Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bahinipati, Chandra Sekhar
- Assessment of Vulnerability to Cyclones and Floods in Odisha, India: A District-Level Analysis
Abstract Views :291 |
PDF Views:112
Authors
Affiliations
1 Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad 380 060, IN
1 Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad 380 060, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 12 (2014), Pagination: 1997-2007Abstract
Most of the districts in Odisha, India are prone to both cyclones and floods. However, the existing studies have assessed vulnerability mainly for the coastal districts, and are largely focused on the biophysical components. Therefore, a comprehensive vulnerability assessment will help unravel the scale of vulnerability across the districts of Odisha, and provide a better understanding of the adaptive capacity of households towards these extreme events. An 'integrated approach' was adopted to assess vulnerability which is viewed as a function of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. A number of proxy indicators were considered to represent these components, and a normalization procedure was adopted in order to aggregate them into a single value. Three key observations emerged. First, components like sensitivity and adaptive capacity were found to act as the major determinants of vulnerability. Secondly, eight districts were found to have a higher vulnerability score, and surprisingly, some of the districts are non-coastal. Thirdly, factors like demography, agriculture and economic capacity emerged as the major cause for increasing vulnerability. These results have policy implications in the context of prioritizing limited resources among the vulnerable districts and determinants through the disaster risk management programme at state and district levels.Keywords
Cyclone and Flood, District-Wise, Integrated Approach, Ohisha, Vulnerability.- Can Developmental Interventions Reduce Households’ Vulnerability? Empirical Evidence from Rural India
Abstract Views :206 |
PDF Views:61
Authors
Affiliations
1 Centre for Climate Change and Sustainability Studies, School of Habitat Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Asia Pacific Rural and Agricultural Credit Association, Bangkok, TH
3 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati 517 506, IN
4 Utkal University, Bhubaneswar 751 004, IN
1 Centre for Climate Change and Sustainability Studies, School of Habitat Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Asia Pacific Rural and Agricultural Credit Association, Bangkok, TH
3 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati 517 506, IN
4 Utkal University, Bhubaneswar 751 004, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 10 (2017), Pagination: 2004-2013Abstract
Vulnerability is a multidimensional concept incorporating notions of risk and poverty. While it has been established that higher incidence of poverty in developing countries exacerbates vulnerability, the role of risk requires closer inspection. Developmental interventions in these countries target poverty reduction, which in turn, could reduce vulnerability. However, a key question is whether developmental interventions reduce the vulnerability and risks faced by households. To answer this, the present study empirically examines the impact of developmental interventions on the vulnerability of households in a rural Indian setting. The major advantage hence is that it not only looks into the impact on aggregate vulnerability but also its different components such as poverty, covariate, idiosyncratic and unexplained risks. Empirical analysis is based on a survey of 800 households in the drought-prone villages of western Odisha, India, where a key developmental intervention, Western Orissa Rural Livelihood Project was implemented during the last decade. Adopting ‘vulnerability as expected utility’ approach, this study reveals three major findings. First, both aggregate risk and poverty are the dominant sources of vulnerability, with the former accounting for a sizable share. Second, the households that benefited from livelihood interventions are found less vulnerable. Third, the other major determinants of vulnerability are education, access to social network, family size and crop-diversification. From a policy perspective, results support continuation of these programmes, but realigning these also target risk reduction.Keywords
Covariate, Developmental Interventions, Idiosyncratic Risk, Rural Setting, Vulnerability.References
- Bahinipati, C. S., Economics of adaptation to climate change: learning from impact and vulnerability literature. MIDS Working Paper No. 213, Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai, 2011.
- Patnaik, U. and Narayanan, K., Vulnerability and climate change: an analysis of the eastern coastal districts of India. In Paper presented at the GECHS International Workshop on Human Security and Climate Change, Oslo, Norway, 2005.
- Adger, N., Vulnerability. Global Environ. Change, 2006, 16(3), 268–281.
- Kanbur, R. and Squire, L., The Evolution of Thinking About Poverty: Exploring the Interaction, 1999; http:/www.worldbank.org/poverty/wdrpoverty/evolut.htm; Frontiers of development economics – The future perspective, World Bank, 2001, pp. 183–226.
- Ligon, E. and Schechter, L., Measuring vulnerability. Econ. J., 2003, 113(486), C95–C102.
