Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Parthiban, K. T.
- Consortium of Industrial Agroforestry:An Institutional Mechanism for Sustaining Agroforestry in India
Abstract Views :444 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agroforestry, Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
1 Department of Agroforestry, Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 30-36Abstract
India is among the few tropical countries which have been reporting a progressive increase in forest cover over the past two decades. Our country being a major consumer of wood and wood products, the role of agroforestry as a viable land-use system is gaining significant attention owing to its contribution towards meeting domestic and industrial wood requirements. Growing demand coupled with legal issues in wood supply from Government-owned forests has resulted in a total mismatch between demand and supply of wood and wood products. The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) conceived and implemented ‘a value chain model’ and created sustainability in industrial wood generation and supply in the state by involving a wide range of stakeholders. In order to strengthen the value chain and promote agroforestry based on the objectives envisaged in the National Agroforestry Policy of 2014, TNAU established a ‘Consortium of Industrial Agroforestry’ (CIAF) by linking stakeholders to address the issues related to production, processing and consumption in agroforestry. Keeping in line with the guidelines provided in the National Agroforestry Policy of 2014, CIAF has successfully established decentralized institutions for supply of quality planting materials to the farmers besides facilitating organized plantation developers, harvesting and marketing institutions. The activities of CIAF have paved the way for creating the much needed database in tree cultivation, development of price supportive mechanism for important farm-grown industrial wood species and reducing the risks faced by tree growers through innovative approaches like tree insurance and value addition technologies. This consortium-mode value-chain model in agroforestry holds great potential for adoption and replication across India, which would help create self-reliance in raw material security besides augmenting tree cover in the country.Keywords
Agroforestry, Consortium Approach, Industrial Wood, Value Chain Model.References
- Parthiban, K. T., Vennila, S., Kumar, P., Saravanan, V. and Subbulakshmi, V., Industrial Agroforestry – a value chain approach in Tamil Nadu. In Industrial Agroforestry – Perspectives and Prospectives (eds Parthiban, K. T. et al.), Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, 2014, pp. 7–32.
- FAO, India forestry outlook study. Working Paper No. APFSOS II/WP/2009/06. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (GoI), 2009.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations database, 2013; http://faostat.fao.org/.
- Knickel, K., Agricultural structural change: impact on the rural environment. J. Rural Sci., 1990, 6(4), 383–393.
- Leakey, R. R. B. and Sanchez, P. A., How many people use agroforestry products? Agrofor. Today, 1997, 9(3), 4–5.
- Izac, A. M. N. and Sanchez, P. A., Towards a natural resource management research paradigm: an example of agroforestry research. Agric. Syst., 2001.
- Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., Place, F., van Noordwijk, M. and Xu, J., Trees on farms: an update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio-ecological characteristics. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) South Asia Regional Program, Working Paper No. 179, 1999.
- Xu, D., Forestry and land use change assessment for China. In Forestry and Land Use Change Assessment, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 1999, pp. 73–97.
- IPCC, Climate change impacts on forests. In Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C. and Moss, R. H.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996, p. 879.
- Bargali, S. S., Bargali, K., Singh, L., Ghosh, L. and Lakhera, M. L., Acacia nilotica based traditional agroforestry system: effect on paddy crop and management. Curr. Sci., 2009, 96(4), 581–587.
- Parihaar, R. S., Bargali, K. and Bargali, S. S., Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: a case study in Kumaun Himalayas, India. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2015, 85(3), 442–447.
- Vibhuti, Bargali, K. and Bargali, S. S., Effects of homegarden size on floristic composition and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in Central Himalaya, India. Curr. Sci., 2018, 114(12), 2494–2503.
- Anon., National Forest Policy, Ministry of Environment and Forests, GoI, N1988.
- Parthiban, K. T. and Cinthia Fernandaz, C., Industrial agroforestry – status and developments in Tamil Nadu. Indian J. Agroforestry., 2017, 19(1), 1–11.
- Anon., National Agroforestry Policy. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, GoI, 2014.
- Parthiban, K. T., Industrial agroforestry: a successful value chain model in Tamil Nadu, India. In Agroforestry Research Developments, Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, USA, 2016, pp. 523–537.
- Design and Development of Multifunctional Agroforestry for Family Farming
Abstract Views :293 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
Affiliations
1 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
2 Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Tamil Nadu Forest Department, Mettupalayam 600 015, IN
3 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
1 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
2 Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Tamil Nadu Forest Department, Mettupalayam 600 015, IN
3 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 27-28Abstract
No Abstract.References
- Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Decade of Family Farming 2019–2028. Global Action Plan, Rome, Italy, 2019.
