Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Towards a Socially Consistent Science and Technology Policy


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, India
 

The development of science and technology (S&T) in India is widely believed to have not quite lived up to the high expectations in the Scientific Policy Resolution of 1958. To paraphrase a major scientist, it has had tall peaks towering over some much more modest achievements. This article traces some of these shortcomings to the divergence between the direction which the S&T policies have advocated and the socio-economic road the country has taken. Based on an analysis of this divergence, the article argues for a new Science and Technology Policy based on a much broader conception of technology.

Keywords

Innovations, Policy Resolution, Science, Technology.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Solow, R. M., Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1957, 39(3), 312–320.

  • Garg, R. and Dua, P., Foreign portfolio investment flows to India: determinants and analysis. World Dev., 2014, 59, 16–28.

  • Didiera, T. and Schmuklerb, S. L., The financing and growth of firms in China and India: evidence from capital markets. J. Int. Money Finance, 2013, 39, 111–137.

  • Siemiatycki, M., Message in a metro: building urban rail infrastructure and image in Delhi, India. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 2006, 30(2), 277–292.

  • India, G. O. (15 March 1964). Government of India’s Scientific Policy Resolution, New Delhi, 1958; unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0015/001543/154344eb.pdf (retrieved on 19 November 2015).

  • India, Government of India’s Scientific Policy Resolution, New Delhi 1958, 1964, p. 2.

  • Krishnaraja Wadiyar, IV, The underdog as scientist. In Bengaluru, Bangalore, Bengaluru: Imaginations and their Times (ed. Narendar Pani, S. R.), Sage Publications, New Delhi, 2009, pp. 104– 106.

  • Udgaonkar, B., Implementation of the Scientific Policy Resolution. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 1970, 5(52), 2091–2095.

  • Cited in Singh, B. P., Science communication in India: policy framework. J. Sci. Temper, 2014, 2(1&2), 141–151; 144.

  • India, G. o., Science and technology policy 2003; www.csir. res.in: www.csir.res.in/external/heads/aboutcsir/Policy2003.htm (retrieved 18 November 2015).

  • India, G. o., Science and Technology Policy 2003.

  • India, G. o., Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, 2013, p. 2.

  • India, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013, p. 2.

  • Dasgupta, B., India’s green revolution. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 1977, 6/8(12), 241–260.

  • Narasimha, R., Science, technology and the economy: an Indian perspective. Technol. Soc., 2008, 30, 330–338; 331.

  • Bhat, B. and Bowonder, B., Innovation as an enhancer of brand personality: globalization experience of Titan industries. Creat. Innov. Manage., 2001, 10(1), 26–39.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. and Greenwald, B. C., Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress, Columbia University Press, New York, 2014.

  • Schumpeter, J. A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper, New York, 1943.

  • Bernal, J., Science in History, Vol. 1, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1969, p. 47.

  • Hess, D., Technology and the development of science and technology studies. In Handbook of Ethnography (eds Atkinson, P. et al.), Sage, London, 2001, pp. 234–245.


Abstract Views: 398

PDF Views: 132




  • Towards a Socially Consistent Science and Technology Policy

Abstract Views: 398  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

Narendar Pani
National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


The development of science and technology (S&T) in India is widely believed to have not quite lived up to the high expectations in the Scientific Policy Resolution of 1958. To paraphrase a major scientist, it has had tall peaks towering over some much more modest achievements. This article traces some of these shortcomings to the divergence between the direction which the S&T policies have advocated and the socio-economic road the country has taken. Based on an analysis of this divergence, the article argues for a new Science and Technology Policy based on a much broader conception of technology.

Keywords


Innovations, Policy Resolution, Science, Technology.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv110%2Fi9%2F1624-1629