Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Fauna Associated with Wheat Cultivation in High Altitudes of the Nilgiris, India


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station, Wellington 643 231, India
2 The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 8499000, Israel
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Regional Station, Madikeri 571 201, India
4 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Regional Station, Udagamandalam 643 004, India
5 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
6 ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Regional Station, Udhagamandalam 643 004, India
7 ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, India
 

Wheat cultivation in southern India is unique as it is grown in high altitudes (1500 m amsl), surrounded by the pristine environment of the Western Ghats. Also, it can be grown throughout the year, unlike only once a year in India’s central and northern plains. The faunal pressure on wheat cultivation in southern India is different from the other wheat-growing regions in the country. However, information on faunal diversity associated with wheat crops in this unique ecosystem is meagre. Hence, the present study aimed to acquire knowledge based on the fauna associated with and their influence on wheat cultivation in the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, South India. Our results indicated that the phylum Arthropoda dominated the ecosystem with 61 species, followed by the Chordata with 41 species, and the Nematoda with 22 species. The coleopterans were found to be dominant among arthropods followed by lepidopterans. In chordates, small birds such as spotted munia and common rosefinch were observed often, while among the Nematoda, the plant-parasitic order Tylenchida topped the list. During different phases of cultivation, the overall diversity was highest during the early stages of the crop and least during the vegetative phase. This study also highlights the human– animal interaction in the context of agriculture, as it was observed that the damage caused by Nilgiri gaur, spotted munia and common rosefinch was one of the major reasons for non-preference of wheat crops by the farmers besides the lack of cost-effective technologies to ward-off wild animals. This initiative may encourage researchers to perform more comprehensive studies on the faunal diversity of the entire crop-growing areas in the southern hill regions of India.

Keywords

Agroecosystem, Animals, Biodiversity, Birds, Nematodes, Wheat.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agricoop, Annual Report 2020–21. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Government of India, Madras, 2021, pp. 1–13; https://agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/Web%20copy%20of%20-AR%20%28Eng%29_7.pdf
  • Francis, W., The Nilgiris Madras District Gazateers, The Superintendent, Government Press, 1908.
  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. and Kent, J., Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 2000, 403, 853–858.
  • Cobb, N. A., Estimating the nema population of soil, with special reference to the sugar-beet and root-gall nemas, Heterodera schachtii Schmidt and Heterodera radicicola (Greef) Müller. Agricultural Technology Circular. Bureau of Plant Industry, US Department of Agriculture, Government Print Office, USA, 1918.
  • Seinhorst, J. W., A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica, 1959, 4, 67–69.
  • Goodey, T., Goodey, J. B. and Jenkins, W. R., Soil and freshwater nematodes. Soil Sci., 1964, 97, 291.
  • Jairajpuri, M. S. and Ahmad, W., Dorylaimida – Free-Living, Predaceous and Plant-Parasitic Nematodes, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, Delhi, 1992, pp. 1–458.
  • Ahmad, W., Plant Parasitic Nematodes of India: An Identification Manual, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Press, Aligarh Muslim University, 1996, pp. 1–348.
  • Siddiqi, M. R., Tylenchida: Parasites of Plants and Insects, CABI, London, UK, 2000, 2nd edn, pp. 86–121.
  • Ahmad, W. and Jairajpuri, M. S., Mononchida, the Predatory Soil Nematodes, BRILL Publisher, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2010, pp. 51–238.
  • Berliner, J., Mhatre, P. H., Kalai, P. V., Kalaiarasan, P., Parvez, R. and Manimaran, B., Nematode trophic diversity in the pristine and cultivated fields of Nilgiris using Sedgewick–Rafter slides. Indian J. Nematol., 2021, 51, 149–154.
  • Shannon, C. E., A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1948, 27, 379–423.
  • Menhinick, E. F., Estimation of insect population density in herbaceous vegetation with emphasis on removal sweeping. Ecology, 1963, 44, 617–621.
  • Evans, E. W., Rogers, R. A. and Opfermann, D. J., Sampling grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on burned and unburned tall-grass prairie: night trapping vs sweeping. Environ. Entomol., 1983, 12, 1449–1454.
  • Gullan, P. J. and Cranston, P. S., Methods in entomology: collecting, preservation, curation, and identification. In The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010, 2nd edn, pp. 443–459.
  • Roulston, T. H., Smith, S. A. and Brewster, A. L., Short communication: a comparison of pan trap and intensive net sampling techniques for documenting a bee (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) fauna. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 2007, 80, 179–181.
  • Daniel, J. A. H. S. and Hegde, D., Butterfly diversity in Tamil Nadu agricultural university campus, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 2018, 6, 1354–1361.
  • Mitra, S. S. and Sheldon, F. H., Use of an exotic tree plantation by Bornean lowland forest birds. Auk, 1993, 110, 529–540.
  • Ripley, S. D. and Ali, S., Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. Vol. 7, Oxford University Press, 1972, pp. 1–228.
  • Berliner, J., Mhatre, P. H., Manimaran, B. and Parvez, R., The role of weeds in survival of root-knot nematode in Nilgiris. In Souvenir and Abstracts, Fifth National Symposium on Plant Protection in Horticulture (NSPPH-2021): Challenges and Roadmap Ahead, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, 27–29 December 2021, p. 86.
  • Rashid, P., Prevalence of plant parasitic and predatory nematodes associated with different crops of Badaun district (Uttar Pradesh). Curr. Nematol., 2004, 16, 43–46.
  • Borad, C. K. and Parasharya, B. M., Community structure of birds in wheat crop fields of Central Gujarat. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 2018, 6, 19–24.
  • Parasharya, B. M., Dodia, J. F., Mathew, K. L. and Yadav, D. N., The role of birds in the natural regulation of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner in wheat. Pavo, 1996, 1, 33–38.
  • Baker, E. C., The Fauna of British India, Volume 5, Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 1930.
  • https://ebird.org/view/checklist/S55009232 (accessed on 5 August 2022).
  • https://ebird.org/checklist/S112360201 (accessed on 5 August 2022).
  • Thapa, A., Singh, A., Pradhan, P. K., Joshi, B. D., Takur, M., Sharma, L. K. and Chandra, K., Is the Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus moving higher up in the mountains? Indian Birds, 2020, 15, 177–179.
  • Kumar, A., Walker, S. and Molur, S., Prioritisation of endangered species. Report submitted to WWF-India, 1998.
  • ICAR-IIWBR, Progress report of AICRP on wheat and barley 2017–18. In Crop Protection (eds Singh, D. P. et al.), ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 2018, p. 259.
  • Ramesh, T., Milda, D., Kalle, R., Gayathri, V., Thanikodi, M., Ashish, K. and Giordano, A. J., Drivers of human–megaherbivore interactions in the Eastern and Western Ghats of southern India. J. Environ. Manage., 2022, 316, 115315; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv-man.2022.115315.

