Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Conversion of Biomass-Generated Syngas into Next-Generation Liquid Transport Fuels through Microbial Intervention: Potential and Current Status


Affiliations
1 TERI, Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi 110 003, India
2 TERI University, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 070, India
 

The production of biofuels from synthesis gas that utilizes a wide variety of biomass is an emerging concept, particularly with the focus on biomass-based economy. Biomass is converted to synthesis gas via gasification, which involves partial oxidation of the biomass at high temperature. This route of ethanol or liquid biofuel production has the advantage of utilizing the entire biomass, including the lignin content. Though the technology is yet to be established, there is a major breakthrough in understanding the microbial route of synthesis gas conversion. Acetogenic microorganisms such as Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium aceticum, Acetobacterium woodii, Clostridium carboxidivorans and Clostridium autoethanogenum have already been reported to play a role in the conversion of synthesis gas to ethanol and acetic acid. Poor mass transfer properties of the gaseous substrates and low ethanol yield from these biocatalysts are the major challenges, preventing the commercialization of synthesis gas fermentation technology. This article reviews the existing literature on biomass-derived synthesis gas fermentation into biofuels, specifically ethanol. Special emphasis has been laid on understanding the need of synthesis gas fermentation and its bioconversion into next-generation liquid transport fuels. However, advantages of microbial process over conventional methods and the role of different microorganisms and pathways used have also been described. The article also outlines the challenges and future research directions regarding up scaling and commercialization of synthesis gas fermentation technology.

Keywords

Biomass, Microbial Interventions, Synthesis Gas, Transport Fuels.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, A., Pant, D. and Olsen, S. I., Key issues to consider in microalgae based biodiesel production. Energy Edu. Sci. Technol. Part A, 2012, 29, 563–576.

  • Joshua, D. M., The use of syngas derived biomass and waste products to produce ethanol and hydrogen. Basic Biotechnol. e-journal, 2007.

  • Nguyen, T. L. T., Gheewala, S. H. and Garivait, S., Energy balance and GHG abatement cost of cassava utilization for fuel ethanol in Thailand. Energy Policy, 2007, 35, 4585–4596.

  • Schubert, C., Can biofuels finally take center stage? Nat. Biotechnol., 2007, 24, 777–784.

  • Demirbas, A., Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Prog. Energy Combust., 2007, 33, 1–18.

  • Balat, M. and Balat, H., Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl. Energy, 2009, 86, 2273–2282.

  • Elmekaway, A., Diels, L., Wever, H. D. and Pant, D., Valorization of cereal based biorefinery by-products: reality and expectations. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47, 9014–9027.

  • Elmekaway, A., Diels, L., Bertin, L., Wever, H. D. and Pant, D., Potential biovalorization techniques for olive mill biorefinery wastewater. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 2014, 8, 283–293.

  • Cotter, J. L., Chinn, M. S. and Grudnen, A. M., Ethanol and acetate production by Clostridium ljungdahlii and Clostridium autoethanogen using resting cells. Bioprocess. Biosyst., 2009, 32, 369– 380.

  • Abubackar, H. N., Veiga, M. C. and Kennes, C., Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gasses to bioethanol. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 2011, 5, 93–114.

  • Datar, R. P., Shenkman, R. M., Cateni, B. G., Huhnke, R. L. and Lewis, R. S., Fermentation of biomass-generated producer gas to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2004, 86, 587–594.

  • Worden, R. M., Grethlein, A. J., Jain, M. K. and Datta, R., Production of butanol and ethanol from synthesis gas via fermentation. Fuel, 1991, 70, 615–619.

  • Filippis, P. D., Borgianni, C., Paolucci, M. and Pochetti, F., Prediction of syngas quality for two-stage gasification of selected waste feedstocks. Waste Manage., 2004, 24, 633–639.

  • Henstra, A. M., Sipma, J., Rinzema, A. and Stams, A. J. M., Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2007, 18, 200–206.

  • Ahmed, A., Cateni, B. G., Huhnke, R. L. and Lewis, R. S., Effects of biomass-generated producer gas constituents on cell growth, product distribution and hydrogenase activity of Clostridium carboxidivorans P7. Biomass Bioenerg., 2006, 30, 665e72.12.