- Nair, P. K. R, Viswanath, S., and Lubina, P. A., Agrofor. Syst., 2016, 91, 901–917.
- Abate, et al., Agriculture at Cross Roads: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
- Understanding Cultural Ecosystem Services of Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from the Foothills of The Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India
Abstract Views :180 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
3 Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, IN
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam 641 301, IN
3 Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 12 (2021), Pagination: 1610-1618Abstract
Numerous studies have underlined the benefits of cultural services from different landscapes and acknowledge the non-material benefits linking society and nature. However, cultural services from agroforestry have not been reported. Therefore, the present study was conducted in multifunctional agroforestry (MFA) comprised of 24 tree species and 8 intercrops established at the Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, India. Four workshops were conducted and a total of 105 respondents were asked to fill two sets of questionnaires regarding their perception of cultural ecosystem services in MFA. Among the selected components, education and scientific knowledge (0.90) ranked first, followed by relaxation (0.86) and walking (0.84). Results from principal component analysis revealed that three components, viz. relaxation, education and scientific knowledge, and inspiration accounted for 56.60% of the variance. Respondents’ willingness to pay was Rs 33/visit on an average and multiple regression analysis indicated that the MFA model was a good fit (R2 = 0.79) for agroforestry tourism. The results indicate that MFA provides scope for agroforestry tourism, which will be an additional source of income for small and marginal-scale farmers.Keywords
Aesthetic and Recreation, Agroforestry Tourism, Cultural Ecosystem Services, Multifunctional Agroforestry, Willingness to Pay.References
- Reid, W. V. et al., Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, 2005, ISBN 9781597260404-137.
- Kuenkel, P., Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation, Springer, Cham, 2019, p. 321, ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1.
- Guo, Z., Zhang, L. and Li, Y., Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(10), 1–8.
- Van Noordwijk, M., Sustainable development through trees on farms: agroforestry in its fifth decade, World Agroforestry Centre (International Council for Research in Agroforestry), Bogor, Indonesia, 2019.
- World Bank, Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2004, ISBN 0-8213-5755-7.
- Zomer, R. et al., Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: the contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 29987.
- Dhyani, S. K., National Agroforestry Policy and the need for area estimation under agroforestry. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107, 9–10.
- Chavan, S. B., Keerthika, A., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., Newaj, R. and Rajarajan, K., National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1826–1834.
- Parthiban, K. T., Srivastava, D. and Keerthika, A., Design and development of multifunctional agroforestry for family farming. Curr. Sci., 2021, 120(1), 27–28.
- Rosenstock, T. S. et al., A planetary health perspective on agroforestry in Sub-Saharan Africa. One Earth, 2019, 1(3), 330–344.
- Torralba, M., Fagerholm, N., Burgess, P. J., Moreno, G. and Plieninger, T., Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2016, 230, 150–161.
- Lescourret, F. et al., A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust., 2015, 14, 68–75.
- Plieninger, T. and Huntsinger, L., Complex rangeland systems: integrated social-ecological approaches to silvopastoralism. Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 2018, 71(5), 519–525.
- Boerema, A., Rebelo, A. J., Esler, K., Patrick, M. and Bodi, M. B., Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? J. Appl. Ecol., 2017, 54, 358–370.
- Daniel, T. C. et al., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, 109, 8812–8819.
- Dickinson, D. and Hobbs, R., Cultural ecosystem services: characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosyst. Ser., 2017, 25, 179–194.
- Gould, R. K., Coleman, K. and Gluck, S. B., Exploring dynamism of cultural ecosystems services through a review of environmental education research. Ambio, 2018, 47(8), 869–883.
- Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol., 1932, 22(140), 1–55.
- Tam, V. W. Y. and Le, K. N., Environmental assessment by power spectrum. Sustainable development through culture and innovation: executive summaries. The Joint International Conference on Construction Culture, Innovation and Management, Dubai, 26–29 November 2006.
- Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. and Bieling, C., Assessing, mapping and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33, 118–129.
- Van Berkel, D. B. and Verburg, P. H., Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic., 2014, 37, 163–174.
- Zoderer, B. M., Tasser, E., Erb, K. H., Stanghellini, P. S. L. and Tappeiner, U., Identifying and mapping the tourists perception of cultural ecosystem services: a case study from an Alpine region. Land Use Policy, 2016, 56, 251–261.