Abstract Views: 114

PDF Views: 68




  • Fauna Associated with Wheat Cultivation in High Altitudes of the Nilgiris, India

Abstract Views: 114  |  PDF Views: 68

Authors

J. Berliner
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station, Wellington 643 231, India
J. Alfred-Daniel
The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 8499000, Israel
Balaji Rajkumar
ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Regional Station, Madikeri 571 201, India
H. C. Hombegowda
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Regional Station, Udagamandalam 643 004, India
B. Manimaran
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
Rashid Parvez
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
M. R. Khan
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
Priyank Hanuman Mhatre
ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Regional Station, Udhagamandalam 643 004, India
Guru-Pirasanna-Pandi Govindharaj
ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753 006, India

Abstract


Wheat cultivation in southern India is unique as it is grown in high altitudes (1500 m amsl), surrounded by the pristine environment of the Western Ghats. Also, it can be grown throughout the year, unlike only once a year in India’s central and northern plains. The faunal pressure on wheat cultivation in southern India is different from the other wheat-growing regions in the country. However, information on faunal diversity associated with wheat crops in this unique ecosystem is meagre. Hence, the present study aimed to acquire knowledge based on the fauna associated with and their influence on wheat cultivation in the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, South India. Our results indicated that the phylum Arthropoda dominated the ecosystem with 61 species, followed by the Chordata with 41 species, and the Nematoda with 22 species. The coleopterans were found to be dominant among arthropods followed by lepidopterans. In chordates, small birds such as spotted munia and common rosefinch were observed often, while among the Nematoda, the plant-parasitic order Tylenchida topped the list. During different phases of cultivation, the overall diversity was highest during the early stages of the crop and least during the vegetative phase. This study also highlights the human– animal interaction in the context of agriculture, as it was observed that the damage caused by Nilgiri gaur, spotted munia and common rosefinch was one of the major reasons for non-preference of wheat crops by the farmers besides the lack of cost-effective technologies to ward-off wild animals. This initiative may encourage researchers to perform more comprehensive studies on the faunal diversity of the entire crop-growing areas in the southern hill regions of India.

Keywords


Agroecosystem, Animals, Biodiversity, Birds, Nematodes, Wheat.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi4%2F426-433