Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding Age-Friendliness of Cities and Urban Communities through the Perceptions of Senior Citizens in Kolkata, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Planning and Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 769 008, India
2 Department of Architecture and Regional Planning, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India
 

To better understand the requirements of senior citizens for an age-friendly urban environment, especially in the Indian context, it is important to consider their perception of age-friendly cities and urban communities, as well as assess their experience of living in a city as an ageing person. This study highlights a perception-based methodological approach for planning age-friendly urban communities. Major tools used in the study are Focus Group Discussion to validate and modify the components derived from the literature and formulation of indicators of age-friendliness, questionnaire survey and Ridit analysis. The result generates a priority-wise rank of indicators of age-friendliness expressing the perceptions and preferences of senior citizens on the existing conditions in the study area. The result also highlights the checklist of indicators for policy intervention to achieve age-friendliness in three dimensions – social, physical and economic.

Keywords

Age-Friendly Environment, Cities and Urban Communities, Context Specific Measurable Indicators, People’s Perception, Senior Citizens.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Roy, A., Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Plann. Theory, 2009, 8(1), 76–87.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Parry, M. L.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.

  • Sarkar, B., Banerji, H. and Sen, J., Assessment of socio-economic vulnerability using select indicators. 52nd Annual Congress of International Society of City and regional Planners (ISOCARP), 2016.

  • Pathak, M. and Mahadevia, D., Urban informality and planning: challenges to mainstreaming resilience in Indian cities. Resilience-oriented Urban Planning, Springer International Publishing (online), 2018, pp. 49–66.

  • Roy, A., Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 2005, 71(2), 147–158.

  • Baviskar, A., Between violence and desire: space, power and identity in the making of Metropolitan Delhi. Int. Soc. Sci. J., 2003, 55(175), 89–98.

  • Bhan, G., Planned illegalities: housing and the ‘failure’ of planning in Delhi: 1947–2010. Econ. Polit. Wekly, 2013, 48(24), 58–70.

  • Lefebvre, H., The right to the city. Writings on Cities, Le droit a la Ville, Anthropos, Paris, 63181, 1968.

  • Harvey, D., Debates and developments: the right to the city. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 2003, 27(4), 939–941.

  • Harvey, D., The Right to the City, 2008, pp. 23–40.

  • Harvey, D., Rebel Cities: from the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, Verso Books, New York, 2012, 1st edn.

  • Barough, B. I. and Hadafi, F., Study on environmental factors in elderly house. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res., 2017, 7(4), 12–25.

  • WHO, Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide, Geneva, WHO, 2007.

  • WHO, Measuring the Age-friendliness of Cities: A Guide to Using Core Indicators, 2015.

  • WHO, World Report on Ageing and Health. WHO, Luxembourg City, 2015.

  • UNDP, Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UNDP, New York, 2012.

  • United Nations Development Programme, UNDP Support to the Implementation of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UNDP, New York, 2016.

  • WHO, Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health, 2015.

  • Help Age International, Ageing and the city: making urban spaces work for older people, 2016.

  • Dellobelle, I., retrieved 13 August 2019; from Huffington Post, 2017; https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/inge-delobelle/ageing-in-the-city-creati_b_17816560.html?guccounter=1.

  • NGO Committee for Social Development, Social Integration in Action: stories from the Grassroots, 2009; https://ifa.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/059_January-10-Report-of-NGO-Committee-on-Social-Integration.pdf.

  • Butler, R. N. and Gleason, H. P., Productive aging: enhancing vitality in later life, Springer, New York, 1985.

  • WHO, Health for all: updated targets. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 1994.

  • Rowe, J. W. and Kahn, R. L., Successful aging. Gerontologist, 1997, 37(4), 433–440.

  • Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M., Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioural Sciences (eds Baltes, P. B. and Balted, M. M.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990, pp. 1–34.

