Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Does conservation agriculture promote Sustainable intensification in the rice–wheat System of the Indo-Gangetic plains in India? Empirical evidences from on-farm studies


Affiliations
1 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., India
 

The sustainability of rice–wheat (RW) production system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India is being threa­tened by climate change, and land and water degradation. Conservation agriculture practices provide a nature-based solution by addressing these challenges without affecting food security. In this study, a meta-analysis framework was employed to assess the on-farm economic and environmental impacts of CA in the RW system of the Indian IGP. Results show a higher on-farm yield response of CA in wheat (+5.6%) and a slight reduction in rice yield (–0.4%) compared to conventional tillage (CT). Nevertheless, the Eastern IGP witnessed a positive rice yield (+4.3%) under CA. Carbon sequestration potential of the RW system was found to be significantly higher (+22.70%) in CA. Implementation of CA practices resulted in a substantial reduction of carbon dioxide (–18.80%) and global warming potential (–23.26%). A significant amount of water was saved following CA practices on farms (+19.78%). From an economic point of view, CA practices were found to be more cost-effective with higher net returns compared to conventional tillage in the study region. Outscaling CA represents a win-win strategy for mitigating climate change without affecting food and livelihood security in the region. Providing payment for ecosystem services and developing cost-effective technologies are critical for the outscaling of CA in the IGP.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration, climate change, con-servation agriculture, food security, Rice–wheat system.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Regmi, A. P. et al., Yield and soil fertility trends in a 20-year rice– rice–wheat experiment. Better Crops Int., 2003, 17(2), 30.

  • Ladha, J. K. et al., How extensive are yield declines in long-term rice–wheat experiments in Asia? Field Crops Res., 2003, 81, 159– 180.

  • Gupta, R. and Seth, A., A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP). Crop Prot., 2007, 26(3), 436–447.

  • Samal, S. K. et al., Evaluation of long-term conservation agriculture and crop intensification in rice–wheat rotation of Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia: carbon dynamics and productivity. Eur. J. Agron., 2017, 90, 198–208.

  • Pal, D. K., Bhattacharyya, T., Srivastava, P., Chandran, P. and Ray, S. K., Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: their historical perspective and management. Curr. Sci., 2009, 96(9), 1193–1202.

  • Sekar, I. and Pal, S., Rice and wheat crop productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: changing pattern of growth and future strategies. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2012, 67(2), 1–15.

  • Gathala, M. K. et al., Optimizing intensive cereal-based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 2013, 177, 85–97.

  • Kumar, P. et al., Economic analysis of total factor productivity of crop sector in Indo-Gangetic Plain of India by district and region. Agricultural Economics Research Report, Indian Agricultural Re-search Institute, New Delhi, India, 2002, No. 2.

  • Bhattacharyya, R., Tuti, M. D., Bisht, J. K., Bhatt, J. C. and Gupta, H. S., Conservation tillage and fertilization impact on soil aggrega-tion and carbon pools in the Indian Himalayas under an irrigated rice–wheat rotation. Soil Sci., 2012, 177(3), 218–228.

  • Ghimire, R., Adhikari, K. R., Chen, Z. S., Shah, S. C. and Dahal, K. R., Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by tillage, crop residue, and nitrogen application in rice–wheat rotation system. Paddy Water Environ., 2012, 10(2), 95–102.

  • Erenstein, O. and Laxmi, V., Zero tillage impacts in India’s rice– wheat systems: a review. Soil Till. Res., 2008, 100(1–2), 1–14.

  • Aryal, J. P., Sapkota, T. B., Jat, M. L. and Bishnoi, D. K., On-farm economic and environmental impact of zero-tillage wheat: a case of North-West India. Exp. Agric., 2015, 51(1), 1–16.

  • Humphreys, E., Kukal, S. S., Christen, E. W., Hira, G. S. and Sharma, R. K., Halting the groundwater decline in north-west India – which crop technologies will be winners? Adv. Agron., 2010, 109, 155–217.

  • Sapkota, T. B., Jat, M. L., Aryal, J. P., Jat, R. K. and Khatri-Chhetri, A., Climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and eco-nomic profitability of conservation agriculture: some examples from cereal systems of Indo-Gangetic Plains. J. Integr. Agric., 2015, 14, 1524–1533.

  • Godfray, H. C. J. and Garnett, T., Food security and sustainable intensi-fication. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., London, Ser. B, 2014, 369(1639), 1–10.

  • FAO, What is conservation agriculture, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy, 2014; http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html

  • Hobbs, P. R., Sayre, K. and Gupta, R., The role of conservation ag-riculture in sustainable agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., London, Ser. B, 2008, 363(1491), 543–555.

  • Kumara, K. T. M., Kandpal, A. and Pal, S., Determinants and im-pacts of conservation agriculture in South Asia: a meta-analysis of the evidences. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2019, 74, 311–320.

  • Kumara, T. K., Kandpal, A. and Pal, S., A meta-analysis of eco-nomic and environmental benefits of conservation agriculture in South Asia. J. Environ. Manage., 2020, 269, 110773.

  • Erenstein, O., Conservation agriculture-based technologies and the political economy: lessons from South Asia. In Contested Agronomy, Routledge, London, 2012, pp. 59–75.

  • Kumar, V., Saharawat, Y. S., Gathala, M. K., Jat, A. S., Singh, S. K., Chaudhary, N. and Jat, M. L., Effect of different tillage and seeding methods on energy use efficiency and productivity of wheat in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Res., 2013, 142, 1–8.

