morning and afternoon sessions to assess their usefulness in characterizing the infiltration process. Observations revealed that the average increment in temperature by 9°C increased the final and initial infiltration rates by 65% and 38% respectively. The combined effects of the 23° slope and higher temperature increased the infiltrated volume by 6.4 times. The comparative analysis showed Kostiakov as the most efficient model incorporating combined and individual effects of temperature and slope
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, R. P., Tyagi, V. V., Allen, T., Ibrahim, M. H. and Kothari, R., An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario. Renew. Sus-tain. Energy Rev., 2011, 15, 4797–4808; https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.RSER.2011.07.071.
  • Census of India 2011, Population projections for India and the states: 2011–2036, National Commission on Population, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, 2020.
  • Annual Report with respect to solid waste management rules, 2016 in respect of NCT of Delhi for the Year 2016, Delhi Pollution Con-trol Committee, Government of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi, 2019.
  • Annual Report in respect of NCT of Delhi for the year 2021–2022 on the implementation of solid waste management rules, 2016, New Delhi, 2022.
  • Delhi Pollution Control Council, Compliance report of Govt. of NCT of Delhi in OA No. 606/2018, New Delhi, 2020.
  • Talyan, V., Dahiya, R. P. and Sreekrishnan, T. R., State of municipal solid waste management in Delhi, the capital of India. Waste Man-age., 2008, 28, 1276–1287.
  • Chakma, S. and Mathur, S., Estimation of primary and mechanical compression in MSW landfills. J. Hazard., Toxic, Radioact. Waste, 2012, 16, 298–303.
  • Mukherjee, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Hashim, M. A. and Sen Gupta, B., Contemporary environmental issues of landfill leachate: assessment and remedies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 45, 472–590; https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.876524.
  • Chakma, S. and Mathur, S., Postclosure long-term settlement for MSW landfills. J. Hazard., Toxic, Radioact. Waste, 2013, 17, 81–88.
  • Hopmans, J., Clausnitzer, V. and Kosugi, K. I., Evaluation of various infiltration models. Sci. Agric., 1995, 140, 5–8.
  • Haghighi, F., Gorji, M., Shorafa, M., Sarmadian, F. and Mohammadi, M. H., Evaluation of some infiltration models and hydraulic para-meters. Span. J. Agric. Res., 2010, 8, 210.
  • Sihag, P., Tiwari, N. K. and Ranjan, S., Estimation and inter-com-parison of infiltration models. Water Sci., 2017, 31, 34–43.
  • Helalia, A. M., The relation between soil infiltration and effective porosity in different soils. Agric. Water Manage., 1993, 24, 39–47.
  • Mishra, S. K., Tyagi, J. V. and Singh, V. P., Comparison of infiltra-tion models. Hydrol. Process., 2003, 17, 2629–2652.
  • Skaggs, R. W., Huggins, L., Monke, E. and Foster, G., Experimental evaluation of infiltration equations. Trans. ASAE, 1969, 12, 822–828.
  • Levy, G. J., Smith, H. J. C. and Agassi, M., Water temperature effect on hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate of soils. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil, 1989, 6, 240–244.
  • Gavin, K. and Xue, J., A simple method to analyze infiltration into unsaturated soil slopes. Comput. Geotech., 2008, 35, 223–230.
  • Langhans, C., Govers, G. and Diels, J., Development and parame-terization of an infiltration model accounting for water depth and rainfall intensity. Hydrol. Process., 2013, 27, 3777–3790.
  • Avudainayagam, S., Sharma, K. K. and Rajamani, V., Rate of infil-tration – an in situ measurement. Curr. Sci., 1987, 13, 663–664.
  • Fenn, D. G., Hanley, K. J. and Degeare, T. V., Use of the water-balance method for predicting leachate generation from solid-waste-disposal sites. Technical Report, Office of Scientific and Technical Infor-mation, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 1975; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6328350
  • Kargas, G. and Kerkides, P., A contribution to the study of the phe-nomenon of horizontal infiltration. Water Resour. Manage., 2010, 25, 1131–1141.
  • ICAR, Daily weather data, Indian Council of Agricultural Res-earch, New Delhi, 2020.
  • Mohan, M. and Kandya, A., Impact of urbanization and land-use/ land-cover change on diurnal temperature range: a case study of tropical urban airshed of India using remote sensing data. Sci. Total Environ., 2015, 506–507, 453–465.
  • Integrated Research and Action for Development, Report on assessment of landfill gas and pre feasibility study at the Okhla landfill gas uti-lization as domestic fuel, New Delhi, 2009.
  • Gregory, J. H., Dukes, M. D., Miller, G. L. and Jones, P. H., Analysis of double-ring infiltration techniques and development of a simple automatic water delivery system. Appl. Turfgrass Sci., 2005, 2, 1–7.
