Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Strategies for Strengthening Farmer Producer Organizations in India Based on the One District One Product scheme


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan 731 236, India
2 ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, India
 

Farmer producer organizations (FPOs) have been pivotal in empowering Indian agriculture in recent years. The Government of India has taken several steps to help in the growth of FPOs. For example, it has initiated the ‘One District One Product’ (ODOP) scheme. In each district of the states, major commodities are identified which can be promoted through FPOs. The present study focuses on the experiences in Bihar, where abundant production of cash crops like makhana (about 85% of the world’s production) has been achieved by the farmers (about 50,000 t of makhana). Despite the huge demand, makhana has been lagging in exports due to a lack of quality produce, skill, mechanization in harvesting and processing, and a near absence of value addition. In this context, integration of the ODOP scheme with FPOs can be a potential option to combat production constraints, facilitate marketing and export of the produce. This study proposes a strategy using a conceptual model, viz. technology–infrastructure–policy–export orientation (TIPE) model, that specifies the steps to be undertaken for better promotion of products through FPOs. A congenial ecosystem is necessary for the growth of producer organizations to provide a comprehensive solution with required policy backup and triggering factors that can contribute to the sustainable development of FPOs.

Keywords

Agriculture, Cash Crops, Conceptual Model, Farmer Producer Organizations, Government Schemes.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • FAO, Sustainable agriculture and rural development. Policy Brief, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2007, pp. 1–3.

  • Ahmad, L., Habib Kanth, R., Parvaze, S. and Sheraz Mahdi, S., Agro-climatic and agro-ecological zones of India. In Experimental Agrometeorology: A Practical Manual, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 99–118; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69185-5_15

  • Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D., Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 2003, 300(5620), 758–762.

  • Bachke, M. E., Are farmers’ organizations a good tool to improve small-scale farmers’ welfare? In Paper presented at the II Conferencia do IESE ‘Dinamicas da Pobreza e Padrões de Acumulação em Moçambique’, Maputo, 2009, pp. 4–29.

  • Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Satyapriya and Burman, R. R., Road map and strategies for effective viable profit-making farmer producer companies. ICAR News, 2018, pp. 16–18.

  • Mukherjee, A., Roy, S., Yadav, V. K., Pradhan, K., Shubha, K., Singh, D. K. and Kumar, U., Problems faced by the vegetable based-farmers producer companies: a descriptive analysis. Veg. Sci., 2022, 49(1), 96–100.

  • Mukherjee, A., Prioritization of problems in integrated agriculture: a case of Rampur village in sub humid region of Eastern India. Indian Res. J. Extens. Educ., 2016, 15(1), 53–59.

  • Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Shubha, K. and Burman, R. R., Facilitating and hindering factors affecting growth and functioning of farmers producer companies in India. Indian J. Extens. Educ., 2019, 55(4), 14–20.

  • Vinayak, N., Premlata, S., Arathy, A. and Shiv, K., Farmer producer organisations: innovative institutions for upliftment of small farmers. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2019, 89(9), 1383–1392.

  • NABARD, Farmer producers’ organizations (FPOs): status, issues & suggested policy reforms, 2019–20. National Paper, pp. 1–10.

  • Joshi, E., Assessing India’s FPO Ecosystem, Tata Cornell University News, 2022.

  • Kumar, A., Singh, R. K. P., Chandra, N., Bharati, R. C., Kumar, U. J. J. W. A. L. and Mishra, J. S., Foodgrain production performance in Bihar: a temporal analysis. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88, 1227–1232.

  • Vutukuru, V. K., Singh, P. and Kumar, M., A decade of rural transformation. Lessons learnt from the Bihar rural livelihoods project – Jeevika, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 69–76.

  • Nayaji, A. and Dixit, S., Farmers producers organizations (FPO) in Bihar: a road ahead. Innovations, 2021, 66, 425–431.

  • APEDA Export Strategy: Part II – Focus Product. 2017; https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/Announcements/APEDA%20Export%20-Strategy%20(Part-2).pdf (accessed on 15 January 2021).

