Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Landscape of World Research on Fertilizers: A Bibliometric Profile


Affiliations
1 Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India., India
 

The environmental cost of increased fertilizer application is an emerging concern, worsened by farmers’ reluctance to adopt alternative fertilizer products. The right fertilizer must be applied at the correct rate and time at the right place for maximum benefit. However, empirical evidence from across the world suggests a deviation from these normative strategies. Considering the lack of a holistic overview of the knowledge structure of the growing literature on fertilizers, we conducted a bibliometric analysis using data extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We identified the publication trend and the important authors, journals and countries contributing to research on fertilizers. In addition, the topics that have received research attention were also identified. We can locate that issues like nitrogen fertilizers and their effect on growth and yield will never lose relevance. Most importantly, researchers are now dealing more with topics related to the externalities of chemical fertilizer use. Our findings will help interested researchers to gain systematic insights into the knowledge structure of fertilizer research.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis, Environmental Cost, Fertilizer, Knowledge Structure, Research Trend.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Sutton, M. A. et al., Our Nutrient World: The challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2013.
  • Benson, T. and Mogues, T., Constraints in the fertilizer supply chain: evidence for fertilizer policy development from three Afri-can countries. Food Secur., 2018, 10, 1479–1500.
  • Jayne, T. S., Mason, N. M., Burke, W. J. and Ariga, J., Review: taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs. Food Policy, 2018, 75, 1–14.
  • Jayne, T. S., Mather, D., Mason, N. and Ricker-Gilbert, J., How do fertilizer subsidy programs affect total fertilizer use in sub-Saharan Africa? Crowding out, diversion, and benefit/cost assessments. Agric. Econ., 2013, 44, 687–703.
  • Gulati, A. and Banerjee, P., Rationalising fertiliser subsidy in India: key issues and policy options. Working Paper, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, 2015.
  • Ricker-Gilbert, J. and Jayne, T. S., Estimating the enduring effects of fertiliser subsidies on commercial fertiliser demand and maize production: panel data evidence from Malawi. J. Agric. Econ., 2017, 68, 70–97.
  • Birner, R., Gupta, S. and Sharma, N., The political economy of agricultural policy reform in India fertilizers and electricity for Irrigation. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2011.
  • Gulati, A. and Narayanan, S., Demystifying fertiliser and power subsidies in India. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2015, 35, 784–794.
  • Chand, R. and Pandey, L. M., Fertilizer growth, imbalances and subsidies – trends and implication. Discussion Paper, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi, 2008.
  • Aayog, N., Direct Benefit Transfer in Fertilizer: Fourth round of concurrent evaluation – A nationally representative study, 2020.
  • Kishore, A., Praveen, K. V. and Roy, D., Direct cash transfer system for fertilisers: why it might be hard to implement. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2013, 48, 54–63.
  • Hossain, M. and Singh, V. P., Fertilizer use in Asian agriculture: implications for sustaining food security and the environment. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 2000, 57, 155–169.
  • Chand, R. and Pavithra, S., Fertiliser use and imbalance in India: analysis of states. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2015, 50, 98–104.
  • Sharma, V. P. and Thaker, H., Demand for fertilisers in India: dete-minants and outlook for 2020. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2011, 66, 638–661.
  • Chen, X. et al., What has caused the use of fertilizers to skyrocket in China? Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 2018, 110, 241–255.
  • Sun, Y., Hu, R. and Zhang, C., Does the adoption of complex ferti-lizers contribute to fertilizer overuse? Evidence from rice produc-tion in China. J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 219, 677–685.
  • Jan, P., Calabrese, C. and Lips, M., Determinants of nitrogen sur-plus at farm level in Swiss agriculture. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 2017, 109, 133–148.
