Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Accounting for Gender Research Performance Differences in Ranking Universities


Affiliations
1 Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science, National Research Council of Italy, Via del Taurini 19, 00185, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Engineering and Management, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
 

The literature on the theme of gender differences in research performance indicates a gap in favour of men over women. Beyond the understanding of the factors that could be at the basis of this phenomenon, it is worthwhile understanding if it would be appropriate to conduct the evaluation per population in a manner distinguished by gender. In fact, if there is some factor that structurally determines a penalization of performance by women researchers compared to men, then the comparative evaluation in the performance of organizations' that do not take gender into account will lead to an advantage for those that employ more men, under parity in the capacities of their staff. In this work we measure the differences in the performance and the rank of research institutions as observed when gender is taken into account compared to when it is ignored. The study population consists of all Italian universities and the performance measured in the hard sciences for the period 2006-10.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Gender Differences, Ranking Universities, Research Productivity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics (database), 2015; DOI:10.1787/ data-00182-en. Retrieved on-line from http://stats.oecd.org/ Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB (last accessed 6 November 2015).

  • Mauleón, E. and Bordons, M., Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of material science. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(1), 199–218.

  • Lee, S. and Bozeman B., The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc. Stud. Sci., 2005, 35(5), 673–702.

  • Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. A., Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. Am. Sociol. Rev., 1998, 63(6), 847–870.

  • Long, J. S., Measure of sex differences in scientific productivity. Soc. Forces, 1992, 71(1), 159–178.

  • Fox, M. F., Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Soc. Stud. Sci., 1983, 13(2), 285–305.

  • Frietsch, R., Haller, I., Funken-Vrohlings, M. and Grupp, H., Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Res. Policy, 2009, 38(4), 590–599.

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Caprasecca, A., Gender differences in research productivity: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 2009, 79(3), 517–539.

  • Alonso-Arroyo, A., González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. and Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Gender analysis of papers published in Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria (1999–2006). Actas ESP Psiquiatr., 2007, 36(6), 314–322.

  • Leahey, E., Gender differences in productivity: research specialization as a missing link. Gender Soc., 2006, 20(6), 754–780.

  • Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. A., Women in science: career processes and outcomes (review). Soc. Forces, 2004, 82(4), 1669–1671.

  • Cole, J. R. and Zuckerman, H., The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns in publication of men and women scientists. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement (eds Steinkamp, M. W. and Maehr, M. L.), Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1984, vol. 2, pp. 217–258.

  • Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. A., Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. Am. Sociol. Rev., 1998, 63, 847–870.

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Caprasecca, A., The contribution of star scientists to sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(1), 137–156.

  • Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, M. T. and Gómez, I., One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: differences by gender and professional category of scientists. Scientometrics, 2003, 57(2), 159–173.

  • Ding, W. W., Murray, F. and Stuart, T. E., Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science, 2006, 313(5787), 665–667.

  • Zainab, A. N., Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 1999, 4(2), 73–110.

  • Rossiter, M. W., The Matilda effect in science. Soc. Stud. Sci., 1993, 23(2), 325–341.

  • Van Den Brink, M., Brouns, M. and Waslander, S., Does excellence have a gender? A national research study on recruitment and selection procedures for professorial appointments in the Netherlands. Employee Relations, 2006, 28(6), 523–539.

  • Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E. and Marusic, A., Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 2006, 296(9), 1103–1115.

  • Ley, T. J. and Hamilton, B. H., The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science, 2008, 322(5907), 1472–1474.

  • Mauleón, E., Bordons, M. and Oppenheim, C., The effect of gender on research staff success in life sciences in the Spanish National Research Council. Res. Eval., 2008, 17(3), 213–225.

  • Fox, M. F., Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Soc. Stud. Sci., 2005, 35(1), 131–150.

  • Stack, S., Gender, children and research productivity. Res. Higher Educ., 2004, 45(8), 891–920.

  • Kyvic, S. and Teigen, M., Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Sci., Technol., Human Values, 1996, 21(1), 54–71.

  • Bozeman, B. and Corley, E., Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res. Policy, 2004, 33(4), 599–616.

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Solazzi, M., The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3), 629–643.

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Murgia, G., Gender differences in research collaboration. J. Informetr., 2013, 7(4), 811–822.

  • Badar, K., Hite, J. H. and Badir, Y. F., Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 2013¸ 94(2), 755–775.

  • Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gelinas, P. and Gingras, Y., Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Quebec university professors. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3), 483–498.

  • Kyvik, S. and Teigen, M., Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Sci. Technol. Human Values, 1996, 21(1), 54–71.

  • McDowell, J. M., Larry, D., Singell Jr, L. D. and Stater, M., Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Econ. Inquiry, 2006, 44(1), 153–168.

  • McDowell, J. M. and Smith, K. J., The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: implications for academic promotions. Econ. Inquiry, 1992, 30(1), 68–82.

  • Duch, J., Zeng, X. H. T., Sales-Pardo, M., Radicchi, F., Otis, S., Woodruff, T. K. and Amaral, L. A. N., The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(12), e51332.

  • Ceci, S. J. and Williams, W. M., Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 108(8), 3157–3162.

  • Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C. A., How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2), 1129–1144.

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Rosati, F., The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences. J. Informetr., 2013, 7(1), 198–208.

  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T. and D’Angelo, C. A., Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges. J. Inform., 2013, 7(2), 528–539.

  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T. and D’Angelo, C. A., Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? J. Inform., 2015, 9(1), 25–38.


Abstract Views: 394

PDF Views: 117




  • Accounting for Gender Research Performance Differences in Ranking Universities

Abstract Views: 394  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

Giovanni Abramo
Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science, National Research Council of Italy, Via del Taurini 19, 00185, Rome, Italy
Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
Department of Engineering and Management, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Abstract


The literature on the theme of gender differences in research performance indicates a gap in favour of men over women. Beyond the understanding of the factors that could be at the basis of this phenomenon, it is worthwhile understanding if it would be appropriate to conduct the evaluation per population in a manner distinguished by gender. In fact, if there is some factor that structurally determines a penalization of performance by women researchers compared to men, then the comparative evaluation in the performance of organizations' that do not take gender into account will lead to an advantage for those that employ more men, under parity in the capacities of their staff. In this work we measure the differences in the performance and the rank of research institutions as observed when gender is taken into account compared to when it is ignored. The study population consists of all Italian universities and the performance measured in the hard sciences for the period 2006-10.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Gender Differences, Ranking Universities, Research Productivity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv109%2Fi10%2F1783-1789