Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Estimation of energetics and energy-use efficiency of rice–green gram sequence in the coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
2 Polytechnic, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur 522 034, India, India
3 AICRP on Sailine Water Scheme, Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
4 Department of Crop Physiology, Agricultural College, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
 

A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural College, Bapatla, AP, India during kharif and rabi seasons from 2019 to 2021 using different establishment and nutrient treatments. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the energetics between the treatments in the rice–green gram. The results indicated that the input and output energy were the highest in the conventio­nal and the lowest in the minimum tillage. Highest total energy productivity and energy use efficiency were recorded with the reduced tillage. In case of nutrient management, the highest input, output energy and energy productivity and energy use efficiency were recorded with inorganic fertilizer + cured poultry manure treatments. It can be concluded that the reduced tillage with the application of inorganic fertilizer + cured poultry manure is the best in the constraints-prone coastal zone with limited irrigation facilities due to low require­ment of non-rene­wable energy

Keywords

Coastal zone, crop establishment methods, energy use efficiency, energy productivity, rice and green gram.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gautham Priyanka, G., Sharma, G. D., Ranchana, R. and Lal, B., Effect of integrated nutrient management and spacing on growth parameters, nutrient content and productivity of rice under system of rice intensification. Int. J. Res. Stud. Biosci., 2013, 2(3), 53–59.
  • www.rkmp.co.in
  • www.Indiastat.com
  • Mangal Deep, Mahender Kumar, R., Saha, S. and Singh, A., Rice based cropping systems for enhancing productivity of food grains in India: decadal experience of AICRP. Indian Farm., 2018, 68(01), 27–30.
  • Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V., Statistical Methods for Agricul-tural Workers, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 1989.
  • Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A., Statistical Procedures for Agri-cultural Research (2nd edn), John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1984, p. 680.
  • Shahana, F., Balazzii Naaiik, R. V. T., Soundharya, B., Vijaya Lak-shmi, D. and Venkataiah, M., Evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based cropping systems for productivity and profitability in the ver-tisols of Telangana, India. Curr. Sci., 2022, 122(6), 699–704.
  • Roy, D. C., Ray, M., Sarkar, U. and Patra, B. C., Bio-energy, pro-ductivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems in coastal flood plain of West Bengal, India. Int. J. Bioresour. Stress Manage., 2015, 6(1), 001–006.
  • Smil, V., Energy in Nature and Society: General Energetics of Complex Systems, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2008.
  • Kumar, S. M. G. K., Mishra, V. N., Maruti Sankar, G. R., Patil, S. K., Srivastav, L. K., Thakur, D. S. and Srinivasa Rao, C. H., Soil test based optimum fertilizer dose for attaining yield targets rice under midland Alfisols of eastern India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2015, 46, 2177–2190.
  • Sarkar, U., Rahman, M. M., Nahar, U. A. and Ahmed, M. N., Soil test based inorganic fertilizer and integrated plant nutrition system for rice cultivation in Inceptisols of Bangladesh. Agriculturists, 2016, 14(1), 3342.
  • Tuti, M. D., Energy budgeting of colocasia-based cropping systems in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Energy, 2012, 45, 986–993.
  • Khan, M. A. and Hossain, S. M. A., Study on energy input, output and energy use efficiency of major jute based cropping pattern. Bangladesh J. Sci. Indust. Res., 2007, 42(2), 195–202.
  • Mittal, V. K., Mittal, J. P. and Dhawan, K. C., Research digest on energy requirements in agricultural Section. Energy Requirement Scheme Report, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, 1985.
  • Devasenapati, P., Senthilkumar, G. and Shanmugam, P. M., Energy management in crop production. Indian J. Agron., 2008, 54(1), 80–90.
  • Mohammadshirazi, A., Akram, A., Rafiee, S., Mousavi-Avval, S. H. and Bagheri, K. E., An analysis of energy use and relation bet-ween energy inputs and yield in tangerine production. Renew. Sus-tain. Energy Rev., 2012, 16, 4515–4521.
  • Heideri, M. D. and Omid, M., Energy use pattern and econometric models of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran. Energy, 2011, 36, 220–225.
  • Ziaei, S. M., Mazloumzadeh, S. M. and Jabbary, M. A., Comparison of energy use and productivity of wheat and barley (case study). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 2015, 14, 19–25.
  • Esengun, K., Gunduz, O. and Erdal, G., Input–output energy analysis in dry apricot production of Turkey. Energy Conver. Manage., 2007, 48, 592–598.
  • Mobtaker, H. G., Keyhani, A., Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S. and Akram, A., Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for barley produc-tion. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 2010, 137, 367–372.
  • Imrana, M., Ozçatalbas, O. and Khalid Bashir, M., Estimation of energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission of cotton crop in South Punjab, Pakistan. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 2020, 19, 216–224.
  • Zangeneh, M., Omid, M. and Akram, A., A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamdan Province of Iran. Energy, 2010, 35, 2927–2933.
  • Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A. and Mohammadi, A., Energy flow modeling and sensitivity analysis of inputs for canola production in Iran. J. Clean. Prod., 2011, 19, 1464–1470.
  • Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S. and Mohammadi, A., Optimiza-tion of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy, 2011, 36, 909–916.
  • Rafiee, S., Mousavi-Avval, S. H. and Mohammadi, A., Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 2010, 35, 3301–3306.
  • Unakitan, G., Hurma, H. and Yilmaz, F., An analysis of energy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey. Energy, 2010, 35, 3623–3627.
  • Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H. and Fert, C., Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renew. Energy, 2004, 29, 39–51.
  • Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R. and Rafiee, S., Neural network modeling of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of watermelon production systems. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 2016, 15, 38–47.
  • Zahedi, M., Eshghizadeh, H. R. and Mondani, F., Energy use efficiency and economic analysis in cotton production in an arid region: a case study for Isfahan Province, Iran. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, 2014, 4(1), 43–52.

Abstract Views: 266

PDF Views: 122




  • Estimation of energetics and energy-use efficiency of rice–green gram sequence in the coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract Views: 266  |  PDF Views: 122

Authors

Polagani Nagarjuna
Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
B. Venkateswarlu
Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
M. Sreerekha
Polytechnic, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur 522 034, India, India
P. Venkata Subbaiah
AICRP on Sailine Water Scheme, Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla 522 101, India, India
K. Jayalalitha
Department of Crop Physiology, Agricultural College, Bapatla 522 101, India, India

Abstract


A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural College, Bapatla, AP, India during kharif and rabi seasons from 2019 to 2021 using different establishment and nutrient treatments. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the energetics between the treatments in the rice–green gram. The results indicated that the input and output energy were the highest in the conventio­nal and the lowest in the minimum tillage. Highest total energy productivity and energy use efficiency were recorded with the reduced tillage. In case of nutrient management, the highest input, output energy and energy productivity and energy use efficiency were recorded with inorganic fertilizer + cured poultry manure treatments. It can be concluded that the reduced tillage with the application of inorganic fertilizer + cured poultry manure is the best in the constraints-prone coastal zone with limited irrigation facilities due to low require­ment of non-rene­wable energy

Keywords


Coastal zone, crop establishment methods, energy use efficiency, energy productivity, rice and green gram.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi8%2F946-955