Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Indian Economics and Indian Scholarly Publishing: is there Room for Current Science?


Affiliations
1 Department of Quantitative Methods in Economics, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland
2 Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland
3 School of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom
 

Multidisciplinary science journals include a few papers in economics. However, very few papers in economics appear in Current Science, itself a multidisciplinary journal. This article reports the results obtained from our analysis of the possible reasons for this situation. A study of almost 6500 articles from the journal's archives led us to the conclusion that the proportion of the journal's papers in the field of economics is very small, less than 0.5%. Thus we conducted an e-mail survey with 43 Indian authors publishing in Indian economics journals, asking them whether or not they had submitted any manuscript to Current Science and what were the reasons for this decision. Then, following a quantitative analysis, we constructed a model that represented the different argumentation strategies used by our sample of authors. Our main conclusion is that it is a lack of communication between economics researchers and the journal itself that creates disciplinary gaps in the multidisciplinary nature of Current Science.

Keywords

Dissemination of Scientific Results, International Acknowledgement, Multidisciplinary Journals.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 227

PDF Views: 90




  • Indian Economics and Indian Scholarly Publishing: is there Room for Current Science?

Abstract Views: 227  |  PDF Views: 90

Authors

Marcin Kozak
Department of Quantitative Methods in Economics, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland
Olesia Iefremova
Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland
Mateusz Stopa
Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland
James Hartley
School of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom

Abstract


Multidisciplinary science journals include a few papers in economics. However, very few papers in economics appear in Current Science, itself a multidisciplinary journal. This article reports the results obtained from our analysis of the possible reasons for this situation. A study of almost 6500 articles from the journal's archives led us to the conclusion that the proportion of the journal's papers in the field of economics is very small, less than 0.5%. Thus we conducted an e-mail survey with 43 Indian authors publishing in Indian economics journals, asking them whether or not they had submitted any manuscript to Current Science and what were the reasons for this decision. Then, following a quantitative analysis, we constructed a model that represented the different argumentation strategies used by our sample of authors. Our main conclusion is that it is a lack of communication between economics researchers and the journal itself that creates disciplinary gaps in the multidisciplinary nature of Current Science.

Keywords


Dissemination of Scientific Results, International Acknowledgement, Multidisciplinary Journals.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv106%2Fi5%2F681-684