- Balazsi, A., Riechers, M., Hartel, T., Fischer, J. and Leventon, J., The impacts of social–ecological system change on human–nature connectedness: a case study from Transylvania, Romania. Land Use Policy, 2019, 89, 104–232.
- Riechers, M., Balázsi, Á., Abson, D. J. and Fischer, J., The influence of landscape change on multiple dimensions of human–nature connectedness. Ecol. Soc., 2020, 25(3), 3.
- Fagerholm, N., Oteros-Rozas, E., Raymond, C. M., Torralba, M., Moreno, G. and Plieninger, T., Assessing linkages between ecosystem services, land-use and well-being in an agroforestry landscape using public participation GIS. Appl. Geogr., 2016, 74, 30–46.
- Varga, A., Odor, P., Molnar, Z. and Boloni, J., The history and natural regeneration of a secondary oak–beech woodland on a former wood-pasture in Hungary. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol., 2015, 84(2), 215–225.
- Varga, A. and Molnar, Z., The role of traditional ecological knowledge in managing wood-pastures. In European Wood-Pastures in Transition (eds Hartel, T. and Plininger, T.), Routledge, London, UK, 2014, pp. 187–202.
- Molnar, Z. et al., Common and conflicting objectives and practices of herders and nature conservation managers: the need for the ‘conservation herder’. Ecosyst. Health Sustain, 2016, 2(4), 01215.
- Kaszyńska, P., Cent, J., Jurczak, M. G. and Szymańska, M., Factors influencing perception of protected areas –the case of Natura 2000 in Polish Carpathian communities. J. Nat. Conserv., 2012, 20, 284–292.
- Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ., 2008, 65(4), 663–674.
- Platania, M. and Rizzo, M., Willingness to pay for protected areas: a case of Etna Park. Ecol. Indic., 2018, 93, 201–206.
- Nie, X., Chen, Q., Xiao, T. and Wang, H., Willingness to pay for ecological function regions protection based on a choice experiment method: a case study of the Shiwandashan Nature Reserve. Qual. Quant., 2019, 53(2), 813–829.
- Kaffashi, S., Yacob, M. R., Clark, M. S., Radam, A. and Mamat, M. F., Exploring visitors WTP to generate revenues for managing the National Elephant Conservation Center in Malaysia. For. Policy Econ., 2015, 56, 9–19.
- Lal, P. et al., Valuing visitor services and access to protected areas: the case of Nyungwe National Park in Rwanda. Tourism Manag., 2017, 61, 141–151.
- Brown, G. and Fagerholm, N., Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst. Serv., 2015, 13, 119–133.
- Quantification and Economic Valuation of Carbon Sequestration from Smallholder Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from The Foothills of The Nilgiris, India
Abstract Views :177 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Institute, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 301, IN
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Institute, Pali Marwar 306 401, IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 301, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 122, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 61-69Abstract
Agroforestry is widely recognized for its role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, carbon sequestration and a marketable carbon value of smallholder agroforestry systems in India are poorly documented. Therefore, the present study was carried out to quantify carbon stock in a circular-shaped multifunctional agroforestry (MFA) divided into four equal quadrats. It comprises 24 different tree species and 8 intercrops, mainly established to provide daily income to small and marginal farmers. A nondestructive method was used to assess biomass carbon stock. Soil core samples collected from 0 to 60 cm depth were analysed to quantify soil organic carbon (SOC) stock. Results revealed significantly higher biomass and carbon stock in the following order: Neolamarckia cadamba > Melia dubia > Lagerstroemia parviflora > Dalbergia latifolia > Tectona grandis. Duncan’s multiple range test revealed significant differences in the multi-utility circles (P < 0.001). The total change in SOC stock was 11.55 Mg quadrat–1, but the difference was insignificant in different soil depths. The results indicated that the total carbon sequestration and CO2e from vegetation were 2.23 and 9.23 tonnes respectively. Similarly, CO2e from the soil were 42.37 Mg quadrat–1 respectively; the highest contributions were from quadrat II and quadrat IV of MFA. By taking into account profitability and incentives to smallholder farmers, the total marketable carbon revenue of MFA was calculated as US$ 206.40Keywords
Biomass Carbon Stock, Multifunctional Agroforestry, Soil Organic Carbon, Total Carbon Sequestration.References
- Watson‐Lazowski, A. et al., Plant adaptation or acclimation to rising CO2? Insight from first multigenerational RNA‐Seq transcriptome. Global Change Biol., 2016, 22(11), 3760–3773.