  • Walker, A., A strategy for active ageing. Int. Soc. Sec. Rev., 2002, 55, 121–139.

  • WHO, Health and Ageing: A Discussion Paper, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.

  • Paúl, C., Ribeiro, O. and Teixeira, L., Active ageing: an empirical approach to the WHO model. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res., 2012, Article ID 382972; https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/382972.

  • Fries, J. F., The theory and practice of active aging. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res., 2012, Article ID 420637; doi:10.1155/2012/420637.

  • Policy Brief, Active Ageing, United Nations economic Commission for Europe Policy Brief on Ageing, No 13, 2012; https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/age/Policy_briefs/ECE-WG.1.17.pdf.

  • Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Census of India, Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, New Delhi, 1991.

  • Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Census of India, Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, New Delhi, 2001.

  • Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Census of India, Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, New Delhi, India, 2011.

  • Registrar General, India, SRS Bulletin, GoI, New Delhi, 2013.

  • Subaiya, L. and Bansod, D., Demographics of population ageing in India, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, United Nations Population Fund, New Delhi, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, 2011.

  • Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Senior Citizens Welfare Fund: Annual Report for the Year 2016–2017. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, New Delhi, 2016.

  • Kumar, S., Sathyanarayana, K. M. and Omer, A., Living arrangements of elderly in India. International Conference on Challenges in Population Aging in Asia, New Delhi, UN Fund for Population Activities, 2011, pp. 1–4.

  • Saha, S., Basu, S. and Pandit, D., Identifying factors influencing perceived Quality of Life (QoL) of Indian elderly: case study of Kolkata, India. Soc. Indic. Res., 2020, 160(3), 1–41; doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02493-7.

  • Lamb, S., Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. J. Aging Stud., 2014, 29(supplement C), 41–52; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013. 12.006.

  • Brijnath, B., Why does institutionalised care not appeal to Indian families? Legislative and social answers from urban India. Ageing Soc., 2012, 32(4), 697–717.

  • Aroonsrimorakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., Metadilogkul, O. and Konjengbam, S., Ageing, social isolation, loneliness, health, social care and longevity: insights from case studies in Thailand and India. Ageing Int., 2019, 44(4), 371–384; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-019-09353-x.

  • Gangopadhyay, J., Examining the changing processes of aging in urban Kolkata. Ageing Int., 2019, 45, 273–287; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-019-09352-y.

  • Torku, A., Chan, A. and Yung, E., Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions. Ageing Soc., 2020, 1–38; doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000239.

  • Havighurst, R. J. and Albrecht, R., Older people, Longmans, Green, Oxford, England, 1953.

  • Havighurst, R. J., Developmental tasks and education, David McKay, New York, 1972.

  • Maddox, G. L., Activity and morale: a longitudinal study of selected elderly subjects. Soc. Forces, 1963, 42, 195–204.

  • Lemon, B. W., Bengston, V. L. and Peterson, J. A., An exploration of activity theory of aging: activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. J. Gerontol., 1972, 27, 511–523.

  • Longino, C. F. and Cart, C. S., Explicating activity theory: a formal replication. J. Gerontol., 1982, 35, 713–722.

  • Harlow, R. E. and Cantor, N., Still participating after all these years: a study of life task participation in later life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 1996, 71, 1235–1249.

  • Birren, J. E. and Schroots, J. J. F., History of gero-psychology. In Handbook of Psychology of Aging (ed. Birren, J. E.), Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, 5th edn, pp. 3–28.

  • Rose, A. M., Hennis, A. J. and Hambleton, I. R., Sex and the city: differences in disease and disability-free life years, and active community participation of elderly men and women in 7 cities in Latin America and the Caribbean. BMC Public Health, 2008, 8, 127.

  • McMullin, J. A., Diversity and the state of sociological aging theory. Gerontologist, 2000, 40, 517–530.