  • ASTM D3385-03, Standard test method for infiltration rate of soils in field using double-ring infiltrometer, ASTM International, 2009.
  • Rocheta, V. L. S., Isidoro, J. M. G. P. and de Lima, J. L. M. P., Infiltra-tion of Portuguese cobblestone pavements – an exploratory assessment using a double-ring infiltrometer. Urban Water J., 2015, 14, 291– 297; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1111914.
  • Shukla, M. K., Lal, R., Owens, L. B. and Unkefer, P., Land use and management impacts on structure and infiltration characteristics of soils in the North Appalachian region of Ohio. Soil Sci., 2003, 168, 167–177.
  • Kirkham, M. B. (ed.), Infiltration. In Principals of Soil Plant Water Relations (Second Edition), 2014, pp. 201–227.
  • Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J., Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res., 1999, 35, 233–241.
  • Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van, L., Bingner, W., Harmel, R. D. and Veith, T. L., Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantifica-tion of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE, 2007, 50, 885–900.
  • Jaynes, D. B., Temperature variations effect on field-measured in-filtration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1990, 54, 305–312.
  • Sharma, K. D., Singh, H. P. and Pareek, O. P., Rainwater infiltration into a bare loamy sand. Hydrol. Sci. J., 2009, 28, 417–424; https:// doi.org/10.1080/02626668309491980.
  • Mu, W. et al., Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on run-off and soil moisture content on different growing stages of spring maize. Water, 2015, 7, 2990–3008.
  • Khan, M. N. et al., Effect of slope, rainfall intensity and mulch on erosion and infiltration under simulated rain on purple soil of south-western Sichuan Province, China. Water, 2016, 8, 528.
  • Klein, R., Baumann, T., Kahapka, E. and Niessner, R., Temperature development in a modern municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash landfill with regard to sustainable waste manage-ment. J. Hazard. Mater., 2001, 83, 265–280.
  • Wright, P. G., The variation of viscosity with temperature. Phys. Educ., 1977, 12, 323–325.
  • Petrucci, G., De Bondt, K. and Claeys, P., Toward better practices in infiltration regulations for urban stormwater management. Urban Water J., 2016, 14, 546–550.
  • Lv, M., Hao, Z., Liu, Z. and Yu, Z., Conditions for lateral downslope unsaturated flow and effects of slope angle on soil moisture move-ment. J. Hydrol., 2013, 486, 321–333.
  • Miyazaki, T., Water Flow in Soils, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2005, pp. 163–217.
  • Poesen, J., The influence of slope angle on infiltration rate and Hortonian overland flow volume. Z. Geomorphol. Suppl., 1984, 49, 117–131.
  • Chen, L. and Young, M. H., Green–Ampt infiltration model for sloping surfaces. Water Resour. Res., 2006, 42, 1–9.
  • Liu, C.-W., Chen, S.-K., Jou, S.-W. and Kuo, S.-F., Estimation of the infiltration rate of a paddy field in Yun-Lin, Taiwan. Agric. Syst., 2001, 1, 41–54.
  • Chahinian, N., Moussa, R., Andrieux, P. and Voltz, M., Comparison of infiltration models to simulate flood events at the field scale. J. Hydrol., 2005, 306, 191–214.
  • Zolfaghari, A. A., Mirzaee, S. and Gorji, M., Comparison of different models for estimating cumulative infiltration. Int. J. Soil Sci., 2012, 7, 108–115.
  • Farid, H. U. et al., Estimation of infiltration model parameters and their comparison to simulate the onsite soil infiltration characteristics. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2019, 12, 84–91.
  • Ioannou, I., Charalambous, C. and Hall, C., The temperature variation of the water sorptivity of construction materials. Mater. Struct. Constr., 2017, 50, 1–12.

Abstract Views: 153

PDF Views: 97




  • Effects of temperature and slope on the infiltration rate for a landfill surface

Abstract Views: 153  |  PDF Views: 97

Authors

Lohit Jain
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi 110 016, India, India
Sumedha Chakma
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi 110 016, India, India

Abstract


In this study, parameters of the Kostiakov, Horton, Modified Kostiakov, SCS, Philip and Smith models were estimated using the double-ring infiltrometer on two different slopes, viz. 4° and 23°; in morning and afternoon sessions to assess their usefulness in characterizing the infiltration process. Observations revealed that the average increment in temperature by 9°C increased the final and initial infiltration rates by 65% and 38% respectively. The combined effects of the 23° slope and higher temperature increased the infiltrated volume by 6.4 times. The comparative analysis showed Kostiakov as the most efficient model incorporating combined and individual effects of temperature and slope

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi1%2F94-101