- Gunther, I. and Harttgen, K., Estimating households’ vulnerability to idiosyncratic and covariate shocks: a novel method applied in Madagascar. World Dev., 2009, 37(7), 1222–1234.
- Bahinipati, C. S., Consumption smoothing and climate extremes: evidence from a farm household survey in eastern coastal India. Soc. Change Dev., 2016, 13, 1–18.
- Stern, N., Stern’s Review on Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, London, 2007.
- Kumar, K. S. K. et al., Vulnerability to poverty and vulnerability to climate change: conceptual framework, measurement and synergies in policy. MSE Working Paper No. 19, Madras School of Economics, Chennai, 2007.
- Patnaik, U., Das, P. K. and Bahinipati, C. S., Analysing vulnerability to climate variability and extremes in the coastal districts of Odisha, India. Rev. Dev. Change, 2013, XVIII(2), 173–189.
- Panda, A. et al., Adaptive capacity contributing to improved agricultural productivity at the household level: empirical findings highlighting the importance of crop insurance. Global Environ. Change, 2013, 23(4), 782–790.
- Panda, A., Exploring climate change perceptions, rainfall trends and perceived barriers to adaptation in a drought affected region in India. Nat. Hazards, 2016, 84(2), 777–796.
- Panda, A., Vulnerability to climate variability and drought among small and marginal farmers: a case study in Odisha, India. Climate Dev., 2017, 9(7), 605–617.
- WORLP, Project Memorandum. Western Odisha Rural Livelihoods Project. Odisha Watershed Development Mission, Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar, 1999.
- Hoddinott, J. and Quisumbing, A., Methods for micro-econometric risk and vulnerability assessments. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0324, World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 2003.
- Chambers, R., Vulnerability, coping and policy: editorial introduction. IDS Bull., 1989, 20(2), 1–7.
- Hoddinott, J. and Quisumbing, A., Data sources for microeconometric risk and vulnerability assessments. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0323, World Bank, Washington DC, 2003.
- Patnaik, U. and Narayanan, K., Vulnerability of households to disaster risks: evidence from rural India. Artha Vijnana, 2010, 52(3), 261–273.
- Pradhan, K. C. and Mukherjee, S., Covariate and idiosyncratic shocks and coping strategies for poor and non-poor rural households in India. MSE Working Paper No. 139, Madras School of Economics, Chennai, 2016.
- Bahinipati, C. S., Assessment of vulnerability to cyclones and floods in Odisha, India: a district-level analysis. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(12), 1997–2007.
- IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team (eds Pachuri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A.), Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
- Patnaik, U. and Narayanan, K., How effective are coping mechanisms in securing livelihoods against climatic aberrations? Evidences from rural India. Int. J. Climate Change Strat. Manage., 2015, 7(3), 359–374.
- Patnaik, U. and Narayanan, K., Are traditional coping mechanisms effective in managing the risk against extreme events? Evidences from flood prone region in rural India. Water Policy, 2015, 17(4), 724–741.
- Patnaik, U., Das, P. K. and Bahinipati, C. S., Coping with climatic shocks: empirical evidence from rural coastal Odisha. Global Bus. Rev., 2016, 17(1), 161–175.
- Bahinipati, C. S. and Patnaik, U., The damages from climatic extremes in India: do disaster specific and generic adaptation measures matter? Environ. Econ. Policy Stud., 2015, 17(1), 157–177.
- Esteves, T. et al., Agricultural and livelihood vulnerability reduction through the MGNREGA. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2013, XLVIII(52), 94–103.
- Tiwari, R. et al., MGNREGA for environmental service enhancement and vulnerability reduction: rapid appraisal in Chitradurga district, Karnataka. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2011, XLVI(20), 39–47.
- Routray, S., Local appropriations of developmental imperatives: notes from a watershed project in Odisha, eastern India. Eur. J. Develop. Res., 2015, 27(5), 672–685; doi:10.1057/ejdr.2014.51.
- Patnaik, U. and Das, P. K., Do developmental interventions confer adaptive capacity? Insights from rural India. World Develop., 2017, 97, 298–312.
- Sharma, V., Reddy, B. and Sahu, N., Sustainable rural livelihoods approach for climate change adaptation in Western Odisha, Eastern India. Dev. Pract., 2014, 24(4), 591–604.