  • Lange, J. and Grossman, S., Theories of aging. In Geronotological Nursing Competencies for Care (ed. Mauk, K.), Jones and Bartlett, Boston, MA, 2010, pp. 51–73.

  • Cumming, E. and Henry, W., Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement, Basic Books, New York, 1961.

  • Diggs, J., Activity theory of ageing. In Encyclopedia of Ageing and Public Health (eds Loue, S. J. and Sajatovic, M.), Springer, Boston, MA; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33754-8_9.

  • Hochshild, A. R., Disengagement theory: a critique and proposal. Am. Sociol. Rev., 1975, 40(5), 553–569.

  • Baltes, P. B., Theoretical proposition of life span development psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Develop. Psychol., 1987, 23, 611–626.

  • Achenbaum, W. A. and Bengtson, V. L., Re-engaging the disengagement theory of aging: on the history and assessment of theory development in gerontology. Gerontologist, 1994, 34, 756–763.

  • Schroots, J. J. F., Theoretical development in psychology of aging. Gerontologist, 1996, 36(6), 742–748.

  • Adams, K. B., Changing investment in activities and interests in elders’ lives: theory and measurement. Int. J. Aging Hum. Develop., 2004, 58(2), 87–108.

  • Madison, H. E., Theories of aging. In Gerontologic Nursing (ed. Luekenotte, A. G.), Sage, St Louis, Mosby, 2000, 2nd edn, pp. 20–33.

  • Riley, M. W. and Riley, J. W., Age integration and lives of older people. Gerontologist, 1994, 34, 110–115.

  • Riley, M. W., Johnson, M. and Foner, A., Ageing and Society: A Sociology of Age Stratification, 3, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1972.

  • Marshall, V. W., The stage of theory in aging and the social sciences. In Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (eds Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K.), Academic Press, San Diego, 1996, 4th edn, pp. 12–26.

  • Uhlenberg, P., The burden of aging: a theoretical framework for understanding the shifting balance of caregiving and care receiving at cohorts age. Gerontologist, 1996, 36, 761–767.

  • Uhlenberg, P., Why study age integration? Gerontologist, 2000, 40, 261–266.

  • Hagestad, G. O. and Dannefer, D., Concepts and theories of aging: beyond microfication in social sciences approaches. In Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (eds Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K.), Academic Press, San Diego, 2001, 5th edn, pp. 3–21.

  • Lawton, M. P. and Nahemow, L., Ecology and aging process. In Psychology of Adult Development and Aging (eds Eisdorfer, C. and Lawton, M. P.), American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 1973, pp. 619–674.

  • Lawton, M. P. and Simon, B., The ecology of social relationships in housing for elderly. Gerontologist, 1968, 8, 108–115.

  • Lawton, M. P., The impact of the environment on aging and behavior. In Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (eds Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W.), Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 276–301.

  • Lawton, M. P., Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In Aging and the Environment (eds Lawton, M. P., Windley, P. G. and Byrtes, T. O.), Springer, New York, 1982, pp. 33–59.

  • Lawton, M. P., Environmental proactivity in older people. In The Course of Later Life (eds Bengtson, V. L. and Schaie, K. W.), New York, 1989, pp. 15–23.

  • Lawton, M. P., Environment and aging: theory revisited. In Environment and Aging Theory. A Focus on Housing (eds Scheidt, R. and Windley, P. G.), Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1998, pp. 1–31.

  • Pastalan, L. A., Sensory changes and environmental behaviour. In The Environmental Context of Aging (eds Obyerts, T. O. et al.), Garland, New York, 1979, pp. 118–126.

  • Howell, S. C., Determinants of housing choice among elderly: policy implications. Final report, Administration on Aging Grant, 90AR2116. Department of Architecture, Cambridge, MA, MIT, 1982.

  • Patterson, A. H., Territorial behaviour and fear of crime in elderly. Environ. Psychol. Nonverbal Behav., 1978, 2, 131–144.

