Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment Framework for Public Satisfaction on the Urban Water Management Attributes in Central India


Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India
 

Urban areas of the present and future can be sustainably transformed by involving community participation in decision-making because of their local knowledge. Most of0 the Indian cities have water management problems like accessibility, availability, quality, adequate infrastructure and user charges. Urban water management is one of the prime responsibilities of urban local bodies in India, but there is no provision to assess public satisfaction. This study focuses on the assessment of the satisfaction level of the public on urban water management in Central India to improve the efficiency of urban water. The methodology and proposed framework will help in distinguishing the poor functioning among water attributes that need to be strengthened to maximize the efficiency of the water management system.

Keywords

Assessment Framework, City-Planners, Community Participation, Public Satisfaction, Urban Water Management.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Kumar, S. and Dhote, K. K., A grounded theory approach for the assessment of urban development policies in Indian cities. Curr. Sci., 2021, 121(12), 1561–1571.

  • Hans, A. and Bharat, A., Water as a resource: different perspectives in literature. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2014, 3(10), 27–34.

  • Kumar, S. and Dhote, K. K., Calibrating neighbourhood preferences in the land value contour model. Curr. Sci., 2020, 119(6), 1001–1009.

  • Shah, M., Urban water systems in India: a way forward. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, 2016.

  • Dhote, K. K. and Banerjee, S., Assessing inclusive approach in urban planning process for the case of Madhya Pradesh. Int. J. Town Plann. Manage., 2015, 1(1), 1–13.

  • Mitchell, G. V., Applying integrated urban water management concepts: a review of Australian experience. Environ. Manage., 2006, 37(5), 589–605.

  • Kyessi, A. G., Community-based urban water management in fringe neighbourhoods: the case of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat Int., 2005, 29(1), 1–25.

  • Hans, A. and Bharat, A., Exploring indicators for the assessment of urban water. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 2015, 4(9), 69–74.

  • Brown, A. and Matlock, M. D., A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. The Sustainability Consortium, 2011.

  • He, C., Liu, Z., Wu, J., Pan, X., Fang, Z., Li, J. and Bryan, B. A., Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Commun., 2021, 12(1), 1–11.

  • WHO, Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: special focus on inequalities. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.

  • Ananga, E. O., Agong, S. G., Acheampong, M., Njoh, A. J. and Hayombe, P., Examining the effect of community participation on beneficiary satisfaction with the work of water management committee in urban community-based operated water schemes. Sustain. Water Resour. Manage., 2020, 6(49), 1–13.

  • Farrelly, M. and Brown, R., Rethinking urban water management: experimentation as a way forward? Global Environ. Change, 2011, 21(2), 721–732.

  • Wong, T. H. F. and Brown, R., The water sensitive city: principles for practice. Water Sci. Technol., 2009, 60(3), 673–682.

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour. Manage., 2007, 21, 49–62.

  • van der Brugge, R. and Rotmans, J., Towards transition management of European water resources. Water Resour. Manage., 2007, 21(1), 249–267.

  • FAO, The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture-managing systems at risk. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Earthscan, London, 2011.

  • Allan, J. V., Fielding, K. S., Kenway, S. J. and Head, B. W., Community perspectives on sustainable urban water security. Urban Water J., 2021, 13(6), 1–11.

  • Dean, A., Lindsay, J., Fielding, K. and Smith, L., Fostering water sensitive citizenship – community profiles of engagement in water-related issues. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2016, 55(1), 238–247.

  • Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A. and Meek, J. W., Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Admin. Rev., 2006, 66, 76–88.

  • Donald, F. et al., A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care. J. Adv. Nurs., 2013, 69(10), 2148–2161.

  • Yang, K. and Pandey, S. K., Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: when does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Admin. Rev., 2011, 71(6), 880–892.

  • Amado, M. P., Santos, C. V., Moura, E. B. and Silva, V. G., Public participation in sustainable urban planning. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci., 2010, 5(2), 102–108.

  • Leicht, A., Heiss, J. and Byun, W. J., Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCO, 2005.

  • Jerome, B., Towards knowledge societies, UNESCO World Report, 2005.

  • Devi, S. J., Joseph, B., Karunakaran, K., Anuradha, B. and Devi, R., People’s attitude towards paying for water. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(9), 1296–1302.

  • Patil, S., Bhave, N. and Kulkarni, H., Situational analysis of ground-water in Madhya Pradesh, UNDP, 2019.

  • Jemmali, H. and Matoussi, M. S., A multidimensional analysis of water poverty at local scale: application of improved water poverty index for Tunisia. Water Policy, 2013, 15(1), 98–115.

  • Ishaku, H. T. and Majid, M. R., Community participation: alternative approach to water supply in Nigerian rural communities. In The International Conference on Built Environment in Developing Countries, Malaysia, 2010.

  • Maryati, S. and Humaira, A. N. S., Water supply provision characteristics in Peri-Urban area. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2018, 202, 012033.

  • McKenzie, D. and Ray, I., Urban water supply in India: status, reform options and possible lessons. Water Policy, 2009, 11(4), 442–460.

  • Yang, J. C., Pattanayak, S. K., Jonson, F. R., Mansfield, C., van den Berg, C. and Jones, K., Unpackaging demand for water service quality: evidence from conjoint surveys in Sri Lanka. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3817, 2006.

  • Das, R., Laishram, B. and Jawed, M., Public participation in urban water supply projects – the case of South-West Guwahati, India. Water Res., 2019, 165, 1–11.

  • Abrishamchi, A., Ebrahimian, A., Tajrishi, M. and Mariño, M. A., Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 2005, 131(4), 326–335.

  • UNICEF, Progress on sanitation and drinking water, United National International Children’s Emergency Fund, Bangkok, 2015.

  • Jie, L. et al., Water ethics and water resource management, UNESCO, 2011.

  • Chang, H., Parandvash, G. H. and Shandas, V., Spatial variations of single-family residential water consumption in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geogr., 2010, 31(7), 953–972.

  • WHO, The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.


Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 134




  • Assessment Framework for Public Satisfaction on the Urban Water Management Attributes in Central India

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 134

Authors

Shantanu Singh
Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India
Krishna Kumar Dhote
Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India
Sanjeev Kumar
Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India

Abstract


Urban areas of the present and future can be sustainably transformed by involving community participation in decision-making because of their local knowledge. Most of0 the Indian cities have water management problems like accessibility, availability, quality, adequate infrastructure and user charges. Urban water management is one of the prime responsibilities of urban local bodies in India, but there is no provision to assess public satisfaction. This study focuses on the assessment of the satisfaction level of the public on urban water management in Central India to improve the efficiency of urban water. The methodology and proposed framework will help in distinguishing the poor functioning among water attributes that need to be strengthened to maximize the efficiency of the water management system.

Keywords


Assessment Framework, City-Planners, Community Participation, Public Satisfaction, Urban Water Management.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi5%2F591-598