  • Dry, M. E., The Fischer–Tropsch process 1950–2000. Catal. Today, 2002, 71, 227–241.

  • Phillips, J. R., Klasson, K. T., Clausen, E. C. and Gaddy, J. L., Biological production of ethanol from coal synthesis gas medium development studies. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 1993, 39, 559– 571.

  • Vega, J. L., Clausen, E. C. and Gaddy, J. L., Design of bioreactors for coal synthesis gas fermentation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 1990, 3, 149–160.

  • Wolfrum, E. J. and Watt, A. S., Bioreactor design studies for a hydrogen-producing bacterium. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2002, 98, 611–625.

  • Ragauskas, A. J., Williams, C. K., Davison, B. H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J. and Eckert, C. A., The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science, 2006, 311, 484–489.

  • Sung, S. and Lee, P. H., Synthesis Gas Fermentation, Environmental Anaerobic Technology – Applications and New Developments, 978-1-84816-542-7, ISBN: 2010.

  • Abrini, J., Naveau, H. and Nyns, E. J., Clostridium authoethanogenum sp. nov, an anaerobic bacterium that produces ethanol from carbon-monoxide. Arch. Microbiol., 1994, 161, 345e 51.

  • Drake, H. L., Acetogenesis, acetogenic bacteria, and the acetylCoA/Wood Ljungdahl pathway: past and current perspectives. In Acetogenesis (ed. Drake, H. L.), Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994, pp. 3–60.

  • Wood, H. G., Ragsdale, S. W. and Pezacka, E., The acetyl-CoA pathway of autotrophic growth. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1986, 39, 345–362.

  • Sharma, M., Aryal, N., Sarma, P. M., Vanbroekhoven, K., Lal, B., Dominguez-Benetton, X. and Pant, D., Bioelectrocatalyzed reduction of acetic and butyric acids via direct electron transfer by a mixed culture of sulfate-reducers drives electrosynthesis of alcohols and acetone. Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6495–6497.

  • Ahmed, A. and Lewis, R. L., Fermentation of biomass generated synthesis gas: effects of nitric oxide. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2007, 97, 1080–1086.

  • Klasson, K. T., Ackerson, M. D., Clausen, E. C. and Gaddy, J. L., Bioconversion of synthesis gas into liquid or gaseous fuels. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 1992, 14, 602–608.

  • Chang, I. S., Kim, B. H., Lovitt, R. W. and Bang, J. S., Effect of CO partial pressure on cell-recycled continuous CO fermentation by Eubacterium limosum KIST612. Process Biochem., 2011, 37, 411–421.

  • Liou, J. S. C., Balkwill, D. L., Drake, G. R. and Tanner, R. S., Clostridium carboxidivorans sp. nov., a solvent-producing clostridium isolated from an agricultural settling lagoon, and reclassification of the acetogen Clostridium scatologenes strain SL1 as Clostridium drakei sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2005, 55, 2085–2091.

  • Shen, G. J., Shieh, J. S., Grethlein, A. J., Jain, M. K. and Zeikus, J. G., Biochemical basis for carbon monoxide tolerance and butanol production by Butyribacterium methylotrophicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1999, 51, 827–832.

  • Bredwell, M. D., Srivastava, P. and Worden, R. M., Reactor design issues for synthesis-gas fermentations. Biotechnol. Prog., 1999, 15, 834–844.

  • Abubackar, H. N., María, C. V. and Kennes, C., Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gases to bioethanol. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref., 2011, 5, 93–114.

  • Nerenberg, R. and Rittmann, B. E., Hydrogen-based, hollow-fiber membrane biofilm reactor for reduction of perchlorate and other oxidized contaminants. Water Sci. Technol., 2004, 49, 223–230.

  • Zhu, H., Shanks, B. H. and Heindel, T. J., Enhancing CO–water mass transfer by functionalized MCM41 nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47, 7881–7887.

  • Klasson, K. T., Ackerson, C. M. D., Clausen, E. C. and Gaddy, J. L., Biological conversion of coal and coal-derived synthesis gas. Fuel, 1993, 72, 1673–1678.

  • Bouaifi, M., Hebrard, G., Bastoul, D. and Roustan, M., A comparative study of gas hold-up, bubble size, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in gas–liquid reactors and bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Process., 2001, 40, 97–111.