  • Lawton, M. P. and Yaffe, S., Victimization and fear of crime in elderly public housing tenants. J. Gerontol., 1980, 35, 768–779.

  • Slangen-de, K. Y., A tale of two adaptations. Coping Processes of Older Persons in the Domain of Independent Living, Eindhoven, University Press Facilities, The Netherlands, 1999.

  • Wahl, H.-W. and Oswald, F., Environmental perspectives on aging. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology (eds Dannefer, D. and Phillipson, C.), Uni-frankfurt.de, London, UK, 2010, pp. 111–124.

  • Oswald, F., Jopp, D., Rott, C. and Wahl, H.-W., Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? Gerontologist, 2011, 51(2), 238–250; http://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq096.

  • Wahl, H.-W., Iwarsson, S. and Oswald, F., Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. Gerontologist, 2012, 52(3), 306–316; http://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr154.

  • Konig, K., Raje, M., D’Ambrosio, L. A. and Coughlin, J. E., Physical and emotional support of the neighborhood for older adults: a comparison. ARGIS, 2019, 62(13), 84–94.

  • Roy Bardhan, A., Demographic and socio-economic study of the elderly population in Kolkata, India. Int. Schol. Sci. Res. Innov., 2019, 13(11), 1417–1424.

  • Times of India, Kolkata is ageing faster than other metros; https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/kolkata-is-ageing-faster-than-other-metros/articleshow/49546289.cms?utm_source=content-ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst (retrieved on January 2021 and 27 October 2015).

  • Lamb, S. (ed.), White Sarees and Sweet Mangoes, University of California Press, Oakland, 2000.

  • Bhattacharyya, T., Chatterjee, S. C., Chand, D., Chatterjee, D. and Sengupta, J., Assessment of private homes as spaces for the dying elderly. Indian J. Palliat. Care, 2017, 23(3), 325–330.

  • Cochran, W. G., Sampling Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963.

  • Bross, I. D., How to use ridit analysis. Biometrics, 1958, 14, 18–38.

  • Wu, C. H., On the application of grey relational analysis and RIDIT analysis to Likert scale surveys. Int. Math. Forum, 2007, 2(14), 675–687.

  • Pradhan, B. K., Service quality indicators in education setting: application of RIDIT method to Likert scale surveys. Dissertation, NIT Rourkela, 2009.

  • Gopalan, R. and Satpathy, B., Indian retail service quality evaluation-grey and RIDIT approach. Int. J. Bus. Insights Transform., 2013, 7(1), 24–33.

  • Bhattacharya, S. and Kumar, R. V., Modeling Tourists’ Opinions Using RIDIT Analysis, IGI Global, Pennsylvania, 2017.


Abstract Views: 335

PDF Views: 112




  • Understanding Age-Friendliness of Cities and Urban Communities through the Perceptions of Senior Citizens in Kolkata, India

Abstract Views: 335  |  PDF Views: 112

Authors

Basudatta Sarkar
Department of Planning and Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 769 008, India
Haimanti Banerji
Department of Architecture and Regional Planning, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, India

Abstract


To better understand the requirements of senior citizens for an age-friendly urban environment, especially in the Indian context, it is important to consider their perception of age-friendly cities and urban communities, as well as assess their experience of living in a city as an ageing person. This study highlights a perception-based methodological approach for planning age-friendly urban communities. Major tools used in the study are Focus Group Discussion to validate and modify the components derived from the literature and formulation of indicators of age-friendliness, questionnaire survey and Ridit analysis. The result generates a priority-wise rank of indicators of age-friendliness expressing the perceptions and preferences of senior citizens on the existing conditions in the study area. The result also highlights the checklist of indicators for policy intervention to achieve age-friendliness in three dimensions – social, physical and economic.

Keywords


Age-Friendly Environment, Cities and Urban Communities, Context Specific Measurable Indicators, People’s Perception, Senior Citizens.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv125%2Fi2%2F138-147