- IEA, Emissions-Global Energy and CO2 Status report analysis, International Energy Agency, p. 684; https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/emissions
- Nath, A. J., Sileshi, G. W., Laskar, S. Y., Pathak, K., Reang, D., Nath, A. and Das, A. K., Quantifying carbon stocks and sequestration potential in agroforestry systems under divergent management scenarios relevant to India’s nationally determined contribution. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 24831.
- IPCC, Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.), IPCC Press Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019, p. 36.
- Van Noordwijk, M. and Brussaard, L., Minimizing the ecological footprint of food: closing yield and efficiency gaps simultaneously? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain, 2014, 8, 62–70.
- Zomer, R., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., Place, F., Van Noordwijk, M. and Xu, J., Trees on Farms: An update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio-ecological characteristics. Working Paper (ed. WACISARPD WP14064.pdf), World Agroforestry Center, Bogor, Indonesia, 2014, pp. 1–33.
- Ahmad, F., Uddin, M. D., Goparaju, L., Rizvi, J. and Biradar, C., Quantification of the land potential for scaling agroforestry in South Asia. KN-J. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf., 2020, 70(2), 71–89.
- Rizvi, R. H., Newaj, R., Handa, A. K., Sridhar, K. B. and Anil Kumar, Agroforestry mapping in India through geospatial technology: present status and way forward. Technical Bulletin 01/2019, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, 2019.
- Montagnini, F. and Nair, P. K. R., Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst., 2004, 61, 281–295.
- Holmes, I., Kirby, K. R. and Potvin, C., Agroforestry within REDD+: experiences of an indigenous Emberá community i Panama. Agrofor. Syst., 2017, 91, 1181–1197.
- Richards, M. et al., How countries plan to address agricultural adaptation and mitigation: an analysis of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CCAFS dataset version 1.2, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016.
- Government of India, India’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution: working towards climate justice, Government of India, New Delhi, 2015.
- Chavan, S. B., Keerthika, A., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., Newaj, R. and Rajarajan, K., National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1826–1834.
- Parthiban, K., Srivastava, D. and Keerthika, A., Design and development of multifunctional agroforestry for family farming. Curr. Sci., 2021, 120(1), 27–28.
- Woomer, P. L., Karanja, N. K. and Murage, E. W., Estimating total system carbon in smallholder farming systems of the East Africa Highlands. In Assessment of Methods for Soil Carbon (eds Lal, R. et al.), Lewis, London, 2001, pp. 58–78.
- Thangata, P. H. and Hildebrand, P. E., Carbon stock and sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in smallholder agroecosystems of sub-Saharan Africa: mechanisms for ‘reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation’ (REDD+), Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2012, 158, 172–183; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.007.
- Albrecht, A. and Kandji, S. T., Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2003, 99, 15–27; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00138-5.
- Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al., A handbook of protocols standardisation and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot., 2003, 51, 335–380.
- Gupta, D. K., Bhatt, R. K., Keerthika, A., Shukla, A. K., Mohamed, M. N. and Jangid, B. L., Wood specific gravity of trees in hot semi-arid zone of India: diversity among species and relationship between stem and branches. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(8), 1597–1600.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Climate Change Synthesis Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007, pp. 1–53.
- Wani, N. R. and Qaisar, K. N., Carbon percent in different components of tree species and soil organic carbon pool under these tree species in Kashmir valley. Curr. World Environ., 2014, 9(1), 174.
- Walkley, A. J. and Black, C. A., Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chronic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–38.
- Neya, T., Abunyewa, A. A., Neya, O., Zoungrana, B. J., Dimobe, K., Tiendrebeogo, H. and Magistro, J., Carbon sequestration potential and marketable carbon value of smallholder agroforestry Parklands across climatic zones of Burkina Faso: Current Status and Way Forward for REDD+ Implementation. Environ. Manage., 2020, 65(2), 203–211.
- Ajit, et al., Estimating carbon sequestration potential of existing agroforestry systems in India. Agrofor. Syst., 2017, 91(6), 1101– 1118.
- Singh, S., Carbon sequestration potential of red sander (Pterocarpus santalinus) plantations under different ages in Vellore and Thiruvallur districts of Tamil Nadu. Life Sci. Leaflets, 2020, 123, 1–10.