  • Hasler, P. and Nussbaumer, T., Gas cleaning for IC engine applications from fixed bed biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenerg., 1999, 16, 385–395.

  • Turn, S. Q., Kinoshita, C. M., Jakeway, L. A., Jenkins, B. M., Baxter, L. L., Wu, B. C. and Blevins, L. G., Fuel characteristics of processed, high-fiber sugarcane. Fuel Process. Technol., 2003, 81, 35–55.

  • Rajagopalan, S. P., Datar, R. and Lewis, R. S., Formation of ethanol from carbon monoxide via a new microbial catalyst. Biomass Bioenerg., 2002, 23, 487–493.

  • Younesi, H., Najafpour, G. and Mohameda, A. R., Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas via fermentation processes using anaerobic bacterium. Clostridium ljungdahlii. Biochem. Eng. J., 2005, 27, 110–119.

  • Sato, M., Matsuura, K. and Fujii, T., Ethanol separation from ethanol–water solution by ultrasonic atomization and its proposed mechanism based on parametric decay instability of capillary wave. J. Chem. Phys., 2001, 114, 2382–2386.

  • Daniell, J., Köpke, M. and Simpson, S. D., Commercial biomass syngas fermentation. Energies, 2012, 5, 5372–5417.

  • Singla, A., Verma, D., Lal, B. and Sarma, P. M., Enrichment and optimization of anaerobic bacteria mixed culture for conversion of syngas to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol., 2014, 172, 41–49.

  • Gaddy, J. L. and Clausen, E. C., Clostridium ljungdahlii, an anaerobic ethanol and acetate producing microorganism. US Patent 5173429, 1992.

  • Kundiyana, D. K., Wilkins, M. R., Maddipati, P. B. and Huhnke, R. L., Effect of temperature, pH and buffer on syngas fermentation using Clostridium strain P11. Bioresour. Technol., 2011, 102, 5794–5799.

  • Liu, K., Atiyeh, H. K., Tanner, R. S., Wilkins, M. R. and Huhnke, R. L., Fermentative production of ethanol from syngas using novel moderately alkaliphilic strains of Alkalibaculum bacchi. Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 104, 336–341.

  • Lorowitz, W. H. and Bryant, M. P., Peptostreptococcus productus strain that grows rapidly with CO as the energy source. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1984, 47, 961–964.


Abstract Views: 329

PDF Views: 108




  • Conversion of Biomass-Generated Syngas into Next-Generation Liquid Transport Fuels through Microbial Intervention: Potential and Current Status

Abstract Views: 329  |  PDF Views: 108

Authors

Dipti Verma
TERI, Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi 110 003, India
Ashish Singla
TERI University, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 070, India
Banwari Lal
TERI, Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi 110 003, India
Priyangshu M. Sarma
TERI, Darbari Seth Block, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi 110 003, India

Abstract


The production of biofuels from synthesis gas that utilizes a wide variety of biomass is an emerging concept, particularly with the focus on biomass-based economy. Biomass is converted to synthesis gas via gasification, which involves partial oxidation of the biomass at high temperature. This route of ethanol or liquid biofuel production has the advantage of utilizing the entire biomass, including the lignin content. Though the technology is yet to be established, there is a major breakthrough in understanding the microbial route of synthesis gas conversion. Acetogenic microorganisms such as Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium aceticum, Acetobacterium woodii, Clostridium carboxidivorans and Clostridium autoethanogenum have already been reported to play a role in the conversion of synthesis gas to ethanol and acetic acid. Poor mass transfer properties of the gaseous substrates and low ethanol yield from these biocatalysts are the major challenges, preventing the commercialization of synthesis gas fermentation technology. This article reviews the existing literature on biomass-derived synthesis gas fermentation into biofuels, specifically ethanol. Special emphasis has been laid on understanding the need of synthesis gas fermentation and its bioconversion into next-generation liquid transport fuels. However, advantages of microbial process over conventional methods and the role of different microorganisms and pathways used have also been described. The article also outlines the challenges and future research directions regarding up scaling and commercialization of synthesis gas fermentation technology.

Keywords


Biomass, Microbial Interventions, Synthesis Gas, Transport Fuels.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv110%2Fi3%2F329-336