Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Research performance evaluation of leading higher education institutions in Malaysia


Affiliations
1 CSIR National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram 695 019, India
2 University of Malaya, Faculty of Science, Institute of Mathematical Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
 

We carried out a research performance analysis of leading higher education institutions in Malaysia using bibliometric data from the latest (2014) release of the Scimago Institutions Rankings (SIR). We tracked the complete performance chain: input–output–excellence– outcome–productivity using indicators that represent quantity, quality and productivity dimensions. The quantity dimensions are size-dependent, whereas the quality and productivity dimensions are sizeindependent. The largest active institutions, the most productive institutions and the fastest improving institutions over the period 2009–2014 were also identified.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, higher educational institutions, performance chain, research performance.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tan, H. X., Abu Ujum, E., Choong, K. F. and Ratnavelu, K., Impact analysisof domestic and international collaborations: a Malaysian casestudy. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1), 885–904.

  • MOHE, National higher education action plan: 2007–2010. Ministry ofHigher Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2007.

  • MOHE, The national higher education strategic plan: laying the foundationbeyond 2020. Ministry of Higher Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2007.

  • MOHE, Internationalization policy for higher education in Malaysia. Ministryof Higher Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2011.

  • MOSTI, National survey of research and development (R&D) in Malaysia. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2012.

  • Science and Engineering Indicators 2012, National Science Board, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/

  • Hendrix, D., An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes ofHealth funding, and faculty size at Association of AmericanMedical Colleges medical schools, 1997–2007. J. Med. Libr. Assoc., 2008, 96(4), 324–334.

  • Prathap, G., Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2), 563–570.


Abstract Views: 293

PDF Views: 139




  • Research performance evaluation of leading higher education institutions in Malaysia

Abstract Views: 293  |  PDF Views: 139

Authors

Gangan Prathap
CSIR National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram 695 019, India
K. Ratnavelu
University of Malaya, Faculty of Science, Institute of Mathematical Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract


We carried out a research performance analysis of leading higher education institutions in Malaysia using bibliometric data from the latest (2014) release of the Scimago Institutions Rankings (SIR). We tracked the complete performance chain: input–output–excellence– outcome–productivity using indicators that represent quantity, quality and productivity dimensions. The quantity dimensions are size-dependent, whereas the quality and productivity dimensions are sizeindependent. The largest active institutions, the most productive institutions and the fastest improving institutions over the period 2009–2014 were also identified.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, higher educational institutions, performance chain, research performance.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv109%2Fi6%2F1159-1164