- Ghosh, S. and Mujumdar, P. P., Future rainfall scenario over Odisha with GCM projections by statistical downscaling. Curr. Sci., 2006, 90(3), 396–404.
- Pattnaik, I., Livelihood pattern and coping mechanisms during drought: a study of two villages in Odisha. RULNR Working Paper No. 17, Research Unit for Livelihoods and Natural Resources, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad, 2012.
- Swain, M. and Swain, M., Drought vulnerability, coping capacity and residual risk: evidence from Bolangir district in Odisha, India. Asian J. Environ. Disaster Manage., 2011, 3(4), 453–473.
- Swain, M., Sources of growth and instability in agricultural production in Western Odisha, India. Asian J. Agric. Dev., 2014, 11(2), 51–70.
- CRD, Impact assessment of externally aided project interventions on livelihood of the poor and marginalized in KBK districts of Orissa. Study report. Centre for Rural Development, Bhubaneswar, co-sponsored by Planning Commission, Government of India, 2010.
- ICAI, DFID’s livelihoods work in western Odisha. Independent Commission for Aid Impact, London, 18 February 2013; https://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/ICAI-Report-DFIDs-Livelihoods-Work-in-Western-Odisha.pdf (last accessed November 2016).
- Christiaensen, L. and Subbarao, K., Toward an understanding of household vulnerability in rural Kenya. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3326, World Bank, Washington DC, 2004.
- Christiaensen, L., Hoffmann, V. and Sarris, A., Gauging the welfare effects of shocks in rural Tanzania. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4406, World Bank, Washington DC, 2007.
- Datt, G. and Hoogeveen, H., EI Nino and EI Peso? Crisis, poverty, income distribution in the Philippines. World Dev., 2003, 31(7), 1103–1124.
- Dercon, S., Hoddinott, J. and Woldehanna, T., Shocks and consumption in 15 Ethiopian villages, 1999–2004. J. Afr. Econ., 2005, 14(4), 559–585.
- Assessing the Costs of Droughts in Rural India: A Comparison of Economic and Non-Economic Loss and Damage
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:68
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati 517 506, IN
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati 517 506, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 118, No 11 (2020), Pagination: 1832-1841Abstract
Drought, recognized as one of the major disasters, negatively affects India’s agrarian economy, and in turn, farmers’ well-being. Households incur both economic and non-economic loss and damage. The latter is most often unnoticed and unaddressed although it is expected to be quite significant in developing nations. Understanding and assessing loss and damage are the prime objectives of the Warsaw International Mechanism. While numerous studies have emerged to estimate the impact on crop production, income, on-farm employment and financial status, there are only limited studies with respect to assessing loss and damage to intangible resources and the total cost of a drought in particular. By interviewing droughtaffected farmers in the Kutch district of Gujarat state, this study aims to understand the perception of farmers and to estimate total economic value and noneconomic loss and damage. A contingent valuation method was employed. In sum, two major findings emerged: (i) intensity of economic loss and damage is perceived as relatively high as compared to noneconomic loss and damage, although the reverse was expected, and (ii) the average total economic value of a drought was INR 8303, and the mean value of noneconomic loss and damage was INR 4831. This study reveals that households give lower value to intangible losses that occurs over a period than the immediate tangible loss and damage which directly affect their total wealth. Given this, community-level adaptations to minimize non-economic loss and damage are less likely to be formulated. From the policy perspective, this study strongly advocates the evaluation of intangible costs, so that upcoming state action plans, disaster management plans and ex-post assessment reports could be tailored accordingly for minimizing these risks.Keywords
Agrarian Economy, Drought, Non-Economic Loss And Damage, Rural Areas.References
- Ladds, M., Keating, A., Handmer, J. and Magee, L., How much does disaster cost? A comparison of disaster cost estimates in Australia. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2017, 21, 419–429.
- Mechler, R. and Schinko, T., Identifying the policy space for climate loss and damage. Science, 2016, 354(6310), 290–292.
- ECLAC, Handbook for Estimating the Socio-economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2003.
- Warner, K. and van der Geest, K., Loss and damage from climate change: local-level evidence from nine vulnerable countries. Int. J. Global Warm., 2013, 5(4), 367–386.
