Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- Avinash Chandra Rathore
- H. Lal
- N. K. Sharma
- Harsh Mehta
- J. Jayaprakash
- Akram Ahmed
- J. M. S. Tomar
- N. M. Alam
- S. B. Chavan
- A. R. Uthappa
- K. B. Sridhar
- A. Keerthika
- A. K. Handa
- Ram Newaj
- Naresh Kumar
- Dhiraj Kumar
- Rajendra Prasad
- R. H. Rizvi
- Badre Alam
- Anil Kumar Singh
- Mayank Chaturvedi
- P. S. Karmakar
- Abhishek Maurya
- Abhishek Saxena
- Gargi Gupta
- Kedari Singh
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chaturvedi, O. P.
- Livelihood Security through Litchi (Litchi chinensis L.)-Based Agri-Horticultural Models for Resource-Poor Communities of Indian Sub-Himalaya
Abstract Views :257 |
PDF Views:88
Authors
Avinash Chandra Rathore
1,
H. Lal
1,
N. K. Sharma
1,
Harsh Mehta
1,
J. Jayaprakash
1,
O. P. Chaturvedi
1
Affiliations
1 Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 003, IN
1 Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 106, No 11 (2014), Pagination: 1481-1484Abstract
No Abstract.- Influence of Canopy Architecture on Stemflow in Agroforestry Trees in Western Himalayas
Abstract Views :242 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
1 Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 4 (2015), Pagination: 759-764Abstract
Rainfall event on a tree can be partitioned into throughfall, interception loss and stemflow. In this study, stemflow was measured for 39 rainfall events in 5-year-old plantations of 3 trees each, belonging to Morus alba and Grewia optiva in Dehradun, India. Diameter of selected Morus and Grewia trees varies from 7 to 9.3 and 8.12 to 10 cm respectively, whereas height varies from 4 to 4.5 and 5.5 to 6.5 m respectively. The minimum and maximum rainfall events recorded during the study period were 1.01 and 121.70 mm per day respectively. When the rainfall magnitude was less than or equal to 50 mm and more than 50 mm, stemflow volume from Morus was approximately 2.72 and 1.85 fold higher respectively, compared to Grewia. Maximum stemflow volume recorded for Morus and Grewia was 48,065 and 30,633 ml with respect to rainfall magnitude of 109.58 and 121.70 mm respectively. The generation of higher stemflow volume in case of Morus is due to concave orientation of branches and leaves. Results showed that a significant amount of nutrients leached from Grewia and Morus through stemflow process.Keywords
Canopy Architecture, Interception Loss, Rainfall, Stemflow, Throughfall.- Trees for Life:Creating Sustainable Livelihood in Bundelkhand Region of Central India
Abstract Views :281 |
PDF Views:105
Authors
S. B. Chavan
1,
A. R. Uthappa
1,
K. B. Sridhar
1,
A. Keerthika
2,
A. K. Handa
1,
Ram Newaj
1,
Naresh Kumar
1,
Dhiraj Kumar
1,
O. P. Chaturvedi
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 6 (2016), Pagination: 994-1002Abstract
Trees have been a part of life for centuries in India for sustainable livelihood security. Under the difficult climatic situations, farmers are forced to adopt tree-based systems to secure their income and livelihood. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) harvesting, collection and processing are creating several employment opportunities in the drought-prone Bundelkhand region of India. This article aims to document the livelihood dependency on trees of farmers, tribals and landless labourers for income generation. Surveys and interviews in Bundelkhand region provided an overview of the dependency of different rural communities on NTFPs such as gum, dona pattal, lac from Butea; brooms, jaggery and baskets from Phoenix; flowers and seeds from mahua; bidi leaves from tendu and sticks from bamboo for sustaining their livelihood. To promote NTFPs-based livelihood enterprises, more emphasis should be given for sustainable harvest, value-addition and marketing.Keywords
Employment Generation, Sustainable Livelihood, Trees.- Soil Organic Carbon Stock in Agroforestry Systems in Western and Southern Plateau and Hill Regions of India
Abstract Views :282 |
PDF Views:95
Authors
Ram Newaj
1,
O. P. Chaturvedi
1,
Dhiraj Kumar
1,
Rajendra Prasad
1,
R. H. Rizvi
1,
Badre Alam
1,
A. K. Handa
1,
S. B. Chavan
1,
Anil Kumar Singh
1,
Mayank Chaturvedi
1,
P. S. Karmakar
1,
Abhishek Maurya
1,
Abhishek Saxena
1,
Gargi Gupta
1,
Kedari Singh
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 11 (2017), Pagination: 2191-2193Abstract
The rising level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is a major concern, as scientific evidences show that it is the primary cause of global warming. CO2 concentration is expected to double by the middle or end of the 21st century, with a temperature rise between 1.5°C and 4.5°C (ref. 1). The importance of agroforestry as a land-use system is receiving wider recognition not only in terms of agricultural sustainability, but also in issues related to carbon sequestration or climate change.References
- Smith, K. A., Ball, T., Conen, F., Dobbie, K. E., Massheder, J. and Rey, A., Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2003, 54, 779–791.
- Verma, K. S., Kumar, S. and Bhardwaj, D. R., J. Tree Sci., 2008, 27(1), 14–27.
- Jordan, C. F., Agrofor. Syst., 2004, 61, 79–90.
- Peichl, M., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., Huss, J. and Abohassan, R. A., Agrofor. Syst., 2006, 66, 243–257.
- Lorenz, K. and Lal, R., Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2014, 34, 443–454.
- Nair, P. K. R., Agrofor. Syst., 2012, 86, 243–253.
- Haile, S. G., Nair, V. D. and Nair, P. K. R., Global Change Biol., 2010, 16, 427–438.
- Upson, M. A. and Burgess, P. J., Plant Soil, 2013, 373, 43–58.
- Walkley, A. J. and Black, C. A., Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–38.
- Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Ferrer, G. J. and de Jong, B., Agrofor. Syst., 2010, 78, 39–51.
- Nair, P. K. R. and Nair, V. D., Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 6, 22–27.
- Hendrick, R. L. and Pregitzer, K. S., J. Ecol., 1996, 84, 167–176.
- Martin, M. P., Wattenbach, M., Smith, P., Meersmans, J., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L. and Arrouays, D., Biogeosciences, 2011, 8, 1053–1065.
- Munoz-Rojas, M., Jordan, A., Zavala, L. M., De la Rosa, D., Abd-Elmabod, S. K. and Anaya-Romero, M., Solid Earth, 2012, 3, 375–386.
- Swamy, S. L. and Puri, S., Agrofor. Syst., 2005, 64, 181–195.