  • Kassam, A., Friedrich, T. and Derpsch, R., Global spread of con-servation agriculture. Int. J. Environ. Stud., 2019, 76(1), 29–51.

  • Pittelkow, C. M. et al., Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 2015, 517(7534), 365–368.

  • Hedges, L. V. and Gurevitch, J., The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 1999, 80, 1150–1156; https://doi. org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2

  • Mehlka, R. S., Verma, J. K., Gupta, R. K. and Hobbs, P. R., Stagnation in the productivity of wheat in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: zero-till-seed-cum-fertilizer drill as an integrated soluction (No. CIMMYT), 2000.

  • Jat, M. L., Gathala, M. K., Saharawat, Y. S., Ladha, J. K. and Singh, Y., Conservation agriculture in intensive rice–wheat rotation of western Indo-Gangetic Plains: effect on crop physiology, yield, water productivity and economic profitability, 2019.

  • Sidhu, H. S., Humphreys, E., Dhillon, S. S., Blackwell, J. and Bector, V., The Happy Seeder enables direct drilling of wheat into rice stubble. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 2007, 47(7), 844–854.

  • Sidhu, H. S., Singh, M., Singh, Y., Blackwell, J., Singh, V. and Gupta, N., Machinery development for crop residue management under direct drilling. In Fifth World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Brisbane, Australia, 2011.

  • Devkota, M., Devkota, K. P., Acharya, S. and McDonald, A. J., In-creasing profitability, yields and yield stability through sustainable crop establishment practices in the rice–wheat systems of Nepal. Agric. Syst., 2019, 173, 414–423.

  • Magar, S. T., Timsina, J., Devkota, K. P., Weili, L. and Rajbhan-dari, N., Conservation agriculture for increasing productivity, pro-fitability and water productivity in rice–wheat system of the East-ern Gangetic Plain. Environ. Challeng., 2022, 7, 100468.

  • Al‐Kaisi, M. M. and Yin, X., Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn–soybean rotations. J. Environ. Qual., 2005, 34(2), 437–445.

  • Singh, Y., Crop residue management for improving soil and crop productivity. In Resource Conserving Techniques in Crop Produc-tion (eds Sharma, A. R. and Behera, U. K.), Scientific Publishers, India, 2011, pp. 166–189.

  • West, T. O. and Marland, G., Net carbon flux from agricultural ecosystems: methodology for full carbon cycle analyses. Environ. Pollut., 2002, 116(3), 439–444.

  • Lal, R., Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geo-derma, 2004, 123(1–2), 1–22.

  • La Scala Jr., N., Lopes, A., Spokas, K., Bolonhezi, D., Archer, D. W. and Reicosky, D. C., Short-term temporal changes of soil car-bon losses after tillage described by a first-order decay model. Soil Till. Res., 2008, 99(1), 108–118.

  • Feng, J., Li, F., Zhou, X., Xu, C., Ji, L., Chen, Z. and Fang, F., Im-pact of agronomy practices on the effects of reduced tillage systems on CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural fields: a global meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13, 1–17.

  • Mangalassery, S., Sjogersten, S., Sparkes, D. L., Sturrock, C. J., Craigon, J. and Mooney, S. J., To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils? Sci. Rep., 2014, 4, 1–8.

  • FAO, The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW): Managing Systems at Risk. Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy and Earthscan, London, UK, 2011; http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i1688e/i1688e. pdf

  • Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Global Food Report: waste not, want not, 2013; https://www.imeche.org/docs/default-source/reports/ Global_Food_Report.pdf

  • Parihar, C. M. et al., Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Res., 2016, 193, 104–116.

  • Jat, M. L., Gathala, M. K., Saharawat, Y. S., Tetarwal, J. P. and Gupta, R., Double no-till and permanent raised beds in maize–wheat rotation of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: effects on crop yields, water productivity, profitability and soil physical prop-erties. Field Crops Res., 2013, 149, 291–299.

  • Siddique, K. H. et al., Innovations in agronomy for food legumes. a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2012, 32(1), 45–64.


Abstract Views: 244

PDF Views: 124




  • Does conservation agriculture promote Sustainable intensification in the rice–wheat System of the Indo-Gangetic plains in India? Empirical evidences from on-farm studies

Abstract Views: 244  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Ankita Kandpal
ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., India
T. M. Kiran Kumara
ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., India
Suresh Pal
ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., India

Abstract


The sustainability of rice–wheat (RW) production system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India is being threa­tened by climate change, and land and water degradation. Conservation agriculture practices provide a nature-based solution by addressing these challenges without affecting food security. In this study, a meta-analysis framework was employed to assess the on-farm economic and environmental impacts of CA in the RW system of the Indian IGP. Results show a higher on-farm yield response of CA in wheat (+5.6%) and a slight reduction in rice yield (–0.4%) compared to conventional tillage (CT). Nevertheless, the Eastern IGP witnessed a positive rice yield (+4.3%) under CA. Carbon sequestration potential of the RW system was found to be significantly higher (+22.70%) in CA. Implementation of CA practices resulted in a substantial reduction of carbon dioxide (–18.80%) and global warming potential (–23.26%). A significant amount of water was saved following CA practices on farms (+19.78%). From an economic point of view, CA practices were found to be more cost-effective with higher net returns compared to conventional tillage in the study region. Outscaling CA represents a win-win strategy for mitigating climate change without affecting food and livelihood security in the region. Providing payment for ecosystem services and developing cost-effective technologies are critical for the outscaling of CA in the IGP.

Keywords


Carbon sequestration, climate change, con-servation agriculture, food security, Rice–wheat system.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi10%2F1188-1193