- Kunzel, V., Schafer, L., Manninger, S. and Baldrich, R., Loss and damage at COP23: looking at small island developing states. Policy Report, Germanwatch, Bonn, Germany, 2017.
- Serdeczny, O. M., Bauer, S. and Huq, S., Non-economic losses from climate change: opportunities for policy oriented research. Climate Dev., 2018, 10(2), 97–101.
- Hallegatte, S., Natural Disasters and Climate Change: An Economic Perspective, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014.
- Bahinipati, C. S., Rajasekar, U., Acharya, A. and Patel, M., Floodinduced loss and damage to textile industry in Surat city, India. Environ. Urban. Asia, 2017, 8(2), 170–187.
- Government of Odisha, Cyclone Fani: Damage, Loss, and Need assessment, ADB and the World Bank, 2019; http://digitallibrary.in.one.un.org/TempPdfFiles/3965_1.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2019).
- Ranger, N. et al., An assessment of potential impact of climate change on flood risk in Mumbai. Climatic Change, 2011, 104, 139–167.
- Patankar, A. and Patwardhan, A., Estimating the uninsured losses due to extreme weather events and implications for informal sector vulnerability: a case study of Mumbai, India. Nat. Hazards, 2016, 80(1), 285–310.
- Birkmann, J. and Welle, T., Assessing the risk of loss and damage: exposure, vulnerability and risk to climate related hazards for different country classifications. Int. J. Global Warm., 2015, 8(2), 191–212.
- Bahinipati, C. S., Patnaik, U. and Viswanathan, P. K., What causes economics losses from natural disasters in India? In Handbook of Research on Climate Change Impact on Health and Environmental Sustainability (ed. Dinda, S.), IGI Global Publisher, USA, 2016, pp. 157–175.
- Roy, A. and Hirway, I., Multiple impacts of droughts and assessment of drought policy in major drought prone states in India. Project report submitted to the Planning Commission, Government of India, 2007.
- Udmale, P., Ichikawa, Y., Manadhar, S., Ishidaira, H. and Kiem, A. S., Farmers’ perception of drought impacts, local adaptation and administrative mitigation measures in Maharashtra state, India. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2014, 10, 250–269.
- Udmale, P., Ichikawa, Y., Manadhar, S., Ishidaira, H., Kiem, A. S., Shaowei, N. and Panda, S. N., How did the 2012 drought affect rural livelihoods in vulnerable areas? Empirical evidence from India. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2015, 13, 454–469.
- Zhang, X., Obringer, R., Wei, C., Chen, N. and Niyogi, D., Droughts in India from 1981 to 2013 and implications to wheat production. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 44552.
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Noneconomic losses in the context of the work programme on loss and damage, Technical Paper, 2013, pp. 1–22; http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/tp/02.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2019).
- Morrissey, J. and Oliver-Smith, A., Perspectives on non-economic loss and damage: understanding values at risk from climate change, 2013.
- Fankhauser, S., Dietz, S. and Gradwell, P., Non-economic losses in the context of the UNFCCC work programme on loss and damage. Policy Paper, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, UK, 2014.
- Hirsch, T., Minninger, S. and Wirsching, S., Non-economic loss and damage – with case examples from Tanzania, Ethiopia, El Salvador and Bangladesh. Bread for the World, Berlin, Germany, 2017.
- Andrei, S., Rabbani, G. and Khan, H. I., Non-economic loss and damage caused by climatic stressors in selected coastal districts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Centre for Advance Studies, 2014; http://www.icccad.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ADB-StudyonNon-Economic-Losses-and-Damages-Report_Final-VersionReduced-File-Size.compressed1.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2019).
- Chiba, Y., Shaw, R. and Prabhakar, S. V. R. K., Climate change related non-economic loss and damage in Bangladesh and Japan. Int. J. Climate Change Strat. Manage., 2017, 9(2), 166–183.
- Sharma, S. and Majumdar, P., Increasing frequency and spatial extent of concurrent meteorological droughts and heat waves in India. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 1–9.
- Mishra, V., Tiwari, A. D., Aadhar, A., Shah, R., Xiao, M., Pai, D. S. and Lettenmaier, D., Drought and famine in India, 1870–2016. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2019; https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081477.