  • Area and production of fruits, vegetables, plantation crops and aromatic plants in Bihar, 2021; horticulture.bihar.gov.in/Main Site/Statistics.aspx (accessed on 16 June 2022).

  • Horticulture Statistics at a Glance, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare (MoAFW), 2018; https://nhb.gov.in/statistics/Publication/Horticulture%20At%20a%20Glance%-202017%20for%20net%20uplod%20(2).pdf (accessed on 16 June 2022).

  • https://mofpi.nic.in/pmfme/one-district-one-product (accessed on 14 June 2022).

  • Singh, D. K., Kumar, A., Kumar, U., Singh, I. S., Chandra, N. and Bhatt, B. P., Value chain analysis of Makhana. ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, 2020, pp. 1–22.

  • Balyan, K., Shiv Kumar, Chahal, V. P. and Sandeep Kumar, Dynamics of Indian fresh mango export. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2015, 85(11), 1466–1471.

  • GoI, Area and production of horticulture crops report – All India. MoFAW, Government of India, 2018, pp. 1–2.

  • Nayak, A. K. and Nahar, S., Growth, instability and export performance of banana in India – an economic analysis. Agric. Situat. India, 2018, 74(10), 25–33.

  • Karadipatil, S. and Welfare, D. S., SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of farmer producer companies in north-eastern Karnataka. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., 2021, 6, 2456–2165.

  • Manaswi, B. H., Kumar, P., Prakash, P., Anbukkani, P., Kar, A., Jha, G. K. and Lenin, V., Evaluation of farmer producer organizations of Telangana: a SWOT analysis approach. J. Commun. Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2019, 14, 457–466.

  • Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Roy, M., Satyapriya and Burman, R. R., Enhancing farmers income through farmers producers’ companies in India: status and roadmap. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88(8), 1151–1161.

  • Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Maity, A., Shubha, K. and Burman, R. R., Enhancing livelihood security of dairy farmers through farmers’ producer company: a diagnostic study of Bundelkhand region. Range Manage. Agrofor., 2020, 41(1), 156–167.

  • Gorai, S. K., Wason, M., Padaria, R. N., Rao, D. U. M., Paul, S. and Paul, R. K., SWOT and constraint analysis of farmer producer organisations in West Bengal. J. Community Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2022, 17, 197–203.

  • Rajkhowa, P. and Qaim, M., Personalized digital extension services and agricultural performance: evidence from smallholder farmers in India. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16, e0259319.

  • Ayub, G. and Siraj, M., Mango commodity chain study: knowledge gap and use of ICTs in the Chain in India. Report of CABI South Asia, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 2018, pp. 1–15.


Abstract Views: 357

PDF Views: 111




  • Strategies for Strengthening Farmer Producer Organizations in India Based on the One District One Product scheme

Abstract Views: 357  |  PDF Views: 111

Authors

Shreya Anand
Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan 731 236, India
Souvik Ghosh
Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan 731 236, India
Anirban Mukherjee
ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, India

Abstract


Farmer producer organizations (FPOs) have been pivotal in empowering Indian agriculture in recent years. The Government of India has taken several steps to help in the growth of FPOs. For example, it has initiated the ‘One District One Product’ (ODOP) scheme. In each district of the states, major commodities are identified which can be promoted through FPOs. The present study focuses on the experiences in Bihar, where abundant production of cash crops like makhana (about 85% of the world’s production) has been achieved by the farmers (about 50,000 t of makhana). Despite the huge demand, makhana has been lagging in exports due to a lack of quality produce, skill, mechanization in harvesting and processing, and a near absence of value addition. In this context, integration of the ODOP scheme with FPOs can be a potential option to combat production constraints, facilitate marketing and export of the produce. This study proposes a strategy using a conceptual model, viz. technology–infrastructure–policy–export orientation (TIPE) model, that specifies the steps to be undertaken for better promotion of products through FPOs. A congenial ecosystem is necessary for the growth of producer organizations to provide a comprehensive solution with required policy backup and triggering factors that can contribute to the sustainable development of FPOs.

Keywords


Agriculture, Cash Crops, Conceptual Model, Farmer Producer Organizations, Government Schemes.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv125%2Fi6%2F614-622