Open Access
Subscription Access
Monitoring Efficacy of Constructed Wetland for Treating Domestic Effluent-Microbiological Approach
Water scarcity and elevated potential in wastewater treatment in the last decades raise attention towards constructed wetlands (CWs). The present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of CW for faecal coliform (FC) expulsion and to isolate and characterize the microbial communities. Significant differences were observed between influent and effluent microbial counts of vegetated and control cells (without vegetation) of wetland. FC reduction ranged from 64% to 81%; however, total bacterial, fungal and actinomycetes average poll ranged from 66.67 × 105 cfu/g to 142.67 × 105 cfu/g, 1.67 × 102 cfu/g to 10.33 × 102 cfu/g and 16.00 × 103 cfu/g to 53.33 × 103 cfu/g respectively, isolated from vegetated and control cells. Results further indicated that bacteria were most abundant, followed by actinomycetes, whereas the number of fungi was least among three groups of microbes, which could be attributed to wide tolerance to the properties of CW. Removal of FC was less apparent initially compared to the later stages of operation, which is of concern for long-term efficiency and stability of wetland. Also, diversity of identified bacterial strains is beneficial for growth and yield enhancement of agriculture crops. The results also demonstrate that CWs are the key habitats for bioactive actinomycetes with paramount medical, scientific and economic potential significance globally in general and developing countries like India in particular. Overall, backwash imparts the baseline compilation of CWs for its management for sustainable agriculture.
Keywords
Actinomycetes, Bacteria, Constructed Wetland, Faecal Coliform, MPN.
User
Font Size
Information
- Green, B., Constructed wetlands are big in small communities. Water. Environ. Technol., 1994, 65, 51–55.
- Leonard, S. M., Analysis of residential subsurface flow constructed wetland performance in northern Alabama. Small Flows Q, 2000, 1, 34–39.
- Negm, M. S., Nagy, N. M. and Abdel-Rasik, M. H., Sewage characteristics and per capita loads in Ismailia City, Second Middle East Conference, Cairo Egyptian Wastewater Management, 1995.
- Denny, P., Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries. Water Sci. Technol., 1997, 35, 27–34.
- Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., Hofmann, O. and Harrington, R., Performance evaluation of integrated constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut., 2010, 210, 435–451.
- Aguilar, J. R. M., Cabriales, J. J. P. and Vega, M. M., Identification and characterization of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in an artificial wetland that treats wastewater from a tannery. Int. J. Phytoremediat., 2008, 10, 359–370.
- Brix, H., Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci. Technol., 1997, 35, 11–17.
- Gagnon, V., Chazarenc, F., Comeau, Y. and Brisson, J., Influence of macrophyte species on microbial density and activity in constructed wetlands. Water Sci. Technol., 2007, 56, 249–254.
- Munch, Ch., Neu, T., Kuschk, P. and Roske, I., The ischolar_main surface as the definitive detail for microbial transformation processes in constructed wetlands – a biofilm characteristic. Water Sci. Technol., 2007, 56, 271–276.
- Stottmeister, U. et al., Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Adv., 2003, 22, 93–117.
- APHA, Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, New York, 1989.
- Kaushal, M., Kaushal, R. and Mandyal, P., Impact of integrated nutrient management systems on cauliflower (Brassicaoleracea var. botrytis) yield and soil nutrient status. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2013, 83, 1013–1016.
- Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, The Williams and Wilkins, Co., Baltimore, 1986, 1st edn, p. 442.
- Vymazal, J., The use constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow for various types of wastewater. Ecol. Eng., 2009, 35, 1–17.
- Vymazal, J., Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water, 2010, 2, 530–549.
- Truu, J., Nurk, K., Juhanson, J. and Mander, U., Variation of microbiological parameters within planted soil filter for domestic wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 2005, 40, 1191–1200.
- Garcia, M. and Becares, E., Bacterial removal in three pilot-scale wastewater treatment systems for rural areas. Water Sci. Technol., 1997, 35, 197–200.
- Gersberg, R. M., Lyon, S. R., Brenner, R. and Elkins, B. V., Fate of viruses in artificial wetlands. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1987, 53, 731–736.
- Hatano, K., Trettin, C. C., House, C. H. and Wollum II, A. G., Microbial populations and decomposition activity in three subsurface flow constructed wetlands. In Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement (ed. Moshiri, G. A.), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 1993, pp. 541–547.
- Kim, T. K. and Garson, M. J., Marine Actinomycetes related to the ‘Salinospora’ group from the Great Barrier Reef sponge Pseudoceratina clavata. Environ. Microbiol., 2005, 7, 509–518.
- Ningthoujam, D. S., Sanasam, S. and Nimaichand, S., Screening of Actinomycete isolates from niche habitats in Manipur for antibiotic activity. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2009, 5, 221–225.
- Collins, B., McArthur, J. V. and Sharitz, R. R., Plant effects on microbial assemblages and remediation of acidic coal pile runoff in mesocosm treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng., 2004, 23, 107–115.
- Weber, K. P., Gehder, M. and Legge, R. L., Assessment of changes in the microbial community of constructed wetlands mesocosms in response to acid mine drainage exposure. Water Res., 2008, 42, 180–188.
Abstract Views: 368
PDF Views: 149