- NRAA, Contingency and compensatory agriculture plans for droughts and floods in India, 2012. Position Paper No. 6, National Rainfed Area Authority, New Delhi, 2013; http://nraa.gov.in/pdf/Droughts%20and%20Floods%20in%20India-2012.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2019).
- Gupta, A., Tyagi, P. and Sehgal, V. K., Drought disaster challenges and mitigation in India: strategic appraisal. Curr. Sci., 2011, 100(12), 1795–1806.
- Bahinipati, C. S., District-level estimation of development indicators for the state, Gujarat, Research Report submitted to the Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi, India, 2015.
- Mehta, N., An investigation into growth, instability and role of weather in Gujarat agriculture: 1981–2011. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2013, 26, 43–55.
- The Pioneer, Gujarat government declares 623 villages drought affected, 2016; http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/gujarat-governmentdeclares-623-villages-drought-affected.html (accessed on 31 January 2017).
- Mwinjaka, O., Gupta, J. and Bresser, T., Adaptation strategies of the poorest farmers in drought-prone Gujarat. Climate Develop., 2010, 2(4), 346–363.
- Ganguli, P. and Reddy, M. J., Evaluation of trends and multivariate frequency analysis of droughts in three meteorological subdivisions of western India. Int. J. Climatol., 2014, 34, 911–928.
- Mujumdar, S. S., Development of co-relationship between rainfall runoff surface and groundwater potential of Kutch region of Gujarat. Ph D thesis submitted to Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Gujarat, 2010; https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/59754 (accessed on 20 August 2019).
- Government of Gujarat, Kutch District: Disaster Management Plan 2017–18, Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, 2018; http://gsdma.org/uploads/Assets/ddmp/ddmpkutch2017full07122017010345285.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2018).
- Pattanayak, S. and Kramer, R. A., Pricing ecological services: willingness to pay for drought mitigation from watershed protection in eastern Indonesia. Water Resour. Res., 2001, 37(3), 771–778.
- Serdeczny, O., Waters, E. and Chan, S., Non-economic loss and damage in the context of climate change. Discussion Paper 3, German Development Institute, Bonn, Germany, 2016.
- Reddy, A., Impact study of soil health card scheme. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, Hyderabad, 2017, p. 210; http://www.manage.gov.in/publications/reports/shc.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2018).
- Pattnaik, I. et al., Agricultural extension service through Krishi Mahotsav in Gujarat: a preliminary assessment. GIDR Occasional Paper Series No. 2, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad, 2012.
- Dercon, S., Fate and fear: risks and its consequences in Africa. J. Afr. Econ., 2008, 17, ii97–ii127.
- Kishore, A., Supply- and demand-side management of water in Gujarat, India: what can we learn? Water Policy, 2013, 15, 496– 514.
- Bahinipati, C. S. and Viswanathan, P. K., Incentivizing resource efficient technologies in India: evidence from diffusion of microirrigation in the dark zone regions of Gujarat. Land Use Policy, 2019, 86, 253–260.
- Viswanathan, B. and Kumar, K. S. K., Weather, agriculture and rural migration: evidence from state and district level migration in India. Environ. Dev. Econ., 2015, 20(4), 469–492.
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H., The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect., 1991, 5(1), 193–206.
- Soil-Based Interventions for Economic Returns in India
Abstract Views :111 |
PDF Views:65
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Yerpedu 517 619, IN
2 Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai 600 020, IN
3 Centre for Climate Change and Sustainability Studies, School of Habitat Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Yerpedu 517 619, IN
2 Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai 600 020, IN
3 Centre for Climate Change and Sustainability Studies, School of Habitat Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 547-553Abstract
Available empirical evidence for the association between soil-based interventions and economic returns in India reveals the following. First, integrated nutrient management (INM) is superior to balanced nutrient management (BNM) in terms of yield and economic profit for the cultivation of maize and soybean. Second, incentivizing the usage of INM rather than BNM is likely to provide a better yield and higher income to rice, wheat and potato farmers. Third, more studies on various crops are required to scientifically compare and reach a definite conclusion on the yield and economic returns from different types of fertilizer applications – INM, BNM and organic or biofertilizers. These findings have policy implications in India since the Soil Health Card scheme was centralized in 2015.Keywords
Community-Based Farming, Crop Yield, Economic Returns, Fertilizers, Soil Interventions.References
- Thakur, D. S. and Sharma, K. D., Organic farming, sustainable agriculture and meeting the challenges of food security in 21st century: an economic analysis. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2005, 60(2), 1–15.
