Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor


Affiliations
1 Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, India., India
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi 630 004, India., India
 

The residence time distribution was used to study the hydrodynamic behaviour using the pulse input tracer technique. The effect of medium, compartment-wise variation in the mixing patterns inside the reactor and hydraulic retention time on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the reactor was studied. The influence of the number of compartments was predominant compared to the hydraulic retention time and presence of a medium. The flow regime in the first, second and third compartments was in the intermediate state whereas the flow regime was in plug-flow state in the rear compartment. The interactive effects were evaluated using response surface methodology

Keywords

Anaerobic Baffled Reactor, Dead Space, Hydrau-Lic Efficiency, Residence Time Distribution, Response Surface Methodology.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Barber, W. P. and Stuckey, D. C., The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res., 1999, 33(7), 1559–1578.

  • Wang, J., Huang, Y. and Zhao, X., Performance and characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 2004, 93(2), 205–208.

  • Khalekuzzaman, M., Hasan, M., Haque, R. and Alamgir, M., Hydrody-namic performance of a hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor (HABR): effects of number of chambers, hydraulic retention time, and influ-ent temperature. Water Sci. Technol., 2018, 78(4), 968–981.

  • Mansouri, Y., Zinatizadeh, A. A., Mohammadi, P., Irandoust, M., Akhbari, A. and Davoodi, R., Hydraulic characteristics analysis of an anaerobic rotatory biological contactor (AnRBC) using tracer experiments and response surface methodology (RSM). Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2012, 29(7), 891–902.

  • Lindmark, J., Thorin, E., Bel Fdhila, R. and Dahlquist, E., Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2014, 40, 1030–1047.

  • Michalopoulos, I. et al., Experimental and numerical assessment of the hydraulic behavior of a pilot-scale periodic anaerobic baffled reactor (PABR). Comput. Chem. Eng., 2018, 111, 278–287.

  • Bevziuk, K., Chebotarev, A., Snigur, D., Bazel, Y., Fizer, M. and Sidey, V., Spectrophotometric and theoretical studies of the proto-nation of Allura Red AC and Ponceau 4R. J. Mol. Struct., 2017, 1144, 216–224.

  • Levenspiel, O., Chemical Reaction Engineering Third Edition, Wiley, New York, USA, 1999.

  • Ji, J. Y., Zheng, K., Xing, Y. J. and Zheng, P., Hydraulic characteristics and their effects on working performance of compartmentalized an-aerobic reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 116, 47–52.

  • Li, S. N., Nan, J., Li, H. and Yao, M., Comparative analyses of hydrau-lic characteristics between the different structures of two anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs). Ecol. Eng., 2015, 82, 138–144.

  • Hasan, M., Khalekuzzaman, M., Alamgir, M. and Islam, M. K., Effect of temperature on hydrodynamic behaviour of a modified anaerobic baffled reactor. J. Eng. Sci., 2018, 9(1), 103–110.

  • Jamadia, M. H. and Alighardashib, A., Hydrodynamic characteristics and flow regime investigation of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Desalin. Water Treat., 2017, 1, 1–10.

  • Thackston, E. L., Sheilds Jr, F. D. and Schroeder, P. R., Residence time distribution of shallow basins. J. Environ. Eng., 1987, 113(6), 1319–1332.

  • Persson, J., Somes, N. L. G. and Wong, T. H. F., Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci. Technol., 1999, 40(3), 291–300.

  • Renuka, R., Mariraj Mohan, S. and Amal Raj, S., Hydrodynamic behaviour and its effects on the treatment performance of panelled anaerobic baffle-cum filter reactor. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 13(1), 307–318.

  • Li, S., Nan, J. and Gao, F., Hydraulic characteristics and perfor-mance modeling of a modified anaerobic baffled reactor (MABR). Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 284, 85–92.

  • Pirsaheb, M., Rostamifar, M., Mansouri, A. M., Zinatizadeh, A. A. L. and Sharafi, K., Performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating high strength baker’s yeast manufacturing wastewater. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 2015, 47, 137–148.

  • Sarathai, Y., Koottatep, T. and Morel, A., Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system. J. Environ. Sci., 2010, 22(9), 1319–1326.

  • Liu, X., Ren, N. and Yuan, Y., Performance of a periodic anaerobic baffled reactor fed on Chinese traditional medicine industrial wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 2009, 100(1), 104–110.

  • Krishna, G. V. T., Kumar, P. and Kumar, P., Treatment of low-strength soluble wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). J. Environ. Manage., 2009, 90(1), 166–176.


Abstract Views: 86

PDF Views: 58




  • Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor

Abstract Views: 86  |  PDF Views: 58

Authors

N. Dharsika
Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, India., India
S. Amal Raj
Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, India., India
S. Mariraj Mohan
Department of Civil Engineering, Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi 630 004, India., India

Abstract


The residence time distribution was used to study the hydrodynamic behaviour using the pulse input tracer technique. The effect of medium, compartment-wise variation in the mixing patterns inside the reactor and hydraulic retention time on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the reactor was studied. The influence of the number of compartments was predominant compared to the hydraulic retention time and presence of a medium. The flow regime in the first, second and third compartments was in the intermediate state whereas the flow regime was in plug-flow state in the rear compartment. The interactive effects were evaluated using response surface methodology

Keywords


Anaerobic Baffled Reactor, Dead Space, Hydrau-Lic Efficiency, Residence Time Distribution, Response Surface Methodology.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi2%2F176-182