Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Cold Fusion: Comments on the State of Scientific Proof


Affiliations
1 SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, United States
 

Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium-deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium-deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims?.

Keywords

Cold Fusion, Fleischmann, Pons, Scientific Proof.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 406

PDF Views: 140




  • Cold Fusion: Comments on the State of Scientific Proof

Abstract Views: 406  |  PDF Views: 140

Authors

Michael C. H. McKubre
SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, United States

Abstract


Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium-deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium-deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims?.

Keywords


Cold Fusion, Fleischmann, Pons, Scientific Proof.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv108%2Fi4%2F495-498