- Swaminathan, M. S., An evergreen revolution. Crop Sci., 2006, 46(5), 2293–2303.
- Pathak, H., Trend of fertility status of Indian soils. Curr. Adv. Agric. Sci., 2010, 2(1), 10–12.
- Prasad, J., Soil health management – a key sustainable production. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2015, 63(S), S6–S13.
- Shamrao, T. S., A study of fertilizer policy in India. Int. J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 3(3), 145–149.
- Chander, G., Wani, S. P., Sahrawat, K. L., Kamdi, P. J., Pal, C. K., Pal, D. K. and Mathur, T. P., Balanced and integrated nutrient management for enhanced and economic food production: case study from rainfed semi-arid tropics in India. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2013, 59(12), 1643–1658.
- Chander, G. et al., Soil test-based nutrient balancing improved crop productivity and rural livelihoods: case study from rainfed semi-arid tropics in Andhra Pradesh, India. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2014, 60(8), 1051–1066.
- Chander, G., Wani, S. P., Krishnappa, K., Sahrawat, K. L., Parthasaradhi, G. and Jangawad, L. S., Soil mapping and variety-based entry-point interventions for strengthening agriculture-based livelihoods – exemplar case of ‘Bhoochetana’ in India. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(9), 1683–1691.
- Gulati, A. and Narayanan, S., Demystifying fertiliser and power subsidies in India. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2000, 35(10), 784–794.
- Singh, B., Are nitrogen fertilizers deleterious to soil health? Agronomy, 2018, 8(4), 48.
- Paul, B., Patnaik, U., Sasidharan, S., Murari, K. K. and Bahinipati, C. S., Fertilizer use, value and knowledge capital: a case of Indian farming. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 12491; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912491.
- Gopikrishna, S. R., Soil health and support systems: contradictions and missing links. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2012, 47(29), 24–26.
- Wadodkar, M. R. and Ravisankar, T., Soil resource database at village level developmental planning. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2011, 39(4), 529–536.
- Jat, L. K. et al., Does integrated nutrient management enhance agricultural productivity. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol., 2015, 9(2), 1211–1221.
- Bahinipati, C. S., Kumar, V. and Viswanathan, P. K., An evidence-based systematic review on farmers’ adaptation strategies in India. Food Security, 2021, 13, 399–418.
- Bahinipati, C. S. and Patnaik, U., What motivates farm-level adaptation in India? a systematic review. In Climate Change and Community Resilience (eds Haque et al.), Springer, 2022, pp. 49–68.
- Mishra, K. N., Patra, A. K., Garnayak, L. M., Mohanty, A. K. and Swain, S. K., Long-term effects of integrated nutrient management on productivity and soil properties of rice (Oryza sativa) – rice cropping system in coastal Odisha. Indian J. Agron., 2017, 62(3), 239–246.
- Dey, P., Targeted yield approach of fertiliser recommendation for sustaining crop yield and maintaining soil health. JNKVV Res. J., 2015, 49(3), 338–346.
- Dwivedi, B. S., Tiwari, R. K., Pandey, A. K., Tiwari, B. K. and Thakur, R. K., Economically viable STCR based nutrient management on soybean (Glycine max). Econ. Aff., 2015, 60(2), 225–228.
- Dhillon, I. S. and Singh, D., Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity and economics of rabi onion (Allium cepa L). J. Krishi Vigyan, 2019, 8(1), 87–91.
- Patra, A. K., Mishra, K. N., Garnayak, L. M. and Mohanty, A. K., Influence of long-term organic nutrient management on soil quality and crop productivity in rice (Oryza sativa) – potato (Solanum tuberosum) – okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) cropping system under irrigated condition. Indian J. Agron., 2017, 62(3), 268–274.
- Devi, K. N., Singh, M. S., Singh, N. G. and Athokpam, H. S., Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Crop Weed, 2011, 7(2), 23–27.
- Desai, H. A., Dodia, I. N., Desai, C. K., Patel, M. D. and Patel, H. K., Integrated nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Trends Biosci., 2015, 8(2), 472–475.