  • Ghosh, N., Promoting bio-fertilizers in Indian agriculture. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2004, 39, 5617–5625.
  • Theriault, V., Smale, M. and Haider, H., Economic incentives to use fertilizer on maize under differing agro-ecological conditions in Burkina Faso. Food Secur., 2018, 10, 1263–1277.
  • Marenya, P. P. and Barrett, C. B., Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Agric. Econ., 2009, 40, 561–572.
  • Sheahan, M., Black, R. and Jayne, T. S., Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research. Food Policy, 2013, 41, 39–52.
  • Xu, Z., Guan, Z., Jayne, T. S. and Black, R., Factors influencing the profitability of fertilizer use on maize in Zambia. Agric. Econ., 2009, 40, 437–446.
  • Burke, W. J., Jayne, T. S. and Black, J. R., Factors explaining the low and variable profitability of fertilizer application to maize in Zambia. Agric. Econ., 2017, 48, 115–126.
  • Ichami, S. M., Shepherd, K. D., Sila, A. M., Stoorvogel, J. J. and Hoffland, E., Fertilizer response and nitrogen use efficiency in African smallholder maize farms. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 2018, 113, 1–19.
  • Liverpool-Tasie, L. S. O., Is fertiliser use inconsistent with expected profit maximization in sub-Saharan Africa? ‘Evidence from Nigeria’. J. Agric. Econ., 2017, 68, 22–44.
  • Xu, X., He, P., Pampolino, M. F., Qiu, S., Zhao, S. and Zhou, W., Spatial variation of yield response and fertilizer requirements on regional scale for irrigated rice in China. Sci. Rep., 2019, 9, 1–8.
  • Good, A. G. and Beatty, P. H., Fertilizing nature: a tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biol., 2011, 9, e1001124.
  • Kanter, D. R., Zhang, X. and Mauzerall, D. L., Reducing nitrogen pollution while decreasing farmers’ costs and increasing fertilizer industry profits. J. Environ. Qual., 2015, 44, 325–335.
  • Garg, A., Shukla, P. R. and Upadhyay, J., N2O emissions of India: an assessment of temporal, regional and sector trends. Clim. Change, 2012, 110, 755–782.
  • Bhatia, A., Pathak, H. and Aggarwal, P. K., Inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils of India and their global warming potential. Curr. Sci., 2004, 87, 317–324.
  • Albanito, F. et al., Direct nitrous oxide emissions from tropical and sub-tropical agricultural systems – a review and modelling of emission factors. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 1–12.
  • Cai, J., Xia, X., Chen, H., Wang, T. and Zhang, H., Decomposition of fertilizer use intensity and its environmental risk in China’s grain production process. Sustainability, 2018, 10, 498–512.
  • Kahrl, F., Li, Y., Su, Y., Tennigkeit, T., Wilkes, A. and Xu, J., Greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogen fertilizer use in China. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2010, 13, 688–694.
  • Davidson, E. A., The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860. Nature Geosci., 2009, 2, 659–662.
  • Keeler, B. L. et al., The social costs of nitrogen. Sci. Adv., 2016, 2, e1600219.

Abstract Views: 202

PDF Views: 118




  • The Landscape of World Research on Fertilizers: A Bibliometric Profile

Abstract Views: 202  |  PDF Views: 118

Authors

K. V. Praveen
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India., India
Alka Singh
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India., India

Abstract


The environmental cost of increased fertilizer application is an emerging concern, worsened by farmers’ reluctance to adopt alternative fertilizer products. The right fertilizer must be applied at the correct rate and time at the right place for maximum benefit. However, empirical evidence from across the world suggests a deviation from these normative strategies. Considering the lack of a holistic overview of the knowledge structure of the growing literature on fertilizers, we conducted a bibliometric analysis using data extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We identified the publication trend and the important authors, journals and countries contributing to research on fertilizers. In addition, the topics that have received research attention were also identified. We can locate that issues like nitrogen fertilizers and their effect on growth and yield will never lose relevance. Most importantly, researchers are now dealing more with topics related to the externalities of chemical fertilizer use. Our findings will help interested researchers to gain systematic insights into the knowledge structure of fertilizer research.

Keywords


Bibliometric Analysis, Environmental Cost, Fertilizer, Knowledge Structure, Research Trend.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi10%2F1140-1150