The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Non-structural components (NSCs) should be analysed properly using the floor response spectra (FRS) method to reduce financial loss due to earthquakes. There are various methods available in the literature to scale recor­dings. However, there is little or no agreement among researchers regarding the correctness of these methods in the analysis of NSCs. Therefore, the present study examines the influence of different amplitude scaling techniques (geometric mean and Sa(T1)) and spectral matching procedures on the seismic demands of NSCs. The spectral matching method shows the lowest ground motion parameter dispersion. The results reveal that the Sa(T1) scaling method produces lower floor responses. The spectral matching method shows smaller dispersion in the spectral ordinates and median response quantities. The amplification factors estimated in this study were compared to those from the existing code formula­tions. Based on the findings of this study, the spectral matching approach in the time domain may be utilized to better estimate seismic demands on NSCs

Keywords

Amplitude scaling, dispersion, floor amplification, non-structural components, spectral matching.
User
Notifications
Font Size