- Agarwal, D. K., Billore, S. D., Sharma, A. N., Dupara, B. U. and Stivastava, S. K., Soybean: introduction, improvement, and utilization in India – problems and prospects. Agric. Res., 2013, 2, 293–300.
- Ramesh, P., Panwar, N. R., Singh, A. B., Ramana, S., Yadav, S. K., Shrivastava, R. and Rao, A. S., Status of organic farming in India. Curr. Sci., 2010, 98(9), 1190–1194.
- Khadse, A. and Rosset, P. M., Zero budget natural farming in India – from Inception to institutionalization. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst., 2019, 43(7–8), 848–871.
- Prasad, R., Organic farming vis-à-vis modern agriculture. Curr. Sci., 2005, 89(2), 252–254.
- Bansal, K. N., Gupta, N. and Tomar, P. S., Nutrient management for crop production. JNKVV Res. J., 2015, 49(3), 280–291.
- Lal, R., Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 2015, 7(5), 5875–5895.
- Manjula, M. and Devi, P. I., Organic farming in India: catalysts that can help in transition. Ecol., Econ. Soc. – INSEE J., 2021, 4(1), 21–29.
- Jain, N., Bhatia, A. and Pathak, H., Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2014, 14(1), 422–430.
- Kamble, B. M. and Kathmale, D. K., Effect of different levels of customized fertilizer on soil nutrient availability, yield and economics of onion. J. Appl. Nat. Sci., 2015, 7(2), 817–821.
- Chouhan, R. S., Sharma, H. O., Rathi, D. and Niranjan, H. K., Impact of Soil Health Card scheme on farmers’ income – a case study of kharif crops in Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2017, 30(347-2017-2761), 139–141.
- Bhat, J., Aaga, F., Ahmad, L., Bhat, T. A., Jan, R. and Wani, S., Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to integrated nutrient management under temperate condition of Kashmir. Curr. Adv. Agric. Sci., 2014, 6(1), 61–63.
- Choudhary, V. K. and Kumar, P. S., Maize production, economics and soil productivity under different organic source of nutrients in eastern Himalayan Region, India. Int. J. Plant Prod., 2013, 7(2), 167–186.
- Chander, G., Reddy, T. Y., Kumar, S., Padmalatha, Y., Reddy, S., Adinarayana, G., Wani, S. P., Reddy, Y. V. M. and Srinivas, K., Low-cost interventions for big impacts in dryland production systems. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2019, 65(9), 1211–1222.
- Deva, S., Rao, G. M. V., Vinayalakshmi, P. and Rao, C. V., Micro-nutrients spray on yield and economics of cotton in rainfed areas of Prakasam district in Andhra Pradesh. J. Krishi Vigyan, 2019, 8(1), 208–211.
- Mayadevi, M. R., Sushama, P. K. and Sandeep, S., Effects of in-situ bioconversion of farm residues on growth and quality of banana cv. Nendran in laterite soils of Kerala. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 2017, 5(3), 341–350.
- Bindu, B., Response of micronutrient mixture application in banana enhanced growth and yield. J. Krishi Vigyan, 2019, 8(1), 252–255.
- Banyal, S. K. and Banyal, A. K., Foliar fertilization for enhancing yield and fruit quality of apple under rain-fed conditions of mid-Himalayas. J. Krishi Vigyan, 2019, 8(1), 137–141.
- Kirankumar, C., Santhi, R., Maragatham, S., Meena, S. and Chandrasekhar, C. N., Validation of soil test crop response based fertiliser prescription equations under integrated plant nutrition system hybrid brinjal on inceptisol of Andhra Pradesh. Madras Agric. J., 2019, 106(7/9), 517–521.
- Dwivedi, B. S., Rawat, A. K., Dixit, B. K. and Thakur, R. K., Effect of inputs integration on yield, uptake and economics of kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.). Econ. Aff., 2016, 61(3), 519–524.
- Lal, R., Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad. Dev., 2006, 17(2), 197–209.
- Mishra, A., Prasad, K. and Geeta, R., Effect of bio-fertilizer inoculations on growth and yield of dwarf field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in conjunction with different doses of chemical fertilizers. J. Agron., 2010, 9(4), 163–168.