- Tamilselvan, B., Sekar, T. and Anbarashan, M., Short-term girth increment and biomass changes in tree species of Javadhu hills, Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Trees, For. People, 2021, 4, 100081.
- Rizvi, R. H., Handa, A. K., Dhillon, R. S. and Tewari, S., Development and validation of generalized biomass models for estimation of carbon stock in important agroforestry species. Indian J. Agrofor., 2018, 20, 68–72.
- Kumar, P. et al., Biomass estimation and carbon sequestration in Populus deltoides plantation in India. J. Soil Salinity Water Qual., 2016, 1, 25–29.
- Brown, S., Schroeder, P. and Birdsey, R., Above ground biomass distribution of US Eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development. For. Ecol. Manage., 1997, 94, 37–47.
- Marak, T. and Khare, N., Carbon sequestration potential of selected tree species in the campus of SHIATS. Int. J. Sci. Res. Develop., 2017, 5(6), 63–66.
- Nimbalkar, S. D., Patil, D. S., Sharma, J. P. and Daniel, J. N., Quantitative estimation of carbon stock and carbon sequestration in smallholder agroforestry farms of mango and Indian gooseberry in Rajasthan, India. Environ. Conserv. J., 2017, 18(1&2), 103– 107.
- Chandana, P., Lata, A. M., Khan, M. A. and Krishna, A., Climate change smart option and doubling farmer’s income through Melia dubia-based agri-silviculture system. Curr. Sci., 2020, 118(3), 444.
- Roshetko, J. M., Lasco, R. D. and Angeles, M. S. D., Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 2007, 12(2), 219–242.
- Takimoto, A., Nair, P. K. R. and Nair, V. D., Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2008, 125, 159–166.
- Vertical Assessment of Soil Quality In Permanent Manurial Experiment of Dryland Ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract Views :90 |
PDF Views:59
Authors
V. Venkatesh
1,
N. Chandra Sekaran
1,
V. Sanjivkumar
1,
S. Meena
1,
K. T. Parthiban
2,
B. Balaganesh
3,
K. Subash Chandra Bose
1,
S. Murali
1
Affiliations
1 Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641 003, India., IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, TNAU, Mettupalayam 641 301, India., IN
3 School of Agricultural Sciences, Karunya University, Coimbatore 641 114, India., IN
1 Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641 003, India., IN
2 Forest College and Research Institute, TNAU, Mettupalayam 641 301, India., IN
3 School of Agricultural Sciences, Karunya University, Coimbatore 641 114, India., IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 11 (2023), Pagination: 1308-1318Abstract
A study was conducted to assess the impact of different nutrient management practices on soil quality in a permanent manurial experiment cotton field established in 1982 at the Agriculture Research Station of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, which falls under the dryland ecosystem of Kovilpatti in Tamil Nadu, India. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with nine different treatments. The effect of these treatments in different depths (0–15, 15–30 and 30–45 cm) was compared, and the soil quality index was developed with a total of 27 parameters, including physical, chemical and biological parameters. Principal component analysis was carried out and the principal components with eigenvalue >1 were selected to determine the indicators to be retained in the minimum dataset. The highly weighted variables, viz. field capacity, available water content, cation exchange capacity, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, etc. with a variance of 93.57% were retained for MDS. Linear scoring functions were used to transform them into unitless scores ranging from 0 to 1. Three different methods of soil quality were analysed, viz. weighed additive soil quality index (SQIw), additive soil quality index (SQIa) and Nemoro soil quality index (SQIn). In all three methods, the treatment receiving farmyard manure at 12.5 t ha–1 showed superiority in maintaining soil qualityKeywords
Cotton, Dryland Ecosystem, Nutrient Management Practices, Permanent Manurial Experiment, Soil Quality Index.References
- Tian, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, J. and Wang, Z., Evaluation of soil quality for different types of land use based on minimum dataset in the typical desert steppe in Ningxia, China. J. Adv. Transp., 2022, 2022, 1–14.
- Krauss, M., Berner, A., Perrochet, F., Frei, R., Niggli, U. and Mäder, P., Enhanced soil quality with reduced tillage and solid manures in organic farming – a synthesis of 15 years. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1), 1–12.
- Nortcliff, S., Standardisation of soil quality attributes. Agric. Eco-syst. Environ., 2002, 88, 161–168.
- Mandal, U. K. et al., Assessing soil quality in a semiarid tropical watershed using a geographic information system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2011, 75, 1144–1160.
- Ray, S. K. et al., Soil and land quality indicators of the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107, 1470–1486.
- Moncada, M. P., Gabriels, D. and Cornelis, W. M., Data-driven analysis of soil quality indicators using limited data. Geoderma, 2014, 235, 271–278.
- Gupta, R. P. and Dakshinamurthi, C., Procedures for Physical Analysis of Soils, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 1981, pp. 1–293.
- Richards, L. A., Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils, US Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 60, Govern-ment Printing Office, Washington DC, 1954, pp. 1–154.
- Jackson, M. L., Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 1973, pp. 151–154.
- Walkley, A. and Black, I. A., An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modifi-cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 1934, 37(1), 29–38.
- Subbiah, B. V. and Asija, G. L., Alkaline method for determination of mineralizable nitrogen. Curr. Sci., 1956, 25(2), 259–260.
- Olsen, S. R., Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extrac-tion with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, 1954, p. 939.
- Stanford, G. and English, J., Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agron. J., 1949, 41(9), 446–447.
- Lindsay, W. L. and Norvell, W. A., Development of DTPA soil test for Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1978, 42(3), 421–428.
- Collings, C. H. and Lyne, M. P., Microbiological Methods, Butter-worth, London, UK, 1984, 5th edn, pp. 56–113.
- Kenknight, G. and Muncie, J. H., Isolation of phytopathogenic ac-tinomycetes. J. Phytopathol., 1939, 29(11), 1000–1001.
- Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M., Use of p-nitrophenyl phos-phate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1968, 1(4), 301–307.
- Casida, J. L. E., Klein, D. A. and Santoro, T., Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci., 1964, 98(6), 371–376.
- Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L. and Mitchell, J. P., A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in northern California. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 2002, 90(1), 25–45.
- Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B., Defining and assessing soil quality. In Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment (eds Doran, J. W. et al.), Soil Science Society of America Journal, Madison, 1934, pp. 3–21.
- Tripathi, R. et al., Soil aggregation and distribution of carbon and nitrogen in different fractions after 41 years long-term fertilizer ex-periment in tropical rice–rice system. Geoderma, 2014, 213, 280– 286.
- Das, B., Chakraborty, D., Singh, V. K., Aggarwal, P., Singh, R., Dwivedi, B. S. and Mishra, R. P., Effect of integrated nutrient management practice on soil aggregate properties, its stability and aggregate-associated carbon content in an intensive rice–wheat sys-tem. Soil Tillage Res., 2014, 136, 9–18.
- Masto, R. E., Chhonkar, P. K., Singh, D. and Patra, A. K., Soil quality response to long-term nutrient and crop management on a semi-arid Inceptisol. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2007, 118, 130–142.
- Majhi, P., Rout, K. K., Nanda, G. and Singh, M., Soil quality for rice productivity and yield sustainability under long-term fertilizer and manure application. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2019, 50(11), 1330–1343.
- Mairan, N. R., Patil, S. G. and Kachhave, K. G., Physico-chemical properties under sorghum–sunflower cropping sequence in Ver-tisols. J. Soils Crops, 2005, 15(2), 352–355.
- Eghball, B., Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus and nitro-gen based manure and compost applications. Agron. J., 2002, 94(1), 128–135.
- Bellakki, M. A., Badanur, V. P. and Setty, R. A., Effect of long-term integrated nutrient management on some important properties of a Vertisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 1998, 46(2), 176–180.
- Chaudhury, J., Mandal, U. K., Sharma, K. L., Ghosh, H. and Mandal, B., Assessing soil quality under a long term rice based cropping system. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2005, 36(9–10), 1141– 1161.
- Gupta, R. K., Arora, B. R., Sharma, K. N. and Ahluwalia, S. K., In-fluence of biogas slurry and farmyard manure application on the changes in soil fertility under rice–wheat sequence. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 2000, 48(3), 500–505.
- Chu, H., Lin, X., Fujii, T., Morimoto, S., Yagi, K., Hu, J. and Zhang, J., Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer manage-ment. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2007, 39(11), 2971–2976.
- Bhattacharyya, P., Pathak, H. and Pal, S. (eds), Soil management for climate-smart agriculture. In Climate Smart Agriculture, Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 41–56.
- Vasu, D. et al., Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India. Geoderma, 2016, 282, 70–79.
- Romero, E., Fernández-Bayo, J., Díaz, J. M. C. and Nogales, R., Enzyme activities and diuron persistence in soil amended with vermicompost derived from spent grape marc and treated with urea. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2010, 44(3), 198–204.